Upload
antu-iit
View
231
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
1/12
Derivation of Equations
Article Langmuir 2010, 26(12),
10365-10372
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
2/12
Assumption Spherical droplets of radius R0 (Dia.-D0) takes the form of spherical cap of radius Rf; Possible effects caused by temperature variations are neglected;
In addition, we assume that the time scale for evaporation of the droplet is much larger than the time scale of the impactprocess;
After impact the fluid flow velocity is zero and the droplet has taken the shape of a spherical cap with contact angle
Weber Number:
Reynold Number:
1(a)
1(b)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
3/12
Energy Balance Equation
whereRf is the final radius after impact has completed, fS is the ratio of the fluidvapor
surface and the fluidsolid surface, and Eu is the dissipated energy in the impact process
by viscosity. ls and sv are the surface energies of the liquidsolid and solidvapor
interfaces, respectively.
(2)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
4/12
Youngs Energy Balance
sv ls = cos() (3)
Volume Conservation:From Geometry--
Volume of Sphere Volume of Spherical Cap
(4)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
5/12
Using (1a), (2), (3) and (4) and neglecting Eu,
the following is obtained:
(5)
From Equation (4),
(6)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
6/12
Drop-Track Mass Conservation
L (7)
r radius of the cylindrical
cap (analogous to Rf)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
7/12
From (7),
Where p drop pitch and equals to L/N
Maximum value of when Rf= Ro
r is analogous to Rf; w* is the dimensionless width
Maximum Pitch (pmax at Rf= R0) is given by
pmax=
(8)
(9a)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
8/12
In dimensionless form,
(9b)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
9/12
Dynamic Line Stability- A further bulging instability is observed at smaller droplet
separation, which consists of a series of bulges connected by ridges of width Rf.
According to Duineveld, transition to this morphology can be explained by an axial
flow within the bead that occur over a timescale significantly shorter than for
capillary spreading. He said that there is a flow, Q, along the bead driven by a
pressure difference from any variation in bead width. If Q>>QA, where QA is the
applied flow caused by the deposition of droplets, then any newly deposited liquid
will preferentially flow along the bead to the area of low pressure rather than causing
the bead to spread.
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
10/12
Generalization of Dynamic Line Stability
According to Duineveld, QA is the mean flow rate, generated by droplet
deposition, is significantly slower than the axial flow rate, Q, due to pressuredifferences within the bead, i.e.,
(10)
or, (11)
where k1 is a constant and >1;
QA could be defined by the rate of arrival of drops from the printer,
where VD is the volume of a droplet, f is the frequency of droplet generation,
and UT is the speed at which the substrate moves relative to the print head.
(12)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
11/12
According to Berger, Volumetric rate of flow through ridge, Q, is
given by:
(13)
where PR Pressure difference b/w ridge and bulge;
AR Cross-sectional area of the ridge;
Dynamic viscosity of the liquid;lr length of the ridge between the droplets;
and S shape factor (a function of the contact angle, ..
According to Duineveld,
Now, the pressure difference PR b/w ridge & droplet could be
generalized as
(14)
8/2/2019 Derivation of Equations
12/12
Now, approximately,
lr =p (15)
Also, from mass conservation within the bead, the area of cross-section of
ridge is given by:
From Equations (11) to (16),
(17)
In dimensionless drop spacing, p*, equation (17) could be expressed as:
(16)
(18)