Development Control Unit No. 002

Development Control Unit

No. 002 11 April 2018 at 11:00 AM

Hunter 's H i l l Counc i l

ORDER OF BUSINESS

Attendance, Apologies,

Declarations of Interests

1 Confirmation of Minutes

2 Development Applications

Item Page 3

HUNTER'S HILL COUNCIL DEVELOPMENT CONTROL UNIT

11 April 2018

INDEX

1 – CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

1 Confirmation of Minutes of Development Control Unit 001 held 28 March 2018

2 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

2.1 3 Garrick Avenue, Hunters Hill 1

3 - PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 11 April 2018

Minutes of the Development Control Unit Meeting held on 28 March 2018. This is page 1

COMMENCEMENT

The meeting commenced at approximately 10:30 am.

LIST OF ATTENDEES

Barry Smith General Manager – (Chair)

Steve Kourepis Group Manager, Development & Regulatory Control

Shahram Zadgan Development Assessment Officer

Anna Govender Administration Officer

APOLOGIES

No apologies were received.

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

There were no declarations of interest.

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

Nil

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS

2.1 10:30 AM - 12B FERDINAND STREET, HUNTERS HILL

PROCEEDINGS IN BRIEF

PROPOSAL Demolition of existing single storey house, garage, swimming pool & decking. Construction of a new two (2) storey residence with double garage, swimming pool and pool house – S4.55 modifications – modify existing masonry front fence/gate stepped to meet adjoining property fence at No.14 Ferdinand Street and modify existing rear hallway window. ATTENDEES Rob Adam - Submission Emma Adam - Submission Elizabeth Kaplus - Submission Mr and Ms Adam provided members with a number of photos to support their objection. (Photos attached to end of minutes) Question was raised from attendee regarding DA2012-1083-2 in regard to Condition 71 of the consent as to the condition of landscaping, please advise.



RESOLUTION

The Development Control Unit Committee resolved:

Part A That pursuant to Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and

Assessment Act 1979, that Development Application No.2012/1083-4 for modifying the existing front fence/gate at No.12B Ferdinand Street, Hunters Hill, be approved in part, and additional condition No.71 to be added to the consent as follows:

Condition 71

(a) The existing hedge located along the front eastern boundary shall be maintained at 1.5m

1. (b) One (1) small tree shall be planted along the front eastern boundary to the south of the front entrance gate.

2.

Species shall be selected from: Gordonia axillaris‘Fried Egg Plant’ or

Magnolia grandiflora‘Teddy Bear’

The tree shall have a minimum container size of 75L at the time of planting. 3.

The tree shall be planted using healthy and vigorous stock grown in accordance with Australian Standard 2302 (2015) Tree Stock for Landscape Use.

4.

Evidence of the planting shall be provided to Council upon completion of the works. A photo showing the new tree planted in the approved location is considered satisfactory. Alternatively, a time can be arranged for a Council Officer to make a site inspection.

Part B That pursuant to Section 4.55 of the Environmental Planning and

Assessment Act 1979, that Development Application No.2012/1083-4 for the proposed modifications to the first floor hallway window on the western elevation at No.12B Ferdinand Street, Hunters Hill, be refused.

Attachments tabled below









DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS 11 April 2018

Item 2.1 Page 1

ITEM NO : 2.1

SUBJECT : 3 GARRICK AVENUE, HUNTERS HILL

CSP OUTCOME : THE HERITAGE, CHARACTER AND CONSERVATION OF THE AREA IS RESPECTED, PRESERVED AND ENHANCED

DELIVERY PLAN STRATEGY

: ASSESS ALL APPLICATIONS AGAINST THE NEW LEP/DCP

REPORTING OFFICER : KERRY SMITH

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION NO

2017-1190

PROPOSAL DEMOLITION OF EXISTING DWELLING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW PART TWO STOREY AND PART SINGLE STOREY DWELLING INCLUDING SWIMMING POOL, FRONT FENCE AND LANDSCAPE WORKS

APPLICANT DALE DESIGN GROUP

OWNER A & K LYONE

DATE LODGED 7 DECEMBER 2017

Ref:359262

INTRODUCTION Reasons for Report One (1) submission was received in response to the neighbour notification process. REPORT 1. SUMMARY Issues

Overbearing streetscape

Excessive height

Loss of privacy

Larger building footprint

Loss of natural light

Building line encroachment

Loss of solar access

Excessive excavation


Item 2.1 Page 2

Submissions One (1) submission was received. Recommendation The application is recommended for a ‘deferred commencement’ approval for reasons that it is acceptable having regard to: 1. It exceeds the two storey height control. 2. It complies with the relevant planning objectives contained in Hunters Hill Local

Environmental Plan 2012 and Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. 3. It will not have adverse effects on the amenity of adjoining properties.

