Upload
jie-fu
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/29/2019 digest_Technology and signal processing for brain-machine interfaces, paper
1/3
Technology and signal processing for brain-machine interfaces
(paper)
Jie Fu
https://sites.google.com/site/bigaidream/
3/7/2013 8:16 PM
KEY: signal processing for neural signal
Neurotechnology is the enabling mechanism through which function of the nervous system can
be restored or enhanced using bioengineering principles.
It is believed that the neocortex is a scale-free system, with highly unstable transient dynamics
and order parameters that bring the system back to lower energy states. How a neuron
contributes to macroscopic cognitive events in space-time that produce behavior is still today
largely unknown.
Grand challenges of BMIs
Multiscale signal processing and modeling
[KEY] The challenge in the development of new signal processing approaches for BMI data
analysis is learning how to handle large multi-input multi-output systems with signalrepresentations that span continuous and discrete time. The best performing BMIs require in
https://sites.google.com/site/bigaidream/https://sites.google.com/site/bigaidream/https://sites.google.com/site/bigaidream/7/29/2019 digest_Technology and signal processing for brain-machine interfaces, paper
2/3
principle sufficient knowledge of the spatio-temporal representation created by assemblies of
neurons. Therefore, a critical path for advancement involves the integration of improved signal
processing methods that capture global computation on multiple spatial and temporal scales.
{deep architecture would be a good choice}
Control feature extraction in model-based BMIs
[KEY] The success of BMIs relies heavily upon the ability to first extract control features from
neural activity related to goal-directed behavior.
The neural representation of control commands has been analyzed from three perspectives:
spectral analysis (continuous brain oscillations), firing rate coding (semi-continuous
neuromodulation), and spike timing (point process spike events), as shown in Figure 1.
[KEY] The rate coding BMI experimental paradigm lends itself very nicely to statistical signalprocessing methodologies used to derive optimal models from data.
It is possible to translate the decoding problem into a system identification framework, where a
parametric linear or nonlinear system can be trained directly from the data to achieve outputs
with small error compared to the true hand positions.
Spike timing in neural decoding
Quantification of temporal structure of spike trains for BMIs is an important operation in the
processing and analysis of any point process and, in particular, of neural spike trains [Multipleneural spike train data analysis: State-of-the-art and future challenges]. In contrast to the
rate-coding hypothesis, is there any advantage in decoding accuracy when using spike
timing-based representations?
[KEY] The fundamental problem in BMI signal processing is how to find more effective ways to
work directly with spikes for modeling.
A new statistical framework to directly quantify the time structure of multichannel spike trains to
quantify entropy over a time segment using the concepts recently introduced in information
theoretic learning (ITL). These approaches can define a continuous time stochastic function to
quantify the similarity between spike trains, which is called the instantaneous cross information
potential (ICIP).
[LIMITATIONs] Despite these advances, all the probabilistic approaches require preknowledge of
the neuron receptive properties. Moreover, there is potential advantage in terms of accuracy but
the algorithms become much more computationally complex because they must be updated on
the time scale of the spike times (1 ms or less).
Summary
It is clear that the next generation of BMI technologies cannot be built solely from existing
7/29/2019 digest_Technology and signal processing for brain-machine interfaces, paper
3/3
engineering principles.
Neural engineering approaches can benefit from the intersection of top-down signal processing
techniques with bottom-up theories of neurophysiology. By reverse engineering the neural
interface problem using modified versions of standard signal processing techniques, one can
overcome the bottlenecks.