26
Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central Appalachia: the Design of Stable and Sustainable Landforms Leslie C. Hopkinson John D. Quaranta Nathan DePriest WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central Appalachia: the Design of Stable

and Sustainable Landforms

Leslie C. Hopkinson John D. Quaranta Nathan DePriest

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering

Page 2: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

AOC Variance Valley-Fill Design Conceptual Geomorphic Reclamation Design

Can we use Geomorphic Landform Design principles to rethink valley fill design?

Page 3: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Can we use Geomorphic Landform Design principles to rethink valley fill design?

Traditional

GLD

Stability Short-term stability with long-term erosion Dynamic equilibrium

Appearance Geometric Natural appearance

Maintenance Continuous maintenance Suggested reduction in maintenance

Page 4: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Objectives: Can stable landforms be designed such that streams are mitigated or preserved on site, while maintaining the same overall footprint as conventional reclamation?

1. Obtain and quantify characteristics of mature

landforms in West Virginia.

2. Generate geomorphic valley fill designs, using data specific to Central Appalachia mining regions.

Page 5: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Drainage density Ridge to head of

channel distance

Main channel slope Channel characteristics

• Bankfull width • W:D • Sinuosity

Bed particle size distribution Vegetation zones Subridge angle Baseflow (where applicable)

This project will define the reference landform characteristics necessary for design.

Page 6: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Task 1: Obtain and quantify characteristics of mature landforms in West Virginia.

Two Field Site Locations Twin Falls State Park

• Dixon watershed • Jackson watershed

Cabwaylingo State Forest • Wiley watershed

Page 7: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Ridge to head of channel distance: Head of channel locations and ridge points were surveyed with a Topcon GPS.

Page 8: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Field data were collected at 8 heads of channel in Dixon, 11 in Jackson, and 3 in Wiley.

Dixon

Jackson

Wiley

Page 9: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Channel/valley characteristics were defined for each site.

• Channel slope • Channel cross-section • Sinuosity

• Discharge • Grain size • Vegetation

Page 10: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Dixon Watershed

R

D

L

U D4

Page 11: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Grain size: The majority of bed material was sand and gravel.

0

25

50

75

100

Sand Gravel Cobble Boulder

%

Dixon

Jackson

Wiley

Site D50 (mm) Dixon 2.8

Jackson 3.7 Wiley 0.8

Page 12: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

D1 D3 D4 D5 D5A D6 D7 J1 J2 J3 J3A J5 J6 J7 J8 J9 J10 J11 W1 W2 W3

RTHO

C (m

) Ridge to head of channel (RTHOC) distance was calculated as the distance from head of channel to associated ridge point.

Wiley Jackson Dixon

Page 13: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

The majority of slopes were in the range of 20-40%.

Dixon

Jackson

Wiley

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100

% A

rea

Slope ranges (%)

Dixon Jackson Wiley

Page 14: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Slopes aspects were well distributed among all directions.

Dixon

Jackson

Wiley

0

5

10

15

20

25

% A

rea

Dixon Jackson Wiley

Page 15: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Consistent with field site selection criteria, vegetation was dense forest.

Dixon

Jackson

Wiley

Page 16: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Measured landform characteristic varied from software recommended values.

Input Default Measured ROTC (ft) 80 408

Target drainage density (ft/ac) 100 61.7

Target drainage density variance (%) ± 20 ± 23

Page 17: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Task 2: Create landform designs for valley fills in southern West Virginia.

1 2

3 Can stable landforms be designed such that streams

are mitigated or preserved on site, while maintaining the same overall footprint as

conventional reclamation?

Page 18: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Task 2: Create landform designs for valley fills in southern West Virginia.

1 2

We are developing two designs for each valley fill:

1) Preserve 2) Create

Page 19: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

VF1

Preserved Created

Page 20: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

VF1: Preserving channels accounted for 65% of the overburden

Preserved

Watershed area • 10.11 ac

Drainage density • 48.75 ft/ac

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100

% A

rea

Slope ranges (%)

Dixon Jackson Wiley VF1-P

Page 21: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100

% A

rea

Slope ranges (%)

Dixon Jackson Wiley VF1-C

VF1: Creating channels accounted for 99% of the overburden

Created

Watershed area • 10.11 ac

Drainage density • 48.75 ft/ac

Page 22: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

VF2

Preserved Created

Page 23: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

VF2: Preserving channels accounted for 53% of the overburden

Preserved

Watershed area • 20.7 ac

Drainage density • 48.65 ft/ac

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100

% A

rea

Slope ranges (%)

Dixon Jackson Wiley VF2-P

Page 24: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

VF2: Creating channels accounted for 85% of the overburden

Created

Watershed area • 20.7 ac

Drainage density • 48.65 ft/ac

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

0-20 20-40 40-60 60-80 80-100

% A

rea

Slope ranges (%)

Dixon Jackson Wiley VF2-C

Page 25: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

Conclusions

• Data on the geomorphic properties of mature and reclaimed landforms in southern WV have been compiled.

• Input values for geomorphic designs have been determined for landforms specific to Central Appalachia.

• Preliminary results indicate that landforms can be created with a similar footprint. – Varies by location and size

• Additional work will test for stability, hydrologic response, and contaminant transport.

Page 26: Developments in Valley Fill Reclamation in Central

QUESTIONS?

WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering