146
Diabetes Gestacional Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2013 Williams OBSTETRICS 24 Ed American Diabetes Association ADA Nature Reviews | Endocrinology volume 8 | november 2012 | 639 Current Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Guido Menato et all.- Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2008;3(1):73-91 Uptodate 2015 UPC 23/02/2015 Marco Antonio Martina Chávez 1

Diabetes.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Diabetes Gestacional

    Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2013

    Williams OBSTETRICS 24 Ed

    American Diabetes Association ADA

    Nature Reviews | Endocrinology volume 8 | november 2012 | 639

    Current Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

    Guido Menato et all.- Expert Rev of Obstet Gynecol. 2008;3(1):73-91

    Uptodate 2015

    UPC 23/02/2015 Marco Antonio Martina Chvez

    1

  • Diabetes Mellitus (siglo I gr correr a travs Areteo de

    Capadocia y en 1675 Thomas Wllis: miel orina)

    Es una enfermedad metablica endocrinolgica crnica

    caracterizada por el dficit relativo o absoluto de insulina

    (Alteraciones en la secrecin, o accin de la insulina) resultando

    en hiperglicemia perdida de la homeostasis de la glucosa

    Causas: (Multifactorial, gentica, inmunolgica, adquirida)

    Deficiencia de insulina

    Resistencia a la insulina

    Impacto de la Hiperglicemia:

    Riesgos para la madre y su feto

    Disfuncin multi orgnica

    Mortalidad elevada

    Manifestaciones:

    Intolerancia a la glucosa

    Cetoacidosis

    Complicaciones crnicas

    2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • Epidemiologia

    Diabetes en la Gestacin

    4 - 6% de los embarazos en USA se complican con DM,

    representan 50 - 150,000 / ao. 30 35% recurrencia

    88% GDM, el 8% DM tipo II, el 4% DM tipo 1

    Epidemia actual: Obesidad y diabetes: ms casos de diabetes tipo

    2 en las MEF y ms casos de mujeres embarazadas con diabetes

    tipo 2 no diagnosticada

    Complicacin mdica ms comn de la gestacin

    DM Gestacional 90%

    DM Preexistente 10%

    6

  • El estudio epidemiolgico multinacional HAPO

    (Hyperglucemia and Pregnancy Outcome Adverse, 25.000

    mujeres embarazadas), demostr que el riesgo de los

    resultados maternos, fetales y neonatales adversos aument

    continuamente en funcin de la glucemia materna desde las

    24 - 28 semanas

    Este nuevo enfoque aument la prevalencia de DMG ya que

    basta un solo valor anormal para hacer su diagnstico (de 4

    al 6%)

    GDM es ms comn entre las personas de ascendencia

    asitica o etnia hispana y menos comn en personas de

    ascendencia europea; e incidencia intermedia en las

    mujeres afroamericanas

    7

  • HAPO

    A > hiperglicemia, sea en ayunas, a 1

    2 hrs > LGA

    8

  • Diabetes Gestacional: Definicin

    Cualquier grado de Intolerancia a la glucosa que se inicia o

    diagnostica por primera vez durante el embarazo, ya sea que la

    hiperglicemia persista o no despus de l.

    No es endocrinolgica. Es contrainsulnica o de resistencia a

    la insulina (Insulinasa placentaria, > cortisol)

    Incluye embarazadas con DM 1 2 no Dx previamente

    El 90 % de embarazadas diabticas constituyen ARO:

    macrosoma, sufrimiento fetal y complicaciones metablicas

    neonatales (HAPO)

    Por lo tanto, GDM slo representa los niveles elevados de

    glucosa en un momento determinado: embarazo

    Se trata de un pncreas insuficiente. Embarazo normal:

    compensa con insulina (si pncreas N)

    9

  • Metabolismo de los Carbohidratos

    Efectos del embarazo normal:

    En el 1er trimestre hay un en la sensibilidad insulnica.

    Compensa con > secrecin de insulina si el pncreas est

    normal (30%)

    Hay un del volumen plasmtico en la gestacin temprana y

    un de la utilizacin de glucosa fetal a medida que avanza el

    embarazo

    progresivo de la resistencia tisular a la insulina

    Supresin de la respuesta del glucagn

    de Prolactina, cortisol

    HPL tiene efectos semejantes a la Hormona del Crecimiento

    (comparten 87% de sus amino cidos)

    10

  • Hipoglucemia en

    ayunas leve

    Hiperglucemia

    postprandial

    Hiperinsulinemia

    Debido a la resistencia

    perifrica a la insulina

    lo que asegura un

    suministro adecuado de

    glucosa para el beb

    11

  • Metabolismo de la glucosa en el embarazo

    Precozmente en el Embarazo : Estrgenos y Progesterona inducen hiperplasia de clulas Beta del Pncreas con

    aumento de Insulina, disminucin perifrica de glucosa y

    disminucin de los niveles de glicemia en ayunas en un 10 a

    20 %

    En el 2 y 3er. Trimestre la demanda de nutrientes fetal y moviliza depsitos de glucosa materna, glucogenolisis

    heptica y hay resistencia Insulnica mediada por

    Lactgeno Placentario (correlacionado con la masa

    placentaria), Prolactina, Cortisol

    Estado anablico

    de las reservas de grasa materna

    de la concentracin de FFA

    de las necesidades de insulina

    12

  • Efectos Diabetgenos del Embarazo

    Resistencia a la Insulina (perifrica y > en los msculos):

    Debido a las hormonas placentarias HCG, HLP (Producida por el

    sincitiotrofoblasto de la placenta, promueve la liplisis

    cidos grasos libres y la absorcin de glucosa materna y la

    gluconeognesis: es "Anti-insulina), Cortisol, Estrgenos,

    Progesterona (que interfieren con la relacin entre insulina y

    glucosa), Destruccin de la Insulina por el Rin y la Placenta

    (3 veces > que en no gestantes). La respuesta normal es el de

    Insulina basal y la post prandial 1.5 a 2.5 veces, si ello no

    ocurre son intolerantes a la Glucosa

    Aumento de Lipolisis: Madre usa grasas para caloras y guarda

    Glucosa para el feto. : Ac. Grasos libres, Oxidacin glucosa,

    Glicolisis en msculo

    Cambios en la Glucognesis: Feto usa ms Alanina y otros

    aminocidos, privando a la madre de sustrato para

    Gluconeognesis

    13

  • Fisiopatologa

    La DMG es causada por una reduccin (en la primera fase) en

    la funcin de las clulas del pancreas que lleva a una

    disfuncin de ellas

    Las alteraciones en la sensibilidad a la insulina llevan a

    alteraciones del metabolismo de las grasas, carbohidratos,

    aminocidos etc.

    Ms evidente entre las 26 y 30 semanas

    Insulinasa: Producto placentario que puede jugar un rol <

    Potencia Diabetgena y mxima secrecin: (1: dbil, 5: fuerte)

    Estradiol 1 26 semanas

    Prolactina 2 10 semanas

    hPL 3 26 semanas

    Cortisol 5 26 semanas

    Progesterona 4 32 semanas

    14

  • Crculo Vicioso?