2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL It is proposed to demolish the existing dwelling house and to construct a new dwelling, the details of which are as follows: On the lower ground floor, double car garage, media room, storeroom and staircase. On the ground floor, main entrance, guest bedroom with ensuite, laundry, powder room, pantry, kitchen/dining room, living room and staircases. Across the western side of rear of the building will be an alfresco/BBQ area with an operable metal louvre vergola. On the master bedroom floor, master bedroom with ensuite and walk in ‘robe, study and staircase. On the first floor, two (2) bedrooms, bathroom, W.C., rumpus room and staircase. At the western side of the front of the dwelling will be a covered balcony 5.0 metres wide x 1.1 metres deep. Across the front of the site will be a pier and plinth rendered masonry fence with steel infill panels and vehicular gates. In the rear yard will be a swimming pool with spa. Accompanying the application were a Statement of Environmental Effects, a Basix Certificate, an Arboricultural Impact Assessment Report and a Heritage Impact Statement. 3. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND LOCALITY The premises are known as No.3 Garrick Avenue, Hunters Hill and are legally described as Lot 6 in DP 12055. The site is located on the southern side west of Crescent Street. The site has an area of 747.7sqm with a frontage of 18.88 metres to the street. The site has a slope of 4.51 metres down to the street and a cross slope of 0.74 metres down to the east along the street frontage. Existing on the site is a part single storey and part two storey brick/weatherboard and tiled dwelling with sheds at the rear. Adjoining and surrounding development is a mix of single-storey, two-storey and three storey dwellings.


Item 2.1 Page 3

4. PROPERTY HISTORY On 13 February 2017, the development application to carry out alterations and additions to the existing dwelling was refused under delegated authority for 8 reasons: Following the Conservation Advisory Panel meeting of 19 April 2017, the applicant submitted further amending plans to Council on 12 May 2017, altering the fenestration, providing for a simplified roof form and a more appropriate front fence design. However, this was not deemed to be a formal submission of amending plans to Council at the time in that it did not address the on-going three storey height non-conformity. These plans therefore were not re-notified by Council. The applicant submitted a s.82A application to review the refusal of the application and with altered plans it provided for the demolition of the existing dwelling and the construction of a new dwelling rather than alterations and additions to the existing dwelling. Inadequate time was allowed for Council to be able to process this application within the statutory 6 month period under the Act. Hence, this application was not proceeded with. 5. STATUTORY CONTROLS Relevant Statutory Instruments Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 Local Environmental Plan 2012 Zone: Low Density Residential R2 Conservation Area: Yes River Front Area: No SREP (Sydney Harbour Catchment) 2005: No Development Control Plan 2013: 2013 Listed Heritage item: No Contributory Building: No Vicinity of Heritage Item: Yes 6. POLICY CONTROLS Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 7. REFERRALS 7.1 External Approval Bodies Not applicable. 7.2 Health & Building The application was referred to Council’s Environmental Health and Building Surveyor who advised by memo that the development gives compliance to the BCA and the Swimming Pools Act subject to compliance with standard conditions. 7.3 Heritage As stated within the body of the report, the property is a heritage item and/or is in a conservation area under Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. The proposal was referred to Council’s Heritage Advisor who provided the following comments:


Item 2.1 Page 4

Heritage Status: within Conservation Area C1 (‘The Peninsula”); nearest Heritage Items at 1 & 3 Crescent Street.

Proposal: alterations and additions [?]- appears to be all new in this latest version.

Statement of Heritage Impact: [as previous]

Comments: I have reviewed the amendments (drawings date stamped 15 Jun 2017) to the amending proposal that was considered by the Conservation Advisory Panel at its meeting of 19 April 2017, the minutes of which are (in part):

In considering the proposal, the Panel consider that the following elements of the design should be reviewed: Hips to roof in lieu of gables: it was considered that the overall presentation of the proposal would be improved through using hipped roofs in lieu of the proposed mix of hips and gables. Fenestration: the composition of the façades would be improved through the use of a lesser number of window configurations and sizes with more vertical proportions. It was suggested that this be discussed further with Council’s Heritage Advisor. Balustrade: it was recommended that a simple “palisade” –type balustrade be used in lieu of the proposed masonry upstand/ glazed panels. Street Fence: the proposed “pier & panel” style fence is considered inappropriate, and a simple picket fence or wall (in accordance with the DCP heights) should be used. There was also discussion in relation to the proposed excavated garage and access measures, but this was considered a non- heritage related matter.

