1
Development anomalies of the vertebral column in Portuguese Prehistoric samples Ana Maria Silva and Sofia Tereso Laboratory of Prehistory, CIAS, University of Coimbra 3000 – 456 Coimbra, Portugal [email protected]. INTRODUCTION The spine can provide a large amount of information about an individual’s physical condition, lifestyle, epidemiology and familial links of birth defects. The aim of this research was the analysis of developmental anomalies of the vertebral column of Portuguese Middle/Late Neolhiitic and Chalcolithic skeletal collections. These were recovered from collective tombs, were the bones are found disturbed, very fragmented with few or complete absence of anatomical connection. Despite these limitations, several developmental anomalies of the cervical and thoracic part of the spine were observed. RESULTS All defects were observed in adult individuals except the case of Praia da Samarra, that belongs to a non-adult that died between 12 and 17/19 years. These include: Developmental delay of vertebral elements (cleft neural): Atlas bipartita and cleft posterior arch of atlas (Table 1); Segmentation errors (Failure of segmentation): block vertebra (Table 2); SITE TYPE OF DEFECT : F AILURE OF SEGMENTATION Lugar do Canto C2-C3 Block vertebrae (NMI C2 provisional: 8); C2-C3 Block vertebrae; 2 cervical block vertebrae; 2 thoracic block vertebrae; Tholos de Paimogo I C2-C3 Block vertebrae (1/48 = 2,1%) (Figure 4); 2 thoracic block vertebrae (Figure 6); Praia da Samarra C2-C3 Block vertebrae (+ Possible hypoplasia of dens axis*) (Figure 5); *Cranial- caudal border shifting defect; SITE TYPE OF DEFECT : CLEFT NEURAL Tholos de Paimogo I Atlas bipartita (1/23 = 4.35%) (Figure 2); Hipogeu de São Paulo II Cleft posterior arch of atlas (1/30 = 3.3%) (Figure 3); Figure 4: C2-C3 block vertebrae recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I. Figure 5: C2-C3 block vertebrae recovered from Praia da Samarra associated with a possible case of dens hypoplasia. Figure 6: Thoracic block vertebrae recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I. Lateral viex; X-ray –Lateral view; posterior view. Superior view Inferior view Figure 2: Atlas bipartita recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I. Figure 3: Cleft posterior arch of atlas exhumed from the Hipogeu de São Paulo II. DISCUSSION The most frequent defect observed was C2-C3 vertebral blocks (Figures 4 and 5). A rare thoracic block vertebrae was also register a (Figure 6). In all, trauma and degenerative origin can be excluded due to the absence of osteophyte formations. These defects could correspond to possible cases of Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS). KFS is a complex congenital disease that results from an interruption of the normal segmentation of vertebrae during the second to eighth week of gestational development a,c,f . Diagnoses is established with the presence of, at least, 2 fused cervical vertebrae. Clinically, it can be associated to several symptoms and anomalies, like short neck, limited neck range of motion, low posterior hairline c,f . KFS patients are particularly vulnerable to spinal canal compromise and spinal cord compression d,f . Unfortunately, the isolate nature of these vertebral blocks don’t allow a more conclusive diagnosis. In one case, Samarra, another development defect was found associated: presence of dens hypoplasia (Figure 5). Atlas cleft neural defects, that is, defects due to developmental delay of vertebral elements were noted in two samples. Clefting of posterior arch of atlas, the most common defect of this type a , was observed in São Paulo II collection. A rarer defect, atlas bipartita, was found among the recovered remains of Paimogo I. METHODS Developmental anomalies were scored according to Barnes (1994); For block vertebrae, the classification followed the definition of Barnes (1994) and Pany and Teschler-Nicola (2007): Type I: involves several cervical and thoracic vertebrae confined in one osseous block that usually signals major additional defects a ; Type II: fusion of two or three vertebrae in the cervical region, usually C2 and C3 or C5 and C6; less commonly T2 and T5. Hemivertebrae and occipitalization may also be present e . Type III: typically involves block cervical vertebrae with additional thoracic and lumbar segmental errors a . FINAL REMARKS Although the main limitation of the nature of the samples, recovered from collective tombs, with very fragmented and disturbed bones with few or complete absence of anatomical connections, some relevant data about development defects of the spine of these prehistoric individuals were obtained. Besides the documentation of defects of several types, the importance of these disorders also lies in the fact that they can serve as indicators of the degree of homogeneity in populations. Therefore, they can help in reconstructing genetic relationships among populations and social aspects associated with inbreeding or certain marriage practices. The relatively high frequency of vertebral blocks in the Lugar do Canto sample, allow to infer small population size or population isolation. In fact, this is the oldest sample, and the only one dated to the Middle Neolithic. Bibliography: a Barnes, E. 1994. Developmental Defects of the Axial Skeleton in Paleopathology. University Press of Colorado. b Boaventura, R.; Ferreira, M.; Neves, MJ; Silva, AM. 2014.Funerary practices and anthropology during middle-late Neolithic (4 th and 3 rd Millennia BCE) in Portugal: Old Bones, New Insights. Anthropologie, LII/2: 183-205. c Buikstra, J. E. (ed). 2019. Ortner’s Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Academic Press, 3rd edition. d Igoumenou, V.G.; Karantzoulis, V.G.; Vazifehdan, F. 2018. Thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism, 15(1): 107-110. e Pany, D.; Teschler-Nicola, M. 2007. Klippel-Feil syndrome in an early Hungarian period juvenile skeleton from Austria. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 17 (4): 403-415. f Samartzis, D.; Kalluri , P.; Herman, J.; Lubicky, J. P.; Shen, F. H. 2011. Cervical Scoliosis in the Klippel–Feil Patient. SPINE, 36 (23): E1501–E1508. Figure 1: Geographic location of the analysed samples. MATERIAL This study includes the human remains recovered from 4 collective burials dated to the Late Neolithic/Chalcolithic, except Lugar do Canto from the Middle Neolithic period (Figure 1): Natural cave of Lugar do Canto (1); Tholos de Paimogo I (2); Tholos Praia da Samarra (3); Hipogeu de São Paulo II (4); The human remains were recovered without anatomical connection and fragmented. The present analysis includes data from cervical and thoracic region of the spine.

