Design of Artificial Knee Joint

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    1/47

    1

    DESIGN OF ARTIFICIAL KNEE JOINT

    In this project, our aim is to design and analyze a mechanism to support the human knee

    during the weight acceptance part of the gait cycle by taking half of the maximum load and

    provide free motion for the rest of the cycle. The basic functioning of the knee was studied and

    the anatomy and mechanism of walking were analysed for this purpose.

    Then based on the data gathered, a system based on a torsion spring controlled by a

    Whitworth uick !eturn "echanism was proposed. The Whitworth mechanism was driven by a

    motor which was controlled by a microcontroller#sensor system. The specifications of the motor

    were based on the tor$ue re$uirement results of the dynamic analysis in %olidworks &'(& and the

    speed calculations were made analytically based on the human walking pattern.

    )ased on the gait cycle, the velocity ratio was decided and the link lengths were calculated

    for the mechanism analytically. The entire system was made into %olidworks &'(& and the

    dynamic analysis of the system were done including the force analysis, Tor$ue re$uirements on

    the motor and the variation of these $uantities with respect to the time of operation of the system.

    *ecessary analyses were also done in the software itself to ensure that the Whitworth mechanism

    can withstand the maximum load of +' *.m with a good fatigue life during its period of

    operation.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    2/47

    2

    Table Of Contents

    Sr.

    No.

    Chapter Name Pae

    No.

    ! bstract (

    ! -ist of igures / Tables 0

    ! *omenclature 1

    " Introduction

    (.( 2steoarthritis

    3

    4

    # -iterature !eview

    &.( Walking "echanism

    &.(.( 5ait 6hases &.(.& natomical terms of motion

    &.(.&.( lexion and extension

    &.(.&.& bduction and dduction

    &.(.&.+ 7levation and depression

    &.(.&.0 !otation

    &.& nalysis of 8nee 9oint

    &.&.( :egrees of reedom

    &.&.& uasi#%tiffness of 8nee

    &.&.+ -oad constraints on the knee

    &.+ 2rthotics

    &.+.( Types of 7xoskeletons

    ;

    ;

    ;arious %tances of 5ait =ycle ;

    &.& >arious "otion Terms ('

    &.+ 8nee joint showing the cartilage and the meniscus ((

    &.0 >arious dimensional motions of 8nee (+

    &.1 "oment#ngle 5raph (+&.3 6arallel type 7xoskeleton (4

    &.4 %eries type 7xoskeleton (;

    +.( -ower 7xtremity -imbs (w A Working %troke >elocity Bm?sC

    3. >r A !eturn %troke >elocity Bm?sC

    4. a A "oment when heel strikes the ground B*.mC

    ;. b A "aximum moment at an angle of (1 degree B*.mC

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    6/47

    C+APTER "

    INTROD,CTION

    The knee is a hinge#like joint, and is a place where bones come together in the body to

    facilitate movement and bear weight.

    The knee joint connects the upper and lower portions of the leg and allows it to bend and

    straighten # and even rotate inward and outward a little bit. It is made up of four bones, the

    largest being the femur Bthigh boneC and the tibia Blarge shin boneC, which go head#to#head

    within the knee joint and bear the brunt of the impact of movement.

    The smaller two are the fibula Bsmaller shin boneC, which sits to the side of and slightly under

    the tibia, and the patella Bknee capC, which acts like a shield to protect the knee joint from

    trauma. %everal muscles, tendons and ligaments connect these four bones, make movement

    possible, and help keep the knee joint aligned and stable.

    ig (.(D The anatomy of knee showing the joints connecting the two major

    bones E emur and tibia and the two smaller bonesD 6atella and ibula F&&G

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    7/47

    "." Osteoarthr(t(s

    2steoarthritis B2C is one of the most common forms of arthritis. It is a chronic condition in

    which the material that cushions the joints, called cartilage, breaks down. This causes the bones

    to rub against each other, causing stiffness, pain and loss of joint movement. The cause is not

    fully understood.

    "ore than &' million people in the H% suffer from knee osteoarthritis B2C. )y &'+', &'@

    of mericans Babout 4' million peopleC of more than 31 years of age are at risk for 2. 5lobal

    statistics reveal over ('' million people worldwide suffer from 2, which is one of the most

    common causes of disability. In addition, younger individuals may be susceptible to injury#

    induced 2. "ore than 1'@ of the population around the world Bmore than 31 yearsC show #

    ray evidence of 2 in one of the joints, thus demonstrating the high incidence of this disease.