The above matters have been positively responded to in the latest amendments, and the proposal is now supportable in terms of potential impacts on the character of the conservation area.

Recommendation: Approval.

The application was previously forwarded to the Conservation Advisory Panel at its meeting of 19 April 2017. The minutes are set out below:

The Panel was addressed by the designer, Belinda Gale and planner, Andrew Martin. The property is within Hunters Hill Conservation Area C1 (“The Peninsula”), and within the vicinity of heritage items at 18 Woolwich Road, 1 Passy Avenue and 1 & 3 Crescent Street. The Panel was requested to consider a s82A Review of Development Application in light of comments previously provided in relation to the initial development application proposal. It appears it is proposed to abandon the previous alterations and additions proposal and erect a new dwelling-house.


Item 2.1 Page 5

In considering the proposal, the Panel consider that the following elements of the design should be reviewed: Hips to roof in lieu of gables: it was considered that the overall presentation of the proposal would be improved through using hipped roofs in lieu of the proposed mix of hips and gables. Fenestration: the composition of the façades would be improved through the use of a lesser number of window configurations and sizes with more vertical proportions. It was suggested that this be discussed further with Council’s Heritage Advisor. Balustrade: it was recommended that a simple “palisade” –type balustrade be used in lieu of the proposed masonry upstand/ glazed panels. Street Fence: the proposed “pier & panel” style fence is considered inappropriate, and a simple picket fence or wall (in accordance with the DCP heights) should be used. There was also discussion in relation to the proposed excavated garage and access measures, but this was considered a non- heritage related matter.

Committee Resolution: That the Manager, Development & Regulatory Control, be advised of the CAP’s comments for consideration in the process of s82A Review.

It was subsequently concluded by the Heritage Adviser due to the altered plans that the development is now satisfactory from the aspect of heritage conservation. The recommendation accordingly is for approval. 7.4 Works & Services The application was referred to Council’s Design and Development Engineer who raised no engineering objections to the proposal. 7.5 Parks & Landscape The application was referred to Council’s Tree Consultants who recommended additional details re tree management and landscaping that such conditions recommended are set out as Schedule 1 conditions for a deferred commencement approval. 8. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER S.79C The relevant matters for consideration under section 79C and section 82A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 are assessed under the following headings. 9. STATE INSTRUMENTS / LEGISLATION 9.1 State Environmental Planning Policies (SEPPs) Not applicable. 9.2 Regional Environmental Plans (REPs) – Deemed SEPPs Not applicable.


Item 2.1 Page 6

9.3 Other Legislation Not applicable. 10. HUNTERS HILL LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLAN 2012 10.1 Aims and Objectives of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Zone The proposal is permissible with consent under Zone Low Density Residential R2 and does not comply with the relevant statutory controls of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. The proposed development provides for a two storey development and it complies with the landscaped area provisions of LEP 2012. Approval would not create an undesirable precedent for Council. Thus, the proposal is deemed to comply with the aims and objectives of LEP 2012, in particular Part 1.2 (2) (a) (b) & (d), and the desired future character of the garden suburb. 10.2 Statutory Compliance Table The following table illustrates whether or not the proposed development complies with the relevant statutory controls of Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan No.2012.

Compliance with Current Statutory Controls

Proposed Control Compliance

HEIGHT 8.5 metres 8.5 metres Yes

STOREYS 2 storeys 2 storeys Yes

LANDSCAPED AREA 55.7% 50% Yes

FLOOR SPACE RATIO N/A N/A N/A

10.3 Site Area Requirements The proposal does not comply with these requirements. 10.4 Residential flat buildings and low-rise multi-unit housing-density and garden

area controls Not Applicable. 10.5 Height of Buildings The height of the proposal, being in part, 2 storeys in height and 8.5 metres to the ridge is acceptable as it would comply with the objective and standard as prescribed by Clause 4.3 of the Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. 10.6 Landscaped Area The proposed revised garden area of 55.7% would be above the 50% minimum permissible landscaped area as prescribed by the Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012. 10.7 Subdivision Lot Size Not Applicable.