    15

  • Factores de Bajo Riesgo de DG

    Edad de 25 aos

    No hispanos, afro, nativo americano

    IMC < 25 (peso normal antes del embarazo)

    No intolerancia a la glucosa previa

    No resultados adversos obsttricos anteriores

    No tener historia de diabetes familiar de primer grado

    16

  • Factores de Alto Riesgo de DG

    Historia familiar de Diabetes Mellitus

    Edad > 30 aos

    Obesidad marcada IMC > 30

    Diabetes Gestacional previa

    Antecedentes:

    Obito de causa inexplicable

    Malformaciones Fetales

    Macrosoma previa

    Dao Fetal previo no explicado

    Feto actual crece sobre el percentil 90

    Polihidramnios previo o actual

    Glucosuria primera orina matinal

    Parto prematuro

    ITU recidivante

    HTA

    Moniliasis

    Negros, Hispanos 17

  • Screening para Alto Riesgo

    Tan pronto como sea posible. Repita en 24 a 28 semanas si

    los valores son negativos o antes si aparecen sntomas de

    glucosuria desarrollar

    75 g de glucosa

    15% de los pacientes positivos

    Valor > 10.3: diagnstico de DMG (no necesita TTG)

    24 - 28 semanas de rutina

    No se necesita que sea en ayunas

    Testear en la 1ra CPN si hay historia de DMG previa

    Testear a las 12 - 24 semanas si hay factores de riesgo

    18

  • 19

  • 20

  • 21

  • Cambios Patolgicos en la DG

    Resistencia a la

    Insulina

    Deficiencia de

    Insulina

    22

  • Hiperglicemia materna Hiperglicemia fetal Hiperinsulinemia fetal (promueve el almacenamiento de exceso

    de nutrientes Crecimiento fetal anormal: Macrosoma (> 4000 o P90). Deterioro del Bienestar Fetal. el catabolismo del exceso de nutrientes e el uso de la energa

    Anomalas congnitas (3v >, 50% mueren). 4 a 8 v > riesgo en

    DM Pre existente. 600 v en Sndrome de Regresin Caudal. Defectos ms comunes: SNC, CV, Renal, GI

    Trauma del nacimiento: distocia de hombro y las

    complicaciones relacionadas

    RCIU: Hipoxia crnica (Madres DM Tipo I). Por afeccin vascular

    materna, hiperG materna hiperglicemia fetal del lactato y pO

    2 sangre fetal. Tambin: glicosilacin Hb Hb A1c

    liberacin O2 placenta

    Abortos (3 v >, relacionados con control de la glicemia) HbA1c >

    12. Hasta 40%

    DG: Riesgos Fetales

    23

  • 24

  • Policitemia e Hiperviscocidad (HiperG > eritropoyetina fetal que

    puede llevar a la isquemia tisular e infarto)

    Hipoglicemia Neonatal: Debida a hiperG materna

    hiperinsulinemia. Nace: ya no hay hiperG materna y sigue alta la

    hiperinsulinemia fetal Hipoglicemia fetal: convulsiones, coma,

    dao cerebral

    Hipocalcemia Neonatal

    Hiperbilirrubinemia: 25%. Es por la policitemia

    Cardiomiomatia Hipertrfica y Congestiva

    Sindrome de Distres Respiratorio: 5 6 v > frec. Pulmn inmaduro

    Tolerancia alterada a la glucosa en la infancia

    Aumento de la acidosis

    Hipomagnemesia

    Alteraciones del desarrllo cognitivo

    Natimuertos: sin Tto, > 36 semanas

    DG: Riesgos Neonatales

    25

  • de almacenamiento de

    oxgeno fetal e hipoxia fetal

    episdica

    Hipoxia fetal episdica

    conduce a de catecolaminas

    que provocan:

    Hipertensin fetal

    Remodelacin cardaca y la

    hipertrofia

    El de la eritropoyetina,

    glbulos rojos, hematocrito

    La mala circulacin fetal e

    hiperbilirrubinemia

    26

  • Mortalidad materna 0.5 % es 5 a 10 veces mayor

    Traumas o injurias del parto

    Parto quirrgico: Cesrea

    50% de riesgo de desarrollar de DM Tipo II

    Riesgo de recurrencia de la DMG: 30 - 50%

    Polihidramnios: 10%. > 2000 cc. > riesgo DPP, parto

    prematuro

    Neuropata, Retinopata Diabtica

    Preeclampsia: 2 veces >. 40% HTS Crnica

    ITU (orina rica en glucosa y estasis urinaria)

    Cetoacidosis

    DG: Riesgos Maternos

    27

  • 28

  • 29

  • 30

  • 31

  • 32

  • 33

  • Clasificacin

    1. Diabetes Tipo I (Destruccin clulas B, velocidad de

    destruccin variable). AC. Destruyen 80 90%. Insulina

    insuficiente para la regulacin de la glucosa. Umbral renal 180

    mg/dl. Aumento del Catabolismo (protelisis). Formacin de

    cuerpos cetnicos y > glucosa. Acidosis (disminucin de

    niveles de HCO3 renal). Cetoacidosis (descompensacin en

    DB). Hiperglicemia, Deshidratacin. Desequilibrio electroltico.

    Acidosis Metablica

    Mediada inmunolgicamente

    Ideoptica: cetosis, asociacin Familiar

    2. Diabetes Tipo II: Factor de Resistencia a Insulina. Etiologa no

    bien definida. No factores inmunolgicos. Asociacin familiar.

    Niveles de insulina normales o elevados

    3. Diabetes Gestacional: Se inicia durante la gestacin.

    Asintomtica. Predispone a DBM tipo 2

    34

  • 35

  • Clase Inicio

    Glucosa

    Plasmtica

    en ayunas

    Glucosa 2 hr Post

    Prandial

    Terapia

    A1

    A2

    Gestacional

    Gestacional

    < 105 mg/dl

    > 105 mg/dl

    < 120 mg/dl

    20

    10 a 19

    < 10

    Cualquiera

    Cualquiera

    Cualquiera

    < 10

    10 a 19

    > 20

    Cualquiera

    Cualquiera

    Cualquiera

    No

    No

    Retinopata Benigna

    Nefropata

    Retinopata Proliferativa

    Corazn

    insulina

    insulina

    insulina

    insulina

    insulina

    insulina

    36

  • Recomendaciones

    Hacer screening en la primera visita prenatal en pacientes con factores

    de riesgo usando los criterios de Dx estndar para D/C DM Tipo 2 (B)

    En las mujeres embarazadas que no saben que tienen diabetes, hacer

    screening a las 24 - 28 semanas, con 75 g de glucosa TTOG 2 h y hacer el

    diagnstico de acuerdo a los puntos de corte (B)

    Screening a mujeres con GDM con diabetes persistente en 6 - 12 semanas

    post parto, utilizando el TTOG y el Dx de acuerdo criterios de Dx de las

    embarazadas (E)

    Mujeres con antecedentes de DMG deben hacerse una revisin a lo largo

    de toda su vida para Dx diabetes o prediabetes al menos c/3 aos (B)

    Las mujeres con antecedentes de DMG que se les encuentra prediabetes

    deben recibir Metformina ms intervenciones de cambio de estilo de vida

    para prevenir la diabetes (A)

