Click here to load reader
Upload
sunred5
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Did Jesus Survive the Crucifixion (Www.markmason.net)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/did-jesus-survive-the-crucifixion-wwwmarkmasonnet 1/3
Did Jesus Survive the Crucifixion?
Did he live in India to age 100?
From Ch. 4 of In Search of the Loving God
by Mark Mason
. . .
Extraordinary as this story of Jesus visiting India is, some have taken it even further.
Holger Kersten, in his book Jesus Lived in India, extends the story to even more
incredible heights, backed up by even more sketchy evidence. We will just very
briefly look at his theory, before moving on to better established knowledge about
Jesus.
Kersten uses evidence from the Shroud of Turin (of much challenged authenticity) to
maintain that Jesus was not dead, in the modern sense of the word, when taken from
the cross, but just in a deep coma, and that, in the tomb, he rose from the teeth of death and made a remarkably quick recovery. If he could miraculously heal others, it
seems reasonable to suppose he could do the same for himself. Indeed, Jesus inferred
he would do this, when he said, referring to his body, "Destroy this temple, and I will
raise it again in three days." (John 2:19). After this Jesus appeared to his disciples a
few times, then left with his mother Mary to travel gradually, over a period of sixteen
years, back to India. The by now elderly Mary died on the way, but Jesus continued
on to Kashmir, and lived and taught there till he was about a hundred years old. There
is even speculation that he attended the Fourth Buddhist Council, held in Kashmir
toward the end of the first century A.D., and helped inspire the important reforms
made to Buddhism at this council.
The second century Church Father Irenaeus wrote a celebrated book called Against
Heresies, which was crucial in establishing church orthodoxy. In this book he claimed
Jesus lived to be an old man, and remained in "Asia" with his disciple John, and
others, up to the times of the Emperor Trajan, before finally dying. Trajan's reign
began in 98 A.D., at which time Jesus would have been just over one hundred years
old.[22] This is support, from a most unexpected quarter, for Kirsten's theory.
Kirsten himself uses place names, age-old traditions, and claims in certain documents,
to give credence to this theory. The story is that after Jesus appeared to his disciples,
he went to Damascus in Syria, where the Jews had been disliked since the Maccabean
wars, but where the Essenes had a spiritual center, and where he would be safer thanin Palestine. He was still there about two years later when he dramatically appeared to
Saul on the road to Damascus, in order to win him over from being the main
persecutor of the Way to being the main proponent of it (Acts 9:1-31). About five
kilometers outside Damascus there is to this day a place called Mayuam-i-isa,
which means "The place where Jesus lived," and the Persian historian Mir
Kawand has cited several sources claiming Jesus lived and taught in Damascus
after his crucifixion.[23] These Persian sources claim that Jesus, while in Damascus,
received a letter from the King of Nisibis (now Nusaybin near Edessa in Turkey),
asking Jesus to cure him of a disease. He sent Thomas to cure him, and later visited
there himself, before leaving to travel north west into the Kurdish territory in the
north of Anotolia. The apocryphal Acts of Thomas relates how Jesus suddenly
appeared there at the marriage festivities of a princess at the court of the King of
Andrapa. From there Jesus and Mary apparently journeyed eastward over the old Silk
Road, where certain place names such as "House of Mary" (near Ephesos on the west
coast of modern Turkey), supposedly suggest their stay. As Jesus gradually moved
through Persia, he increasingly became known as "Yuz Asaf," meaning "leader of the
healed." Tradition says he preached throughout Persia, and converted vast numbers to
7/28/2019 Did Jesus Survive the Crucifixion (Www.markmason.net)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/did-jesus-survive-the-crucifixion-wwwmarkmasonnet 2/3
his creed. Accounts such as Agha Mustafai's Jami-uf-Tawarik (Vol II) claim Yuz
Asaf and Jesus were one and the same man, and the court poet of Emperor Akbar of
India later backed this up when he called Jesus Ai Ki Nam-i to: Yus o Kristo, or "Thou
whose name is Yuz or Christ."[24]
The Acts of Thomas describe the stay of Jesus and Thomas in Taxila (now in
Pakistan) at the court of King Gundafor in the twenty-sixth year of his rule (47 A.D.).
East of Taxila is a small town called Mari ("Murree" in English) near the modern
border with Kashmir. In Mari there is a grave which has been maintained and honored
as far back as anyone can remember, called Mai Mari da Asthan, "The Final Resting
Place of Mother Mary." The grave is orientated east-west in Jewish fashion, rather
than the Muslim north-south. Moreover, the area was under Hindu rule in Jesus' time,
and the Hindus cremated their dead and scattered their ashes, so had no need for
graves. When Islam took over this area in the seventh century A.D., all "infidel"
monuments were destroyed, but they recognized this grave as being a relic of a
"People of the Book," Christian or Israelite, and respected it. The grave continues to
be honored as the final resting-place of Jesus' mother by Muslims, who consider Jesus
one of the most important prophets of Islam. [25] The Qur'an states that Jesus (Issa or
Isa) was saved from dying on the cross, which it considered an accursed death,
unworthy of him (Deut 21:23), and has many other references to the "prophet Issa,"
supposedly to correct the distorted image in the writings of his followers. The mostincredible of these is that Muhammad believed Jesus' prophecy of the coming of the
"Spirit of truth" (John 16:12-14) referred to him.
