40
September 7, 2012

Differentiated Accountability Initial Sustainability Review FPE

  • Upload
    austin

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Differentiated Accountability Initial Sustainability Review FPE. September 7, 2012. FPE Profile Demographics. Our student population based on August 2012 membership. Our student demographics are as follows: 77% Caucasian 24% African-American - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

September 7, 2012

Page 2: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Our student population based on August 2012 membership. Our student demographics are as follows:

77% Caucasian 24% African-American 11% Hispanic 8% Indian/Mixed 2% Asian 19% Students With Disabilities (SWD) 72% Free or Reduced Lunch (Sept. 4, 2012) <1% Migrant The average daily absentee rate for our school is approximately 7.17 % and Fruitland Park has a student mobility of 9.0% based on trend data for 2011-2012.

Page 3: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Total School Population (325) White (246) Black (75) Economically Disadvantaged (243) SWD (39) Hispanic (36) ELL (9)

Page 4: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Access Data Base monitoring system

Edusoft Mini-Assessments (IFLs) Achieves Mini-Assessments CWT Data Student Data Binders Success Board Progress Checker electronic folder

for every teacher including all students

Page 5: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Reading FPE 2012 Performance

FPE Goals 2013

District 2012 Performance

District Goals2013

Proficiency

52% 60% 56% 59%

Learning Gains

61% 67% 64% 67%

Learning Gains, Low 25%

69% 75% 66% 69%

Page 6: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Initiate Kagan structures schoolwide across all subjects to promote oral language skills and rich, text based discussions

Supplement reading curriculum with “Great Books” literature using shared inquiry strategies to dig deeper better preparing for Common Core

Use Fetzer strategies mirroring CIS (Comprehension Instructional Sequence lesson) to read complex text closely

Integrate FPE Reading Block Summary Card establishing a school culture for whole group instruction, guided small group instruction, stations, progress monitoring, and non negotiables

Continue DBQ for 4th and 5th grade and scaffold lessons to pilot in 3rd grade

Page 7: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue DAILY 5 with PLC’s targeted to teacher needs for creating and monitoring stations including Word Work, Read to Self/Someone, Work on Writing with response to text

Provide PD and build teacher resources for Words Their Way, Fetzer Phonics, and Making Words, to strengthen phonics skills

Continue utilizing special area teachers (Music, Media, Computer) and Title 1 personnel for targeted small group and individual remediation

Continue use of Thinking Maps

Continue Weekly Reader and Science Spin magazines for informational text reading activities

Page 8: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Integrate the use of Achieves mini assessments in grades 3-5 for progress monitoring of benchmarks utilizing county blueprints and task cards as resources

Ignite a passion for reading school wide including using Reading Surveys to uncover student interests empowering teachers as “Book Whisperers”

Promote weekly student Book Talks encouraging students to recommend books to peers on morning announcements

PAWS will be utilized to support struggling readers

Page 9: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Math FPE 2012 Performance

FPE Goals 2013

District 2012 Performance

District Goals2013

Proficiency

55% 65% 57% 60%

Learning Gains

64% 70% 66% 69%

Learning Gains, Low 25%

65% 70% 64% 67%

Page 10: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue the 90 minute math block Initiate Kagan structures schoolwide across all

subjects to promote oral language skills and rich, text based discussions

Sustain the use of manipulatives and hands-on activities

• Building problem solving strategies• Bridging concrete, representational, and

abstract thinking

Continue the use of Thinking Maps and support teachers with their implementation

Continue to support and to train teachers in the Go Math! series and instructional strategies

Page 11: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Support the Daily Instructional Focus Lessons (Wylie’s Warm-ups) and weekly mini assessments

Continue to use the disaggregated data to better align intervention and extension stations

Utilize the District Curriculum Specialist/Coach for instructional strategies, modeling lessons and PLC projects including peer observations

Continue to implement AIMS activities integrating Math with Science

Utilize additional Title I teachers for skill focused small group instruction

Page 12: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Integrate FPE Math Block Summary Card establishing a school culture for whole group instruction, guided small group instruction, gradual release, progress monitoring, and non negotiables

Page 13: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Writing FPE 2012 Performance

FPE Goals 2013

District 2012 Performance

District Goals2013

Proficiency @ Level 4

27% 82% 44% 82%

Proficiency @ Level 3

77% 82% 79% 82%

Page 14: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

PARCC Model of Content Framework Chart

Page 15: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Students will write over extended time frames for a range of discipline specific tasks, purposes and audience.Continue to emphasize Response-to-Text tasks in the Daily 5 station structure.Use mentor text as examples for writing craft skills to enhance clarity, support, and voice.Continue Document Based Questions to express an opinion or make an argument. Continue Professional Development Writing PLCs for training and support.

Page 16: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue to provide Writing Family Nights Follow best practices in the 2012-2013

District Writing Curriculum Blueprints (4th grade).

Continue to coach the classroom teacher and to conduct small group instruction

Continue use of Thinking Maps At-A-Glance Writing Organizers – Nancy

Fetzer Writing Connections Developing a Writing Coaching Card to

align the rubrics with the skills and expectations K-5

Page 17: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Science FPE 2012 Performance

FPE Goals 2013

District 2012 Performance

District Goals2013

Proficiency

48% 52% 49% 52%

Page 18: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Grades K-5 will continue to integrate Science into both the Reading and Math blocks

Utilize “Picture Perfect Science” resources in each grade level integrating literature and real world applications of math and science concepts

Continue to integrate AIMS activities into Math and Science lessons

Continue STEM extension activities for 3rd, 4th and 5th graders

Page 19: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue to provide support and resources for Science content during the Reading Block

Sustain hands on lab activities and experiments weekly for all 5th grade classes

Integrate the use of Science Achieves mini assessments in grade 5 for progress monitoring of benchmarks utilizing county blueprints and task cards as resources