    37

  • Puntos Clave

    La DMG esta asociada con un modesto incremento en los resultados

    adversos perinatales, un incremento de riesgo de obesidad en sus hijos y

    un alto riesgo de desarrollar subsecuentemente Diabetes Mellitus en la

    madre

    La DMG es tratada con dieta, es decir nutricionalmente, insulina or

    antidiabticos orales pueden ser agregados si los niveles de glucosa

    maternos y/o parmetros de crecimiento fetal indican un suficiente alto

    riesgo de complicaciones perinatales

    Manejo a largo plazo de las madres incluye la evaluacin del nivel y tipo de

    diabetes y de evaluacin de nuesvos estilos de vida y agentes

    farmacolgicos para mujeres con tipo II de diabetes

    Manejo a largo plazo de sus hijos debera enfocar la deteccin y mitigacin

    del desarrollo de la obesidad y de sus complicaciones

    38

  • 39

  • Al menos hay tres causas subyacentes distintas de disfuncin de las clulas

    En primer lugar, algunas mujeres tienen marcadores circulantes inmunolgicos

    (anticuerpos anti - clulas de los islotes anticuerpos a la glutamato

    descarboxilasa) que son diagnosticados en la evolucin de diabetes mellitus tipo

    1. La frecuencia de estos auto - anticuerpos es generalmente < 10% de todas las

    mujeres con GDM y tiende a ser paralela a la prevalencia en DMT1

    En segundo lugar, algunas mujeres tienen variantes genticas que son diagnstico

    de las formas monognicas de diabetes. Estas mujeres pueden tener subtipos de

    diabetes de comienzo en la madurez de los jvenes y de acuerdo a su carga

    gentica materna de DM. Datos sistemticos sobre la frecuencia de estas formas

    monognicas de diabetes en GDM son limitados, pero parecen ser raros,

    representando el 1-5% de los casos

    En tercer lugar, la presencia de los defectos de clulas que subyacen en la GDM

    propios de la obesidad y la resistencia crnica a la insulina. Este grupo representa

    la mayora de los casos de diabetes gestacional, por lo que muchos clnicos ven a

    la GDM como una forma de evolucin de la diabetes mellitus tipo 2

    >ria de las mujeres que hacen DMG tienen una disfuncin crnica y no parecera

    adquirido en el embarazo. La obesidad y la gestacin favoreceran su aparicin.

    40

  • 41

  • Se estima que aproximadamente 10%

    de las mujeres con diabetes

    gestacional tienen diabetes mellitus

    poco despus del parto

    El resto desarrolla diabetes mellitus a

    tasas de 20 - 60% dentro de 5 a 10

    aos

    42

  • Primera visita perinatal o en hospitalizacin

    Revise las pruebas de laboratorio de rutina prenatal

    Exmenes de orina para proteinuria y depuracin de creatinina

    en 24 horas

    Examen basal de retina: Para diabticos tipo 1

    EKG: Para diabticos tipo 1

    Pruebas de funcin tiroidea: Para diabticos tipo 1

    Hemoglobina A1C

    Ecocardiograma fetal para diabticos pregestacional

    43

  • Monitoreo de la Glucosa en la casa

    En ayuno y 2 horas post-prandial

    Valores antes de las comidas slo si se usa escala mvil de

    insulina de accin corta

    Valores tempranos en la maana si se sospecha hipoglucemia

    Asegrese de que el medidor de glucosa este calibrado

  • Indicaciones para la Hospitalizacin

    Nauseas y vomitos persistentes

    Infeccin materna

    Cetoacidosis diabtica

    Mal control o no cumplimiento

    Labor pretermino

    45

  • Diagnstico

    Dos glicemias ayuno > 105 mg/dl

    TTGO 75gr > 140 mg/dl a las 2 horas

    Cualquier glicemia mayor a 200 mg/dl

    Triaje: Primer control Embarazo de glicemia en ayuno

    TTGO 75 gr entre 24 - 28 semanas y repetir

    entre 32 - 34 semanas

    46

  • Manejo:

    Objetivo: optimizar los niveles de glucosa sangunea

    para minimizar los resultados adversos neonatales

    Dieta: tiene lugar

    Autocontrol Domiciliario

    Ejercicios

    Antidiabticos orales

    Terapia Insulnica

    Diabetes Gestational

    47

  • Manejo: Dieta 30 - 35 Kcal. mnimo 1800 Kcal

    IMC > 27: 25 kcal / kg / ideal de peso corporal / d

    IMC 20 26: 30 kcal / kg / ideal de peso corporal / d

    IMC < 20: 38 kcal / kg / ideal de peso corporal / d

    55% Carbohidratos (180 200 g), 25% de Protenas (1.3

    1.5 g /kg), 20 - 30% de grasas

    Ganancia normal de peso 10 - 12 kg (igual que Normal)

    Evitar la cetosis

    Programa de ejercicio liberal para optimizar el control

    de la glucosa sangunea

    Diabetes Gestational

    48

  • Si la hiperglicemia persiste despus de 1 semana de control

    diettico: proceder a usar Insulina

    06 - 14 semanas 0.5 u / kg / day

    14 - 26 semanas 0.7 u / kg / day

    26 - 36 semanas 0.9 u / kg / day

    36 40 semanas 1 u / kg / day

    Diabetes Gestational

    49

  • Control Glicemia

    Glicemia de ayunas: Menor de 105

    Glicemia Post prandial: Menor de 120

    Insulina: 0.3 - 0.5 u / kg

    Insulina repartir 2/3 diurnos y 1/3 nocturnos

    Insulina NPH: 0.1 - 0.3 u / kg

    Insulina Cristalina 2 a 4 U. Pre almuerzo y comida

    Lo ms frecuente: mezcla de NPH y Cristalina dos dosis diarias

    90 % se controlan con Dieta

    Restriccin calrica 33% en obesas

    50

  • Dieta de la ADA Asociacin Americana de Diabetes

    Evitar las comidas abundantes con alto porcentaje de hidratos de

    carbono simples. No sacarosa. Consumir fibra 20 35 gr/d

    Tres comidas pequeas con tres bocadillos son los preferidos

    Los alimentos con bajo ndice glucmico liberan caloras en el

    intestino lentamente y mejorar el control metablico

    El contenido calrico:

    35 caloras / kg de peso corporal ideal ( 15 calorias / IBW libra)

    No menos de 1800 caloras y no ms de 2800

    Paciente Pequeo 1800 caloras

    Paciente Mediano 2200 caloras

    Paciente Grande 2400 caloras

    51

  • Contenido de almidn en los alimentos e Indice Glicmico

    Bajo Cebada 33

    Legumbres / Frejoles 30

    Panes multigranos 40

    Copos de avena 50

    Intermedio Bebidas sin alcohol 60

    Leche descremada 34

    Yogurt 30 - 40

    Helado (bajas grasas) 50

    Alto Papas 85

    Copos de maz 77

    Arroz inflado 85

    Pan Integral 70

    Galletas 81

    Arroz 83

    Foster-Powell K, Holt SHA, and Brand-Miller JC. International table of glycemic index and glycemic load

    values:2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76 (1): 5-56.