Item 2.1 Page 7

10.8 Floor Space Ratio Not applicable. 10.9 Street Frontage Not Applicable 10.10 Dual Occupancy Not Applicable 10.11 Foreshore Building Lines Not Applicable. 10.12 River Front Area Not Applicable. 10.13 Other Special Clauses / Development Standards Not Applicable. 11. DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO STATUTORY CONTROLS No relevant draft amendments pertaining to this application. 12. DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLANS (DCPs) 12.1 Compliance Table Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 (DCP)

CONTROL REQUIRED/ PERMISSIBLE

PROPOSED COMPLIANCE

HEIGHT Ridge External walls

8.5 metres 7.2 metres

8.5 metres 6.7 metres

Yes Yes

Storeys 2 2 Yes

Landscaped Area 50% minimum 55.7% Yes

BOUNDARY SETBACKS Dwelling house North (Front) South (Rear) East (Side) West (Side) Pool North (front) South (rear) East (side) West (side)

Predom. Building line 6 metres 1.5 metres 1.5 metres Predom. Building Line 1 metre 1 metre 1 metre

11.09 metres 13.295 metres 2.0 metres 2.0 metres 31.8 meres 2.25 metres 11.7 metres 2.3 metres

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


Item 2.1 Page 8

Planning Policy – All Development The proposal complies with the relevant objectives, design parameters and preferred design elements under Parts 2 and 3 of Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. Heritage Conservation Areas The proposal complies with the relevant objectives under Part 2 of Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. River Front Area Not Applicable Height Complies in terms of measurement to the top of the ridge and for external wall heights. It does comply with the objectives / control for two storey development as set out under clause 3.3.2 of DCP 2013 as well as clause 4.3 of LEP 2012. Front, Side & Rear Setbacks Complies. Landscaped Area Complies. Solar Access Complies in that the living and recreation areas for the adjoining residents will receive at least 3 hours of mid-winter sun. There are no objections to the development from this control of the DCP 2013. Privacy There is not likely to be a loss of privacy for the residents to the west resultant from the new dwelling’s windows facing west. As such views to the west will be off two (2) low usage rooms being bedrooms with the upper level rumpus room on the western side having its side window commencing at the front corner of the room. There will be a 2 metre setback of the dwelling from the western boundary which exceeds the minimum of the DCP 2013 controls of 1.5 metres and which will be an aid in the limiting of privacy loss. Residents to the east will not be likely to suffer from privacy loss as the main part of that elevation is single storey and the rear section upper level has a large window opening onto a large void area. Views There will be no loss of shared water views as a result of this development. Car Parking Complies.


Item 2.1 Page 9

Garages & Carports The proposed garage is accommodated within the two storey sections of the dwelling and as such, does not create a three storey section within the development. It does therefore comply with the objective of two storey development under clause 4.3 of LEP 2012. Fences The design is not clear enough from the plans submitted with the application. Therefore a Schedule 1 condition of the deferred commencement section of the approval will require proper details of that part of the proposal to be provided to Council to check the height and materials for its setting in the local streetscape. 12.2 Other DCPs, Codes and Policies

Hunter’s Hill Council s.7.12 Developer Contributions Plan 2011

13. THE LIKELY IMPACTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT This report has been assessed on the plans submitted with the development application. These plans were not referred back to CAP as the proposal is virtually identical to those last rest referred to CAP which were deemed satisfactory. Similarly, Council’s Heritage Adviser deemed these plans to be acceptable from a streetscape and heritage perspective. The proposed development will provide for a two storey development by definition which gives compliance to the objectives set under clause 4.3 of LEP 2012 and to the development standard of 8.5 metres to the top of the ridge. The proposed development is deemed satisfactory in relation to the development standards of LEP 2012 and the controls of DCP 2013 as set out in the tables above. Additional arboricultural information is required and amendments are required to be applied to the landscaping plan. These requirements are set out as Schedule 1 conditions in the recommendation. 14. SUBMISSIONS The proposed development was notified in accordance with Council’s Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013 for a period of thirty (30) days commencing on the 17 January 2018. Within the specified time period one (1) submission was received. Copy of the submission is attached to the report.

