16
Design and Simulation of Various KID Geometries used to Readout Elements of a mm-wave Filter Bank Spectrometer Pete Barry July 28, 2011

Design and Simulation of Various KID Geometries used to ... · IAntenna guides broadband radiation onto planar transmission line (e.g. CPW, microstrip) ISeries of half-wave ( n=2)

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Design and Simulation of Various

    KID Geometries used to Readout

    Elements of a mm-wave Filter Bank

    Spectrometer

    Pete Barry

    July 28, 2011

  • Overview

    I Briefly describe the SuperSpec concept

    I Discuss the simulation results of various mm-wave resonatorgeometries

    I Discuss possible coupling schemes for KID readout

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 1/15

  • SuperSpec Concept

    I Superconducting filter bank utilising KID technology

    I Antenna guides broadband radiation onto planar transmissionline (e.g. CPW, microstrip)

    I Series of half-wave (λn/2) resonators separate mm-radiationinto NC frequency bands (λn is central wavelength of channeln)

    I KID is coupled to eachindividual channel allowingsimultaneous readout ofall channels

    Zmuidzinas and Kovacs memo (2010)

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 2/15

  • mm-Wave Filter Designs

    I Simulation software - Sonnet EM and ADS

    I λ/2 open circuit termination - theoretically 100% in bandpower transmission to detector

    I Matched termination to feedline characteristic impedance (Z0)- 80-85% power transmission - the ‘U’ resonator

    I Only microstrip architecture presented here

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 3/15

  • λ/2 Open Circuit Termination

    I Microstrip using h/wZ0 ' 50 Ω, h = substrate thickness

    I Antenna and detector modeled aslumped port impedance

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 4/15

  • λ/2 Open Circuit Termination

    Freespace cover

    ' 50% radiatedpower

    Lossless cover→ no radiation

    I Problem with amount of power radiated

    I Prad = 1− (|S21|2 + |S11|2)

    I Possible solution to meander a λ resonator (not shown here)

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 5/15

  • Matched Termination

    I λ/2 ‘U’ resonators coupled to feedline

    I λ/4 spacing of resonators provides constructive inteference

    I Able to control QC by varying distance from the feedline (g)

    1 2

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 6/15

  • Matched Termination

    λ/4 = 100µm

    ∆Lres = 0.25µm

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 7/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 8/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    Q = 600, QC = 1200

    ∆f = 450 MHz

    50% of power absorbed

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 9/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    f = 270.19 GHz

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 10/15

  • Matched Termination

    Rs = 50 Ω/�

    N� = 400

    Pabs ' 70% at270.19 GHz

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 11/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    I Motivated by desire to decrease the MKID readout frequency→ higher inductance required

    I Also have a lot of unused space

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 12/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    Rs = 50 Ω/�

    N� > 1000

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 13/15

  • Matched Termination - Loaded

    I Current distribution at 281.8 GHz

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 14/15

  • Conclusions

    I Starting to converge on a viable mm-wave design

    I Next step is to add in the readout feedline to see effect onmm-wave circuit

    Thanks to

    I P. Mauskopf, S. Doyle (Cardiff)

    I J. Zmuidzinas, A. Kovacs, M. Bradford, P. Day, G.Chattopadhyay, S. Padin, D. Marrone (apologies if I missedanyone out)

    Microresonator Workshop 28-29 July 2011 15/15