    52

  • Control Obsttrico

    Normal hasta las 28 semanas, luego cada 15 das hasta las

    34 semanas y semanal hasta el parto

    Altura uterina, EPF, Volumen LA, Control PA

    Cetonuria (cetosis de ayuno)

    Urocultivo primer trimestre y 28 semanas

    Condicin Fetal desde 34 semanas

    Insulinodependiente: Patologa mdica u obsttrica control

    diario

    Ecografa: medir Circunferencia abdominal > p95

    53

  • Evaluacin del Bienestar Fetal en DG

    Preconcepcion Control Glicmico Materno

    8 - 10 semanas Medicin Ecogrfica de LCR

    16 semanas AFP Materna serica

    20 - 22

    semanas

    ECO de alta resolucin: ecocardiografa fetal en

    mujeres con control subptimo de su diabetes en el

    1er CPN

    24 semanas Medidas del crecimiento fetal por ECO

    28 semanas Autocontrol materno diario de los movimientos

    fetales

    32 semanas Medidas del crecimiento fetal por ECO

    34 semanas Test Biofsicos: NST 2 v/semana o CST semanal o

    PBF semanal

    36 semanas Estimacion del peso fetal por ECO

    37 - 38.5

    semanas

    Amniocentesis & Parto para pacientes con pobre

    control

    38.5 - 40

    semanas

    Parto c/s amniocentesis para pacientes con buen

    control

    NST, CST, Perfil BF Fetal, ECO seriada, Doppler, Crecimiento Fetal,

    Movimientos Fetales

    54

  • Contraindicados

    Sulfonilureas de Primera Generacin: atraviesan la placenta

    Estimulan el crecimiento fetal del pncreas

    Hiperinsulinemia fetal y teratogenicidad

    Antidiabticos orales en la DG

    55

  • Metformina

    Disminuye incidencia ictericia neonatal y de la morbilidad

    infantil

    Incidencia de GEG fue de 15% en el grupo de metformina, 27%

    entre los usuarios glibenclamida, 33% para la terapia

    combinada, y 41% de insulina

    Tratamiento de primera lnea para las mujeres con SOP (PCOS)

    No teratognico

    Reduce el riesgo de aborto en el primer trimestre

    Uso preoeconcepcional reduce la incidencia de Diabetes

    Gestacional de 31 % a 3 %

    No hay resultados adversos del embarazo con el uso de

    metformina

    56

  • Cuidados Anteparto de la DG

    Asesoramiento diettico

    Monitorizacin de la glucosa (5 veces por da)

    Terapia de insulina si es necesario (Agentes Hipoglucemiantes

    orales)

    Frecuente control de la glucosa

    Monitoreo Ecogrfico del crecimiento fetal

    Modo de Parto: Basado en los problemas obsttricos

    Momento de la entrega: Basada en el control de la glucosa

    57

  • Manejo Intraparto

    Requisitos absolutos:

    Dextrosa contenida en lquidos por va intravenosa

    Insulina

    Control de la glucosa por hora

    Monitoreo Continuo de la frecuencia cardaca fetal

    Tocodinanometra continua

    Manejo de la labor en forma normal. Va ms disponible

    58

  • Indicaciones para el parto en gestantes

    diabticas

    Tipo Indicacin

    Fetal

    NST no reactivo + CST Reactivo

    Madurez fetal ms evidencia sonogrfica de

    arresto en el crecimiento fetal

    Disminucin del crecimiento fetal, disminucin

    del lquido amnitico y 40 - 41 semanas

    Materna

    Preeclampsia Severa

    Preeclampsia leve , feto maduro

    Falla renal marcada

    Obsttrica Labor Pretermino con toclisis fallada, feto

    maduro, cervix inducible

    59

  • Interrupcin del Embarazo

    Control metablico adecuado: 40 - 41 sem

    Tratamiento Insulina: Hospitalizar 38 semanas

    Macrosoma, alteracin metablica 37 - 38 semanas

    (madurez fetal)

    Va de Parto: Cesrea si peso mayor de 4.5 kg

    Puerperio normal sin restriccin de Carbohidratos

    TTGO: Entre 6a y 7a. Semana Post parto

    60

  • Diabetes Gestacional c / insulina

    (induccin)

    Suspender Insulina matinal

    Glicemia basal y c/2hrs. (70 - 120 mg/dl)

    Dextrosa 5% a 125 cc/hr

    Insulina 5U/500 cc en Suero fisiolgico a 0.25 U/hr

    Suspender Insulina Post parto

    Post parto inmediato: Dextrosa 5% 125 a 200 cc/hr.

    Post parto: Rgimen blando 50 - 60 gr. de carbohidratos

    cada 6 horas. Insulina Post parto si glicemia es mayor a 180

    mg/dl.

    61

  • Cesrea electiva

    A primera hora y suspender Insulina matinal

    Dextrosa 5% a 125 cc / hr

    Infusin continua de Insulina 0.5 - 1 U / hr

    Mantener glicemia 70 a 120 mg / dl

    Post parto sin Insulina, slo Dextrosa 5% 125 cc / hr por 24 horas

    Rgimen comn lquido a las 12 horas post parto

    Glicemia capilar (hipoglicemia post parto)

    La noche antes de la ciruga: Tomar la dosis completa de NPH o

    gliburida. No aplicarse la dosis matinal de insulina o gliburida

    62

  • Manejo en el Post - Parto

    Dosis usual de insulina es 30 50% menor

    Solo usar Monitoreos de glicemia para pacientes con DG

    Objetivo en posparto inmediato: tener glicemia digital < 200

    Para DG: repetir TTG 75 g a las 6 semanas despus del parto

    Para DG: Riesgo a largo plazo de la DM

    Anticoncepcin

    Acido Flico: 0.4 mg. ARO: 4 mg/d )disminuir riesgo de Defectos

    del Tubo Neural)

    Aumento del riesgo de la obesidad y de tolerancia anormal a la

    glucosa

    17 - 63 % de riesgo de hacer diabetes no gestacional dentro de 5

    a 16 aos despus de la DG, segn los factores de riesgo

    63

  • 64

  • Revisin de los medicamentos para la

    Diabetes despus del parto

    Ajustar la insulina en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 pre

    gestacional despus del parto de acuerdo con las mltiples

    pruebas diarias de glucosa en sangre para mantener la

    hemoglobina A1c a < 7%

    Detener la insulina en mujeres con DG despus del parto y

    monitorear los niveles de glucosa

    Considerar la reinstauracin de la medicacin oral para la

    diabetes en las mujeres con diabetes tipo 2 despus del parto

    a menos que el paciente est amamantando

    65

  • Consejera a todas las MEF Obesas sobre la

    necesidad de Planificacin Familiar

    Asegurar el control de natalidad efectivo en todo momento, a

    menos que el paciente est tratando de concebir y se encuentra

    en un buen control diabtico

    Aconsejar a las mujeres con diabetes tipo 1 o tipo 2 de los

    riesgos de malformacin fetal en los embarazos no planificados

    y con mal control metablico

    Lograr el ayuno niveles de glucosa de 70 a 100 mg / dl y los

    niveles postprandiales (2 horas) de < 140 mg / dl en las mujeres

    diabticas que planeen quedar embarazadas

    66

  • Consejera a todas las mujeres obesas en edad

    frtil sobre la necesidad de la dieta y el ejercicio

    para disminuir el riesgo de DG

    Proporcionar asesoramiento nutricional para las MEF obesas,

    en consonancia con la Asociacin Americana de Diabetes

    Recomendar a las mujeres obesas que estn planeando

    quedarse embarazadas o ya esten embarazadas:

