Upload
juliet-hall
View
228
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Destruction of goods atNTCA Airport Directorate No. 1.
Destruction of goods atNTCA Airport Directorate No. 1.
NTCA Airport Directorate No. 1. (NTCA AD 1)
• Carries out customs clearances
• Monitors customs related activities of companies operating at the airport
• Controls traffic of prohibited and restricted goods
• Creates and maintains contact with other authorities (CITES, police, National Food Chain Safety Office, National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition)
• Manages licenses at a local level (licenses for warehouses, simplified procedures, , etc)
Destruction of goods atNTCA Airport Directorate No. 1.
Director
Deputy Director
Customs Supervision and Licensing Dept.
Risk Management and Patrolling Dept.
Secretariat
Customs Clearences Dept. No. 1
Customs Clearences Dept. No. 2
Head of Audit Departments
Customs Value and Origin Dept.
Post ClearenceDept.
NTCA Airport Directorate No. 1. (NTCA AD 1)
NTCA Airport Directorate No. 1. (NTCA AD 1)
• Controls cargo traffic and courier traffic (an average of 28.000 shipments of non-community goods monthly )
• Risk Analysis and Patrolling Department -> controls legal and illicit traffic of „sensitive goods” (drugs, military and dual-use technology, CITES-related goods, etc AND COUNTERFEITS)
Destruction of goods atNTCA Airport Directorate No. 1.
RISK ANALYSIS AND PATROLLING DEPARTMENT
- Risk analysis and operational unit: 18 persons …. and 1 sniffer dog- IPR unit: 2 persons- Crimes and offences administrators: 2 persons
Legal basis of destructions
• Council Regulation No 608/2013 of of 12 June 2013 concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1383/2003
• Internal directions
Destruction - requirements
• In 10 working days:
1) the rightholder declares that an IPR has been infringed AND
2) the rightholder confirms his agreement to the destruction AND
3) the declarant / holder of the goods confirms his agreement to the destruction (no reaction -> can be considered as a confirmation)
• As a result of destruction goods must become non-usable
Destruction – proper outcome
BEFORE AFTER
Destruction – in practice
- Destruction is carried out by the rightholder / representative -> under customs control
- Costs of destruction are covered by the rightholder / representative (they also take responsibility for it)
- Hazardous goods must be destroyed at specialized facilities
Destruction – in practice
- The rightholder / representative reimburses the costs of storage (goods are stored in the warehouse of the customs office while detained)
- Theoretically goods can be offered for charity purpose – in practise it does not work (rightholder does not confirm his agreement, trademarks cannot be removed, etc)
- Samples can be taken for analysis (such samples must be returned to customs)
- The remains of goods have to be cleared
REPORT
A report is made and signed by both parties (rightholder / customs) of each destruction
REPORT.pdf
AN EXAMPLE
Step 1) 5 pairs of possibly infringing „Nike” shoes were found in a DHL consignment
AN EXAMPLE
Step 2) The rightholder has been notified the very same day
Step 3) The rightholder has confirmed (in writing, in 10 working days) that the shoes infringe their IPR
Step 4) The consignee has confirmed his agreement to the destruction (in fact, he has not exclaimed against the destruction in 10 working days)
AN EXAMPLE
Step 5) Goods destroyed – 14 days later
MAIN ADVANTAGE
A lower number of IP-related offences resulted in less paperwork (officers can avoid interrogating consignees as witnesses, courier consignments can be „seized” /detained/ without the prosecutor’s permission, etc).
Cases still have to be managed: applying the provisons of simplified procedure to a tipical infringing consignment takes 5 man-hours (average)
Thank you for your attention! www.nav.gov.hu