Upload
trinhdat
View
216
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Design & Construction Design & Construction Models that may Save You Models that may Save You
MoneyMoney
Craig PiperCraig PiperDenver Zoological FoundationDenver Zoological FoundationIAAPA 2009IAAPA 2009
Design & Construction ModelsDesign & Construction Models
TraditionalTraditional
Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
Negotiated Select TeamNegotiated Select Team
PrequalifiedPrequalified Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
Construction ManagerConstruction Manager
As AdvisorAs Advisor
As AgentAs Agent
As Constructor (at Risk)As Constructor (at Risk)
Design Design –– BuildBuild
Design Design –– Bid Bid -- BuildBuild
Traditional ModelTraditional Model
Bid/Hire Designer & Prepare Bid/Hire Designer & Prepare CDCD’’ss
Select Builder w/BidsSelect Builder w/Bids
AdvantagesAdvantages
Easy to Manage/Clear RolesEasy to Manage/Clear Roles
Designed Prior to Construction; Designed Prior to Construction; Design QualityDesign Quality
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
LengthyLengthy
Separation of Design & Separation of Design & Construction: Changes in Construction: Changes in Schedule & Cost More LikelySchedule & Cost More Likely
Owner
Designer Builder
Contract
Communication
Negotiated Select TeamNegotiated Select Team
Modified DesignModified Design--BidBid--BuildBuild
Hire Designer and Builder at or Hire Designer and Builder at or Near the Same Time Under Near the Same Time Under Separate ContractsSeparate Contracts
Usually Qualifications BasedUsually Qualifications Based
AdvantagesAdvantages
Cooperative Team ApproachCooperative Team Approach
Cost/Schedule/ Constructability Cost/Schedule/ Constructability Advice During DesignAdvice During Design
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
May Not Get Best Price if May Not Get Best Price if InexperiencedInexperienced
Often Not Allowed in Public Often Not Allowed in Public Sector ProjectsSector Projects
Owner
Designer Builder
Contract
Communication
PrequalifiedPrequalified Design Design –– Bid Bid -- BuildBuild
Modified DesignModified Design--BidBid--BuildBuild
PrequalifyPrequalify Designers and/or Designers and/or BuildersBuilders
Designer Prepares CDDesigner Prepares CD’’ss
Select Builder w/Bids from Select Builder w/Bids from PrequalifiedPrequalified CandidatesCandidates
AdvantagesAdvantages
Narrows Field to Qualified FirmsNarrows Field to Qualified Firms
Better Schedule ControlBetter Schedule Control
Easy to Manage/Clear RolesEasy to Manage/Clear Roles
Designed Prior to ConstructionDesigned Prior to Construction
Sometimes Allowed in Public Sometimes Allowed in Public Sector ProjectsSector Projects
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
May Not Get Best PriceMay Not Get Best Price
Separation of Design & Separation of Design & Construction: Changes in Schedule Construction: Changes in Schedule & Cost More Likely& Cost More Likely
Sometimes Not Allowed in Public Sometimes Not Allowed in Public Sector ProjectsSector Projects
Owner
Designer Builder
Contract
Communication
Contract Communication
Construction Manager as AdvisorConstruction Manager as Advisor
Modified DesignModified Design--BidBid--BuildBuild
CM Hired at Outset or Once Design CM Hired at Outset or Once Design is Completeis Complete
CDCD’’s Prepared, then Bid or s Prepared, then Bid or Negotiate for ConstructionNegotiate for Construction
AdvantagesAdvantages
Owner Contracts Directly with Owner Contracts Directly with Designer & Builder; Has Reduced Designer & Builder; Has Reduced Management DutiesManagement Duties