    Restriccin 30% - 33% de caloras si su IMC > 30

    Limitar consumo de grasas a < 30% de las caloras

    Incrementar su actividad fsica, tal como se recomienda fuera

    embarazo, o un programa de ejercicio moderado si la mujer ya

    est embarazada

    67

  • Plan para las gestaciones futuras

    Recomendar un mtodo anticonceptivo inmediatamente

    despus del parto

    Haga hincapi en la importancia del asesoramiento

    previo a la concepcin

    68

  • Despus del parto, clasificar a los pacientes

    que se encontraron diabticos durante el

    embarazo y hacer planes de seguimiento a

    largo plazo

    Continuar en casa el monitoreo de la glucosa en las mujeres

    que resultaron con DG por lo menos 6 semanas despus del

    parto para determinar si tienen una diabetes tipo 1 o 2, o si su

    hiperglucemia se resolvi

    Asesorar a los pacientes con DG en la necesidad a largo

    plazo para descartar diabetes

    Recomendar nutricin y ejercicios consistentes con la

    Asociacin Americana de Diabetes para los pacientes con

    hiperglucemia transitoria del embarazo y despus del parto

    69

  • 70

  • Diabet Med. 2011 Aug;28(8):900-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-

    5491.2011.03291.x. A meta - analysis of the association between pre-

    eclampsia and childhood-onset Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Henry

    EB, Patterson CC, Cardwell CR.

    Data were available from 16 studies including 8315 children with Type

    1 diabetes

    Overall, there was little evidence of an increase in

    the risk of Type 1 diabetes in children born to

    mothers who had pre-eclampsia

    during pregnancy (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.27; P = 0.17)

    This association did not vary much between studies (I(2) = 28%, P for

    heterogeneity =0.14). The association was similar in three cohort

    studies (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.77-1.44; P = 0.75) and in seven studies with

    a low risk of bias (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.91-1.40; P = 0.27), but was more

    marked in 13 studies which ascertained pre-eclampsia from obstetrical

    records or birth registry data (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36; P = 0.02)

    71

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Henry EB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Henry EB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Henry EB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Patterson CC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Patterson CC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Patterson CC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21418091

  • Conclusions

    This analysis demonstrates little evidence of any substantial

    increase in childhood Type 1 diabetes risk after pregnancy

    complicated by pre - eclampsia

    72

  • Diabetologia. 2008 May;51(5):726-35. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-0941-z.

    Epub 2008 Feb 22. Caesarean section is associated with an increased

    risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of

    observational studies. Cardwell CR, Stene LC,

    Twenty studies were identified. Overall, there was a significant

    increase in the risk of type 1 diabetes in children born by Caesarean

    section (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.15-1.32, p < 0.001)

    There was little evidence of heterogeneity between studies (p = 0.54).

    Seventeen authors provided raw data or adjusted estimates to facilitate

    adjustments for potential confounders

    In these studies, there was evidence of an increase in diabetes risk

    with greater birth weight, shorter gestation and greater maternal age

    The increased risk of type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section was little

    altered after adjustment for gestational age, birth weight, maternal age,

    birth order, breast-feeding and maternal diabetes (adjusted OR 1.19,

    95% CI 1.04-1.36, p = 0.01)

    73

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Cardwell CR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Stene LC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Stene LC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Stene LC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18292986

  • Conclusions

    This analysis demonstrates a 20% increase in the risk of childhood-

    onset type 1 diabetes after Caesarean section delivery that cannot

    be explained by known confounders

    74

  • NICE clinical guidelines Issued: March 2008 (last modified: July 2008) CG63

    Diabetes in pregnancy: Management of diabetes and its complications from

    pre - conception to the postnatal period

    Diabetes is a disorder of carbohydrate metabolism that requires immediate

    changes in lifestyle

    In its chronic forms, diabetes is associated with long-term vascular

    complications, including retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and vascular

    disease

    650,000 women give birth in England and Wales each year, and 2 5% of

    pregnancies involve women with diabetes

    Approximately 87.5% of pregnancies complicated by diabetes are

    estimated to be due to gestational diabetes (which may or may not resolve

    after pregnancy), with 7.5% being due to type 1 diabetes and the remaining

    5% being due to type 2 diabetes

    75

  • The prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes is increasing.

    In particular, type 2 diabetes is increasing in certain minority

    ethnic groups (including people of African, black Caribbean, South

    Asian, Middle Eastern and Chinese family origin)

    Diabetes in pregnancy is associated with risks to the woman and

    to the developing fetus

    Miscarriage, pre - eclampsia and preterm labour are more common

    in women with pre-existing diabetes

    In addition, diabetic retinopathy can worsen rapidly during

    pregnancy

    Stillbirth, congenital malformations, macrosomia, birth injury,

    perinatal mortality and postnatal adaptation problems (such as

    hypoglycaemia) are more common in babies born to women with

    pre-existing diabetes

    76

  • Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD006674. doi:

    10.1002/14651858.CD006674.pub2.. Dietary advice in pregnancy for preventing

    gestational diabetes mellitus. Tieu J, Crowther CA, Middleton P.

    Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a form of diabetes that occurs

    during pregnancy which can result in significant adverse outcomes for mother

    and child both in the short and long term. The potential for adverse outcomes, in

    addition to the increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes worldwide,

    demonstrates the need to assess strategies, such as dietary advice, that might

    prevent gestational diabetes.

    Three trials (107 women) were included in the review. One trial (25 pregnant

    women) analysed high - fibre diets with no included outcomes showing

    statistically significant differences. Two trials (82 pregnant women) assessed low

    glycaemic index (LGI) versus high glycaemic index diets for pregnant women.

    Women on the LGI diet had fewer large for gestational age infants (one trial;

    relative risk (RR) 0.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.69), infants with

    lower ponderal indexes (two trials; weighted mean difference (WMD) -0.18, 95%

    CI -0.32 to -0.04, random-effects analysis) and lower maternal fasting glucose

    levels (two trials; WMD -0.28 mmol/L 95% CI -0.54 to -0.02, random-effects model).

    Results for women on the LGI diet on neonatal birth weight were not conclusive

    under a random-effects model (two trials; WMD -527.64 g, 95% CI -1119.20 to

    63.92); however, on a fixed-effect model, women on the LGI diet gave birth to

    lighter babies (two trials; WMD -445.55 g, 95% CI -634.16 to -256.95). High

    heterogeneity was observed between the trials in most results and both were

    relatively small trials. One of these trials also included a standard exercise

    regimen for all participants.

    77

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tieu J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tieu J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tieu J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=18425961

  • Conclusions

    While a low glycaemic index diet was seen to be beneficial for

    some outcomes for both mother and child, results from the

    review were inconclusive

    Further trials with large sample sizes and longer follow up are

    required to make more definitive conclusions

    No conclusions could be drawn from the high - fibre versus

    control - diet comparison since the trial involved did not report

    on many of the outcomes we prespecified

    78

  • BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3:S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-

    S3-S2. Effect of screening and management of diabetes during pregnancy on

    stillbirths. Syed M, Javed H, Yakoob MY, Bhutta ZA.

    A total of 70 studies were selected for data extraction including fourteen intervention

    studies and fifty six observational studies. No randomized controlled trials were

    identified evaluating early detection of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy versus standard

    screening (glucose challenge test between 24th to 28th week of gestation)

    in pregnancy.