Continue use of Thinking Maps Support teachers in using MyScience online

Page 20: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

PBS Team will have Tier III training Team will continue training of new staff on

schoolwide behavioral systems Team will complete training on Leaps Social

Skills behavioral program for all teachers and specific assistants through PLC meetings

PBS team members will train teachers in the tracking of behavioral issues through the new state web site in PLC meetings

PBS team will continue to utilize a refined Check In - Check Out system with data tracking and train teachers in the revised system

Page 21: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue to support and implement the Tier II and III Interventions:

Reading: Differentiated Instruction, Small groups, Literacy Stations, Earobics, Lexia, Strategic Harcourt Interventions, Fast Forward, Words Their Way, Title I teachers for skill focused small group instruction

Math: Differentiated Instruction, small groups, Everglades Math Program, Title I teachers for skill focused small group instruction

Behavior: Continue to implement charting on students’ targeted behavior with the Guidance Counselor, LEAPS Social Skill Program

Page 22: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Continue training and support for Writing IEPs utilizing district support staff

Sustain the assessment of students for individual goal development appropriate for continued progress monitoring

Progress monitoring on a continued basis through routinely scheduled meetings and electronic files

Provide continued web based training and site support for LEAPS

Provide Behavioral Training to Teacher Assistants

Build the curriculum capacity in self contained classrooms

Building a deeper understanding of NGSS with Alt. Assess

Page 23: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

• First Grade on site Professional Development Day

• Nancy Fetzer on site training Comprehension emphasis on fiction and non-fiction Chunking to support analysis, reflection, and research Emphasis on text coding specifically informational text

• Kagan Training for all Teachers

• 8 Mathematical Practices

• K-2 Thinking Math Instructional Strategies

Page 24: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

• Implementation NGSS-CORE Workshop Curriculum Blueprints Task Cards Coaching Cards/Summary Cards

• Continue Thinking Maps

• Writing Teams

• Two Close Read in-services with Kevin Smith

Page 25: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Great Books Supplemental Materials K-5 Great Book’s “Shared Inquiry” Professional

Development , CCS Leadership Team Attended FLDOE State Common Core

Training Continued support for Nancy Fetzer’s

ELA Common Core instructional strategies

Page 26: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

VisionA dynamic, progressive and collaborative learning community embracing change and diversity where every student will graduate

with the skills needed to succeed in postsecondary education and the workplace.

MissionThe mission on the Lake County Schools is to

provide every student with individual opportunities to excel.

Page 27: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

2B C2 READY = 2 (C+Z) THE FUTURE

Page 28: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE
Page 29: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE
Page 30: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE
Page 31: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE
Page 32: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

Evidence that all members of the school community are steadfast in this belief. All are willing to do what is necessary to meet high standards. There is active implementation, follow-up, and feedback.

Leaders clearly support the constructs of the concepts by providing the formalized structures required. The work is thought of as an obligation to be met. There is evidence of follow-up and feedback.

Concepts are talked about. Concepts are thought of as “another thing to do”. Leaders tend to make broad-based decisions with limited or no follow-up or feedback.

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a sense of accountability.

Page 33: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

1. Organize: Stakeholder Data in Spring/Summer

a. Site based Writing Teams b. Attendance at Summer

Inst. c. State, District, and Site

based assessments

2. Plan: FPE sets Goals based on

Federal, State, District Goals a. Teacher Involvement and

feedback

3. Implement: a. In progress b. See Progress Monitoring slide

4. Sustain: a. Each year FPE Evaluates systems approach utilizing PSDM

Page 34: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and Enforced

(Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

1. Knowledge & Use of CCSS

a. K-1 has been trained CCSS

b.Additional site Workshops

Staff Dev. on Text Complexity, DOK,

Model Classrooms, DRI Model

Classrooms, Peer Mentoring/Feedback

2. Common &Collaborative Planning Time

a. Vertical and Horizontal PLC

Page 35: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and Enforced

(Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

3. Interdisciplinary Content Int.

a. 75% and above of K-1 are integrating math and ELA core subjects.

b.alignment, projects, across

content writing

4. Frequency of Problem-Based Learning

a. Planned staff dev.

5. Student Collaboration a. 90% of teachers are Kagan trained.

6. Integrated Technology a. Electronic Science Fair b. COWs, C. Rem. Comp Teacher

Page 36: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

1. Established Culture and Norms

2. Master schedule supports common and vertical planning.

3. Building Teacher leaders and Train the Trainers

4. Refined to incorporate the 4 question of learning

Page 37: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

1. Adopted FCIM Model2. Incorporated cycle into

data analysis and Progress Monitoring at leadership level and most classrooms.

3. Need to emphasis follow-through interventions with fidelity and adjust instructional activities as we cycle on specific skills.

Page 38: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of

accountability.

1. Structured System2. Varied our

interventions 3. Used FCIM to Review

MTSS4. Utilized PSDM with

faculty5. In the process of

Revamping6. Adjusted Budget to

include ½ RtI manager and TA

Page 39: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Culturally Embedded(Level 3)

Intentionally Structured and

Enforced (Level 2)

In Name Only(Level 1)

There is a sense of commitment.

There is a sense of compliance.

There is a limited sense of accountability.

Leadership Member Trained in previous years.Fourth Grade Team Trained in year 2010-11.Model Classrooms instituted.Fidelity compromised based on attrition, funding, and support.

Page 40: Differentiated Accountability       Initial Sustainability Review            FPE

Where are we on the C2 Ready Continuum?

What is the plan to sustain this year’s work?

What actions will be taken and who is responsible?

What worked well and what do we still need to refine?

What level of support do we need from the district and what can we sustain on our own at the school level?