Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MEETING
TUESDAY 20 NOVEMBER 2018
ATTACHMENT TO ITEM DV18.165
LOT 411 (NO.112) GROVEDALE ROAD, FLOREAT
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ATTACHMENT 1 - DV18.165 - LOT 411 (No. 112) GROVEDALE ROAD, FLOREAT
The Town of Cambridge does not warrant the accuracy of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the Town of Cambridge shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.
Tuesday, 13 November 2018
1:617
DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE ATTACHMENT 1 - DV18.165 - LOT 411 (No. 112) GROVEDALE ROAD, FLOREAT
The Town of Cambridge does not warrant the accuracy of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the Town of Cambridge shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.
Tuesday, 13 November 2018
1:617
Development application site photographs Property Lot 411 (No. 112) Grovedale Road, Floreat Proposal Single Storey Dwelling DA reference 0217DA-2018 Date of photographs 26 October 2018 Photograph 1: Subject site (from Grovedale Road)
Photograph 2: Subject Site (from Blackmore Lane)
Photograph 3: 115 Grovedale Road, Floreat
Photograph 3: 114 Grovedale Road, Floreat
Photograph 4: 110 Grovedale Road, Floreat
The Town of Cambridge does not warrant the accuracy of information in this publication and any person using or relying upon such information does so on the basis that the Town of Cambridge shall bear no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any errors, faults, defects or omissions in the information.
Monday, 22 October 2018
1:600
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 1
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
PTY APPL
24x1210 A
18x
1690
AO
BS
14x
610
FO
BSC
2354x3610SDCOM
27x6.5 FCOM
27x
SP
A
21x2070 FCOM
27x
1210
A 2
7x12
10 A
920
820
820
3x620
720
720
1020CAVITY SD
MANUALROLLER DOOR
2x820180° HINGES
720WC
5x1
450
F
820
W/L
2314
x145
0
27x
970
A
24x1210 A
1,200TF
24cH MIRRORED SLIDERSWITH STEEL LINTEL OVER
820
1020
CA
VITY
SD
1020CAVITY SD
720WC
27x850 AOBS
12x610 FOBSC
5x1450 FOBSC
18x
1690
A
8x3
010
820
720WC
27x
1090
FC
OM
27x
3010
A
24cH
MIR
RORE
D S
LID
ERS
WIT
H S
TEEL
LIN
TEL
OVE
R
24cH
MIR
RORE
D S
LID
ERS
WIT
H S
TEEL
LIN
TEL
OVE
R
24x2050 A
1020
CA
VITY
SD
820AF
GLAZED
27x
1930
A
27x850 A
9203 HINGE
14x
610
FO
BSC
18x
2050
REMOTE CONTROLSECTIONAL DOOR
2x720
820
8203 HINGE
SOLAR PANELS OVER
ELEC PRELAY
RWP
FR RECFZ 2 xWO
WM Dry
GAS HP
FR REC
IRON
N
BATH
CANOPYR/HOOD
F F
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWPRWPRWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWPRWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
RWP
SOLAR PANELS OVER
SOLAR PANELS OVER
V
560x660MH
AL12 GASM/BOX
2,00
0
E2
E4
E3
E1
INVERTERLOCATION
CAPPEDGAS PT
AT 300H
PROPOSED PANEL & POSTRETAINING WALL
PIANO
DRYINGCOURT
300 REC CL
KING BED
DR
EXTENT OFDROPPEDFOOTING
EXTENT OFDROPPEDFOOTING
SLOPE DOWN
CAPPEDGAS PT
3 PHASE
2c LOWWALL VENT
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
CAPPEDCOLD & HOT
WATER AT 300H
POSSIBLE LIMESTONE FACE TOPANEL & POST TO BE
DISCUSSED AT PRESTART
KITCHEN 33c CL + PL
FAMILY
LINEN
PORTICO 40c CL + PL
GARAGEFL -6c CONC
MASTER SUITE
BED 2 33c CL + PL
BED 3 33c CL + PL
BED 4 33c CL + PL
STUDY 33c CL + PL
2nd ENTRY 31c CL + PL
SCULLERY
L'DRY
MEDIA 33c CL + PL
DRESSER 33c CL + PL
ENSUITE 33c CL + PL
WC
PDR
FOYER
BATH 35c CL + PL
WC
STORE
PROPOSED POOL
FW
FW
FW
FW
FW
FW
FW
FW
EXISTING
BRICK FEN
CE TO
BE TEXTURED
45.93
45.7
2
17.54
PEGGONE
ALFRESCO
DINING
DESIGN NOTES26° TILED ROOF
33c CEILING HEIGHT
RENDERED BWK EXTERNALLY
AREAS.....
