Digital Living and Social Networks Alessio Malizia, Prof., PhD, Computer Engineering Dep. University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain [email protected] dei.inf.uc3m.es

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Digital Living and Social Networks Alessio Malizia, Prof., PhD, Computer Engineering Dep. University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain [email protected] dei.inf.uc3m.es [email protected]
  • Slide 2
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Madrid
  • Slide 3
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
  • Slide 4
  • Informatics at UC3M The degree in Informatics Engineering of Universidad Carlos III of Madrid has the following principal distinctive features: 4-year education, taking 240 credits. Internationalization, as it is a degree that is adapted to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Possibility of choosing English/Spanish bilingual education. New teaching methods adapted to the EHEA that include ongoing evaluation, group work, etc., to quantify all the students work, not just that in the classroom. Large practical component, as at least 40% of total credit weight is dedicated to tutored laboratory practicum. Existence of teaching resources adjusted to the number of students, with classrooms and laboratories where a computer per student is available in many cases. Possibility of carrying out in-company internships. Possibility of studying in Europe through Erasmus exchanges. There are currently agreements with a number of universities. Outstanding dedication of the teaching faculty who are highly experienced and are in constant contact with the student. All these features have enabled Informatics Engineering at Universidad Carlos III of Madrid to hold second place in the NATIONAL ranking of degrees published in "El Mundo" newspaper in May 2008, and the employability of these graduates is 100%, just as soon as they finish their studies and even before.
  • Slide 5
  • DEI Lab @ UC3m dei.inf.uc3m.es [email protected] Web applications Information access Interactive systems
  • Slide 6
  • Outline Digital Living Social Networks as Science Technology Popular Culture Developing for Cooperation Tagging Mash-ups Conclusions
  • Slide 7
  • Entertainment Communication & Collaboration Daily Life Working and Learning
  • Slide 8
  • Evolution of Digital Living e-mail website e-commerce tools e-commerce tools e-business tools e-business tools environment for network environment for network digital ecosystems digital ecosystems Digital Interaction living Digital Interaction living Extent of economical impact, organizational change and sophistication* Internal/ External Communications Visibility and diffusion of information On-line market and payments Maximize accessibility to global markets Supply Chains Value-chain integration Reduction of distribution costs Outsourcing Virtual Enterprises Crowdsourcing Knowledge sharing Web Services and Solutions People, community, Society Ergonomy Content Management Digital Rights Management Management of Change
  • Slide 9
  • Focus switch Technology Computers Supercomputers Programming Optimization Applications and Services People Mobile Devices Usability, Universal Access
  • Slide 10
  • Slide 11
  • Slide 12
  • Perspective on Users User Customer Producer or Consumer Stand Alone Participant Designer Producer and Consumer Interconnected
  • Slide 13
  • User Participant
  • Slide 14
  • Perspective on Users User Customer Producer or Consumer Stand Alone Participant Designer Producer and Consumer Interconnected
  • Slide 15
  • Audience Designer
  • Slide 16
  • Perspective on Users User Customer Producer or Consumer Stand Alone Participant Designer Producer and Consumer Interconnected
  • Slide 17
  • Consumer and Producer
  • Slide 18
  • Slide 19
  • Perspective on Users User Customer Producer or Consumer Stand Alone Participant Designer Producer and Consumer Interconnected
  • Slide 20
  • Stand alone Interconnected
  • Slide 21
  • Outline Digital Living Social Networks as Science Technology Popular Culture Developing for Cooperation Tagging Mash-ups Conclusions
  • Slide 22
  • Social Networks
  • Slide 23
  • social networks as science Social network analysis is an interdisciplinary social science, but has been of special concern to sociologists. Recently, physicists and mathematicians have made large contributions to understanding networks in general (as graphs) and thus contributed to an understanding of social networks too.
  • Slide 24
  • social networks as science [Social network analysis] is grounded in the observation that social actors [i.e., people] are interdependent and that the links [i.e., relationships] among them have important consequences for every individual [and for all of the individuals together].... [Relationships] provide individuals with opportunities and, at the same time, potential constraints on their behavior.... Social network analysis involves theorizing, model building and empirical research focused on uncovering the patterning of links among actors. It is concerned also with uncovering the antecedents and consequences of recurrent patterns. (from Linton C. Freeman)
  • Slide 25
  • social networks as science A and B are structurally equivalent because they connect to the same people and thus have equivalent positions in the network. B A
  • Slide 26
  • social networks as science Centrality is computed from the number of direct connections between nodes. Diane is central (6/9); Jane is not (1/9). orgnet.com/sna.html
  • Slide 27
  • social networks as science if youre a boy in this network (a triangle) and you want to meet a girl (a circle), who are you going to call for an introduction? Bridge
  • Slide 28
  • social networks as technology email, newsgroups, and weblogs. In the design of the arpanet (the forerunner to the internet) email was an afterthought!
