19
INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD.

DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY

BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD.

Page 2: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

METHODOLOGIES AVAILABLE

• SEROLOGICAL ASSAYS• SUPPLEMENTAL ASSAYS• ANTIGEN DETECTION• VIRAL CULTURE• MOLECULAR METHODS• SURROGATE MARKERS

Page 3: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

SEROLOGICAL ASSAYSDepends on rise of antibody levels to

detectable range.2- 8 weeks of acquiring the

infection( not useful for early infections)

IgM- Gag proteins.IgG- p 24 antigen and the gp120…. gp

41Persistently undetectable antibodies

more than 3 months – rare.

Page 4: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

SEROLOGICAL ASSAYSELISA Format: First generation: Whole viral lysate.Second generation: Recombinant antigensThird generation:- synthetic peptides.Sens: >99% Specificity: >98.5%Principles: Sandwich assay Competitive assay Capture assay principle

Page 5: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

False negative serology results• Very early during the course of infection.• Immunocompromised patients.• Errors in collection, labeling and handling

of the specimens.• Unusual HIV strains ( O group HIV strain)• Recent Exchange transfusion.Postulated to be due to a lack of B cell “

help”

Page 6: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

False positive Serology Results

1. Human Error.2. Lipaemic or hemolysed

samples.3. VDRL Positive.4. Autoimmune disorders.5. Hypergammaglobulinemia.6. Multiple myeloma.

Page 7: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

SEROLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES

Latex agglutination Immunochromatography. Other spot tests.

Page 8: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

SUPPLEMENTAL ASSAYS

• WESTERN BLOT ASSAY• INDIRECT

IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE• RIPA ( Radio

immunoprecipitation assay)• Specific Blots for the

differentiation of the subtypes of HIV-1

Page 9: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

WESTERN BLOT

Relevant antigens are separated from electrophoresis and transferred to a membrane.

Antibody reactivity is visible as bands.

Subjectivity is a problem and causes diagnostic confusion.

Page 10: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Interpretation of Western Blot assay

CDC Criteria.WHO Criteria.American Red Cross Criteria.ASPTHLD Criteria. Reactive Borderline reactive. Non Reactive.

Page 11: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Problems in Interpretation

1. False positive results- Hyperbilirubinemia, Connective tissue disorders, Polyclonal gammopathies.

2. Assays with no Group O proteins tend to miss the Non Type B infections of HIV-1

3. 20% of the HIV- 2 assays may give a false negative result.

4. No clear patterns to predict seroconversion.

Page 12: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Problems in Interpretation

A single band in the blot.Strong positive ELISA with a

borderline reactive blot.Weak positive ELISA with a

borderline reactive blot.Technical errors causing

diagnostic confusion.

Page 13: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

ANTIGEN DETECTION• Almost obscure today- replaced by

the RNA based molecular diagnostic tests.

• Both false negative results and false positive results seen.

• Average sensitivity of the assays- 10- 30pg/ml.

• Heat or glycine mediated dissociation of the immune complexes- more sensitive.

Page 14: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

VIRUS CULTURECumbersome but highly specific for the

diagnosis of HIV-1 Infection.Co-cultivation of the PBM’C of a donor

with those of the patient. RT activity or the p 24 antigen are

measured.Drug resistance studies can be done

with the viral culture and strain typing with differentiation can be performed.

Time consuming to be of clinical use.

Page 15: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS• Detection of HIV- 1 RNA in plasma

using RNA RT PCR( Lower limit of detection 20-50 copies of the genome).

• Detection of the HIV- 1 Subtypes is still far from reality.

• Window period diagnosis can be settled with these assays, although not validated by the US FDA for clinical use.

Page 16: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS

Detection of the proviral DNA in PBMC’S 9 Helpful in the neonatal HIV infection)

More sensitive and rapid than culture

Technically more cumbersome and tedious than RNA RT PCR.

Page 17: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Quantification of the HIV- Viral oad• Measurement of Virological set point

and prognosis.• Monitoring response to therapy.• Predicting resistance to anti-

retroviral drugs.• Predict progression of disease.• Predict maternal vertical

transmission.

Page 18: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

Specialised Testing Procedures

1. Screening for mutations in CCR5 gene( homozygotes versus heterozygotes)

2. Detection of HIV strains with genomic defects ( Deletions in the nef gene)

3. NSI/ SI phenotypes- inability to infect lymphoblastoid cell lines- low multiplication rate.

Page 19: DIAGNOSIS OF HIV INFECTION THE LABORATORY BY DR. K.BUJJIBABU.MD

SURROGATE MARKERS

1. CD4/ CD8 ratios ( useful but superseded by the viral load tests)

2. Beta –2 microglobulin.3. Serum neopterin levels.4. Serum IgA levels.5. High CD8 counts reflective of

slower disease progression.