GROUND FLOORPORTICOGARAGEALFRESCOSTORE
302.4617.8648.5536.047.06
411.97 m2
GROUND FLOOR1:100
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 2
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
2,86
3 2,86
4REMOTE SECTIONALDOOR
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARY
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
DOUBLE SIDEDGLAZING BARS
DOUBLE SIDEDGLAZING BARS
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
90mm WIDE, 40mmCORBELLINGSURROUND
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
100 DEEPFEATURE
MASONRYRECESSES
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
DROPPED FOOTING -8cDROPPED FOOTING -6c
GLAZINGBARS TO MATCH
WINDOWS
CL 33c+PL
FL 0c
8c
22c
43c
GARAGE CL 27c
FL -6c
27c
35c
40c
35c
42c
49c
33c
7c
8c
7c
22c
11c
22c
11c
0c
7c
35c
14c
36c
35c
8c
7c
35c
14c
8c
40c 36c
23c
-6c
31c
2,86
32,86
4
470
2,38
0FR
OM
NEI
GH
BOU
RS L
EVEL
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
2,41
4
2,39
4
1,60
0 FE
NC
E
2,50
0FR
OM
NEI
GH
BOU
RS L
VEL
15,400 of 1600H FENCE
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARY
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
PROPOSED LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
SOLAR PANEL
SOLAR PANELSOLAR PANEL
DROPPED FOOTING -8c
SOLAR PANEL
1.8H SCREEN WALL
1.8H SCREEN WALLABOVE RETAINING
DROPPED FOOTING -6c
90mm WIDE, 40mmCORBELLINGSURROUND
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
SKY-LITE
36cCL 33c+PL
FL 0c
GARAGE CL 27c
FL -6c
30c 30c 30c
49c 43c
35c
42c
8c
7c
27c
16c
27c
49c
40c 36c
7c
0c
DESIGN NOTES26° TILED ROOF
33c CEILING HEIGHT
RENDERED BWK EXTERNALLY
E/01 Front Elevation1:100
E/02 Side Elevation1:100
DATE
BUILDER
OWNER
OWNER
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 3
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
RETAINING WALLTOP AT 11.85
RETAINING WALLTOP AT 12.00
2,86
4
290
2,38
0FR
OM
NEI
GH
BORS
LEV
EL
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
1,79
3 FE
NC
E
590
1,60
0 FE
NC
E
2,4001600H FENCE
OBSC
A/C
UN
IT
OBSCOBSC
RAIN HEAD
outlet c.l
MIXER1100AFLou
tlet c
.l
RECESSED SILL
41c
30c
CL 33c+PL
FL 0c
36c
30c
11c
22c
2,05
0
2,45
0FR
OM
NEI
GH
BOU
RS L
EVEL
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARY
PROPOSED LIMESTONE RETAINING WALLPROPOSED LIMESTONERETAINING WALL
COL
RETAINING WALLTOP AT 10.85
ELEC
GAS
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
3 PHASE
SPANDREL
RETAINING WALLTOP AT 12.00 RETAINING WALL
TOP AT 11.85RETAINING WALL
TOP AT 11.85
470
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
OBSC
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARYPROPOSED LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL
A/C UNIT
OBSC OBSC
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
DOUBLE SIDEDGLAZING BARS
90mm WIDE, 40mmCORBELLINGSURROUND
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
SKY-LITE
33cCL 33c+PL
FL 0c
38c 41c
30c
49c
40c
35c
7c
11c 11c2,86
4
270
590
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
234
2,66
0
DROPPEDFOOTING -6c
E/03 Rear Elevation1:100
E/04 Side Elevation1:100
DATE
BUILDER
OWNER
OWNER
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 4
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
ELEC
GAS
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
RECESSEDGAS INST.
