Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/19/2006
Design and Construction of a High Energy, High Average
Power Nd:Glass Slab Amplifier
Dale MartzDepartment of Electrical & Computer
Engineering
2
OutlineIntroductionNd:Glass Slab
Nd:Glass Material PropertiesSlab vs. Rod Geometry
Discussion of the Rod GeometryAdvantages of the Slab
Design of the Amplifier Head and Support SystemsMountingCoolingDesign of the Pulse Forming Network (PFN)
Design Specifications & ConsiderationsSimmering of Lamps
ResultsSingle Pass Gain
ConclusionsFuture Work
3
IntroductionEUV lasers require high energy pumping by optical lasers
Ex: 13.2 nm Ni-Like Cd Laser*1 µW @ 5 Hz300-350 mJ 120 ps pre-pulse1 J 8 ps heating pump pulse
Current Ti-Sapphire (800 nm) pump laser has 3 stages of amplification3rd stage is pumped by a Nd:YAG laser
Infrared radiation (1064 nm) up-converted to 2nd harmonic5 J of green light (532 nm)Repetition rate of 5 Hz
*Weith et al. - Opt. Lett. 31, 1994-1996 (2006)
4
Replacement Pump Laser Schematic
5
Slab Amplifier SpecificationsMust amplify infrared radiation at 1053 nm to be doubled to 527 nm
Green pump should have 14-18 J per arm (both sides of the Ti-Sapph should be pumped)
Infrared output for one arm should have 20-25 J of energy
A gain of 3.3x per pass has been shown to produce the desired energy after eight passes*Input beam to the slab will be 12 cm x 8 mm
60 mJ with a 20 ns pulse width FWHM at 1053 nm and a 1 nm bandwidth
Must be able to operate at > 1 Hz
*Dane et al. – Journal of Quantum Electronics 31, 148-163 (1995)
6
Nd:Glass
Similar to Nd:YAGFour level system
Has an amorphous structureNot crystalline
Glass has high energy storage potential
Large VolumeSmall stimulated emission cross-section3.5x10-20 cm2
7
Why a Slab Geometry?Generation of good beam quality at high energies and high average power
Due to increased repetition rate of pumping, temperature gradients across the cross-sectional area of gain medium develop
Thermal focusing
Stressed induced biaxial focusing
Stressed induced birefringence resulting in depolarization
8
Thermal Loading in a RodTemperature Distribution
T(K)Temperature Gradient
G(104 K/m)
A rod with 14 cm2 cross-sectional area, with 1250 W heat loading and cooling to 35 oC on the outer surface – Temperature differential of 485 oC
9
Change in the Index of Refraction Due to Temperature Change
Given the temperature distribution modeled for a 1250 W heat load the change in the index of refraction can be calculated
))((*)( oo TxTdTdNnxn −+=
Where is the temperature coefficient of refractive index
For the glass that is used,
dTdN
CdTdN o/10*2 6−≈
10
Thermal Focusing (Lensing)Given the temperature distribution modeled for a 1250 W heat load the change in the index of refraction can be calculated
Using this index profile, Hecht gives an expression to find the focal length of the thermal lens
))((*)( oo TxTdTdNnxn −+=
* Approximation assuming focal length much larger than the rod length
The resulting focal length that fits this profile is:f = 52 cm from the end of the rod (92 cm from the beginning of the rod)
dffrnrn /)()( 22max −+−=
11
Thermal Focusing (Lensing) - continued
Because the resulting focal length of 52 cm is on the order of the length of the rod (40 cm), ray tracing was employed to verify the exampleThe focal length was found to be:f = 45 cm from the end of the rod (85 cm total) - lensing is severe
12
Thermal Loading in a SlabA slab with 14 cm2 cross-sectional area
1250 W heat loadingequal to the heat loading on the rod
Cooling to 35 oC on the pump faces
Temperature differential of 38 oC
Pump Faces
13
Discussion of Phase-Front Aberrations
As the rod caused spherical focusing, the slab will cause cylindrical focusingTo avoid aberrations and focusing effects, the beam’s phase-front should pass through an averaged (non-uniform) temperature/stress environmentThe slab geometry allows this by letting the beam take a zig-zagoptical path through the gain medium
Pump Faces
14
APG-1 from Schott North AmericaAPG-1 is an advanced phosphate based laser glass
40 cm x 14 cm x 1 cm
Upper-level lifetime = 361 µs
Lower-level lifetime = 192-380 ps
Emission peak at 1053.9 nm
Emission bandwidth of 27.8 nm
Index of refraction n = 1.526
The doping of the glass is 2.7% by weight of Nd3-3.5 x1020 Nd atoms/cm3
Thermal Cond. = 0.78 W/m*K
15
Use of Flashlamps to Pump
Emission spectrum of the flashlamp
(Fenix Tech.)