Expert Oversight if Not Available InExpert Oversight if Not Available In-- House; Good for Complicated House; Good for Complicated ProjectsProjects
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
Added Consultant FeeAdded Consultant Fee
Poor Cost/Schedule ControlPoor Cost/Schedule Control
Confusion of Roles & Confusion of Roles & CommunicationCommunication
Owner
Designer Builder
CM
Contract Communication
Construction Manager as AgentConstruction Manager as Agent
CM Has Powers of OwnerCM Has Powers of Owner
CM Hired at Outset; CM Assumes CM Hired at Outset; CM Assumes Financial AuthorityFinancial Authority
Designer Hired by CMDesigner Hired by CM
CDCD’’s Prepared, then CM Bids or s Prepared, then CM Bids or Negotiates for ConstructionNegotiates for Construction
AdvantagesAdvantages
Single Point of Contact for OwnerSingle Point of Contact for Owner
Owner Able to Step Back; Expert Owner Able to Step Back; Expert Oversight if Not Available InOversight if Not Available In--HouseHouse
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
Added Consultant FeeAdded Consultant Fee
Communication Suppressed Communication Suppressed Between Owner & Designer or Between Owner & Designer or ContractorContractor
Confusing RolesConfusing Roles
Poor Cost/Schedule ControlPoor Cost/Schedule Control
Owner
Designer Builder
CM
Construction Manager as ConstructorConstruction Manager as Constructor (At Risk)(At Risk)
CM Assumes Liability & CM Assumes Liability & Responsibility of ContractorResponsibility of Contractor
CM Often Selected by Bid at 30% Design CM Often Selected by Bid at 30% Design DocumentsDocuments
CM Usually CM Usually RebidsRebids some Work when some Work when CDCD’’s completes complete
Contracts Similar to Traditional Design Contracts Similar to Traditional Design –– Bid Bid -- BuildBuild
AdvantagesAdvantages
Usually Acceptable for Public ProjectsUsually Acceptable for Public Projects
Initial Focus on DesignInitial Focus on Design
Construction Advice Early in ProcessConstruction Advice Early in Process
Oversight of Cost & Time/Ability to Fast Oversight of Cost & Time/Ability to Fast TrackTrack
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
Reduced Owner Quality Control; CM Reduced Owner Quality Control; CM controls contracts.controls contracts.
Potential for Adversarial RelationshipsPotential for Adversarial Relationships
Change Orders/Delay Claims from Prime Change Orders/Delay Claims from Prime Contractors or SubcontractorsContractors or Subcontractors
Owner
Designer CM/Builder
Contract Communication
Multiple Prime Contracts
Contract Communication
Design BuildDesign Build
Single Point of ResponsibilitySingle Point of Responsibility
May be Led by Designer or BuilderMay be Led by Designer or Builder
Early Commitment to GMPEarly Commitment to GMP
AdvantagesAdvantages
Single Point of Contact for OwnerSingle Point of Contact for Owner
Good for Fast Track Projects which Good for Fast Track Projects which are Well Defined at Outsetare Well Defined at Outset
Useful for Complex Projects which Useful for Complex Projects which Require Extensive CoordinationRequire Extensive Coordination
Reduced Change Orders & DelaysReduced Change Orders & Delays
DisadvantagesDisadvantages
Complex for Those without Complex for Those without ExperienceExperience
Potential Lack of Contact between Potential Lack of Contact between Owner and Designer.Owner and Designer.
Cost Savings Can Erode Design Cost Savings Can Erode Design and Construction Qualityand Construction Quality
Owner
Designer Builder
Design Build Entity
Design Build
Team
Which Model to Use?Which Model to Use?
