Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    1/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    Dielectric constant of a plasma

    A plasma is very similar to a gaseous medium, expect that the electrons arefree: i.e.,

    there is no restoring force due to nearby atomic nuclii. Hence, we can obtain an

    expression for the dielectric constant of a plasma from Eq. (1149) by setting to

    zero, and to the number density of electrons, . We obtain

    (1150)

    where the characteristic frequency

    (1151)

    is called theplasma frequency. We can immediately see that formula (1150) is

    problematic. For frequencies above the plasma frequency, the dielectric constant of

    a plasma is less than unity. Hence, the refractive index is also less than unity.

    This would seem to imply that high frequency electromagnetic waves can propagate

    through a plasma with a velocity which is greaterthan the velocity of light in a

    vacuum. Does this violate the principles of relativity? On the other hand, for

    frequencies below the plasma frequency, the dielectric constant is negative, which

    would seem to imply that the refractive index is imaginary. How should we

    interpret this?

    Consider an infinite plane-wave, of frequency, , greater than the plasma frequency,

    propagating through a plasma. Suppose that the wave electric field takes the form

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    2/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    (1152)

    where it is understood that the physical electric field is the real partof the above

    expression. A peak or trough of the above wave travels at the so-calledphase

    velocity, which is given by

    (1153)

    Now, we have also seen that the phase velocity of electromagnetic waves in a

    dielectric medium is , so

    (1154)

    It follows from Eq. (1150) that

    (1155)

    in a plasma. The above type of expression, which effectively determines the wave

    frequency, , as a function of the wave-number, , for the medium in question, is

    called a dispersion relation (since, amongst other things, it determines how fast

    wave-pulses disperse in the medium). According to the above dispersion relation,

    the phase velocity of high frequency waves propagating through a plasma is given by

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    3/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    (1156)

    which is indeed greater than . However, the theory of relativity does not forbid

    this. What the theory of relativity says is that information cannot travel at a velocity

    greater than . And the peaks and troughs of an infinite plane-wave, such as (1152),

    do notcarry any information.

    We now need to consider how we could transmit information through a plasma (orany other dielectric medium) by means of electromagnetic waves. The easiest way

    would be to send a series of short discrete wave-pulses through the plasma, so that wecould encode information in a sort of Morse code.We can build up a wave-pulse from

    a suitable superposition of infinite plane-waves of different frequencies and wave-

    lengths: e.g.,

    (1157)

    where , and is determined from the dispersion relation

    (1155). Now, it turns out that a relatively short wave-pulse can only be built up from

    a superposition of plane-waves with a relatively wide range of different values.

    Hence, for a short wave-pulse, the integrand in the above formula consists of the

    product of a fairly slowly varying function, , and a rapidly oscillating function,

    . The latter function is rapidly oscillating because the phase varies

    very rapidly with , relative to . We expect the net result of integrating the

    product of a slowly varying function and rapidly oscillating function to be small, since

    the oscillations will generally average to zero. It follows that the integral (1157) is

    dominated by those regions of -space for which varies least rapidlywith .

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    4/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    Hence, the peak of the wave-pulse most likely corresponds to a maximum or

    minimum of : i.e.,

    (1158)

    Thus, we infer that the velocity of the wave-pulse (which corresponds to the velocity

    of the peak) is given by

    (1159)

    This velocity is called the group velocity, and is different to the phase velocity in

    dispersive media, for which is not directly proportional to . (Of course, in a

    vacuum, , and both the phase and group velocities are equal to .) The

    upshot of the above discussion is that information (i.e., an individual wave-pulse)

    travels through a dispersive media at the group velocity, rather than the phase

    velocity. Hence, relativity demands that the group velocity, rather than the phase

    velocity, must always be less than .

    What is the group velocity for high frequency waves propagating through a plasma?

    Well, differentiation of the dispersion relation (1155) yields

    (1160)

    Hence, it follows from Eq. (1156) that

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    5/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    (1161)

    which is less than . We thus conclude that the dispersion relation (1155) is indeed

    consistent with relativity.

    Let us now consider the propagation of low frequency electromagnetic waves througha plasma. We can see, from Eqs. (1156) and (1161), that when the wave frequency,

    , falls below the plasma frequency, , both the phase and group velocities becomeimaginary. This indicates that the wave attenuates as it propagates. Consider, for

    instance, a plane-wave of frequency . According to the dispersion relation

    (1155), the associated wave-number is given by

    (1162)

    Hence, the wave electric field takes the form

    (1163)

    Indeed, it can be seen that for electromagnetic waves in a plasma take the

    form of decaying standing waves, rather than traveling waves. We conclude that an

    electromagnetic wave, of frequency less than the plasma frequency, which is

    incident on a plasma will not propagate through the plasma. Instead, it will be totally

    reflected.

    We can be sure that the incident wave is reflected by the plasma, rather than absorbed,

    by considering the energy flux of the wave in the plasma. It is easily demonstrated

    that the energy flux of an electromagnetic wave can be written

  • 8/8/2019 Dielectric Constant of a Plasma

    6/6

    http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/~rfitzp/teaching/em/lectures/node100.html

    (1164)

    For a wave with a real frequency and a complex -vector, the above formula

    generalizes to

    (1165)

    However, according to Eq. (1162), the -vector for a low frequency electromagnetic

    wave in a plasma ispurely imaginary. It follows that the associated energy flux is

    zero. Hence, any low frequency wave which is incident on the plasma must be totally

    reflected, since if there were any absorption of the wave energy then there would be

    a net energy flux into the plasma.

    The outermost layer of the Earth's atmosphere consists of a partially ionized zone

    known as the ionosphere. The plasma frequency in the ionosphere is about 1MHz,

    which lies at the upper end of the medium-wave band of radio frequencies. It followsthat low frequency radio signals (i.e., all signals in the long-wave band, and most in

    the medium-wave band) are reflectedoff the ionosphere. For this reason, such signalscan be detected over the horizon. Indeed, long-wave radio signals reflect multiple

    times off the ionosphere, with very little loss (they also reflect multiple times off the

    Earth, which is enough of a conductor to act as a mirror for radio waves), and can

    consequently be detected all over the world. On the other hand, high frequency radiosignals (i.e., all signals in the FM band) pass straight through the ionosphere. For this

    reason, such signals cannot be detected over the horizon, which accounts for the

    relatively local coverage of FM radio stations. Note, from Eq. (1151), that the plasma

    frequency is proportional to the square root of the number density of free electrons.Now, the level of ionization in the ionosphere is maintained by ultra-violet light from

    the Sun (which effectively knocks electrons out of neutral atoms). Of course, there isno such light at night, and the number density of free electrons in the ionosphere

    consequently drops as electrons and ions gradually recombine. It follows that the

    plasma frequency in the ionosphere also drops at night, giving rise to a marked

    deterioration in the reception of distant medium-wave radio stations.