Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Diffraction
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Diffraction
Sound wavelength ~ 10-0.01 m
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
A Little Bit of History
The first Nobel prize in Physics?
Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen (1901)“in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered by the discovery of the remarkable rays subsequently named after him”
X-rays
3
His wife’s hand
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
More Nobel PrizesAntoine Henri Becquerel (1903)"in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered by his
discovery of spontaneous radioactivity“
Pierre & Marie Curie (1903)"in recognition of the extraordinary services they have rendered by their
joint researches on the radiation phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel“
Max von Laue (1914)“for his discovery of the diffraction of X-rays by crystals“
Sir William Henry & William Lawrence Braggs (1915)"for their services in the analysis of crystal structure by means of X-rays“
Charles Glover Barkla (1917)"for his discovery of the characteristic Röntgen radiation of the elements"
4 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
DIFFRACTION
Can be observed for any kind of waves
When diffraction occurs from several periodically arranged objects, the waves add up (interference) to produce maxima and minima of intensity
To achieve this effect, the distance between the objects should be comparable to the wavelength
In crystals, interatomic distancesare on the order of 10-10 m = 1 Å
Hence, the X-rays!
5 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
X-ray generation
6
2019 Department of Chemistry,Iowa State University. All rights reserved
X-ray generation
7
Sealed tube Microfocus Rotating Anode Liquid Anode1 5-12 15-20 30+
Ga
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
OUR PLAN
8
Learn the basic theory – how it works- Miller planes and Miller indices- reciprocal lattice- Bragg law- powder diffraction
Additional suggested reading:
-Vitalij Pecharsky, Peter Zavalij, Fundamentals of Powder Diffraction and Structural Characterization of Materials. 2nd Edition. Springer, ISBN: 978-0-387-09579-0.
-Jenkins & Snyder, Introduction to X-ray Powder Diffractometry, 1996
(for those who would like to acquire deeper knowledge of the subject)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
Atoms form periodically arranged planes
Any set of planes is characterized by:(1) their orientation in the crystal (hkl) – Miller indices(2) their d-spacing (dhkl) – distance between the planes
h, k, l correspond to the number of segments in which the a, b, c axes, respectively, are cut by the set of planes
On average, the higher (hkl),the closer is the interplanar distance, dhkl
2-D Examples
9 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
10
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
11
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
12
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
13
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
14
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
15
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
MILLER PLANES
16
a
b
c
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
BRAGG VIEW OF DIFFRACTIONX-rays that hit the crystal are elastically scattered by the sets of (hkl) planes
θ θ
θ θdhkl
θ θ
The path difference for rays 1 and 2 equals to the length of two blue lines:
1
2
1′
2′
θsin2)2-1( hkld=∆
17 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
BRAGG LAW
The diffraction maxima will be created by reflection from a set of planes at angle θ that results in the integer wavelength difference in the path of the rays:
θdn hkl sin2=λ
Consequence 1:Each set of planes (hkl) is characterized by its own value θhklat which the diffraction maximum is observed
Consequence 2:Each crystalline compound is characterized by a set of reflections at characteristic dhkl , or θhkl(diffraction “fingerprint” of the compound)
18 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
BRAGG VIEW OF DIFFRACTION
The deviation of the ray from its initial path equals 2θ
θ θ
dhkl
1 1′
2θ
19 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Diffraction from Polycrystalline Sample (Powder)
The powder sample in the center is rotatinggenerating “2θ cones” or diffracted rays
2θ
20 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Diffraction from Polycrystalline Sample (Powder)
The film arranged cylindrically around the sample records lines in the places where it is intersected by the cones.
film
22 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
POWDER DIFFRACTOMETER
This one is a very old model. We hardly use films anymore.But it is good for basic understanding of the diffraction principles.