Development anomalies of the vertebral column in …cias.uc.pt/.../03/Silva-and-Tereso-Berlim-2019-final.pdfDevelopment anomalies of the vertebral column in Portuguese Prehistoric

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Development anomalies of the vertebral column in …cias.uc.pt/.../03/Silva-and-Tereso-Berlim-2019-final.pdfDevelopment anomalies of the vertebral column in Portuguese Prehistoric

Development anomalies of the vertebral column in Portuguese Prehistoric samplesAna Maria Silva and Sofia Tereso

Laboratory of Prehistory, CIAS, University of Coimbra

3000 – 456 Coimbra, Portugal

[email protected].

INTRODUCTION

The spine can provide a large amount of information about an individual’s physical condition, lifestyle, epidemiology and familial links of birth defects. The aim of this research was the analysis of

developmental anomalies of the vertebral column of Portuguese Middle/Late Neolhiitic and Chalcolithic skeletal collections. These were recovered from collective tombs, were the bones are found

disturbed, very fragmented with few or complete absence of anatomical connection. Despite these limitations, several developmental anomalies of the cervical and thoracic part of the spine were

observed.

RESULTS

All defects were observed in adult individuals except the case of Praia da Samarra, that belongs to a non-adult that died between 12 and 17/19 years. These include:

Developmental delay of vertebral elements (cleft neural): Atlas bipartita and cleft posterior arch of atlas (Table 1);

Segmentation errors (Failure of segmentation): block vertebra (Table 2);SITE TYPE OF DEFECT: FAILURE OF SEGMENTATION

Lugar do Canto C2-C3 Block vertebrae (NMI C2 provisional: 8);

C2-C3 Block vertebrae;

2 cervical block vertebrae;

2 thoracic block vertebrae;

Tholos de Paimogo I C2-C3 Block vertebrae (1/48 = 2,1%) (Figure 4);

2 thoracic block vertebrae (Figure 6);

Praia da Samarra C2-C3 Block vertebrae (+ Possible hypoplasia of dens axis*) (Figure

5);*Cranial- caudal border shifting defect;

SITE TYPE OF DEFECT: CLEFT NEURAL

Tholos de Paimogo I Atlas bipartita (1/23 = 4.35%) (Figure 2);

Hipogeu de São Paulo II Cleft posterior arch of atlas (1/30 = 3.3%) (Figure 3);

Figure 4: C2-C3 block vertebrae recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I.

Figure 5: C2-C3 block vertebrae recovered from Praia daSamarra associated with a possible case of denshypoplasia.

Figure 6: Thoracic block vertebrae recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I. Lateral viex; X-ray –Lateral view; posterior view.