    Intensive management of gestational diabetes (including specialized dietary advice,

    increased monitoring and tailored dietary therapy) during pregnancy (3 studies: 3791

    participants) versus conventional management (dietary advice and insulin as required)

    was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of stillbirths (RR 0.20; 95%

    CI: 0.03-1.10) ('moderate' quality evidence)

    Optimal control of serum blood glucose versus sub-optimal control was associated

    with a significant reduction in the risk of perinatal mortality (2 studies, 5286

    participants: RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.25- 0.63), but not stillbirths (3 studies, 2469

    participants: RR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.14-1.88). Preconception care of diabetes (information

    about need for optimization of glycemic control before pregnancy, assessment

    of diabetes complications, review of dietary habits, intensification of capillary blood

    glucose self-monitoring and optimization of insulin therapy) versus none (3 studies: 910

    participants) was associated with a reduction in perinatal mortality (RR = 0.29, 95% CI

    0.14 -0.60). Using the Delphi process for estimating effect size of

    optimal diabetes recognition and management yielded a median effect size of 10%

    reduction in stillbirths

    79

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Syed M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Syed M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Syed M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Javed H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Javed H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Javed H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21501437

  • Conclusions

    Diabetes, especially pre-gestational diabetes with its attendant

    vascular complications, is a significant risk factor for stillbirth and

    perinatal death

    Our review highlights the fact that very few studies of adequate

    quality are available that can provide estimates of the effect of

    screening for aid management of diabetes in pregnancy on stillbirth

    risk

    Using the Delphi process we recommend a conservative 10%

    reduction in the risk of stillbirths, as a point estimate for inclusion

    in the LiST.

    80

  • BMJ. 2010 Apr 1;340:c1395. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1395. Effects of treatment in

    women with gestational diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-

    analysis. Horvath K, Koch K, Jeitler K, Matyas E, Bender R, Bastian H, Lange

    S, Siebenhofer A.

    Five randomised controlled trials matched the inclusion criteria for specific

    versus usual treatment. All studies used a two step approach with a 50 g

    glucose challenge test or screening for risk factors, or both, and a

    subsequent 75 g or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test

    Meta-analyses did not show significant differences for most single end

    points judged to be of direct clinical importance

    In women specifically treated for gestational diabetes, shoulder dystocia

    was significantly less common (odds ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.21

    to 0.75), and one randomised controlled trial reported a significant reduction

    of pre-eclampsia (2.5 v 5.5%, P=0.02)

    For the surrogate end point of large for gestational age infants, the odds

    ratio was 0.48 (0.38 to 0.62). In the 13 randomised controlled trials of

    different intensities of specific treatments, meta-analysis showed a

    significant reduction of shoulder dystocia in women with more intensive

    treatment (0.31, 0.14 to 0.70).

    81

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horvath K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horvath K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horvath K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koch K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koch K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koch K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jeitler K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jeitler K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Jeitler K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Matyas E[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Matyas E[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Matyas E[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bender R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bender R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bender R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bastian H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bastian H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bastian H[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lange S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lange S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Lange S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Siebenhofer A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Siebenhofer A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Siebenhofer A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20360215

  • Conclusions

    Treatment for gestational diabetes, consisting of treatment to

    lower blood glucose concentration alone or with special

    obstetric care, seems to lower the risk for some perinatal

    complications

    Decisions regarding treatment should take into account that the

    evidence of benefit is derived from trials for which women were

    selected with a two step strategy (glucose challenge

    test/screening for risk factors and oral glucose tolerance test)

    82

  • Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jul 11;7:CD009021. doi:

    10.1002/14651858.CD009021.pub2. Exercise for pregnant women for preventing

    gestational diabetes mellitus. Han S, Middleton P, Crowther CA.

    We included five trials with a total of 1115 women and their babies (922 women and their

    babies contributed outcome data). Four of the five included trials had small sample sizes

    with one large trial that recruited 855 women and babies. All five included trials had a

    moderate risk of bias. When comparing women receiving additional exercise interventions

    with those having routine antenatal care, there was no significant difference in GDM

    incidence (three trials, 826 women, risk ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to

    1.84), caesarean section (two trials, 934 women, RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.84) or operative

    vaginal birth (two trials, 934 women, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.17)

    No trial reported the infant primary outcomes prespecified in the review. None of the five

    included trials found significant differences in insulin sensitivity. Evidence from one single

    large trial suggested no significant difference in the incidence of

    developing pregnancy hyperglycaemia not meeting GDM diagnostic criteria, pre-eclampsia or

    admission to neonatal ward between the two study groups

    Babies born to women receiving exercise interventions had a non-significant trend to a lower

    ponderal index (mean difference (MD) -0.08 gram x 100 m(3), 95% CI -0.18 to 0.02, one trial,

    84 infants)

    No significant differences were seen between the two study groups for the outcomes of birth

    weight (two trials, 167 infants, MD -102.87 grams, 95% CI -235.34 to 29.60), macrosomia (two

    trials, 934 infants, RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.22), or small-for-gestational age (one trial, 84

    infants, RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.25 to 4.40) or gestational age at birth (two trials, 167 infants, MD -

    0.04 weeks, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.29) or Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (two trials,

    919 infants, RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.65).

    None of the trials reported long-term outcomes for women and their babies

    No information was available on health services costs.

    83

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han S[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Crowther CA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22786521

  • Conclusions

    There is limited randomised controlled trial evidence available on the

    effect of exercise during pregnancy for preventing pregnancy glucose

    intolerance or GDM

    Results from three randomised trials with moderate risk of bias

    suggested no significant difference in GDM incidence between women

    receiving an additional exercise intervention and routine care

    Based on the limited data currently available, conclusive evidence is not

    available to guide practice

    84

  • J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Oct;20(10):1551-63. doi:

    10.1089/jwh.2010.2703. Epub 2011 Aug 12. Interventions for preventing

    gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta - analysis.

    Oostdam N, van Poppel MN, Wouters MG, van Mechelen W.

    Nineteen studies evaluating six types of interventions were included.

    Dietary counseling significantly reduced GDM incidence compared to

    standard care

    None of the interventions was effective in lowering maternal fasting blood

    glucose

    Low glycemic index (LGI) diet advice and an exercise program significantly

    reduced the risk of macrosomia

    The quality of evidence for these outcomes was low

    85

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Oostdam N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Oostdam N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Oostdam N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Poppel MN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Poppel MN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Poppel MN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Poppel MN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Poppel MN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wouters MG[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wouters MG[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wouters MG[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Mechelen W[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Mechelen W[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Mechelen W[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Mechelen W[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Mechelen W[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21838525

  • Conclusions

    The results indicate that there may be some benefits of dietary

    counseling, an LGI diet advice, or an exercise program

    However, better-designed studies are required to generate higher

    quality evidence

    At the moment, no strong conclusions can be drawn with regard to

    the best intervention for prevention of GDM

    86

  • Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Jun;55(6):1026-39. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.12.036.

    Epub 2010 Mar 25. Kidney disease after preeclampsia: a systematic review

    and meta-analysis. McDonald SD, Han Z, Walsh MW, Gerstein

    HC, Devereaux PJ.