By measuring the lines on the film, we can obtain a set of θhkl (or dhkl) corresponding to our powder sample. 23
θdn hkl sin2=λ 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
2θ
POWDER DIFFRACTOMETER
24
θdn hkl sin2=λ
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
POWDER DIFFRACTOMETER
X-ray source25
Detector9-sample changer
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Applications of Powder Diffractometry
26
Qualitative phase analysis (comparison to the known patterns)
Quantitative phase analysis (intensity measurements)
Unit cell determination (dhkl′s depend on lattice parameters)
Study of phase transitions
Particle size estimation (line width)
Crystal structure refinement (line intensities and profiles)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Applications of Powder Diffractometry
27
Qualitative phase analysis (comparison to the known patterns)
Quantitative phase analysis (intensity measurements)
Unit cell determination (dhkl′s depend on lattice parameters)
Study of phase transitions
Particle size estimation (line width)
Crystal structure refinement (line intensities and profiles)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Qualitative Phase Analysis
28
Direct comparison: if you know what phases can be present in your sample, the pattern can be compared against the one calculated from the known crystal structure
- can be done by most of the common structure visualization software (Mercury, CrystalMaker/Diffract, X-Seed, Diamond)
Search/Match comparison: the pattern is compared against the recorded powder patterns stored in the database (PDF from ICDD)
- only compares the position and intensity of peak maxima, but not the peak profiles
- contains both experimental and calculated patterns
- accuracy of the stored patterns is systematically reevaluated
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Reciprocal Lattice
29 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Applications of Powder Diffractometry
30
Qualitative phase analysis (comparison to the known patterns)
Quantitative phase analysis (intensity measurements)
Unit cell determination (dhkl′s depend on lattice parameters)
Study of phase transitions
Particle size estimation (line width)
Crystal structure refinement (line intensities and profiles)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
RECIPROCAL LATTICE
The orientation of a plane is defined by the direction of a normal to the plane:
hklhkl dNd
=
31 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
RECIPROCAL LATTICE
32
dhkl vectors in the direct space
d*hkl vectors in the reciprocal space
hklhkl d
Nd
=*
hklhkl dNd
= [Å]
[1/Å]
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
RECIPROCAL LATTICE
33
The reciprocal lattice is periodic.Therefore, we should be able to define the reciprocal unit cell:
(a*, b*, c*)
such that any vector in the lattice can be described as
d*hkl = ha* + kb* + lc*
Now let’s see how the reciprocal latticeis related to the diffraction pattern
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Why Use The Reciprocal Space?
34
Think about the Bragg law:
What do we measure experimentally?
Angles at which diffractionmaxima are observed
θdn hkl sin2=λ
*
21
22sin hkl
hklhkl
dnd
ndnθ ×=
×==
λλλ
×==
hklhkl dn
dnθ 1
22sin λλ
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
xr1
r2
θ
Why Use The Reciprocal Space?
35
The experimental measurement is directly related to d*hkl OR
The detector is scanning for the reciprocal lattice points d*hkl
xr
dnθ hkl ×=×=2
* 12
sin λ
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Why Use The Reciprocal Space?
36Diffraction from a single Xtal
A diffraction pattern is not a direct representation of the crystal lattice The diffraction pattern is a representation
of the reciprocal lattice
In order to find the reciprocal lattice,the diffraction pattern can be indexed
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING PROCEDURE
37
To index a diffraction pattern means:
to find such a basis (a*,b*,c*) that all the diffraction spots (or lines) can be described (indexed) as
d*hkl = ha* + kb* + lc*
with only integer (hkl) values allowed.
All we need to do is to find the value of d* for each spot and then index = let software find the unit cell (in our lazy time).
Basically, we deal with a system of linear equations.
The more reflections we have,the more reliably the unit cell will be determined.
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
THE RECIPROCAL UNIT CELL
38
The reciprocal UC is related to the direct UC:
By definitiona*·a = 1 b*·a = 0 c*·a = 0a*·b = 0 b*·b = 1 c*·b = 0a*·c = 0 b*·c = 0 c*·c = 1
which means that
a* ⊥ (bc) b* ⊥ (ac) c* ⊥ (ab)
If we can index the diffraction patternand find the reciprocal UC,then we will be able to find the direct UC.
c
ba*
θ
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
THE RECIPROCAL UNIT CELL
39
The reciprocal UC is related to the direct UC:By definition
a*·a = 1 b*·a = 0 c*·a = 0a*·b = 0 b*·b = 1 c*·b = 0a*·c = 0 b*·c = 0 c*·c = 1
a* ⊥ (bc) b* ⊥ (ac) c* ⊥ (ab)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
40 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
41
The simplest case – cubic symmetry
For a cubic system the expected lines in a powder pattern can be generated from the following relationships
The relationship between the Miller indices of a peak (hkl) and the interplanar d-spacing
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]
Whered = λ/(2sinθ)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
42
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]
h k l l2+k2+l2 d (Å) 2θ
1 0 0 1 5.350 16.561 1 0 2 3.783 23.501 1 1 3 3.089 28.882 0 0 4 2.675 33.472 1 0 5 2.393 37.562 1 1 6 2.184 41.302 2 0 8 1.892 48.063 0 0 9 1.783 51.182 2 1 9 1.783 51.183 1 0 10 1.692 54.17
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
43
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]Manual Indexing
Indexing a powder pattern is the reverse of peak generation.
