19
1 Design and Manufacturing of a TP Composite Bumper Beam by QSP® JEC world 2017 conference CETIM : Damien Guillon, Clément Callens SNOP : Mickaël Moscardo, Eric Deprun, Georges TEIXEIRA

Design and Manufacturing of a TP Composite …images.jeccomposites.com/jw17/presentations/1.Thermoplastics... · Design and Manufacturing of a TP Composite Bumper Beam by QSP

  • Upload
    buibao

  • View
    220

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

Design and Manufacturing of a

TP Composite Bumper Beam by QSP®

JEC world 2017 conference

CETIM : Damien Guillon, Clément Callens

SNOP : Mickaël Moscardo, Eric Deprun, Georges TEIXEIRA

2

A regional, national and international player:

➢ 115 M€ turn over,

➢ 900 employees,

➢ 8 sites in France,

➢ 44,000 m² of laboratories and platforms

➢ 3 subsidiaries in France and North Africa

Part of a strategic French R&D network:

➢ Covering all topics in the mechanical field with 9 open labs with universities

➢ Paving the way to innovative technologies on the whole product’s lifecycle

A strategy geared around innovation:➢ R&T development & support for more than 4,000 customers per year➢ Acting in standardization committees (216 seats)

Cetim the french innovation maker in mechanics

3

Cetim Composite at a glance:

Polymer Material expertise for 40 years

+120 PhD, Engineers and Technicians

18M€ turn over in composite activity

Scientific partnership with:

ECNantes,

ENSCachan,

Onera,

Imperial College of London

Industrial partnership with AFPT for Spide TP

and Pinette, Loiretech and Compose for QSP

4

Key Figures

➢ 834 M€ turn over,

➢ 5740 employees,

➢ 27 manufacturing plants

➢ Operating in 11 countries

➢ 400 000 Tons of steels stamped per year

3 main activities:

➢ Development and industrialization Manufacturing of BIW subassemblies

➢ Design and manufacturing of stamping dies

➢ Design and manufacturing of production means : presses and roll forming lines

Advanced Engineering :

➢ Reason for being part of the project consortium : Weight reduction thought usage of Composite must be anticipated and Product/Process knowledge acquired early.

SNOP – French leading Supplier for Body in White

14.0

3.2

017

5

TP composite bumper beam project

Demonstration of the QSP capability

Results of a three years long process development project

A one year long part development

Design :

Specification and validation by SNOP, automotive bumper supplier

Optimization methodology to choose the better lay-up configuration

Process simulation in input of mold design and product simulation

Manufacturing

Use of in house pultruded tape

Continuous automated production with less than 2 minutes cycle time

Testing and costing

Real performance and accurate cost analysis

14.0

3.2

017

6

Design : Use of optimization methodology

Optimization results : Thickness and anisotropy in each area

5mm thicknesswith 95% of 0° fiber

5.5 mm thicknesswith 50% of 0° fiber

14.0

3.2

017

7

Design : Process analysis for real composite sizing

Use of « drape estimator » :

Real fiber orientation in

calculation

Choice of ply shape to avoid

material scrap

14.0

3.2

017

8

Design : Forming Simulation

Use of Hyperform :

Validation of process estimation with explicit Finite Element Analysis using fabrics

material and inter-ply contact behavior

Precise patch shape definition and lay-up position

14.0

3.2

017

9

Multi-thickness / multi-orientation / multi-material solution

Composite part lay-upTwo versions of patch 1 and 9 : - 4:1 fabrics- UD tape 1,2mm 0° + 0,3mm 90°

Multi-material front end bumper system1,8kg composite + 0,5kg plastics + 1,3 kg aluminium + 0,1kg rivets= 3,7 kg total weight

26% mass saving on the steel reference

Welding of aluminium part

Riveting of the beamsandwiched betweenaluminium parts

14.0

3.2

017

10

Specification fulfill!

Test case Target

Damner crash

16 km/h

Fmax < 65 kN OK

Eabs > 4000 J OK

No Body in white damage OK

Front Pole test crash

25km/h

Finit > 20 kN OK

No final failure before 200mm calculation OK, test TBC

RCAR Bumper crash

10,5km/h

Fmax < 65 kN calculation OK, test TBC

Eabs = 3100 J calculation OK, test TBC

Enfoncement maxi. = 70 mm calculation OK, test TBC

ECE42 parking crash

4km/h

Flèche < 30mm OK

No damage OK

Towage

750daN (30°/40°)

No damage OK

Sufficient Stiffness OK

14.0

3.2

017

11 General possibilities of the QSP® (Cetim’s pilot line)THERMOFORMING &

OVERMOULDINGTo add a maximum value

intra-mold& get a netshape part

RAW MATERIALS

Fibers & Thermoplastic

HIGH SPEED CUTTINGTo cut all patches needed for the multi-thickness preform

TP PULTRUSIONTo create semi-products with a low cost and high

speed of production FAST HEATINGCombining conduction & High-Speed IR ovens for multi-thickness preforms

PREFORM ASSEMBLYTo make an automated assembly of a multilayer “netshape” preform < 1min

HIGH SPEED TRANSFER< 5sec

Any other organosheets or tapes

14.0

3.2

017

12 From the raw material to the preform

Pultrusion of the main reinforcement

85% of the part’s mass at lower cost

The right width to avoid scrap

The optimized thickness (1,2 mm)

and 50% volume of fibre content.

0% of scrap thanks to

rectangular cut patern

Patch 1 Patch 9 Patch 62 34 5

78

Cut patern of the pultruded tape (230 mm specific width)

Cut patern of the thin CELSTRAN tape (305 mm standard width)

1a 1b 1c1d9d

9a 9b 9c

14.0

3.2

017

13 From the preform to the part

95 seconds heating time (5,7mm maximum thickness)

Temperature homogeneity (deviation<20°C) thanks to combined ovens

Forming, holes drilling and

overmoulding in one step

14.0

3.2

017

14 From the preform to the part

14.0

3.2

017

15 Testing

« Parking » low velocity

ECE 42 crash test

No damage

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

-40 -20 0

Forc

e (

kN)

displacement (mm)

Test simulation

14.0

3.2

017

16 Testing

Pole test 36km/h

No final breaking

before 200mm of

intrusion, thanks to a

progressive failure

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 50 100 150 200

Forc

e (

kN)

displacement (mm)

14.0

3.2

017

17 Economical summary

Detailed cost analysis according to automotive standard have been made

Function integration needed to enhance the performance/cost ratio.

Step Price

Composite material (prepreg price 3€/kg) 5,7 €

Cutting 0,6 €

Plastic material (compound price 3€/kg) 1,2 €

QSP 3,4 €

Composite beam total 10,9 €

Aluminium parts 11,2 €

Final assembly 1,8 €

Total system cost 23,9€

14.0

3.2

017

18 Next step : Towards an integrated composite crashbox

14.0

3.2

017

19 Key Benefits of QSP Bumper beam

Multi-thickness/multi-orientation preform

- 20% of composite mass compared to a constant thickness design

Proven and efficient industrial process

300,000 part/year capacity demonstrated on CETIM pilot line

With 2 cavities on a 500T press

Acceptable over-cost (comparable with the one for aluminium solution)

Prepreg price of 3€/kg possible with a 3 meters/minute pultrusion process

Freedom in material choice and 0% scrap design

Ability to mix pultrusion, fabric sheet, thin tape, and to integrate local carbon patches

Come and visit us : Composites in action - Hall 5a - Stand M81