HWU
3 PHASE
SPANDREL
RETAINING WALLTOP AT 12.00 RETAINING WALL
TOP AT 11.85RETAINING WALL
TOP AT 11.85
470
1,80
0 FE
NC
EOBSC
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARYPROPOSED LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL
A/C UNIT
OBSC OBSC
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
DOUBLE SIDEDGLAZING BARS
90mm WIDE, 40mmCORBELLINGSURROUND
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
SKY-LITE
33cCL 33c+PL
FL 0c
38c 41c
30c
49c
40c
35c
7c
11c 11c2,86
4
270
590
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
234
2,66
0
DROPPEDFOOTING -6c
2,86
32,86
4
4702,
380
FRO
M N
EIG
HBO
URS
LEV
EL
1,80
0 FE
NC
E
2,41
4
2,39
4
1,60
0 FE
NC
E
2,50
0FR
OM
NEI
GH
BOU
RS L
VEL
15,400 of 1600H FENCE
NATURAL GROUND LINE AT BOUNDARY
CONTRASTING RENDEREXTENT SHOWN SHADED
PROPOSED LIMESTONE RETAINING WALL
ALUMINIUMGABLE LOUVERS
SOLAR PANEL
SOLAR PANELSOLAR PANEL
DROPPED FOOTING -8c
SOLAR PANEL
1.8H SCREEN WALL
1.8H SCREEN WALLABOVE RETAINING
DROPPED FOOTING -6c
90mm WIDE, 40mmCORBELLINGSURROUND
1c HIGH, 40mmPROJECTINGCORBELLING
SKY-LITE
36cCL 33c+PL
FL 0c
GARAGE CL 27c
FL -6c
30c 30c 30c
49c 43c
35c
42c
8c
7c
27c
16c
27c
49c
40c 36c
7c
0c
E/04 Side Elevation1:150
E/02 Side Elevation1:150
DATE
BUILDER
OWNER
OWNER
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 5
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
STREET PERSPECTIVE
DATE
BUILDER
OWNER
OWNER
© THE COPYRIGHT OF THIS DESIGN IS THE SOLE PROPERTY OF WEBB & BROWN-NEAVES PTY LTD AND THERE IS NO IMPLIED LICENCE FOR ITS USE FOR ANY PURPOSE
D & R Barnao
Floreat
CUSTOM
DATE:DRAWN:REP:JOB No:
CLIENT NOTE:-SKETCHES MAY INCLUDE ITEMS NOT INCLUDED INBUILDERS STANDARD RANGE, PLEASE CHECK YOUR ADDENDA.-ROOM DIMENSIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.-DETAILS SUBJECT TO STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS, PROVISIONOF FULL SITE SURVEY AND LOCAL COUNCIL APPROVAL.-DESIGN SKETCHES MAY REQUIRE MODIFICATIONS TO COMPLYWITH THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENTS OF THE BCA.
Lee HeinkeSR
13/09/18
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
©
Page 6
SKETCH16729
Lot 411 (#112) Grovedale Rd
90mm PVC PRELAY
CUT-OFF GRATE & DRAIN
AL12 GASM/BOX
8,025
31,430
6,264
2,500 13,588 1,452 628
8,025
31,430
6,264
8,035
31,430
6,257
2,500 13,5902,078
8,035
2,500 13,590 5,232
2,500 13,590 5,232 809
1,50
0
500
6,50
0
7,12
5
6,25
7
2,281
1,976
1,600
2,500
1,000
1,200 4,400 3,440
1,106
1,051
6,289
31,588
8,075
34,242
34,242
8,025
31,430
6,265
15,0402,498
2,500 17,140 2,518
6,289
14,442
17,144
8,075
9,040
2,00
08,
400
5,06
7
2,277
EXISTING FENCETO BE PAINTED
EXISTING CROSSOVERTO BE REMOVED
BY OWNER
RETAININGTOP @ 11.85
RETAININGTOP @ 10.85
RETAININGTOP @ 10.85
RETAININGTOP @ 10.85
RETAININGTOP @ 12.00
PANAVIEWGATE
PANAVIEWGATE
PROPOSEDWATER METERLOCATION
PROPOSED PANEL & POSTRETAINING WALL
PROPOSED LIMESTONERETAINING WALL
ALFRESCO
RESTRICTEDBUILDING AREA
BEWARE!COMMUNICATION PIT
KEEP AWAY