Absorption spectrum of the Nd:Glass slab
(Schott N.A.)
16
OutlineIntroductionNd:Glass Slab
Nd:Glass Material PropertiesSlab vs. Rod Geometry
Discussion of the Rod GeometryAdvantages of the Slab
Design of the Amplifier Head and Support SystemsMountingCoolingDesign of the Pulse Forming Network (PFN)
Design Specifications & ConsiderationsSimmering of Lamps
ResultsSingle Pass Gain
ConclusionFuture Work
17
OutlineIntroductionNd:Glass Slab
Nd:Glass Material PropertiesSlab vs. Rod Geometry
Discussion of the Rod GeometryAdvantages of the Slab
Design of the Amplifier Head and Support SystemsMountingCoolingDesign of the Pulse Forming Network (PFN)
Design Specifications & ConsiderationsSimmering of Lamps
ResultsSingle Pass Gain
ConclusionFuture Work
18
Frame and Mounts for SlabFrame, window seals and mounts are made from titaniumWindows form thin 2.5 mm cooling channelsBrass seals do not touch slab, but provide a method to seal with an o-ringBottom & Top seals are made from Delrin plastic
Water enters and exits through these pieces
*Designed by Dave Alessi
19
Reflector CavityCavity
Made from Delrin plastic
Defuse ReflectorMade from SpectralonTM, resistant to deionized water
Flow tubesProvides cooling channel for flashlampsDoped with cerium to block UV light
20
Parasitic OscillationsAbsorbing Glass
Fits inside titanium mountAbsorbing glass
n = 1.5243 mm thickHA-30 (Hoya Corp.)
Attached via index of refraction matched elastomer
Also used to attach the titanium braces to the slab
Allows for a mechanical cushion between the metal and the glass
Entrance faces are parallel but tilted
1.5 degree wedge
21
Nd:Glass Slab Amplifier Head
22
Cooling SpecificationsUse of deionized water as a coolant
cp= 4.184 J/g oC - specific heatµ = 0.00764 g/cm*s - dynamic viscosity
Chosen flow rate of (mp) 3 L/s (kg/s) or 180 L/minCorresponds to the removal of 1250 W of heat
Should keep the temperature differential across the 14 cm dimension of the slab close to 0.1 oC
Reynolds number – ratio of the inertia and viscous forcesTurbulent if > 2300Our channel is 10,870 – sufficient
Re = 4*mp/(µ*wp) - wp = 2*(0.25 + 36) = 72.5 cm
tcmP pp ∆= **
23
Fluid Flow
reflectorcavityleft side
reflectorcavityright side
Pump
2 m of 1’’ tubepsip 50.3=∆
Slab cooling channelspsip 18.0≈∆
90° smooth bend and splitter
smooth bend
3 m of 1’’ tubepsip 25.5=∆
psip 11.1≈∆
psip 28.0≈∆
Lamp water jacketspsip 75.1≈∆
)"1/(18 tubingwpsiptotal ≈∆
smooth bendpsip 28.0≈∆
Small entranceexpansion
Entrance, expansion losspsip 28.0≈∆
Heat Exchangerpsip 4=∆
psip 58.0≈∆
90 degree sharp turn at entrancepsip 22.0≈∆
90° smooth bend
90° smooth bend
90° smooth bend
24
Cooling Test
Cooling of a un-doped glass slab installed in the amplifier head (2.5 kJ/shot)
25
Pulse Forming Network (PFN)A simple RLC circuitPulse requirements
270 µs current pulse2.5 kJ/pulse electrical energy per pulse to all four lampsCritically damped to ensure minimization of ringing
The amplifier has four lamps to pump both sides of the slabTwo PFN units for one amplifier head (one PFN unit for two lamps in series)
