If you can't read please download the document
Upload
eliot
View
48
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Bernd Görzig. Depreciation in EU Member States. Overview. Introduction Depreciation in EU countries Measurement of depreciation Impact of service life assumptions Conclusions. Introduction. CFC ratio: Depreciation / Net domestic product (NDP) at factor costs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Depreciation in EU Member StatesBernd Grzig
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
OverviewIntroductionDepreciation in EU countriesMeasurement of depreciationImpact of service life assumptionsConclusions
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Introduction
CFC ratio:Depreciation / Net domestic product (NDP) at factor costsCFC ratios in EU member states differ between11 % in Greece, and24 % in Finland
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Depreciation in NDP*
* At factor costs
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Economic Theory suggests: Production FunctionsDemographic and geographic factorsMountainous or flat, shape and borders, population density and composition, institutions, culture, a. o. Market StructuresMonopolised marketsProtected output markets, Input markets (labour, capital), institutional settings, a. o. Economic specialisationHeavy or light industries, small and big countries, intensity of use, a.o.
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Selected Indicators and CFC Ratio
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Depreciation and ServicesExcluding Finland:+ 0.34Greece: + 0.29
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Depreciation and Income DistributionExcluding Finland:- 0.77Greece: - 0.59F
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Possible Impact of Depreciation DifferencesGDP CFC is part of value added for non-market producerPolitical implicationsOperating surplus (incl. mixed income)Changes with CFCAnalytical implications
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Assessment for non-market activitiesPercentage change of GDP with same CFC ratio in all countries
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Assessment for market activities
Percentage change of Operating Surplus with same CFC ratio in all countries
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
ResultsSome differences in CFC ratios of EU member states might be explainableHowever: Measurement differences cannot be excluded
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Differences in CFC MeasurementSourcesDepreciationCapital stockService livesService lives: degree of differentiationService lives: comparisonsModelsDepreciation schedule
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Sources of DepreciationDirect observation (only Ireland, some new member states)Gross or net capital stock (most countries)
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Sources of Capital StockDirect observationSurvey (mainly new member states)Administrative registerPerpetual inventory method Model basedDiscard function (most countries)BEA model (2 countries)Survey basedBFA approach (some new member states)
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Service Lives: 12 years instead of 10 years, is that important?In general a 20% increase in service life leads to:Capital stock: + 20 %Depreciation - 20 %In Germany total economy 2001:Net operating surplus + 14%, butRate of return on net stock - 8 %
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Service Lives: SourcesTax registerExperts adviceSurveyOther countries estimate
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Service Lives: Breakdown of estimatesAsset breakdown for Service Lives ranges fromAN classification (mainly: 4 tangibles, 3 intangibles) to> 400 types of assetAdditional industry breakdownApplied by many countries for calculating capital stockRarely with specific Service Life for the particular industries
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Service Lives: Difficulties of comparisonsRole of Service Life in geometric depreciation is different from the linear case Comparison possible only for specified assets
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Comparison of Service Lives
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
What have we learned?Variety of methods, butAre we able to Quantify their impact on depreciation? Separate betweenEconomic andMethodological influences?Separate between the various components of the applied methods?Separate the impact of the underlying service life assumptions?
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
The Inverse PIM Model (InvPIM) PIM Input: Investment time seriesEstimate for the average service life Output:DepreciationCapital stock InvPIM InputAvailable depreciation figuresAvailable investment figures OutputService life estimateNecessary additional investment
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Results of InvPIMGood adaptation for most countriesNot plausible results need Additional researchBetter and more investment data
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Service Life Estimates by InvPIM
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Best results of InvPIM
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Worst results of InvPIM
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
High Service Lives in InvPIM
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Depreciation and Service LivesExcluding Finland:- 0.06Greece: - 0.03
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
ConclusionsCFC ratios in European Economies vary considerablyNo unique explanation possibleImpact of Service life assumptions seems to be overestimatedMore research in the impact of methodological differences necessary
EU Sixth Framework Programme
EU 6th Framework Programme
Questions for the consortiumCan we change national depreciation figures?How is the movement of assets between industries considered?
EU Sixth Framework Programme
Depreciation in EU Member StatesBernd GrzigThank you for listening
EU Sixth Framework Programme