12
Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach by Tijana Prodanović Tijana Prodanović Brian D. Fields University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

  • Upload
    eileen

  • View
    62

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach. by Tijana Prodanović Brian D. Fields University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Outline. Use model-independent ways of constraining both Galactic and extragalactic gamma-rays: Shape of “pionic” gamma-ray spectrum 6 Li-gamma-ray connection. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Diffuse Gamma Rays:A Model-Independent Approach

by

Tijana ProdanovićTijana ProdanovićBrian D. Fields

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Page 2: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Outline

Use model-independent ways of constraining both Galactic and extragalactic gamma-rays:

Shape of “pionic” gamma-ray spectrum 6Li-gamma-ray connection

Page 3: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

“Pionic” Gamma Rays

0 pppp ismcr

Distinctive spectrum – pion “bump”; peaks at m/2 (Stecker 1971; Dermer 1986)

But no strong evidence for pion “bump” Can use the shape of the spectrum (Pfrommer & Enßlin 2003)

to find max “pionic” fraction

Page 4: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Galactic “Pionic” Gamma Rays Find max I

so that

“pion bump” stays below observed Galactic spectrum

GCRs: Max “pionic” fraction

But notice the residual!

%50~/)( obs

2.75GCRp p

???

Prodanović and Fields (2004a)

Brems/IC

Page 5: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Estimating GCR “pionic” -rays from EGRB “Pion bump” not observed in

EGRB data Maximize pionic spectrum

so that it stays below the observed EGRB

GCRs – accelerated in SNRs; use propagated spectrum

Integrate over the redshift history of GCR sources (cosmic star-formation rate)

Max “pionic” fraction

75.2)()( EmE pp

Fields and Prodanović (2005) %75~/)( obs

Page 6: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Estimating SFCR“pionic” -rays from EGRB Structure Forming Cosmic Rays (A.

Loeb talk; also see V. Pavlidou talk) – assume all come from strong shocks with spectrum (about the same source spectrum as for GCRs, but unlike GCRs it does not suffer propagation effects)

Assume all pionic -rays are from

SFCRs and all come from single redshift (unlike for GCRs, history not known in this case)

Max “pionic” fraction z=0 z=10

2.2)()( EpEp

Prodanović and Fields(2004a)

%40~/)( obs

%80~/)( obs

Page 7: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Li--ray Connection Any cosmic-ray source produces both

gamma-rays and lithium

Connected essentially with ratio of reaction rates (Fields and Prodanović 2005)

Li: local CR fluence : CR fluence across Universe

Given one, constrain other

0 pppp ismcr

...Li7,6 ismcr

crism yy ,,

1

Li

Page 8: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Results Use 6Li since it is only made by cosmic rays Use 6LiSolar , assume made by GCRs

but entire observed EGRB (Strong et al. 2004)

What’s going on? MW flux higher than than average galaxy? CR spectrum sensitivity (thresholds!; Li probes low

E) 6Li not from GCRs?

112 srscm 5, 1022.3)GeV1.0( I

51011.1)GeV1.0( I112 srscm

Page 9: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Furthermore…

Problem (?):

SFCR→ pregalactic 6,7Li → confused with Big Bang Li

From observed EGRB estimate maximal pionic contribution, assign it to SFCRs → estimate LiSFCR production

(depending on the assumed redshift)

0.4Li

Li3.0

,

BBNp

SFCR

Page 10: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Testing The “Knee”

Muraishi et al. (2005):

Extragalactic CRs (source spectrum ~E-3) modulated by the galactic wind may produce the “knee” (3×1015 eV) in CR spectrum

But any source of CRs will affect 6Li ! Thus one can use 6Li (and in turn gamma rays) to

constrain contribution of any CR source to the “knee”, or vice versa

HVC Li : constrains LG SFCRs Prodanović and Fields (2004b)

Page 11: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Conclusion Galactic GeV gamma-rays a mystery! No clear evidence to pionic component Model-independent way of testing gamma

rays: 6Li- connection GCR-made 6Li requires too big EGRB:

potential problem? 6Li a powerful probe even at TeV energies Future: GLAST

Better EGRB Pion feature?

Page 12: Diffuse Gamma Rays: A Model-Independent Approach

Tijana Prodanović TeV Particle Astrophysics @ Fermilab July 15th, 2005

Structure Formation Cosmic Rays Structure formation shocks -

cosmological shocks that arise from baryonic infall and merger events during the growth of large-scale structures

Diffusive shock acceleration mechanism

=> structure formation cosmic rays

Mostly protons and α-particles

Miniati et al. 2000