    7 cohort studies were included, involving 273 patients with preeclampsia

    and 333 patients with uncomplicated pregnancies

    At a weighted mean of 7.1 years postpartum, 31% of women with a history

    of preeclampsia had microalbuminuria compared with 7% of women with

    uncomplicated pregnancies, a 4 - fold increased risk, whereas women with

    severe preeclampsia had an 8 - fold increase

    Serum creatinine level and estimated glomerular filtration rate were not

    significantly different at follow-up in women with and without

    preeclampsia, making it unlikely that they would have been different at

    baseline

    87

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McDonald SD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McDonald SD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McDonald SD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han Z[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han Z[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Han Z[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Walsh MW[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Walsh MW[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Walsh MW[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gerstein HC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gerstein HC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gerstein HC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Devereaux PJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Devereaux PJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Devereaux PJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20346562

  • Conclusion

    Women with a history of preeclampsia have an increased risk of

    microalbuminuria with a prevalence similar to the published

    prevalence in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus

    Further research is needed to determine whether the increased risk

    of microalbuminuria persists after adjustment for a thorough set of

    confounding factors in larger populations and the mechanisms

    underlying this association

    88

  • Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012 Mar;28(3):252-7. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.1304.

    Major congenital malformations in women with

    gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Balsells M, Garca-Patterson A, Gich I, Corcoy R.

    Two case control and 15 cohort studies were selected out of 3488

    retrieved abstracts

    A higher risk of major congenital malformations was observed in

    offspring of women with gestational diabetes with the following relative

    risk (RR)/odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI): RR 1.16

    (1.07-1.25) in cohort studies and OR 1.4 (1.22-1.62) in case control

    studies

    Risk of major congenital malformations was much higher in offspring of

    women with PGDM than in those of the reference group: RR 2.66 (2.04-

    3.47) in cohort studies and OR 4.7 (3.01-6.95) in the single case control

    study providing information.

    89

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=22052679

  • Conclusion

    There is a slightly higher risk of major congenital malformations

    in women with gestational diabetes than in the reference group

    The contribution of women with overt hyperglycemia and other

    factors could not be ascertained

    This risk, however, is much lower than in women with

    pregestational diabetes

    90

  • Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62233-7.

    Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review

    and meta-analysis. Flenady V, Koopmans L, Middleton P, Fren JF, Smith

    GC, Gibbons K, Coory M, Gordon A, Ellwood D, McIntyre HD, Fretts R, Ezzati M.

    Of 6963 studies initially identified, 96 population-based studies were included.

    Maternal overweight and obesity (body-mass index >25 kg/m(2)) was the highest

    ranking modifiable risk factor, with PARs of 8-18% across the five countries and

    contributing to around 8000 stillbirths (22 weeks' gestation) annually across all

    high-income countries

    Advanced maternal age (>35 years) and maternal smoking yielded PARs of 7-11%

    and 4-7%, respectively, and each year contribute to more than 4200 and 2800

    stillbirths, respectively, across all high-income countries

    In disadvantaged populations maternal smoking could contribute to 20% of

    stillbirths

    Primiparity contributes to around 15% of stillbirths

    Of the pregnancy disorders, small size for gestational age and abruption are the

    highest PARs (23% and 15%, respectively), which highlights the notable role of

    placental pathology in stillbirth

    Pre-existing diabetes and hypertension remain important contributors to stillbirth

    in such countries

    91

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Flenady V[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Flenady V[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Flenady V[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koopmans L[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koopmans L[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Koopmans L[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Middleton P[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fr%C3%B8en JF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fr%C3%B8en JF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fr%C3%B8en JF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Smith GC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Smith GC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Smith GC[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gibbons K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gibbons K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gibbons K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Coory M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Coory M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Coory M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gordon A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gordon A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gordon A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ellwood D[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ellwood D[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ellwood D[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McIntyre HD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McIntyre HD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=McIntyre HD[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fretts R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fretts R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fretts R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ezzati M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ezzati M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ezzati M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=21496916

  • J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Nov;94(11):4284-91. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-

    1231. Epub 2009 Oct 6. Maternal and fetal outcome in women with type

    2 versus type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and

    metaanalysis. Balsells M, Garca-Patterson A, Gich I, Corcoy R.

    Thirty-three studies qualified for inclusion of 3743 citations retrieved

    Women with type 2 DM had lower glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at

    booking and throughout pregnancy but a higher risk of perinatal

    mortality [odds ratio (OR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15-1.96]

    without significant differences in the rates of major congenital

    malformations, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality

    As to secondary outcomes, women with type 2 DM had less diabetic

    ketoacidosis (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.34) and cesarean section (OR

    0.80, 95% CI 0.59-0.94) without differences in other outcomes

    92

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Balsells M[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Garc%C3%ADa-Patterson A[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Gich I[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Corcoy R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19808847

  • Conclusions

    Despite a milder glycemic disturbance, women with type 2 DM had

    no better perinatal outcomes than those with type 1, indicating that

    type 2 DM in pregnancy is a serious condition

    93

  • Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Nov;203(5):457.e1-9. doi:

    10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.044. Epub 2010 Aug 24. Oral hypoglycemic

    agents vs insulin in management of gestational diabetes: a systematic

    review and metaanalysis. Dhulkotia JS, Ola B, Fraser R, Farrell T.

    Six studies comprising 1388 subjects were analyzed

    No significant differences were found in maternal fasting (weighted

    mean difference [WMD], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-3.43) or

    postprandial (WMD, 0.80; 95% CI, -3.26 to 4.87) glycemic control

    Use of oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) was not associated with risk of

    neonatal hypoglycemia (odds ratio [OR], 1.59; 95% CI, 0.70-3.62),

    increased birthweight (WMD, 56.11; 95% CI, -42.62 to 154.84), incidence

    of caesarean section (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, -0.68 to 1.22), or incidence of

    large-for-gestational-age babies (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.61-1.68).

    94

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Dhulkotia JS[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Dhulkotia JS[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Dhulkotia JS[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ola B[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ola B[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Ola B[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fraser R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fraser R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Fraser R[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Farrell T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Farrell T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Farrell T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20739011

  • Conclusion

    Our study demonstrates that there are no differences in glycemic

    control or pregnancy outcomes when OHAs were compared with

    insulin

    95

  • Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):223-9. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1368. Epub 2010

    Sep 27. Physical activity before and during pregnancy and risk of

    gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. Tobias DK, Zhang C, van

    Dam RM, Bowers K, Hu FB.

    Our search identified seven pre - pregnancy and five

    early pregnancy studies, including five prospective cohorts, two

    retrospective case-control studies, and two cross-sectional study

    designs

    Pre - pregnancy physical activity was assessed in 34,929 total

    participants, which included 2,813 cases of GDM, giving a pooled odds

    ratio (OR) of 0.45 (95% CI 0.28-0.75) when the highest versus lowest

    categories were compared

    Exercise in early pregnancy was assessed in 4,401 total participants,

    which included 361 cases of GDM, and was also significantly protective

    (0.76 [95% CI 0.70-0.83]).

    96

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tobias DK[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tobias DK[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tobias DK[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Zhang C[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Zhang C[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Zhang C[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Dam RM[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Dam RM[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Dam RM[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Dam RM[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=van Dam RM[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bowers K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bowers K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bowers K[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Hu FB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Hu FB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Hu FB[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20876206

  • Conclusions

    Higher levels of physical activity before pregnancy or in

    early pregnancy are associated with a significantly lower risk of

    developing GDM

    97

  • BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Oct 14;10:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-

    10-63. Preconception care for diabetic women for improving maternal

    and fetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Wahabi

    HA, Alzeidan RA, Bawazeer GA, Alansari LA, Esmaeil SA.