Namely we are given the peak positions and we use that information to determine:
The hkl index of each peak
The unit cell dimensions
The systematic absences, which gives information about the space group
Manual indexing consists of the following steps:
Determine d-spacing of each peak from its 2θ value (using Braggs Law)
Create a table of 1/d2 values for each peak
Look for a common factor (1/a2) that can be divided into each of the 1/d2 values
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
44
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]
2θ d (Å) 1000/d2
16.56 5.350 34.923.50 3.783 69.928.88 3.089 104.833.47 2.675 139.837.56 2.393 174.641.30 2.184 209.648.06 1.892 279.451.18 1.783 314.651.18 1.783 314.654.17 1.692 349.3
Lets begin by working the previous example backwards.Starting with the peak positions (recall λ = 1.5406 A).
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
45
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]
With a little inspection (in this case) we see that all of the1000/d2 values can be divided by 34.9
2θ d (Å) 1000/d2 /34.9 hkl
16.56 5.350 34.9 1 100
23.50 3.783 69.9 2 110
28.88 3.089 104.8 3 111
33.47 2.675 139.8 4 200
37.56 2.393 174.6 5 210
41.30 2.184 209.6 6 211
48.06 1.892 279.4 8 220
51.18 1.783 314.6 9 300
51.18 1.783 314.6 9 221
54.17 1.692 349.3 10 310 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
46
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]The last problem was a particularly easy one because there were no missing peaks. Typically there will be some systematic absences.Consider the following example. Once again λ = 1.5406 A.
2θ d (Å) 1000/d2
28.08 3.175 99.232.53 2.750 132.246.66 1.945 264.355.37 1.658 363.858.03 1.588 396.668.14 1.375 528.975.23 1.262 627.977.55 1.230 661.0
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
47
1𝑑𝑑2
= 1𝑎𝑎2
[ℎ2 + 𝑘𝑘2 + 𝑙𝑙2]It�s immediately clear that 99.2 is not a common factor here.Though we can see that 132.2-99.2=33 might be a common factor.So we’ll give it a try.
2θ d (Å) 1000/d2 /33 hkl
28.08 3.175 99.2 3 111
32.53 2.750 132.2 4 200
46.66 1.945 264.3 8 220
55.37 1.658 363.8 11 311
58.03 1.588 396.6 12 222
68.14 1.375 528.9 16 400
75.23 1.262 627.9 19 331
77.55 1.230 661.0 20 420
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
INDEXING A DIFFRACTION PATTERN
48 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Applications of Powder Diffractometry
49
Qualitative phase analysis (comparison to the known patterns)
Quantitative phase analysis (intensity measurements)
Unit cell determination (dhkl′s depend on lattice parameters)
Study of phase transitions
Particle size estimation (line width)
Crystal structure refinement (line intensities and profiles)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
DETERMINING PARTICLE SIZE
50
Scherrer equation:
D – the mean crystallite dimensionW – the full width at half maximum of the peak (FWHM)wi – instrumental broadeningθ - diffraction angleK – shape factor (usually ~0.9)
𝐷𝐷 =𝐾𝐾𝐾𝐾
𝑊𝑊 − 𝑤𝑤𝑖𝑖 cos𝜃𝜃
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Synchrotrons
APS ANL NSLS Brookhaven
ESRF Grenoble
BLS Beijing
ANSTO Melbourne
CLS SaskatoonDiamond Oxford
NSRRC Taiwan
Alba Barcelona
ALS Berkley
PETRA Hamburg Spring-8 Japan
Applications of Powder Diffraction
53
Qualitative phase analysis (comparison to the known patterns)
Quantitative phase analysis (intensity measurements)
Unit cell determination (dhkl′s depend on lattice parameters)
Study of phase transitions
Particle size estimation (line width)
Crystal structure refinement (line intensities and profiles)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Split of the peaks upon lowering of symmetry
54
Applying pressure to the primitive cubic perovskite, ABO3, Pm�3m
Lets calculate three diffraction peaks with hkl: 100, 010, and 001
For cubic: a = b = c
2Theta30.0 30.4 30.8 31.2 31.6 32.0 32.4 32.8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity
fe
1,0,
1100,
01
0,
001
hkldθ 2/sin λ=cl
bk
ah
d hkl
2
2
2
2
2
2
21
++=
addd 22
001
2
010
2
100
1111===
2019 Department of Chemistry,
Iowa State University. All rights reserved
2Theta30.0 30.4 30.8 31.2 31.6 32.0 32.4 32.8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity
fe
1,0,
1
1,1,
0
100,
01
000
1
Split of the peaks upon lowering of symmetry
55
Lets calculate three diffraction peaks with hkl: 100, 010, and 001
For tetragonal: a = b >≈ c
hkldθ 2/sin λ=
Applying pressure to the primitive cubic perovskite, ABO3, Pm-3m
cl
bk
ah
d hkl
2
2
2
2
2
2
21
++=
dd 2
100
2
001
11>
cd 22
001
11=
add 22
010
2
100
111==