TraditionalTraditional
Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
Negotiated Select TeamNegotiated Select Team
PrequalifiedPrequalified Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
Construction ManagerConstruction Manager
As AdvisorAs Advisor
As AgentAs Agent
As Constructor (at As Constructor (at Risk)Risk)
Design Design –– BuildBuild
It Depends on the ProjectIt Depends on the Project
Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
When RequiredWhen Required
Political Reasons (Opportunity Political Reasons (Opportunity for All)for All)
Very Standard ProjectVery Standard Project
Inexperienced OwnerInexperienced Owner
Negotiated Select TeamNegotiated Select Team
When Owner Needs When Owner Needs Specialized SkillsSpecialized Skills
Owner Wants Continuity Over Owner Wants Continuity Over Several ProjectsSeveral Projects
Want High Quality for A Want High Quality for A Defined BudgetDefined Budget
It Depends on the ProjectIt Depends on the Project
PrequalifiedPrequalified Design Design –– Bid Bid –– BuildBuild
To Gain Benefits of Negotiated To Gain Benefits of Negotiated Select Team Under Requirements Select Team Under Requirements of Traditional Design of Traditional Design –– Bid Bid -- BuildBuild
It Depends on the ProjectIt Depends on the Project
CM As AdvisorCM As Advisor
Complex ProjectsComplex Projects
Owner InexperiencedOwner Inexperienced
Lack InLack In--house Staffhouse Staff
Fast TrackingFast Tracking
Design Less Important than Design Less Important than Budget/EfficiencyBudget/Efficiency
Owner Wants to Hold ContractsOwner Wants to Hold Contracts
CM As AgentCM As Agent
Same as CM/Advisor Except Same as CM/Advisor Except Owner Wants to Delegate Owner Wants to Delegate Contracts (Less Owner Contracts (Less Owner Involvement)Involvement)
It Depends on the ProjectIt Depends on the Project
CM As Constructor (at Risk)CM As Constructor (at Risk)
Common among Experienced Common among Experienced Public & Private Owners. Allows Public & Private Owners. Allows Competition Required for Public Competition Required for Public ProjectsProjects
Complex Project Requiring Early Complex Project Requiring Early Construction Pricing ExpertiseConstruction Pricing Expertise
Fast TrackingFast Tracking
It Depends on the ProjectIt Depends on the Project
Design Design -- BuildBuild
Owner Wants Early Cost Owner Wants Early Cost Commitment Commitment –– Control RiskControl Risk
Complex Requiring Extensive Complex Requiring Extensive CoordinationCoordination
Project is Well Defined by Owner Project is Well Defined by Owner at Early Stageat Early Stage
Fast TrackingFast Tracking
Process Oriented ProjectProcess Oriented Project
Owner Wants to Hold Single Owner Wants to Hold Single ContractContract
Construction Cost GrowthConstruction Cost Growth
4.83
3.37
2.17
0
1
2
3
4
5 M
edia
n C
ost G
row
th (%
)
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
Cost Growth = [(Final Project Cost – Contract Award)/Contract Award] X 100
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Schedule GrowthSchedule Growth
4.4
0 0
0
1
2
3
4
5 M
edia
n S
ched
ule
Gro
wth
(%)
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
Schedule Growth (%) = [(Total Project Time – Total As Planned Time)/Total As Planned Time] X 100
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Construction SpeedConstruction Speed
5135
8192
9091
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
Construction Speed (sf/month) = [Area/(Construction as Built Time/30)]
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Design & Construction SpeedDesign & Construction Speed
3250
4712
6842
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
Design & Construction Speed (sf/month) = [Area/(Total Project Time/30)]
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Common Knocks Against DesignCommon Knocks Against Design--BuildBuild
Quality of Design is Less Quality of Design is Less Important than Cost & Important than Cost & Schedule ControlSchedule Control
Quality of Construction is Quality of Construction is Less Important than Cost & Less Important than Cost & Schedule ControlSchedule Control
Focus on Low Initial Cost Focus on Low Initial Cost Leads to High Maintenance Leads to High Maintenance & Life Cycle Costs& Life Cycle Costs
Architects DonArchitects Don’’t Like t Like DesignDesign--Build MethodBuild Method
Construction QualityConstruction Quality
6
7.43 7.5
01
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
(Higher Number = Easier Commissioning)
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Commissioning - Ease of Start-Up
Construction QualityConstruction Quality
7
8.1 7.9
0123456789
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
(Higher Number = Fewer Callbacks)
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
Commissioning – Number of Callbacks
Construction QualityConstruction Quality
5
5.75.4
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Design-Bid-Build CM at Risk Design Build
(Higher Number = Better Meets Expectations)
Source: Construction Industry Institute, Research Summary 133-1, 1997
System Performance (Envelope, Roof, Structure & Foundations)