NOTIFICATION REQUIRED YES

NUMBER NOTIFIED 7

SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED Name & Address of Respondents

SUMMARY OF SUBMISSIONS

Jodie Boland & Kevin Ackhurst 5 Garrick Avenue HUNTERS HILL

Loss of light into the sole window in the eastern side of our property. The proposed dwelling is moving forward on the boundary and closer to our western boundary and the front roofline proposed is much higher than the current tiered roof structure.

Amenities on the western boundary. We do not understand why aircon etc has to be on this boundary

If excavation is proposed, we reiterate our previous submissions


Item 2.1 Page 10

The main issues of concern outlining the objections are discussed below:

Loss of light into the sole window in the eastern side of our property. The proposed dwelling is moving forward on the boundary and closer to our western boundary and the front roofline proposed is much higher than the current tiered roof structure.

Comment: The adjoining residents at No.5 Garrick Avenue will not unduly lose such direct mid-winter sun such that it would contravene those specific provisions of DCP 2013 which require the access to three hours of this sunlight between 9am and 3pm. The development is considered to provide such amount of midwinter sun to adjoining properties. In other words, a refusal on the basis of loss of solar access would not be justifiable at appeal to the Land & Environment Court.

Amenities on the western boundary. We do not understand why aircon etc has to be on this boundary

Comment: This issue is not an uncommon one for houses in the Hunters Hill area and is generally the choice of the applicant be it as exempt development or part of a development application. In this case, the rainwater tank is proposed to be located on the eastern side of the dwelling and the air con and hot water heater on the western side of the dwelling thus ‘spreading the load’. The clothes line is shown to be sited in the rear yard on the eastern side of the site and the pool pump is shown in the south eastern corner of the site. It could not be reasonably argued that all of the services are centres on the eastern side of the proposed dwelling. A refusal on this basis would not be justifiable under appeal.

If excavation is proposed, we reiterate our previous submissions Comment: The maximum amount of excavation proposed for this latest development proposal is 1.5 metres which complies with the provisions of clause 3.3.4 (f) of DCP 2013.

CONCLUSION The proposed development is deemed to be consistent with the aims and objectives of LEP 2012. The proposal would not create an undesirable precedent undermining Council’s planning objectives. The proposal has been assessed in terms of the public interest and following compliance with the relevant development standards and objectives in Consolidated DCP 2013 and LEP 2012 is recommended for a ‘deferred commencement’ approval. The proposed development complies with the minimum landscaped area and maximum height standards of LEP 2012. Details are required to be provided in relation to the new front fence in terms of materials and construction to be tested in the local streetscape. Additional arboricultural information is required and amendments are required to be applied to the landscaping plan. These requirements of Council’s tree consultants are set out as Schedule 1 conditions in the recommendation. The proposal has been assessed having regard to the relevant matters for consideration under Section 4.15 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012 and Consolidated Development Control Plan 2013. For the reasons outlined in this report it is considered that the proposed development would not unduly impact on the desired character of the Hunters Hill local area and approval would not create an undesirable precedent for Council. Accordingly, it is considered the application is reasonable for a ‘deferred commencement’ approval.


Item 2.1 Page 11

The matters relating Schedule 1 conditions for the ‘deferred commencement’ recommendation are need for the details of the new front fence to be provided along with details relating to tree and landscape management. FINANCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct financial impact on Council’s adopted budget as a result of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct environmental impact on Council arising from Council consideration of this matter. SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT There is no direct social impact on Council arising from Council consideration of this matter. RISK ASSESSMENT There are no direct or indirect risks impacting on Council arising from consideration of this matter. HUNTERS HILL 2030 This matter relates to ensuring that heritage and conservation of the area is respected, preserved and enhanced including the preservation of the character, views to and from the Municipality, and the preservation of the tree canopy.

RECOMMENDATION

That the development application No.2017/1190 for the construction of a new two storey dwelling, swimming pool, front fence and landscaping be granted a “Deferred commencement” consent pursuant to Section 4.16 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979 in respect of No.3 Garrick Avenue, Hunters Hill. The development consent as contained in Schedule 2 shall not operate (nor be issued) until such time as the matters contained in Schedule 1 are finalised to the satisfaction of Council. Schedule 1 1. Tree Management

Design Modifications or Root Mapping Design modifications to setback the retaining walls back outside of the SRZ of Tree 1 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda), Tree 13 Morus nigra (Black Mulberry), Tree 16 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda), Tree 17 Murraya paniculata (Murraya) and Group 2 Xylosoma spp. (Xylosoma). Excavations works, including level changes within the SRZ of the above trees will not be supported. Design modifications should be reflected on amended Architectural and Landscape Plans, and made in consultation with the Project Arborist to ensure a tree sensitive design is achieved. Alternatively, root mapping may be undertaken for Tree 1 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda), Tree 13 Morus nigra (Black Mulberry), Tree 16 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) and Tree 17 Murraya paniculata (Murraya).