    While 2 is e$ually present in men and women, it appears to be more common among younger

    men Bless than 01 yearsC and in the older women Bmore than 01 yearsC.

    s per a recent report published in the Times of India B&'('C regarding 2, over 0'@ of the

    Indian population in the age group of 4' years or above suffer from 2. *early &@ of these

    undergo severe knee pain and disability. s per a recent statement $uoted by 6iramal Jealthcare

    -imited in a nationwide campaign against chronic diseases, KIndia is expected to be the chronic

    disease capital, with 3' million people with arthritis, by &'&1. The government, the private

    sector, the medical fraternity and *52s should come together against the onslaught of chronic

    diseases.L lso, majority of those suffering from 2 are deprived of access to $uality treatment.

    2ur attempt in this paper is to make a mechanism which morphs its stiffness according to the

    increasing and decreasing re$uirements during the gait cycle of humans. The mechanism should

    provide the maximum stiffness when the knee is undergoing the maximum weight acceptance

    and should provide complete freedom to move the knees when the knee is not taking any load.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    8/47

    C+APTER #

    LITERAT,RE RE-IE

    #." al/(n 0e*han(sm

    Walking is done in a double pendulum mechanism. Juman walking is accomplished with a

    strategy called the double pendulum. :uring forward motion, the leg that leaves the ground

    swings forward from the hip. This sweep is the first pendulum. Then the leg strikes the ground

    with the heel and rolls through to the toe in a motion described as an inverted pendulum. The

    motion of the two legs is coordinated so that one foot or the other is always in contact with the

    ground.

    #."." Ga(t Phases

    gait cycle is defined as the period between two consecutive heel strikes of the same foot

    with the ground, and is composed of a stance phase where the foot is on the ground and a swingphase where the foot is off the ground, as schematically shown. The stance phase comprises a

    Weight cceptance Bfirst 0'@C and a terminal stance B 0'E3+@C sub#phases. The human knee

    demonstrates a linear flexion stage and a linear extension stage in the W phase of the gait for

    normal, level#ground walking. %tance phase begins with the heel strike # this is the moment when

    the heel begins to touch the ground but the toes do not yet touch. In the mid#stance phase, we can

    ig. &.(D >arious %tances of 5ait =ycle F&+G

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    9/47

    see settlement of the foot at the lateral border. The toe#off phase is also named the propulsive

    phase.

    When the stance phase ends, the swing phase begins. This phase is the phase between the toe

    off phase and the heel strike phase. In the swing phase we can recognize two extra phases #

    acceleration and declaration. The acceleration phase goes from toe#off to mid#swing, while

    declaration goes from mid#swing to heel strike. In the acceleration phase, the swing leg makes an

    accelerated forward movement with the goal of propelling the body weight forward. The

    declaration phase brakes the velocity of this forward body movement in order to place your foot

    down with control. )etween these two phases, the mid#swing phase occurs. In this phase, both

    feet are under the body, with the heel next to each other.

    6articularly, we studied the effect of body size and gait speed on the knee moment#angle

    performance of subjects with gait speed of (.'(E&.3+ m?s, body height of (.0+E(.;3 m, and body

    weight of 13.'E

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    10/47

    7xtension is the opposite of flexion,

    describing a straightening movement that increases theangle between body parts. When a joint

    can move forward and backward, such as the neck and trunk, extension refers to movement in

    the posterior direction. or example, when standing up, the knees are extended. 7xtension of the

    hip or shoulder moves the arm or leg backward. When the chin is against the chest, the head is

    flexed, and the trunk is flexed when a person leans forward.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    11/47

    #.".#.# Ab2)*t(on an2 A22)*t(on

    bduction refers to a motion that pulls a structure or part away from the midline of the body.

    In the case of fingers and toes, it refers to spreading the digits apart, away from the centerline of

    the hand or foot. bduction of the wrist is also called radial deviation. or example, raising the

    arms up, such as when tightrope#walking, is an example of abduction at the shoulder. When thelegs are splayed at the hip, such as when doing a star jump or doing a split, the legs are abducted

    at the hip.

    dduction refers to a motion that pulls a structure or part toward the midline of the body, or

    towards the midline of a limb. In the case of fingers and toes, it refers to bringing the digits

    together, towards the centerline of the hand or foot. dduction of the wrist is also called ulnar

    deviation. or example, dropping the arms to the sides, or bringing the knees together, are

    examples of adduction.