REFER TO WB/APG OFFICE FORALL SERVICE PLANS BEFORE
ANY EARTHWORKS COMMENCE(DBYD J/N: 14099949)
X/OVERBY BUILDER
RELOCATEEXISTING WATER
METER
AGG. PATH
DUCTED VACUUM
INFLOOR HEATINGENSUITE ONLY
1200 DEEP
1600 DEEP
FALL
PROPOSEDRESIDENCE
0c FFL 11.00
GARAGECONC AT -6cFFL 10.486
POSSIBLE PILING REQUIREDDUE TO HOUSE DISTANCE
FROM SEWER MAIN
STORECONC AT -6cFFL 10.486
RL 10.48
RL 10.900
SHADOW CAST ONTO ADJOININGLOT 413 ON 21st JUNE AT MIDDAY
34.46m² (4.5%)
SHADOW CAST ONTO ADJOININGLOT 412 ON 21st JUNE AT MIDDAY
33.37m² (4.4%)
AGG. DRIVEWAY
AGG. PORTICO0c (FL:11.000) FA
LL
A/CUNIT
OUTDOORSHOWER
SOLAR PANELS
SOLAR PANELS
SOLAR PANELS
500m
DEE
P
FW CONNECTEDTO SOAKWELL
NEW 1.2m HIGH POOL FENCEAND GATE TO
COUNCIL REQUIREMENTS NEW 1.8H COLORBONDFENCING
NEW 1.8H COLORBONDFENCING
1500x1500 S/W
1500x1500 S/W
1500x1500 S/W
NEW 1.2m HIGH POOL FENCEAND GATE TO
COUNCIL REQUIREMENTS
RL 1
0.46
RL 10.850
RL 10.900RL 10.850
RL 10.850
RL 10.46
RL 10.48
STEPS
1.8H BRICK RENDERSCREEN WALL
1.6H BRICK RENDERSCREEN WALL
RL 10.900
PROPOSED LIMESTONERETAINING WALL
GROUT INJECTION
POSSIBLE LIMESTONE FACE TOPANEL & POST TO BE
DISCUSSED AT PRESTART
GROUT INJECTION
TEMPORARY TREE PROTECTION
1.8H BRICK RENDERSCREEN WALL
8,02
5
8,92
5
PROPOSEDPOOL
0.022 mLOT MISCLOSE
Grovedale RoadBitumen
Non-Mount Nil
Concrete Footpath
OLDAREA
MEDIUM LOWPRESSURE
Scale 1:200
0 2 4 6 8
W
S
E
N
SOIL DESCRIPTIONSandLight Grass Cover
441231 15 Aug 18 M. Bateman
15 Aug 18 112
371-18/50
Barnao
Lot No.
Plan
Grovedale Road411 908m²Floreat TOWN OF CAMBRIDGE
6091 1108 435
Bitumen
Non-Mount / Nil
Concrete
Sand
GoodLight Grass Cover
Yes
Yes
Yes
U/Ground
NO
45.93
84 °14 '30 "
22.13
90°1'30 "
45.7
2
89 °58 '30 "
17.54
95°4
5'30"
1 0 .18
1 0 .20
11.04
11.0311.88
10.26
10.48
10
.20
10
.26
9 .89
10.37
10
.57
1 0 .86
1 0 .75
1 0 .13
10
.07
10.14 10
.33
1 0 .63
10.20 10.28 10.43 10.98
11.26
11.45
11.29
11
.20
11.6211.27
11
.80
11
.38
11 .46
11
.87
11
.42
12
.16
11
.91
11
.72
12.01
11
.78
13.30
13.84
12
.12
12
.0311
.85
12
.001
1.6
8
13.83
11.48
11.52
11.91
11.90
11.82
11.72
11.6511.56
11.74
11.0110.93
10.5010.42
10.3910 .45
1 0 .51
1 0 .511 0 .3
51 0 .2
4
1 0 .22
1 0 .16
1 0 .231 0 .3
0
1 0 .31
1 0 .27
1 0 .26
10.1710.10
11.02
BitumenCrossover
Verge TreeØ 1.20mHt 10.0m
Verge TreeØ 1.20mHt 10.0m
T
W
Non-Mount NilRef Nail At Base Of KerbAssumed Datum 10.00 m
Carport
Approx F.L @L/Stone 13.23
TimberGazebo
TimberFence PoorCondition
TW[ ]
TW[ ]
TF[ ]
StumpØ 0.4m
BrickGazebo
12.97TF[ ]
10.1910.14
11
.86
11.82
TF[]
TF[ ]
10
.07
TreeØ 0.8mHt 7.0m
10
.10
TF[ ]
Approx F.L @L/Stone 10.10
DUG TO LEVEL10.82 ON LOT(SAND ONLY)
FibroFence PoorCondition
FibroFence PoorCondition
Brick WallWith Pillars
11.4510.8810.3810.2310
.00
Brick & TileGarage
Gate
FibroFence FairCondition
SewerM/H (11.35)
Sewer JunctionInv: 8.8 Depth: 1.6NOTE: UP
NOTE:Approx. Sewer Clearance Line(This line is NOT an easement)Setbacks MUST be confirmedby Water Corp. before anydesign work is undertaken.This line is NOT definitive.
