37
Determining cosmological parameters with current observational data TPCSF Li Hong 2008.12.10

Determining cosmological parameters with current observational data

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Determining cosmological parameters with current observational data. TPCSF Li Hong 2008.12.10. Recent years Cosmology became more and more accurate. CMB 、 LSS and SN. Complementary, GRB and WL also make remarkable progress !. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Determining cosmological parameters with current

observational data

TPCSF

Li Hong

2008.12.10

The cosmological observations play a crucial role in understanding universe !

CMB 、 LSS and SN

Complementary, GRB and WL also make remarkable progress !

•Recent years Cosmology became • more and more accurate

outline

• The global fitting analysis • The constraints on cosmological parameter

s with the latest observational data• Constraints on EOS including GRBs • Simulations for LAMOST• Summary

Global fitting procedure

• Parameterization of EOS: • Perturbation included G.-B. Zhao, et al., PRD 72 123515 (2005)• Method : modified CosmoMC

Calculated at ShangHai Supercomputer Center (SSC)

• Data : CMB+LSS+SNe

• Cosmological parameters:

)1()( 10 awwaw

))sin(ln()( 210 awwwaw

For simplicity, usually consider flat Universe

Quintessece

Quintom A

Quintom B

Phantom

Current constraint on the equation of state of dark energy

WMAP5 resultE. Komatsu et al., arXiv:0803.0547

Xia, Li, Zhao, Zhang, in preparation

Status: 1) Cosmological constant fits data well;2) Dynamical model not ruled out;3) Best fit value of equation of state: slightly w across -1 Quintom model

Difference:

Data: SN (SNLS+ESSENCE+Riess et al.)vs SN (307,Kowalski et al., arXiv:0804.4142)

Method: WMAP distance prior vs Full CMB data.However, results similar (Li et al., arXiv: 0805.1118)

Arxiv: 0805.1118, Accepted by APJ Lett.

For the published version :

Take into account the recent weak lensing data

Global analysis of the cosmological parameters including GRBs

• Results from the global analysis with WMAP3+LSS+SNe(Riess 182 samples)+GRBs (Schaefer 69 sample)

• New method for solution of the circulation problem

the 69 modulus published by Schaefer (in astro-ph/0612285)

Bias with only GRB

Need global analysis

Hong Li, M. su, Z.H. Fan, Z.G. Dai and X.Zhang, astro-ph/0612060, Phys.Lett.B658:95-100,2008

WMAP3+LSS+SN

WMAP3+LSS+SN+GRB

)1/(* zzwww a0

The relevant papers on studies with GRBs:E.L.Wright astro-ph/0701584

F.Y. Wang, Z. G. Dai and Z. H. Zhu, astro-ph/0706.0938

Problems:

• The circulation problem :

Due to the lack of the low-redshift GRBs, the experiential correlation is obtained from the high-redshift GRBs with input cosmology !

S_r is the fluence of the r-ray; t_j is the Break time; n is the circumburst particle Density; eta_r is the fraction of the kineticEnergy that translate to the r-rays;E_peak is the peak energy of the spectrum

What is the circulation problem?

• Due to the lack of the low-redshift GRBs, the experiential correlations are obtained from the high-redshift GRBs with input cosmology which we intend to constrain, it lead to the circulation problem!

From the observation, we can get: S_r, t_j, n, eta_r, E_peak

With a fire ball GRB model:

Ghirlanda et al.

UsuallyInput a cosmology

Get A & C

A new method for overcoming the circulation problem for GRBs in global analysis

ApeakcEE

We integrate them out in order to get the constraint on the cosmological parameter:

We let A and C free:

We can avoid the circulation problem ! And method can apply to the other correlations.

EEpeak Correlation as an example:We takeHong Li et al., APJ 680, 92 (2008)

For flat universe !

With free ! K

For flat universe !

The constraints on A and C related with the correlation:

i. e., in the literature C is set to [0.89, 1.05]; A is set to 1.5One can find that, this will lead to the bias to the final constraints on The cosmological parameters!

• www.lamost.org

z~ 0.2

n~ galaxies710

H.Feldman, et al. Astrophys.J. 426, 23 (1994)

Firstly we take the bias factor: b=1Then we let b free, see the following

Simulations for LAMOST

Simulated power spectrum

1

70 , 7.0 , 3.0 0

s

m

n

H

CDM

Fiducial model:

About other simulations

• Planck: we assume the isotropic noise with variance and a symmetric gaussian beam of 7 arcminutes full-width half-maximum : A. Lewis, Phys.RevD71,083008(2005)

(See the paper by arXiv: 0708.1111, J.-Q. Xia, H. Li et al.)

• SNLS: ~ 500 SN Ia

241032/ KNN EEl

TTl

Constraint on cosmological parameters with LAMOST

Constraints on EoS of Dark Energy

Constraint on absolute neutrino mass

SUMMARY Our results on determining EOS of DE with MCM

C from WMAP+SDSS+SN(+GRBS) ; Cosmological constant fits the current data well

at 2 sigma; Quintom is mildly favored ; The Future observation like Planck and LAMOST will improve the constraints

H. Li, J.-Q. Xia, Zu-Hui Fan and X. Zhang, JCAP 10 (2008) 046