    #.".#.$ Ele3at(on an2 2epress(on

    The terms elevation and depression refer to movement above and below the horizontal. They

    derive from the -atin terms with the same meaning. 7levation refers to movement in a superior

    direction. or example, shrugging is an example of elevation of the scapula. :epression refers to

    movement in an inferior direction, the opposite of elevation.

    #.".#.% Rotat(on

    !otation of body parts is referred to as internal or external, referring to rotation towards or

    away from the center of the body. Internal rotation Bor medial rotationC refers to rotation towards

    ig. &.&D >arious "otion Terms F&0G

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    12/47

    the axis of the body. 7xternal rotation Bor lateral rotationC refers to rotation away from the center

    of the body

    #.# Anal4s(s of Knee Jo(nt

    lthough the leg bones join together at the knee, they donNt actually touch each otherD they are

    held slightly apart by cartilage, a rubbery, gel#like tissue that sits on the ends of bones like plush

    slippers on your feet. =artilage, which is roughly three#$uarters water, prevents the ends of these

    bones from grinding against each other as you moveO instead the bone ends simply glide across

    each other with very little friction. =artilage also absorbs the shock of movement. This is

    particularly important to the knee, a weight#bearing joint that is subject to constant poundingD as

    every time you step and your foot hits the ground, shock waves reverberate up your leg bones.

    When walking, the stress on your knee is roughly three times your body weight, a figure that

    increases to ten times your body weight when you run. Without cartilage, the impact of

    movement would cause stress fractures of the bones, erosion of bone ends, the formation of bone

    spurs Bthink calluses on the ends of the bonesC, and ultimately the destruction of both the bones

    and the weight#bearing joints.

    )ecause the knee is subject to so much stress, a thick layer of cartilaginous tissue called the

    meniscus Bplural menisciC cushions the ends of the femur and the tibia. The meniscus is an

    excellent shock absorber, soaking up the impact created by movement and helping 8nee muscle,

    arthritis of the knee provide stability to the knee joint. damaged meniscus, which is common

    ig &.+D 8nee joint showing the cartilage and the menicus

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    13/47

    among athletes participating in contact sports, is often referred to as Ptorn cartilage.P nother

    kind of cartilage found in the knee joint is articular cartilage, the PstandardP kind thatNs found in

    most joints. This smooth, slick surface covers the underside of the patella and lines the femoral

    groove allowing these bones to glide smoothly within the joint as the knee bends and straightens.

    When either kind of cartilage within the knee becomes cracked, torn, thin, dried out or worn

    through, its ability to absorb shock and cushion the bone ends is reduced. 8nee bones begin to

    grind against each other, causing pain, stiffness, loss of movement and sometimes swelling # in

    other words, a condition called arthritis. nd that can really put a damper on your life.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    14/47

    #.#." Derees of Free2om

    The type of joint in the knee is a hinge joint BginglymusC in which the articular surfaces are

    molded to each other in such a manner as to permit motion only in one plane. In this case, the

    plane is the lexion#extension plane about the sagittal axis.

    #.#.# 5)as(!st(ffness of Knee

    ig &.0D >arious dimensional motions of 8neeF&3G

    a A moment when heel strikes the

    ground

    b A maximum moment at an angle of (1

    c A moment when the leg is at the end

    of weight acceptance phase

    d A moment at terminal stance phase

    e A moment at swing phase

    ig. &.1D "oment#ngle 5raph F&G

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    15/47

    )iomechanical data characterizing the $uasi#stiffness of lower#limb joints during human

    locomotion is limited. Hnderstanding joint stiffness is critical for evaluating gait function and

    designing devices such as prostheses and orthoses intended to emulate biological properties of

    human legs. The knee joint moment#angle relationship is approximately linear in the flexion and

    extension stages of stance, exhibiting nearly constant stiffnesses, known as the $uasi#stiffnesses

    of each stage. "echanisms that can emulate human#like biomechanics areessential for robust

    performance of a number of engineered locomotion systems including anthropomorphic bipedal

    robots, lower#limb wearable exoskeletons, and biologicallyinspired prosthetic limbs. Ideally,

    successful emulation ofhuman locomotion in artificial systems is built upon a foundationof

    simple models Btheoretical or empiricalC that can accurately characterize the normal mechanical

    behavior of the human limb during gait.

