14
Developing Activity Classifications for Time-Use Surveys Andrew Hancock Statistics New Zealand Prepared for 2013 Meeting of the UN Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications

Developing Activity Classifications for Time-Use Surveys Andrew Hancock Statistics New Zealand Prepared for 2013 Meeting of the UN Expert Group on International

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Developing Activity Classifications for Time-Use Surveys

Andrew Hancock

Statistics New Zealand

Prepared for 2013 Meeting of the UN Expert Group on

International Statistical Classifications

Contents

Why have activity classifications in a TUS?

Essential components

ICATUS

Dimension of Time

International Approaches

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Why have activity classifications in a TUS?

Groups and organises activity information meaningfully and systematically

Categorises different activities providing a picture of how people lead their lives

Identifies how much time is spent on economic and non-economic activities

Supports policy making and international comparability of statistical data

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Essential components of an Activity Classification

A consistent conceptual basis that meets user needs

Categories are mutually exclusive and exhaustive and definitions are clear and unambiguous

Up-to-date and robust enough to last for a period of time

Provides comparability over time and between collections

Participation in activities totals 24 hours to reflect time diary

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

ICATUS

ICATUS was designed to:

• Provide a set of activity categories for producing statistics on time use

• Be suitable at the national level, and provide comparability at regional and international levels

• Serve as a standard activity classification consistent with existing standard classifications in labour and economic statistics

• Be applicable to both developing and developed countries• Enable classifying activities to a five level hierarchic structure

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

ICATUS (cont)

ICATUS was prepared on two main principles:

• Maintaining consistency with the conceptual framework of the System of National Accounts (SNA), taking into account the boundaries between economic and non-economic activities, and productive and non-productive activities

• Building on existing national and regional classifications, keeping in mind the experiences of both developed and developing countries

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

ICATUS (cont)

ICATUS was also based on three typologies:

• Activities performed in relation to production within the SNA production boundary

• Activities performed in relation to production activities within the general production boundary but outside the SNA production boundary, or “non-SNA work” activities

• Activities that are not considered as production activities

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

ICATUS Major Divisions by SNA

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Productive Activities Non-productive (personal)

Within SNA Productive Boundary Outside SNA Productive Boundary

01 Formal employment 06 Household – services for own use 09 Learning

02 Household – primary production of goods

07 Household – unpaid work 10 Socializing

03 Household – non-primary production of goods

08 Household – volunteer work 11 Cultural, entertainment

04 Household - construction 12 Hobbies, games

05 Household – services for income 13 Sports

14 Mass media

15 Personal care

Dimensions of Time

Necessary Time: Activities that serve basic physiological needs

Contracted Time: Activities related to paid work or education

Committed Time: Activities related to maintaining a home or family

Free Time: Time left after the previous three types have been used

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Adopting an international activity classification

Does the conceptual base fit with the needs of the users?

Does the classification structure reflect national requirements and assist policy making?

Does it require additional ‘for whom’ or ‘with whom’ classifications?

Does it facilitate international comparability?

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

International approaches

Many and varied flat and hierarchic approaches

Varying conceptual approaches

Differing focuses on data requirements

Developed versus developing country needs

Treatment of secondary or simultaneous activities

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

International approaches (cont)

Limited uptake of ICATUS and usually quite modified as ICATUS quite complex structurally

Common international threads of sleeping, caring, housework, paid work, education and culture/leisure tend to better suit general policy issues regarding gender equality, work-life balance etc

Economic focus versus social/household approach

Lack of clarity on what is useful for international comparability

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Conclusions

Obtain agreement on the conceptual base for an international standard

Review need for consistency with existing labour and economic standards

Clarify policy needs and end use of data to inform development

Review lack of uptake of ICATUS

2013 UN Expert Group Meeting

Developing Activity Classifications for Time-Use Surveys

Andrew Hancock

Statistics New Zealand

Prepared for 2013 Meeting of the UN Expert Group on

International Statistical Classifications