Item 2.1 Page 12

The root mapping report should be prepared by an Arborist with a minimum qualification (using the Australian Qualifications Framework) of NSW TAFE Level 5 or above in Arboriculture. The root mapping should be undertaken to show the potential impact of the proposed development on Tree 1 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda), Tree 13 Morus nigra (Black Mulberry), Tree 16 Jacaranda mimosifolia (Jacaranda) and Tree 17 Murraya paniculata (Murraya). The report must verify the quantity, size, type, depth and orientation of tree roots. The exploratory excavation must be carried out using non-destructive techniques. Transplant Method Statement for Tree 7 Howea forsteriana (Kentia Palm). The Transplant Method Statement should be prepared by a Project Arborist (AQF Level 5).

2. Landscape and Tree Man0agement Amendments to the Landscape Plan, including:

All existing trees located on site and within 4m of site boundaries. Trees should be numbered, with numbers correlating with the Arboricultural Impact Assessment.

Additional levels, both existing and proposed, particularly in areas close to trees proposed for retention.

Tree 7 Howea forsteriana (Kentia Palm) shown for transplantation.

A larger scaled copy of the Landscape Plan should be submitted for review. The A3 copy received is too small to accurately access.

Compliance with AS 1926. 1-2012 Part 1: Safety barriers for swimming pools, which includes new requirements for non-climbable zones.

3. Detailed plans, including large scale elevation and construction details of the new front fence and gates, showing colours and materials, being submitted to Council for the assessment by Council’s Heritage Adviser.

Schedule 2

A. That Development Application No. 2017/1190 for the demolition of the existing

dwelling and the construction of a new two storey dwelling plus pool and new front fence at No.3 Garrick Avenue, Hunters Hill, be approved, subject to the following conditions

Standard Conditions:

GEN0 GEN1 GEN3 GEN5 GEN6 GEN7 GEN20 PCC0 PCC1($3,850.00) PCC2($2,530.00) PCC3($2,600.00) PCC4($2,000.00) PCC5($11,000.00) PCC11 PCC12 PCC13 PCC16 PCC17 PCC18 PCC20 PCC21 PCC40 PCC41 PCW0 PCW1 PCW2 PCW3 PCW4 PCW5 PCW6 CSI0 CSI1 CSI2 CSI3 CSI7 DEM0 DEM1 DEM3 DEM4 DEM5 DEM6 DEM7 DEM8 DEM9 DEM10 DEM11 DEM15 CON0 CON1 CON2 CON3 CON5 CON7 CON8 CON9 CON10 CON12 CON13 CON17 CON18 CON19 CON20 CON21 CON23 CON41 CON42 CON43 CON44 CON45 CON47 POC0 POC1 POC2 POC3 POC4 POC7 POC8 POC13 POC14 POC24 POC25 POC28


Item 2.1 Page 13

GEN3

Drawing Number Drawn By Plan Dated Council Dated

Site Plan A03 Revision 1

Dale Design Group 22 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

Garage Floor Plan A04 Revision 1

22 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

Ground Floor Plan A05 Revision 1

22 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

Master Bedroom Floor Plan A06 Revision 1

22 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

First Floor Plan A07 Revision 1

22 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

South East & North West Elevations A08 Revision 3

21 Dec 2017 2 Jan 2018

North East & South West Elevations A09 Revision 3

21 Dec 2017 2 Jan 2018

Sections AA & BB A10 Revision 1

1 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

Sections CC & DD A15 Revision 1

1 Sep 2017 7 Dec 2017

Colour & Material Schedule A13 revision 1

1 Nov 2017 7 Dec 2017

Colour Samples Unnumbered

Undated 7 Dec 2017

Landscape Concept Plan Dwg 1626-09

PDLA Landscape Architects 2 Oct 2017 7 Dec 2017

Document(s) Dated Council Dated

Basix Certificate 806845S_04 23 Nov 2017 7 Dec 2017

ATTACHMENTS

1. Map 2. Plans 3. Submission


Item 2.1 Attachment 1 Page 14













































Documents

Development Control Unit No. 002