    The $uasi#stiffness is defined as the stiffness of a spring that best mimics the overall behavior

    of a joint during a locomotion task. It can be estimated using the slope of the best linear fit on the

    moment#angle graph of the joint. The $uasi#stiffness of a joint explains how a joint functions

    during a locomotion task or phase, distinguishing it from the passive and active stiffness of a

    joint defined as a specific function of angle and time. The concept of $uasi#stiffness applies

    particularly well to the knee joint during stance phase of walking, where a substantial moment is

    applied to compliantly support the body weight. This compliance was originally considered a

    determinant factor in reducing the vertical travel of center of gravity of the body, and later shown

    to play a major role in shock absorption. pplying a preliminary $uasistiffness analysis revealed

    a nearly linear spring#like behavior that changes with both gait speed and load carriage. Indeed, a

    simple spring#like approximation of knee performance leads to much simpler mechanical designs

    of assistive devices, leading to greater robustness, lower cost, lighter weight, and higher shock

    tolerance. rom the experimental side, it is possible to characterize the kinetic and kinematic

    behavior of the joints using data captured from humans in a gait laboratory. The characteristic

    stiffness of the knee in flexion and extension modes are nearly identical at preferred walking

    speed and differ as the gait speed deviates from the natural value. The variations of the

    characteristic stiffness of the knee has two implications for the design of stance control orthoses.

    irst, the knee does not exhibit a single characteristic stiffness for all walking speeds. s shown

    earlier, the characteristic stiffness of the knee changes as the gait speed varies. In an ideal case,

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    16/47

    the design of a parallel assistive device for a wide range of walking speeds would implement a

    variable stiffness mechanism to allow the characteristic stiffness of the knee in the flexion mode

    to increase and in the extension mode to decrease, with some added damping, as the walking

    speed increases. Jowever, creating a truly variable stiffness mechanism is challenging in

    practice. lternatively, the design of assistive devices and bipedal robots might implement a

    spring with the stiffness that is some weighted average of the expected range of gait %peeds. In

    addition to the stiffness, the overall knee flexion and extension, zero moment angle, and

    maximum moment also change with gait speed. The amount of rotation of the knee linearly

    increases Bfor the flexion mode and for the extension modeC as gait speed increases. Therefore,

    the design of assistive devices should allow for greater rotation when the user walks faster.

    #.#.$ Loa2 *onstra(nts on the /nee

    The maximum tibiofemoral compressive force reached an average load of +.< times body#

    weight B)WC for level walking and ; times )W for downhill walking, in each instance during the

    early stance phase. "uscle forces contributed ;'@ of the maximum bone#on#bone force during

    downhill walking and 4'@ during level walking whereas the ground reaction forces contributed

    only &'@ and +'@ respectively.

    "ost total knee designs provide a tibiofemoral contact area of ('' to +'' mm&. The yield

    point of these polyethylene inlays will therefore be exceeded with each step during downhill

    walking. uture evaluation of total knee designs should be based on a tibiofemoral joint load of

    +.1 times )W at &'M knee.

    The highest knee joint loadings occurred during downhill walking. The peak joint moments

    occurred at 0( Q 3M knee flexion and were &.41 Q '.1 *m?kg for females and &.4' Q '.4 *m?kg

    for males. The vertical joint reaction forces were (1.& Q (.3 *?kg for females and (1.1 Q (.arious materials for fabrication of a 82 include but are not limited to

    metals, plastics, fabrics, and leather. =onditions that might benefit from the use of a 82

    include paralysis, joint laxity or arthritis, fracture, and others. lthough not as widely used as

    knee orthoses, 82s can make a real difference in the life of a paralyzed person, helping them

    to walk therapeutically or, in the case of polio patients on a community level. These devices are

    expensive and re$uire maintenance. %ome research is being done to enhance the design, even

    *% helped spearhead the development of a special knee joint for 82s

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    18/47

    Traditionally, the affected knee is supported during walking using a kneeEankleEfoot orthosis

    B82C, comprising a rigid thermoplastic cast formed around the impaired leg. Traditional

    82 lock the knees throughout the gait cycle therefore demands compensatory, unnatural, and

    metabolically expensive movements from the wearer.