After this Jesus supposedly traveled on to Kashmir, from where he made periodic
journeys to other parts of India. There is a grave in the middle of Srinagar's old town
which many people believe to be the grave of Jesus himself. The building later
erected around the grave stone is called Rozabal , meaning "tomb of a prophet."
Above the passage to the actual burial chamber is an inscription explaining that Yuz
Asaf entered the valley of Kashmir many centuries before, and that his life was
dedicated to the search for the truth. Within the inner burial chamber there are two
long gravestones, the larger for Yuz Asaf, the smaller for an Islamic saint of thefifteenth century. Both gravestones point north-south in keeping with Muslim custom,
but they are in fact only covers: the actual graves are in a crypt under the floor of the
building. There is a tiny opening through which one can look into the true burial
chamber below, and see that the sarcophagus containing the earthly remains of Yuz
Asaf points east-west in keeping with Jewish custom. This clearly indicates Yuz Asaf
was neither an Islamic saint nor a Hindu. [26]
The Indian Mogul emperor Akbar, in the sixteenth century, planned to unite India,
then split into religious factions, with a single religion that would contain the
quintessence of all the various faiths as its one "Truth." Akbar evidently selected at
least one saying of Jesus to inscribe on the wall of his Victory Gate to the centralmosque of the city he built for himself, for (in 1900) this saying, unknown in the west,
and supposedly deriving from Jesus' stay in India, was found on a piece of wall amid
the ruins of Fatehpur Sikri, the city he built 25 km from Agra:
Said Jesus, on whom be peace! The world is a bridge, pass over it but build no house there. He whohopeth for an hour, hope for eternity; the world is but an hour, spend it in devotion; the rest is worth
nothing.[27]
Since Akbar had in common with Jesus a vision of one religion uniting the best from
all religions, perhaps, if he had known about it, he would also have had Jesus'
statement of this vision inscribed where the public could read it:
I have other sheep that are not of this fold. I must bring
them also. They too will hear my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd. (John 10:16 AT)
The Prophet Isaiah, we saw earlier, also had this vision of the whole earth united and
at peace under one God (Isa 2:1-5). It is worth noting that this verse of Jesus', apart
7/28/2019 Did Jesus Survive the Crucifixion (Www.markmason.net)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/did-jesus-survive-the-crucifixion-wwwmarkmasonnet 3/3
from being a vision of religious unity, is also suggestive of the fact that Jesus traveled
and taught outside Palestine.
What are Christians to make of this supposed return of Jesus to India after the
crucifixion? Despite the evidence for it being thin, perhaps we could, at least, ask this
question: what if the inevitable further research into the theory does authenticate it?
What if the remains of "Yuz Asaf" in Shrinagar are exhumed and are well enough
preserved to show evidence of crucifixion? My own belief is that this should not
adversely affect Christian faith. Whether Jesus actually physically died on the cross is
a minor point. The important thing is that he suffered for the sins of all, and indeed, if
he didn't physically die he would have suffered much more (have died a worse
"death") due to the pain of recovering, than he would have if he had just quickly died
and been miraculously raised to life. Later versions of the Nicene Creed say Jesus
"descended into hell" for three days, which would be a good description of such an
ordeal of recovery from terrible wounds while lying in a grave. In either case the
Bible makes it clear that Jesus ended up very much alive in his original body, and that
his body was not subject to decay during the ordeal (Acts 2:31). What is possible is
that he was what we would now call "clinically dead" for a while, and that, like many
patients in modern hospitals, he was restored to life. We do not, however, any longer
think of "clinically dead" as really being dead - only when the brain has decayed so
much as to lose its ability to function do we pronounce a person dead. And, as wehave just seen, the Bible says Jesus' body was not subject to any decay. It is also
worth noting that Jesus said there would be no miraculous sign to demonstrate his
authority, except the sign of the prophet Jonah:
For as Johah was three days and three nights in the belly of a huge fish, so the Son of Man will be three
days and three nights in the heart of the earth.(Matt 12:40)
And Jonah did not die inside the fish before he emerged.
Jesus may have visited India, and he may even have returned there after his
crucifixion. We just don't know for sure yet, one way or the other. The fact that there
is room for speculation about this, and that it can't be ruled out, shows just how little
we actually know about Jesus, and the importance of keeping an open mind about him
and his teachings.
From: In Search of the Loving God by Mark Mason - Copyright © 1997.