Upload
jayden-wicker
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Development of the JFK Airport ITS Master Plan
ITS America Annual Meeting & Expo: Session 24
From Tarmac to Take-off: ITS Deployment in Aviation
June 5, 2007
Philip Riggio, TransCore
Ira Huttner, Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
Map of JFK Central Terminal Area
John F. Kennedy International Airport
Annual Traffic, People, & Cargo Volumes 42 million passengers on 400,000 flights 2 million tons of cargo Nearly 15k public parking spaces used by 5
million paid parkers Employs 35,000 people 9 passenger terminals 30 miles of internal roadways
The Challenge: Efficiently manage landside operations
JFK Landside Operations Responsibilities
Parking management Taxi dispatching Traffic management Traveler information Public transportation Emergency management
The Need for a Master Plan
Constant state of change Reconstructing terminal facilities Developing/renovating parking facilities Realignment of roadways
Stand-alone deployments Real-world problems not currently addressed
Technology deployments to meet operational needs
Enhance customer service Improve access to information
Master Plan Vision
Integrate ITS technologies into a uniform platform enabling operations staff
to implement targeted response plans to mitigate the effects of incidents
and operations challenges
Master Plan Objectives
Facilitate traffic ingress/egress Improve information flow to staff and motorists Deliver coordinated tools to manage
traffic/parking Minimize impact of incidents Minimize impact of construction Improve access and management of ground
transportation services
ProcessNeeds
Strategies
Analyze Potential ITS Solutions
Propose ITS Solutions
Integration Opportunities
Implementation Plan
Define ProjectsPrioritize
Prioritize
Inventory On-Airport Systems and Operational
Practices
Review Regional
Initiatives
Example
Parking Management –
Queue Detection, Surge Detection, and Quantifying Delay for Exiting Vehicles
Needs
Reasonable customer wait time (exit) Alert when wait times are too long Avoid revenue loss – “going manual”
or “bleeding lots” Reduce interior aisle congestion Optimize staffing levels
Improve customer service & operational efficiencies
Strategies
Remotely monitor parking lot exits
Identify wait time threshold breaches
Notify parking operations & OCC staff
Develop tools to reduce delays
Analysis
Access potential solutions CCTV Loop/traffic detectors E-ZPass tag readers License plate readers (LPR)
Considerations Existing deployments Accuracy Additional Services Operations
ITS Solution
Proposed solution - LPR Interconnect with
parking revenue and control system to compare license plate read times
Efficient for operations staff
Detect every vehicle Exit lane-specific
data
Estimate Costs and Qualitative Benefits
Estimated costs Capital: $600k Recurring: $50k annually
Benefits Capacity: increased throughput Mobility: reduced vehicular delay Energy/Environment: reduced fuel consumption
and HC & CO emissions Operational: reduced parking revenue losses;
potential to use data for monitoring parking lot configuration/operator performance
Tying it All Together
Parking Management – Interconnect Diagram
Interconnects – Example
Data received from other subsystems: license plate numbers & time stamps of vehicles at parking lot exit booths, parking lot exit plaza lane configuration
Data provided to other subsystems: parking lot exit wait time (by plaza or by lane), parking lot exit queue length alarms, operational status of hardware
Overall Interconnect Diagram
Operational Plan and Decision Support System
Pre-engineered response plans Coordination across functional areas Timely and consistent information dissemination
HAR HAT VMS WWW
How it All Works Together Data from multiple subsystems is transmitted to the
Operational Plan & Decision Support System It is processed and a pre-arranged response or “Operational
Plan” is recommended by the System for approval by the operations staff via the Integrated Workstation
The operations staff reviews and approves, rejects, or modifies the recommended Plan
With approval, the Operational Plan & Decision Support System commands other subsystems to act
Operations staff monitors the response and the status of the incident via video, voice, and other available information
As the incident changes, the operations staff can adjust the characterization of the event or otherwise modify the System’s response to it
Implementation Plan
Proposed ITS solutions grouped into projects Projects are prioritized and categorized by
short/mid/long-term ranges Working with facility staff, short-term projects
list was designed to integrate existing systems and technologies into a more uniform platform
Long-term projects were intended to meet the Agency’s long-term objectives and may be dependent on the implementation of certain IT infrastructure
Core Project
Develop operational plan and decision support system
Build out data center Dissemination of parking information View and control existing landside CCTV Provide RWIS/VIDS/Transmit to landside ITS Automated VMS/HAR messaging and updates Integrate traffic signal control with landside ITS Integrate JFK Traffic Information subsystem Enhance JFK Web site
Follow on – Next Steps
Internal agency committee was formed to: Review recommendations Revise project priorities with facility staff Refine overall implementation plan Place selected projects in Capital Plan Initiate preliminary designs for construction
Lessons Learned Airport environment unique
Established operational practices and systems Private-sector entities involved Intra-airport passenger and traffic circulation Security issues
Parking management is key Create a Master Plan, not a wish list Be proactive
Integrate systems across functional areas to solve operational problems.