    Meta - analysis suggested that preconception care is effective in

    reducing congenital malformation, RR 0.25 (95% CI 0.15-0.42), NNT17

    (95% CI 14-24), preterm delivery, RR 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.90), NNT = 8

    (95% CI 5-23) and perinatal mortality RR 0.35 (95% CI 0.15-0.82), NNT =

    32 (95% CI 19-109)

    Preconception care lowers HbA1c in the first trimester of pregnancy by

    an average of 2.43% (95% CI 2.27-2.58)

    Women who received preconception care booked earlier for antenatal

    care by an average of 1.32 weeks (95% CI 1.23-1.40).

    98

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wahabi HA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wahabi HA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Wahabi HA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alzeidan RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alzeidan RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alzeidan RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bawazeer GA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bawazeer GA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bawazeer GA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alansari LA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alansari LA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alansari LA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Esmaeil SA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Esmaeil SA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Esmaeil SA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20946676

  • Conclusion

    Preconception care is effective in reducing diabetes related

    congenital malformations, preterm delivery and maternal

    hyperglycemia in the first trimester of pregnancy

    99

  • Obes Rev. 2009 Mar;10(2):194-203. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2008.00541.x.

    Epub 2008 Nov 24. Prepregnancy BMI and the risk of gestational diabetes: a

    systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Torloni MR, Betrn

    AP, Horta BL, Nakamura MU, Atallah AN, Moron AF, Valente O.

    The objective of this study is to assess and quantify the risk for

    gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to prepregnancy maternal body mass

    index (BMI)

    The design is a systematic review of observational studies published in the last 30

    years. Four electronic databases were searched for publications (1977-2007)

    BMI was elected as the only measure of obesity, and all diagnostic criteria for GDM

    were accepted. Studies with selective screening for GDM were excluded. There were

    no language restrictions. The methodological quality of primary studies was assessed.

    Some 1745 citations were screened, and 70 studies (two unpublished) involving 671

    945 women were included (59 cohorts and 11 case-controls). Most studies were of

    high or medium quality. Compared with women with a normal BMI, the unadjusted

    pooled odds ratio (OR) of an underweight woman developing GDM was 0.75 (95%

    confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.82). The OR for overweight, moderately obese and

    morbidly obese women were 1.97 (95% CI 1.77 to 2.19), 3.01 (95% CI 2.34 to 3.87) and

    5.55 (95% CI 4.27 to 7.21) respectively

    For every 1 kg m(-2) increase in BMI, the prevalence of GDM increased by 0.92% (95%

    CI 0.73 to 1.10). The risk of GDM is positively associated with prepregnancy BMI. This

    information is important when counselling women planning a pregnancy.

    100

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Torloni MR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Torloni MR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Torloni MR[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Betr%C3%A1n AP[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Betr%C3%A1n AP[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Betr%C3%A1n AP[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horta BL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horta BL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Horta BL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Nakamura MU[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Nakamura MU[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Nakamura MU[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Atallah AN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Atallah AN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Atallah AN[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Moron AF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Moron AF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Moron AF[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Valente O[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Valente O[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Valente O[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19055539

  • BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009 May 7;9 Suppl 1:S5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-

    9-S1-S5. Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring

    during pregnancy and labour. Haws RA, Yakoob MY, Soomro T, Menezes

    EV, Darmstadt GL, Bhutta ZA.

    We found a dearth of rigorous evidence of direct impact of any of these

    screening procedures and interventions on stillbirth incidence

    Observational studies testing some interventions, including fetal movement

    monitoring and Doppler monitoring, showed some evidence of impact on

    stillbirths in selected high-risk populations, but require larger rigourous

    trials to confirm impact

    Other interventions, such as amniotic fluid assessment for oligohydramnios,

    appear predictive of stillbirth risk, but studies are lacking which assess the

    impact on perinatal mortality of subsequent intervention based on test

    findings

    Few rigorous studies of cardiotocography have reported stillbirth outcomes,

    but steep declines in stillbirth rates have been observed in high-income

    settings such as the U.S., where cardiotocography is used in conjunction

    with Caesarean section for fetal distress

    101

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Haws RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Haws RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Haws RA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Yakoob MY[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Soomro T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Soomro T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Soomro T[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Menezes EV[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Menezes EV[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Menezes EV[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Darmstadt GL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Darmstadt GL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Darmstadt GL[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Bhutta ZA[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19426468

  • Conclusion

    There are numerous research gaps and large, adequately controlled

    trials are still needed for most of the interventions we considered

    The impact of monitoring interventions on stillbirth relies on use of

    effective and timely intervention should problems be detected.

    Numerous studies indicated that positive tests were associated with

    increased perinatal mortality, but while some tests had good sensitivity

    in detecting distress, false-positive rates were high for most tests, and

    questions remain about optimal timing, frequency, and implications of

    testing

    Few studies included assessments of impact of subsequent intervention

    needed before recommending particular monitoring strategies as a

    means to decrease stillbirth incidence

    In high-income countries such as the US, observational evidence

    suggests that widespread use of cardiotocography with Caesarean

    section for fetal distress has led to significant declines in stillbirth

    rates

    Efforts to increase availability of Caesarean section in low-/middle-

    income countries should be coupled with intrapartum monitoring

    technologies where resources and provider skills permit

    102

  • Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 8;(3):CD003395. doi:

    10.1002/14651858.CD003395.pub2. Treatments for gestational diabetes. Alwan

    N, Tuffnell DJ, West J.

    Eight randomised controlled trials (1418 women) were included.

    Caesarean section rate was not significantly different when comparing any

    specific treatment with routine antenatal care (ANC) including data from five

    trials with 1255 participants (risk ratio (RR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI)

    0.80 to 1.12).

    However, when comparing oral hypoglycaemics with insulin as treatment for

    GDM, there was a significant reduction (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.77, two trials,

    90 participants).

    There was a reduction in the risk of pre-eclampsia with intensive treatment

    (including dietary advice and insulin) compared to routine ANC (RR 0.65, 95% CI

    0.48 to 0.88, one trial, 1000 participants).

    More women had their labours induced when given specific treatment compared

    to routine ANC (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.57, two trials, 1068 participants).

    103

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alwan N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alwan N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Alwan N[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tuffnell DJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tuffnell DJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=Tuffnell DJ[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=West J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=West J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed?term=West J[Author]&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=19588341

  • The composite outcome of perinatal morbidity (death, shoulder

    dystocia, bone fracture and nerve palsy) was significantly reduced for

    those receiving intensive treatment for mild GDM compared to routine

    ANC (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.73, one trial, 1030 infants)

    There was a reduction in the proportion of infants weighing more than

    4000 grams (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.63, one trial, 1030 infants) and

    the proportion of infants weighing greater than the 90th birth centile

    (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.99, three trials, 223 infants) of mothers

    receiving specific treatment for GDM compared to routine ANC

    However, there was no statistically significant difference in this

    proportion between infants of mothers receiving oral drugs compared to

    insulin as treatment for GDM

    104

  • Conclusions

    S