26
Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004 Submission for the Student Competition of

Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004. Submission for the Student Competition of. Gathering information 1. The location (Galatsi Olympic Hall 1 ). 6000 people. Gathering information 2. ... and the audience (Olympic Indoor Hall 2 ). 15000 people. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

Design of an Audience Voting System for theOlympic Games 2004

Submission for the Student Competition of

Page 2: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Gathering information 1

The location (Galatsi Olympic Hall1) ....

6000 people

Page 3: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Gathering information 2

... and the audience (Olympic Indoor Hall2)

15000 people

Page 4: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Gathering information 3

Judged sport events are for examplediving, synchronized swimming, gymnastics (summer), and ice-skating (winter)

Page 5: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Gathering information 4

highest possible score is 10.00. The steps for the score are 0.1.

Page 6: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Our design goals Inclusive

Every spectator should be able to participate, one person one vote. Ease of use

Spectators independent of their background should be able to use the system immediately. This should include usage by persons with disabilities.

RobustnessThe system should be simple and robust with regard to installation and maintenance.

Cost effectiveDevelopment, installation and operation of the system should be fairly cheap.

SustainabilityThe system should be designed in a way, that it can be used in further events and that it is ecological.

Tamper ProofMake sure the system is save from manipulation so the audience can trust it.

Page 7: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Discussion ofDesign alternatives

Page 8: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Design Alternative: Input Device

An input device with buttons and a display for every spectator is too expensive.

The installation of wires is also very costly.

The maintenance of 15000 devices is time consuming.

Input devices are vulnerable for vandalism.

Input devices are difficult to modify for future needs.

Page 9: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Design Alternative: cell phone

Many, but not everybody has one. Too many different standards

(international audience). Who pays for communication costs? Cheating is possible. Involvement of third party company

(telecommunication providers) is necessary. (Ask the Hellenic Telecommunications Organisation, who is Grand National Sponsor... or Nokia, AT&T, NTT, Ericsson....)

Page 10: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Our Solution

Page 11: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Paper Judging Board and Cameras

Page 12: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Film

Page 13: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Scenario

Page 14: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Personae

Mr. Lee, 54, from Beijing has come to the gymnastics competition to collect ideas for the Olympic Games 2008 in Beijing.

Mr. Lee is curious about the experience for the audience.

A Group of young locals who won tickets to the competition in a radio open contest.

The group is excited about their first visit to a sport competition.

Page 15: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Distribution of Judging Board

The staff hands out the judging board at the cashier counter

After taking a seat at the stadium Mr. Lee opens the judging board he received at the entrance. Mr. Lee notices the numbers and takes a glance at the instruction manual on the first page.

The group of locals watch the instruction video on the stadium screen.

Page 16: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

The First Voting

Page 17: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

The First Voting

After the athlete performed his dive the moderator asks the audience to use their judging board to give their points.

Mr. Lee combines the numbers on the board to a 9.4 and puts the board on his knees.

One of the locals notices the people around them who use the audience voting board while the others are still talking about their first visit to the Olympic games.

Page 18: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Displaying Results

Page 19: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Displaying Results

The points of the judges appear on the stadium display 9.4.

Next to it are the votes of the audience 9.0 (and an image which represents the votes for each seat). Mr. Lee is happy about his vote that matches the one from

the judges and is eager to watch the next athlete.

The locals notice the number next to the result of the judges and the image that shows dark and light dots.

Page 20: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

The second Voting

Page 21: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

The second Voting

The next athlete is the favourite of the audience.

After his performance the moderator asks for the votes of the judges and the audience. Mr. Lee has noticed a mistake in the athlete’s

performance and combines the numbers to a 9.0.

The locals use the judging board, set them to 10and put the board over their heads.

Page 22: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Displaying Results

Page 23: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Displaying Results

The points of the judges appear on the stadium display 9.0.

Next to it are the votes of the audience 9.8 and the image has turned much darker in the area where the group sits. Mr. Lee is happy about his vote that matches the one from

the judges and is eager to watch the next athlete.

The locals are happy, too, because they see that the majority of the audience also likes their favourite. Additionally they see that their votes were counted because of the colour of the image. They are looking forward to the next performance.

Page 24: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Team Members

Ramon SchalleckLudwig-Maximilians-

UniversitätMünchen

[email protected]

Heiko DrewesLudwig-Maximilians-

UniversitätMünchen

[email protected]

Marcin BoberWarsaw School of Social

Psychologyos. Piłsudskiego 11/43

[email protected]

November 2003 – April 2004

Page 25: Design of an Audience Voting System for the Olympic Games 2004

red_team

Special thanks to

Albrecht Schmidt

Martin Gauser