Design Planing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    1/17

    Design Planning

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    2/17

    Selection of the type of

    prosthesis 3 types

    Removable Partial Denture (RPD)

    Tooth-Supported Fixed Partial Denture (FDP)

    Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Denture

    May be combined in the same arch

    Treatment Simplification

    As simple as possible

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    3/17

    Wrong occlusal

    Plane

    Proper occlusal

    Plane

    Normal state Edentulous

    State

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    4/17

    Removable Partial Denture

    Edentulous spaces Greater than 2 posterior teeth

    Anterior spaces greater than 2 incisors

    Spaces that include a canine and two other contiguous teeth

    i.e. Central incisor, lateral incisor and canine or lateral incisor, canine

    and first molar

    Abutment Configuration

    No distal abutment

    Multiple or bilateral edentulous spaces

    Abutment conditions Short clinical crowns

    Insufficient abutment

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    5/17

    Abutment Alignment

    Tipped abutments can be tolerated

    Widely divergent abutment alignment

    Occlusion More adaptable to irregularities in a healthy opposing natural

    dentition

    Ridge form

    Gross tissue loss in residual ridge

    General Features Dry mouth is a contra indicator

    Cheap

    Acceptable oral hygiene

    Treatment simplification

    Advanced age

    Systemic health problems

    More acceptable to dentition in transition to edentulous state

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    6/17

    Conventional tooth-supported

    fixed partial denture Span Length

    Posterior Span 2 or fewer

    Incisors 4 or fewer

    Span Configuration

    Usually has distal abutment but can be used with short cantilever

    pontic

    Abutment alignment

    Less than 25 inclination can be accommodated by preparation

    modification Abutment condition

    Needs to be good

    Nonvital teeth can be used if there is sufficient coronal tooth

    structure

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    7/17

    Occlusion

    Favorable loading (magnitude, direction, frequency, duration]

    Periodontal Condition

    Good alveolar bone support

    Crown-root ratio 1:1 or better

    No mobility

    Favorable root morphology

    Provides rigid stabilization

    Ridge Form

    Moderate resorption

    No gross soft tissue defects

    General features

    Dry mouth High risk of caries

    Good for Mandibular tori (bony growth in the mandible near tongue)

    Palatal soft tissue lesion

    Large tongue

    Exaggerated gag reflex

    Must be within dentist's skills

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    8/17

    Resin-bonded tooth supported

    fixed partial denture Span Length

    Single tooth (anterior)

    Possible for 2 incisors

    Span configuration

    Abutments mesial & distal to pontic

    Abutment alignment

    Less than 15 inclination mesiodistally

    Should be in same buccolingual plane

    Preparations are not easily modified because of minimal

    reduction Abutment conditions

    Defect-free abutments

    Incisor, premolar replacements

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    9/17

    Occlusion

    Cannot be used for incisor replacement in presence of deep

    vertical overlap

    Periodontal Condition No mobility

    Ridge Form

    Moderate resorption

    No gross soft tissue defects General Features

    Well suited for young patients

    Can be used for replacing molars if masticatory muscles are not

    too well developed

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    10/17

    Implant-supported fixed

    partial denture Span Length

    Single Tooth

    2 to 6 unit span

    Span configuration

    No distal abutment

    Occlusion

    Occlusal forces must be as nearly vertical as possible to prevent

    unfavorable lateral loading of implants

    Periodontal condition Dense bone

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    11/17

    Ridge form

    Broad, flat ridge

    General features

    Able to survive in dry mouth

    May be better choice if teeth will require extensive treatment

    and will still be weak, questionable abutments

    Unfavorable attitude toward RPD

    Must be within dentist's skills

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    12/17

    Crown Ratio

    The optimum crown-root ratio

    for a fixed partial denture

    abutment is 2:3 (A).

    A ratio of 1:1 is the minimum

    that is accepted (B).

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    13/17

    Root Configuration

    Roots that are broader labio-lingually than they are

    mesiodistally are preferable to roots that round in cross

    section

    Multirooted posterior teeth with widely separated roots will

    offer better periodontal support than roots that converge,fuse, or generally present a conical con- figuration

    The molar with divergentroots (A) will be better

    abutment tooth than the one

    whose roots are fused (B).

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    14/17

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    15/17

    Biomechanical Considerations

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    16/17

    Special Problems

    Tilted Molar Abutments

    Will not seat

    due to the

    distal tooth

    Proximal half

    crown as a

    retainer

    Non rigid

    connector on

    the premolar

    Orthodontic approach also possible

  • 8/3/2019 Design Planing

    17/17

    Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures

    A pontic premolar

    has been used

    instead of molar to

    minimize stress on it