    %tance control 82s B%=82sC have recently been commercialized and used clinically

    for patients with paresis and paralysis in the lower limb muscles. Hnlike traditional 82s,

    %=82s actively lock the knee only during the stance phase and allow for free rotation during

    the swing phase. This improvement has led to many medical benefits, including increased

    walking speed, knee range of motion, stride, step lengths, user satisfaction, reduced energy

    expenditure and gait asymmetry, as well as kinematic benefits to both affected and unaffected

    legs, compared with regular 82s. Jowever, rigid locking of the knee joint during stance

    phase in current %=82s hinders the shock absorbing flexion of the knee, and can potentially

    cause increased metabolic cost, user pain and discomfort and limited gait speed.

    #.$." T4pes of E1os/eletons

    The exoskeletons are of two typesD

    Parallel t4pe6

    Increases %trength

    -oad =arrying

    Jigh#g 5aits 7nergy !ecovery

    6ower ssist

    =ontrollability

    Hser orce is directly effective

    5ives 6osition feedback to user

    6assive assist re$uires disengagement to allow foot lift 7xoskeleton assist adds orce

    ig. &.3D 6arallel type F(1G

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    19/47

    Ser(es T4pe6

    Increases 7xtension

    %hock !eduction 7nergy !ecovery

    6ossible Increased 9oint %tress

    =ontrollability

    Hser "otion is directly effective 6assive ssist can cause foot dragging, interfere with normal gait

    5ives direct orce feedback to user

    ctive assist adds "otion

    or the current project, the parallel type of exoskeleton will be used which is ideal for our

    usage in the case of load carrying and power assisted usage in the form of support of knees.

    i . &.4D %eries T e (1

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    20/47

    C+APTER $

    PRESENT IN-ESTIGATION

    $." 0oment Anle beha3(or of Knee

    ig.+.( schematically depicts the lower extremity limbs in a gait cycle, and ig. +.bottom

    shows a typical moment#angle cycle for an unimpaired knee during walking on level ground,

    ig. +.(D -ower 7xtremity -imbs

    ig. +.&D "oment#ngle =ycle for unimpaired knee

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    21/47

    with the corresponding gait instants labeled. The stance phase of walking is composed of a

    weight acceptance phase Ffirst 0'@, as depicted in ig. &BaCEBcCG and a stance termination phase

    F0'@E3+@, as shown in ig. &BcC and BdCG. :uring the weight acceptance phase, the knee

    undergoes substantial loads to support the weight of the superior limbsO therefore, it is highly

    prone to collapse without proper function of the musculature system or external assistance during

    this phase. s ig. & shows and previous research suggests, the knee behaves close to a linear

    torsional spring in the weight#acceptance phase Bparticularly at the preferred gait speedC. This

    spring stiffness is defined as the slope of a linear fit to the moment angle graph of the knee in this

    phase.

    ig. &. TopD %chematic of lower extremity limbs during a gait cycle. 8nee behaves close to a

    torsional spring in the weight acceptance phase of the gait as indicated. )ottomD "oment#angle

    graph for the knee of a subject walking at (.&1. %lope of the linear fit to the graph in the weight

    acceptance phase is termed as the knee $uasi#stiffness in this phase. 8nee function can be

    replaced by a linear torsional spring with spring constant e$ual to the knee $uasi#stiffness. The

    knee exhibits substantially smaller $uasi#stiffness and moment during the terminal stance phase

    and remains nearly silent during the swing phase of the gaitO implying a less eminent need for

    external stabilization. In our previous work, we investigated the linear moment# angle behavior

    of the lower extremity joints.

    $.# Des(n Ob7e*t(3es

    In order to approximate the linear moment# angle behavior of the knee, a compliant knee

    joint should engage a linear torsional spring in parallel with the knee at the onset of the stance

    phase and disengage it at the end of the weight acceptance phase to allow for free motion during

    the rest of the gait. =onsidering the biological performance of the human knee explained in the

    previous section and extensive consultation we received from orthotists, we envision the

    following functional and safety re$uirements for the designed exoskeletonD

    (. The knee joint stiffness of the mechanism, in stance, should be sizable selectable

    for a specific user depending on stature and gait conditions.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    22/47

    &. The mechanism should be capable of accommodating torsional stiffness of ;'E

    41' and maximum moment of up to ('1 *.m.+. The mechanism should provide fast switching between the weight acceptance and

    the rest of the gait cycle based on the input of the sensors in the insole.