2019 Department of Chemistry,
Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Split of the peaks upon lowering of symmetry
56
Lets calculate three diffraction peaks with hkl: 100, 010, and 001
For orthorhombic: a >≈ b >≈ c
2Theta30.0 30.4 30.8 31.2 31.6 32.0 32.4 32.8
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity
fe
0,1,
1
1,0,
1
1,1,
0100
001
010
Applying pressure to the primitive cubic perovskite, ABO3, Pm-3m
hkldθ 2/sin λ=
ddd 2
100
2
010
2
001
111>>
bd 22
010
11=
cd 22
001
11=
ad 22
100
11=
cl
bk
ah
d hkl
2
2
2
2
2
2
21
++=
2019 Department of Chemistry,
Iowa State University. All rights reserved
57
But not all peaks would split:111 in all three cases is a single peak – calculate at home
2Theta15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00
Rel
ativ
e In
tens
ity
Fe
1,0,
00,
0,1
1,1,
01,
0,1
1,1,
1
2,0,
0
0,0,
2
2,1,
0
1,0,
2
2,1,
11,
1,2
tetragonal
2Theta15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 50.0 55.0
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
1.00R
elat
ive
Inte
nsity
Fe
1,0,
0
1,1,
0
1,1,
1
2,0,
0
2,1,
0
2,1,
1
cubic
Split of the peaks upon lowering of symmetry
hkldθ 2/sin λ=
2019 Department of Chemistry,
Iowa State University. All rights reserved
58
Effect of the wave-length
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘Cu (1.54 Å)
Cr (2.29 Å)
Co (1.79 Å)
Mo (0.71 Å)
Ag (0.56 Å)
Synchrotron (0.1-3 Å)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
59
Effect of the wave-length
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘Cu (1.54 Å)
Cr (2.29 Å)
Co (1.79 Å)
Mo (0.71 Å)
Ag (0.56 Å)
Synchrotron (0.1-3 Å)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
60
Effect of the wave-length
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘Cu (1.54 Å)
Cr (2.29 Å)
Co (1.79 Å)
Mo (0.71 Å)
Ag (0.56 Å)
Synchrotron (0.1-3 Å)
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
61
X-ray Fluorescence
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘
Emitting of characteristic X-rays - a principle of XRF method But high background in XRD
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
CoSe2 sample measured on Cu radiation
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
CoSe2 sample measured on Cu radiationwith energy discrimination ON
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
CoSe2 sample measured on Cu radiationwith energy discrimination ON
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
CoSe2 sample measured on Cu radiationwith energy discrimination ON
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
CoSe2 sample measured on Cu radiationwith energy discrimination ON
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
67
X-ray Fluorescence
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘Cu (1.54 Å)
Cr (2.29 Å)
Co (1.79 Å)
Mo (0.71 Å)
Ag (0.56 Å)
Synchrotron (0.1-3 Å)
λ =
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
68
X-ray Absorption
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘
Radiation C P Se Cs Bi
Cu (1.54 Å) 3.33 75.5 80.0 317 244
Mo (0.71 Å) 0.58 7.97 69.5 40.7 126
https://11bm.xray.aps.anl.gov/absorb/absorb.php
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
69
Synchrotron X-ray: 11-BM at APS ANL
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 https://11bm.xray.aps.anl.gov/description.html
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
70
Synchrotron X-ray: 11-BM at APS ANL
sinθ = 𝐾𝐾/2𝑑𝑑ℎ𝑘𝑘𝑘𝑘 https://11bm.xray.aps.anl.gov/description.html
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Lax Ba8−x Cu16P30: lab XRD
La = 1.0
La = 1.4
La = 1.6
La = 1.8
La = 2.0
La = 0.0
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
11-BM data on the same samples
Synchrotron XRD11-BM APS ANL
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Lax Ba8−x Cu16P30: lab XRD
La = 1.0
La = 1.4
La = 1.6
La = 1.8
La = 2.0
La = 0.0
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
11-BM data on the same samples
Synchrotron XRD11-BM APS ANL
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Structure: Lax Ba8−x Cu16P30 and Cex Ba8−x Cu16P30
Chem, 2018, 4, 1465. 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Structure: Lax Ba8−x Cu16P30 and Cex Ba8−x Cu16P30
Chem, 2018, 4, 1465. 2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Cu/P ordering: La1.6Ba6.4Cu16P30
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved
Cu/P ordering: La1.6Ba6.4Cu16P30
Cu is all the time surrounded by 4 P
Minimizing Cu-Cu interactions Maximizing Cu-P interactions
2019 Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University. All rights reserved