  • Slide 29
  • social networks as technology search engines: e.g., Google (www.google.com) Googles Page Rank algorithm gives more weight to popular webpages. A webpage is considered popular if many other webpages link to it. collaborative filtering and/or recommender systems; e.g., amazon.coms feature: People who bought this book also bought... Amazon Mechanical Turk Artificial Artificial Intelligence
  • Slide 30
  • social networks as technology http://quartz.syr.edu/rdlankes/blog/?cat=5
  • Slide 31
  • social networks as popular culture
  • Slide 32
  • e.g., six degrees of kevin bacon bacon number: definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Degrees_of_Kevin_B acon kevin bacon has a bacon number of 0 an actor, A, has a bacon number of 1 if s/he appeared in a movie with kevin bacon an actor, B, has a bacon number of 2 if s/he appear in a movie with A etc. Try it at http://oracleofbacon.org/
  • Slide 33
  • social networks as popular culture Social software; e.g., facebook, friendster, orkut, tribe, etc. Recall the article by danah boyd: what happens to social networks when they are explicitly declared? [danah] emphasize[s] how users have repurposed the technology to present their identity and connect in personally meaningful ways while the architect works to define and regulate acceptable models of use. To understand artificial social networks we need to rethink the social scientific concepts of equivalence, centrality, even node and link.
  • Slide 34
  • Outline Digital Living Social Networks as Science Technology Popular Culture Developing for Cooperation Tagging Mash-ups Conclusions
  • Slide 35
  • Developing for Cooperation By Gerhard Fisher
  • Slide 36
  • Collaborative Tagging and Folksonomies Collaborative tagging is used to describe the process by which people create and share their metadata tags Folksonomies refers to the actual output, or the tags themselves.
  • Slide 37
  • Folksonomies Folksonomies (known also as social classifications) are user created metadata. They are a grassroots community classification of digital assets. The term folksonomy was created by Thomas Vander Val and represents a merging of the terms folk and taxonomy. One form of explicit user created metadata was popularized in the late 1990s with link-focused websites called weblogs
  • Slide 38
  • Where are folksonomies found? Folksonomies are found in social bookmarks managers such as Del.icio.us (http://del.icio.us/) and Furl (http://www.furl.net/), which allow users to:http://del.icio.us/http://www.furl.net/ Add bookmarks of sites they like to their personal collections of links Organize and categorize these sites by adding their own terms, or tags Share this collection with other people with the same interests. The tags are used to collocate bookmarks: (a) within a users collection; and (b) across the entire system, e.g., the page http://del.icio.us/tag/blogging will show all bookmarks that are tagged with blogging by any user.http://del.icio.us/tag/blogging There are no clearly defined relations between and among the terms in the vocabulary, unlike formal taxonomies and classification schemes
  • Slide 39
  • Slide 40
  • Popular folksonomy sites Del.icio.us (http://del.icio.us)Del.icio.us Flickr (http://www.flickr.com)Flickr Frassle (http://www.frassle.org)Frassle Furl (http://www.furl.net)Furl Simpy (http://www.simpy.com)Simpy Spurl (http://www.spurl.com)Spurl Technorati (http://www.technorati.com)Technorati
  • Slide 41
  • Web Mashups Mashup is a Web page or application that uses and combines data, presentation or functionality from two or more sources to create new services.
  • Slide 42
  • Web Tools for Mashups
  • Slide 43
  • An example (eStorys)
  • Slide 44
  • Tools for Mashups Different tools to create mashups Yahoo Pipes Microsoft PopFly Google Mashups (deprecated from January 2009) Marmite Karma IBMs QEDWiki JackBe Dojo
  • Slide 45
  • Conclusions Digital Living is for people not for Users Ubiquitous Tangible Integration New models for design and participation Tools for end-users development Web 3.0 vs Web 2.0