    0. The mechanism should fit a range of individuals of various height, weight andgait patterns.

    $.$ Des*r(pt(on of the total s4stemThe 7xoskeleton basically consists of 1 elementsD

    (. uick !eturn "echanism

    &. :ouble Torsion %pring+. %ensors

    0. "otor

    1. "icro =ontroller

    The total system consists of a double torsion spring in parallel with the knee providing the

    re$uired stiffness during the different phases of the gait cycle. The double torsion spring is

    controlled by a =ontrol module consisting of a Whitworth uick !eturn "echanism connected

    to the spring by a string. The speed of the =ontrol module are regulated by the sensors placed in

    the insole of the shoe which gives the starting and end of the stance cycle of the user. The total

    system is integrated into a regular 82 that lacks a lateral knee joint.

    The lateral joint of the system is primarily composed of a thigh chassis and a shank chassis as

    well as a pulley and additional structural components. The =ontrol module is assembled on the

    thigh and the spring on the shank chassis.

    7xoskeleton -eg ttachment can be represented as followsD

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    23/47

    ig.+.0BaCD 7xoskeleton -eg ttachment &

    ig.+.+D 7xoskeleton -eg ttachment (

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    24/47

    $.$." Control 0o2)le

    The control module consists of a Whitworth uick !eturn "echanism which controls the

    stiffening and the loosening of the torsion spring. The "echanism is designed to withstand the

    load of the maximum moment of ('1 *.m re$uired during the gait cycle and provide a cyclic

    stiffening and loosening of the torsion spring to go with the stance and swing cycle of the gait.

    *ecessary calculations have been done to design and simulate the Whitworth uick return

    mechanism.

    $.$.# 5)(*/ Ret)rn 0e*han(sm

    $uick return mechanism is a mechanism that converts rotary motion into reciprocating

    motion at different rate for its two strokes. When the time re$uired for the working stroke is

    greater than that of the return stroke, it is a $uick return mechanism.

    This mechanism is made of a driving crank and of a driven slider crank. In the considered

    configuration, the fixed pivot of the driven crank is located on the outside of the circle on which

    the end of the driving crank moves. This leads to an alternated motion of the slider crank. The

    configuration where this pivot is located inside the circle on which the end of the driving crankmoves. The angular speed of the driven crank is variable.

    The duration of the motion for its part corresponding to the lower arc is shorter than the one

    related to the upper arc. This is why this device is named $uick return mechanism, which was

    used in crank shapers, with the slow part or the stroke being used for the working time of the tool

    and the $uick part for the non#productive time.

    The digramatical representation of different positions of Whitworth uick return mechanism

    at different walking phases can be shown as below.

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    25/47

    :ifferent Whitworth mechanism positions at different phasesD

    ig.+.0BbCD :ifferent walking positions

    ig +.0BcC D :ifferent Whitworth positions at different phases

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    26/47

    return strock velocity +

    strock velocity &work=

    The link length claculations are found out as followingD

    Where,

    r(Alength of link connecting 2(and 2&

    ig.+.1D -ink "echanism (

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    27/47

    r&Alength of crank

    >rAmaximum return stroke velocity

    >wAmaximum work stroke velocity

    s slider is on same surface as point 2( in our mechanism , r4A'

    or our design re$uirement we want maximum force to be at a point of extreme left. There for

    calculation purpose we are considering extreme position. t extreme position crank will be

    perpendicular to rockerD

    r+&Ar(

    r(&

    r+&A&0r&

    &YYY..Bfrom e$uation +.(C

    r+&A& 3 r2

    &

    +

    0

    (

    & 3

    ((.1+4('(.1+4

    rTan

    r

    = =

    =

    =

    s we want 1thlink to be straight with leg so that it can withstand the load.

    1 (31 =

    Bas the angle where we will have max stiffness is at (1oC

    ig.+.3D -ink "echanism &

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    28/47

    *ow as per the given conditions using simple geometry,

    =11.5370

    &

    =191.5370

    ig.+.4D -ink "echanism +

    ig.+.;D -ink "echanism 0

  • 7/23/2019 Design of Artificial Knee Joint

    29/47

    0

    0

    1

    1

    1

    sinB4;.03+C ........B C

    tanB(1C01

    (&.+'3

    sinB(1C

    (&.'3''.&1