Designing quality e-learning environments for higher education Designing quality e-learning environments

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Text of Designing quality e-learning environments for higher education Designing quality e-learning...

  • Educational Research Vol. 1(6) pp. 186-197 July 2010 Available online http://www.interesjournals.org/ER Copyright ©2010 International Research Journals

    Full length Research Paper

    Designing quality e-learning environments for higher education

    Ahmed E. Hassan1 and Mohamed E. Ibrahim2

    1Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Egypt

    2Faculty of Computers & Information Sciences, Mansoura University, Egypt

    Accepted 10 June, 2010

    With the ever-increasing integration of online learning (or e-learning) into university courses, there is strong need for practical guidelines and recommendations to facilitate the development and delivery of pedagogically effective e-learning environments. An investigation by Siragusa (2005) examined factors which make for effective instructional design principles and learning strategies for higher education students studying within these learning environments. Surveys were administered to students and lecturers in Western Australian universities which revealed numerous areas of students’ e-learning experiences which they had perceived as being successful and those needing improvements. This paper presents a model containing 24 sets of recommendations that were developed from the study’s survey findings. The 24 recommendations accommodate the varying pedagogical needs of learners as well as modes of course delivery. For each recommendation, a pedagogical dimension is presented to illustrate the pedagogical needs and instructional requirements. These 24 dimensions, which are grouped within nine main sections, highlight the decisions which need to be made during the instructional analysis, design, delivery and evaluation phases of e-learning environments in higher education in order to optimise their pedagogical quality. Keywords: Quality e-learning environments, higher education, pedagogical quality optimisation

    INTRODUCTION Higher educational institutions are increasingly moving toward the use of the Internet for delivery of their courses, both on campus and at a distance (Ally, 2004; Kim and Bonk, 2006). The Internet provides significantly different and interesting possibilities for computer- meditated communication and learning from other forms of educational technologies (Weller, 2002). In some cases, courses are delivered exclusively online to students in remote locations and supplementary materials may also be mailed out. The entire class website can be duplicated onto a CD-ROM for the students with slow and unreliable Internet access. In other cases, the lecturer may use a class website as a supplement to their face-to-face delivered classes. Some lecturers utilise the class website for the teaching of specific skills and knowledge through automated pre- programmed online activities that can provide specific feedback to students’ answers (Scott and Judd, 2002). There are, therefore, ways in which e-learning *Corresponding author e-mail: quality.pa53@yahoo.com

    may be utilised based upon pedagogical needs.

    The development of instructionally effective online learning environments that meet these pedagogical needs require the application of appropriate instructional design principles. The literature suggests that there are gaps between the bodies of knowledge relating to learning theories, instructional design principles and student learning in higher education, (Siragusa and Dixon, 2005a). A recent PhD study (Siragusa, 2005) developed a theoretical framework and research methodology (Siragusa and Dixon, 2005b) which made links between these bodies of knowledge together with this study’s research findings in order to put forward instructional design principles that effectively promote the use of online learning to meet the varying pedagogical needs in higher education. These instructional design principles are presented within a model, which is based upon Reeves and Reeves’ (1997) model for creating pedagogically effective online learning environments. Reeves and Reeves put forward 10 pedagogical dimensions of interactive learning on the World Wide Web. The new model developed from the PhD study expands upon Reeves and Reeves’ (1997) model and

  • Hassan and Ibrahim 187

    Figure 1. Dimension for underlying pedagogical philosophy

    Figure 2. Dimension for instructional design analysis presents 24 pedagogical dimensions. These 24 pedagogical dimensions are described within the following nine main sections. They are then presented within a model, followed by an example of their application. Pedagogical philosophy and instructional strategy for e-learning Ally (2004) argued that in order to promote higher-order thinking through technology-based learning environments, instructional strategies which promote learners to make connections with new information to old, acquire meaningful knowledge, and employ metacognitive thinking skills are required within the e- learning environment. This requires an analysis of the learner, the learning context and the learners' specific learning needs. Students may be required to learn a set of principles within a discipline area and integrate previously learned knowledge with new knowledge by employing techniques such as advanced organisers, worked-out examples, and elaborative questions. A lecturer with postgraduate students completing a Masters degree may prefer to adopt a constructivist approach to teaching, where students are encouraged to construct their own meaning of the content through their prior experiences. The varying underlying pedagogical approach is represented along a dimension as illustrated in Figure 1. Instructional design processes for e-learning Caplan (2004) and Davis (2004) described how, in an ideal world, educators, instructional designers, e-learning media developers and graphic designers all work together to create pedagogically effective learning environments that are grounded in sound learning theories. In many cases, however, the lecturer is often left without this team support and resources. There are, however, aspects of the instructional design process that the lecturer needs to consider when creating pedagogically effective e-learning environments

    regardless of the available resources. Instructional design analysis The development of online learning environments needs to draw upon the vast body of knowledge relating to instructional design models (Dick et al., 2005; Gagné et al.,1992) for the analysis of instruction, the learners (background, prior knowledge, motivation, etc.), the learning context, development of an instructional strategy, and evaluation. A lecturer requiring students to learn a particular concepts will take into account the learning environment in which this understanding will be demonstrated, the students’ characteristics (e.g., their prior knowledge and motivation to learn). The lecturer will then develop an instructional strategy which will employ online learning technologies to assist with achieving this instructional goal, or he/she may adopt a constructivist learning environment where students combine new learning with existing knowledge and the learning experiences are authentic depictions of existing practices. The lecturer may develop formative and/or summative evaluations to identify how to improve the instruction and to determine the overall effectiveness of the instruction. The level for which instruction incorporates an instructional design process of analysis, strategy development and evaluation may be represented along a dimension as illustrated in Figure 2. Content The detail and extent of the content provided to students may vary depending upon the students’ pedagogical needs. Students studying entirely online must have access to all of the unit content including the learning outcomes, assignment requirements and relevant resources. Students attending face-to-face classes may receive the content in class and additional content on the supplemental class website. Students studying a first year undergraduate unit in mechanical engineering need to have an understanding of the underlying principles and, therefore, the content needs to be complete,

  • 188 Educ. Res.

    Figure 3. Pedagogical dimension for content provided

    Figure 4. Dimension for online unit information and delivery mode

    Figure 5. Pedagogical dimension for student motivation

    relevant and accurate, (Glaser, 1987). The purpose of the class website should be made clear and unambiguous instructions for access, navigation to relevant information, and use of communication tools and other features of the website. Students studying at postgraduate level may need to construct their own knowledge based upon their literature review and research and, therefore, less content is provided. Figure 3 illustrates two contrasting pedagogical approaches relating to content on a pedagogical dimension. Online information and delivery mode The amount of information to provide on a class website may be determined by the delivery mode. If a unit is to be delivered entirely online, then the website must include all the information needed for students’ successful completion of the unit including appropriately detailed content, learning activities, assignment requirements, and supporting materials. Students in remote locations with unreliable Internet access may need to receive a copy of the entire unit’s information in paper-based and possibly CD-ROM format as a backup. If the class website is to be supplemental to face-to-face classes, then the lecturer