PEGGONE
PEGGONE
PEGGONEPEG
GONE
Brick & TileOn Limestone
Brick & TileOn Limestone
#114
#110
Brick & C/BondOn Slab -Clear
10.5
11.0
11.0
11.5
11.5
10.5
(Scaled from StreetSmart DirectoryOnly - Confirm With Shire)
Client
Date
Suburb
House No.
Street
Shire
C/T Vol. Fol
AreaGOOD
GOOD
BUILDING SITE INSPECTION REPORTSERVICE AND CONTOUR SKETCH
Road Descr.
Kerbing
Condition
Footpath
Condition
Soil
Drainage
Vegetation
Services: Gas Phone Comms.
Water Sewer
Electricity
Coastal Zone
Fencing andother improvements
Special Features
AS SHOWN
AS SHOWN
J/N: DATE: DRAWN:SCALE:
cLicensed Surveyors
MSD REF
87-89 Guthrie Street, Osborne Park, Western AustraliaTelephone: (08) 9446 7361 Facsimile: (08) 9445 2998
Email : [email protected] Website: www.cottage.com.au
1:200
SEC DomePower PolePhone Pits
LEG
EN
D
T C
TP10.00TWTRTF
[[[[
10.0010.0010.00
]]]]
Top Pillar/PostTop WallTop RetainingTop Fence
W Water Conn.
Gravel & Sand
7.04
00 m Blackmore Lane
Hole
Retic Valve(Plastic)
R
Meter InHatch (Metal)
PROPOSED SITE PLAN1:200
112 Grovedale Road, Floreat - Attachment 5 - Schedule of Submissions
Submitter Number Received
Type of Comment Comments
1 18/10/2018 Object With regards to the request by the owners of 112 Grovedale Rd for variations to the regulations we submit the following:
Reduced Street (Front) Setback
We DO NOT object to the proposed reduction in front setback from the required minimum of 9m to the proposed minimum of 6.516m as we do not feel that the reduced setback will adversely affect the streetscape. The properties on either side of 112 & 114 Grovedale Road are both corner allotments with Grovedale Road setbacks of around 4.5m, although the carport structure for the property on the Evandale St corner has a nil setback on Grovedale Rd. As such a reduced setback at 112 Grovedale Road would not look out of place. Should the proposed setback reduction be passed by council however, we would expect the same to be afforded to any new development on 114 Grovedale Road.
Setback of Garage
We DO NOT object to the proposed position of the garage despite it not conforming with the planning policy which requires it to be in line or behind at least two thirds of the remainder the dwelling. We feel that given the setback for the proposed garage is neither the minimum proposed setback nor is it excessively forward of the rest of the dwelling the proposed garage will not adversely affect the streetscape.
Height of Retaining Wall
We DO object to a retaining wall along the common boundary between 114 & 112 Grovedale Rd if it is in excess of twice the height of the maximum normally permitted. However, we believe that the maximum height of 1.03m we have been given may only be at a specific point along the wall
where there appears to be a bit of a depression along the 114 side of the existing fence. If the average height of the retaining wall is around 0.75m then that combined with the proposed fence height of 1.8m gives an overall boundary wall height of 2.55m which we are prepared to accept. However we do request that the retaining wall structure be located wholly within the boundary of 112 Grovedale Road.