Superior viewInferior view

Figure 2: Atlas bipartita recovered from Tholos of Paimogo I.

Figure 3: Cleft posterior archof atlas exhumed from theHipogeu de São Paulo II.

DISCUSSION

The most frequent defect observed was C2-C3 vertebral blocks (Figures 4 and 5). A rare thoracic

block vertebrae was also registera (Figure 6). In all, trauma and degenerative origin can be

excluded due to the absence of osteophyte formations. These defects could correspond to

possible cases of Klippel-Feil syndrome (KFS). KFS is a complex congenital disease that results

from an interruption of the normal segmentation of vertebrae during the second to eighth week

of gestational developmenta,c,f. Diagnoses is established with the presence of, at least, 2 fused

cervical vertebrae. Clinically, it can be associated to several symptoms and anomalies, like short

neck, limited neck range of motion, low posterior hairlinec,f. KFS patients are particularly

vulnerable to spinal canal compromise and spinal cord compressiond,f. Unfortunately, the isolate

nature of these vertebral blocks don’t allow a more conclusive diagnosis. In one case, Samarra,

another development defect was found associated: presence of dens hypoplasia (Figure 5).

Atlas cleft neural defects, that is, defects due to developmental delay of vertebral elements were

noted in two samples. Clefting of posterior arch of atlas, the most common defect of this typea,

was observed in São Paulo II collection. A rarer defect, atlas bipartita, was found among the

recovered remains of Paimogo I.

METHODS

Developmental anomalies were scored according to Barnes (1994);

For block vertebrae, the classification followed the definition of Barnes (1994) and Pany and

Teschler-Nicola (2007):

Type I: involves several cervical and thoracic vertebrae confined in one osseous block that usually

signals major additional defectsa;

Type II: fusion of two or three vertebrae in the cervical region, usually C2 and C3 or C5 and C6;

less commonly T2 and T5. Hemivertebrae and occipitalization may also be presente.

Type III: typically involves block cervical vertebrae with additional thoracic and lumbar segmental

errorsa.

FINAL REMARKS

Although the main limitation of the nature of the samples, recovered from collective tombs, with

very fragmented and disturbed bones with few or complete absence of anatomical connections,

some relevant data about development defects of the spine of these prehistoric individuals were

obtained. Besides the documentation of defects of several types, the importance of these

disorders also lies in the fact that they can serve as indicators of the degree of homogeneity in

populations. Therefore, they can help in reconstructing genetic relationships among populations

and social aspects associated with inbreeding or certain marriage practices.

The relatively high frequency of vertebral blocks in the Lugar do Canto sample, allow to infer

small population size or population isolation. In fact, this is the oldest sample, and the only one

dated to the Middle Neolithic.

Bibliography:aBarnes, E. 1994. Developmental Defects of the Axial Skeleton in Paleopathology. University Press of Colorado.bBoaventura, R.; Ferreira, M.; Neves, MJ; Silva, AM. 2014.Funerary practices and anthropology during middle-late Neolithic (4th and 3rd Millennia BCE) in Portugal: OldBones, New Insights. Anthropologie, LII/2: 183-205.cBuikstra, J. E. (ed). 2019. Ortner’s Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains. Academic Press, 3rd edition.dIgoumenou, V.G.; Karantzoulis, V.G.; Vazifehdan, F. 2018. Thoracic and lumbar spinal stenosis in a patient with Klippel-Feil syndrome. Clinical Cases in Mineral andBone Metabolism, 15(1): 107-110.ePany, D.; Teschler-Nicola, M. 2007. Klippel-Feil syndrome in an early Hungarian period juvenile skeleton from Austria. Int. J. Osteoarchaeol., 17 (4): 403-415.fSamartzis, D.; Kalluri , P.; Herman, J.; Lubicky, J. P.; Shen, F. H. 2011. Cervical Scoliosis in the Klippel–Feil Patient. SPINE, 36 (23): E1501–E1508.

Figure 1: Geographic location of the analysed samples.

MATERIAL

This study includes the human remains recovered from 4 collective burials dated to the Late

Neolithic/Chalcolithic, except Lugar do Canto from the Middle Neolithic period (Figure 1):

Natural cave of Lugar do Canto (1);

Tholos de Paimogo I (2);

Tholos Praia da Samarra (3);

Hipogeu de São Paulo II (4);

The human remains were recovered without anatomical connection and fragmented.

The present analysis includes data from cervical and thoracic region of the spine.