Upload
manos-kritikos
View
233
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Design Planing
1/17
Design Planning
8/3/2019 Design Planing
2/17
Selection of the type of
prosthesis 3 types
Removable Partial Denture (RPD)
Tooth-Supported Fixed Partial Denture (FDP)
Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture
May be combined in the same arch
Treatment Simplification
As simple as possible
8/3/2019 Design Planing
3/17
Wrong occlusal
Plane
Proper occlusal
Plane
Normal state Edentulous
State
8/3/2019 Design Planing
4/17
Removable Partial Denture
Edentulous spaces Greater than 2 posterior teeth
Anterior spaces greater than 2 incisors
Spaces that include a canine and two other contiguous teeth
i.e. Central incisor, lateral incisor and canine or lateral incisor, canine
and first molar
Abutment Configuration
No distal abutment
Multiple or bilateral edentulous spaces
Abutment conditions Short clinical crowns
Insufficient abutment
8/3/2019 Design Planing
5/17
Abutment Alignment
Tipped abutments can be tolerated
Widely divergent abutment alignment
Occlusion More adaptable to irregularities in a healthy opposing natural
dentition
Ridge form
Gross tissue loss in residual ridge
General Features Dry mouth is a contra indicator
Cheap
Acceptable oral hygiene
Treatment simplification
Advanced age
Systemic health problems
More acceptable to dentition in transition to edentulous state
8/3/2019 Design Planing
6/17
Conventional tooth-supported
fixed partial denture Span Length
Posterior Span 2 or fewer
Incisors 4 or fewer
Span Configuration
Usually has distal abutment but can be used with short cantilever
pontic
Abutment alignment
Less than 25 inclination can be accommodated by preparation
modification Abutment condition
Needs to be good
Nonvital teeth can be used if there is sufficient coronal tooth
structure
8/3/2019 Design Planing
7/17
Occlusion
Favorable loading (magnitude, direction, frequency, duration]
Periodontal Condition
Good alveolar bone support
Crown-root ratio 1:1 or better
No mobility
Favorable root morphology
Provides rigid stabilization
Ridge Form
Moderate resorption
No gross soft tissue defects
General features
Dry mouth High risk of caries
Good for Mandibular tori (bony growth in the mandible near tongue)
Palatal soft tissue lesion
Large tongue
Exaggerated gag reflex
Must be within dentist's skills
8/3/2019 Design Planing
8/17
Resin-bonded tooth supported
fixed partial denture Span Length
Single tooth (anterior)
Possible for 2 incisors
Span configuration
Abutments mesial & distal to pontic
Abutment alignment
Less than 15 inclination mesiodistally
Should be in same buccolingual plane
Preparations are not easily modified because of minimal
reduction Abutment conditions
Defect-free abutments
Incisor, premolar replacements
8/3/2019 Design Planing
9/17
Occlusion
Cannot be used for incisor replacement in presence of deep
vertical overlap
Periodontal Condition No mobility
Ridge Form
Moderate resorption
No gross soft tissue defects General Features
Well suited for young patients
Can be used for replacing molars if masticatory muscles are not
too well developed
8/3/2019 Design Planing
10/17
Implant-supported fixed
partial denture Span Length
Single Tooth
2 to 6 unit span
Span configuration
No distal abutment
Occlusion
Occlusal forces must be as nearly vertical as possible to prevent
unfavorable lateral loading of implants
Periodontal condition Dense bone
8/3/2019 Design Planing
11/17
Ridge form
Broad, flat ridge
General features
Able to survive in dry mouth
May be better choice if teeth will require extensive treatment
and will still be weak, questionable abutments
Unfavorable attitude toward RPD
Must be within dentist's skills
8/3/2019 Design Planing
12/17
Crown Ratio
The optimum crown-root ratio
for a fixed partial denture
abutment is 2:3 (A).
A ratio of 1:1 is the minimum
that is accepted (B).
8/3/2019 Design Planing
13/17
Root Configuration
Roots that are broader labio-lingually than they are
mesiodistally are preferable to roots that round in cross
section
Multirooted posterior teeth with widely separated roots will
offer better periodontal support than roots that converge,fuse, or generally present a conical con- figuration
The molar with divergentroots (A) will be better
abutment tooth than the one
whose roots are fused (B).
8/3/2019 Design Planing
14/17
8/3/2019 Design Planing
15/17
Biomechanical Considerations
8/3/2019 Design Planing
16/17
Special Problems
Tilted Molar Abutments
Will not seat
due to the
distal tooth
Proximal half
crown as a
retainer
Non rigid
connector on
the premolar
Orthodontic approach also possible
8/3/2019 Design Planing
17/17
Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures
A pontic premolar
has been used
instead of molar to
minimize stress on it