2 14/10/2018 Support Thank you for your request for comments on the above property. We have had a good look at the Plans. We are impressed by the layout, and how well the single story design fits in the immediate environment.
As for the “ deemed to comply provisions “, it is very evident to us that a number of houses in the vicinity, in Grovedale Rd, and surrounds, make it obvious that the insistence of the 9m setback, for this dwelling, is inappropriate. It would be a “letter of the law” principle being applied, without due reference to the environment.
One only needs to go a little North or South of the location, along Grovedale Rd, to realize that setbacks vary, without any compromise to the aesthetics of the locality. This is a very old suburb, in which Residential Design Codes have varied and changed.
We do understand that there are places, and land developments where such a consideration goes up in importance, for uniformity, safety, etc. On the other hand, from our perspective, and that of many others, the Perry Lakes development beggars belief. Dwellings of all nature are in close proximity to the roads. In this instance the proximity and uniformity per se compromise the aesthetics badly. It is difficult to account for such planning being approved?
We support the plans presented by Lot 411, with the setbacks as they are. We sincerely hope the Town will, in this instance, not cement itself to a provision that has previously varied, and had exceptions.
112 Grovedale Road, Floreat - Attachment 5 - Schedule of Submissions
Submitter Number Received
Type of Comment Comments
1 18/10/2018 Object With regards to the request by the owners of 112 Grovedale Rd for variations to the regulations we submit the following:
Reduced Street (Front) Setback
We DO NOT object to the proposed reduction in front setback from the required minimum of 9m to the proposed minimum of 6.516m as we do not feel that the reduced setback will adversely affect the streetscape. The properties on either side of 112 & 114 Grovedale Road are both corner allotments with Grovedale Road setbacks of around 4.5m, although the carport structure for the property on the Evandale St corner has a nil setback on Grovedale Rd. As such a reduced setback at 112 Grovedale Road would not look out of place. Should the proposed setback reduction be passed by council however, we would expect the same to be afforded to any new development on 114 Grovedale Road.
Setback of Garage
We DO NOT object to the proposed position of the garage despite it not conforming with the planning policy which requires it to be in line or behind at least two thirds of the remainder the dwelling. We feel that given the setback for the proposed garage is neither the minimum proposed setback nor is it excessively forward of the rest of the dwelling the proposed garage will not adversely affect the streetscape.
Height of Retaining Wall
We DO object to a retaining wall along the common boundary between 114 & 112 Grovedale Rd if it is in excess of twice the height of the maximum normally permitted. However, we believe that the maximum height of 1.03m we have been given may only be at a specific point along the wall
where there appears to be a bit of a depression along the 114 side of the existing fence. If the average height of the retaining wall is around 0.75m then that combined with the proposed fence height of 1.8m gives an overall boundary wall height of 2.55m which we are prepared to accept. However we do request that the retaining wall structure be located wholly within the boundary of 112 Grovedale Road.
2 14/10/2018 Support Thank you for your request for comments on the above property. We have had a good look at the Plans. We are impressed by the layout, and how well the single story design fits in the immediate environment.
As for the “ deemed to comply provisions “, it is very evident to us that a number of houses in the vicinity, in Grovedale Rd, and surrounds, make it obvious that the insistence of the 9m setback, for this dwelling, is inappropriate. It would be a “letter of the law” principle being applied, without due reference to the environment.
One only needs to go a little North or South of the location, along Grovedale Rd, to realize that setbacks vary, without any compromise to the aesthetics of the locality. This is a very old suburb, in which Residential Design Codes have varied and changed.
We do understand that there are places, and land developments where such a consideration goes up in importance, for uniformity, safety, etc. On the other hand, from our perspective, and that of many others, the Perry Lakes development beggars belief. Dwellings of all nature are in close proximity to the roads. In this instance the proximity and uniformity per se compromise the aesthetics badly. It is difficult to account for such planning being approved?
We support the plans presented by Lot 411, with the setbacks as they are. We sincerely hope the Town will, in this instance, not cement itself to a provision that has previously varied, and had exceptions.