Over designing the PFN unit: 2 kJ/pulse (4 kJ/pulse total)For a 145.16 µF Capacitor, 5.3 kV charge voltage corresponds to 2 kJ
26
Variable ResistanceVariable resistance – Two lamps in series
or
Each lamp is filled with 170 Torr of Xe w/ 18 mm boregives an arc length of 15.35 in for one lamp or 30.7 in. for twowith a ko = 22.82, or 45.64 when running two in series*
IkR o /= IkV o *=
*Information given by Fenix Technology (vendor of the flashlamps)
27
Simulation of PFN
28
Lighting and SimmeringProblem: 1 kV per inch of arc length required to light lampsSolution: Creation of an electric field between anode and the wall of the flashtube
Use of high turn-ration pulse transformers (1:36) to convert -520 V pulses to -18.7 kV20-30 Hz
The lamps are simmered with two 60 W simmer units providing 1A of current (max. voltage 1500 V)
1.6 A boost after current pulse for 8 ms
29
Preliminary Circuit DesignThe “switch” for this RLC circuit consists of two thyristors in series from Dynex Semi-Conductor (DCR1050F) Rated for
4 kV1 kA of current RMS12 – 15 kA non-repetitive surge currents
30
Measured PFN Pulse
31
Problem with “Blow Out”
32
Schematic of PFN w/ Added High-Voltage Transformer
33
Resulting Pulse with HV Transformer
34
Resulting Pulse with HV Transformer
35
Power Delivered to the FlashlampsNot the energy stored in capacitor
Tolerance of components
Loss in components increases as charge voltage increases
Lamp resistance gets smallInductorWire
36
OutlineIntroductionNd:Glass Slab
Nd:Glass Material PropertiesSlab vs. Rod Geometry
Discussion of the Rod GeometryAdvantages of the Slab
Design of the Amplifier Head and Support SystemsMountingCoolingDesign of the Pulse Forming Network (PFN)
Design Specifications & ConsiderationsSimmering of Lamps
ResultsSingle Pass Gain
ConclusionFuture Work
37
OutlineIntroductionNd:Glass Slab
Nd:Glass Material PropertiesSlab vs. Rod Geometry
Discussion of the Rod GeometryAdvantages of the Slab
Design of the Amplifier Head and Support SystemsMountingCoolingDesign of the Pulse Forming Network (PFN)
Design Specifications & ConsiderationsSimmering of Lamps
ResultsSingle Pass Gain
ConclusionFuture Work
38
Single Pass Gain ResultsExperimental Setup:
6 mm diameter, 20 ns, 1 mJ pulses from a single mode Nd:YLF oscillator are used
39
Measured Single Pass Gain
Compared to similar work done by:Dane et al. – Journal of Quantum Electronics 31, 148-163 (1995)
40
Spatial Gain Results Along 14 cm Dimension
41
Future WorkObtain four passes of amplification
Preliminary results are advantageousPossibly phase-conjugate after four passesAchieve 20-25 J output after eight passesSuccessfully double to 527 nmOperate amplifier at high average power (>1Hz)Pump both sides of the Ti-Sapphire amplifier by operating two units simultaneously
42
AcknowledgementsThanks to my committee members:
Dr. Jorge Rocca, Dr. Siu Au Lee and Dr. Carmen Menoni
I would also acknowledge everyone who has helped me during my time at the lab
David Alessi, Mike Grisham, Scott Heinbuch, Brad Luther, Paul Platte, Mike Purvis, Brendan Reagan and David Springer.
43
Questions?