1
Non-Cognitive Predictors of Student Success: A Predictive Validity Comparison Between Domestic and International Students The magnetic interactions of RuCl 3 can be described through the frustration of Heisenberg spin exchanges Non-Cognitive Predictors of Student Success: A Predictive Validity Comparison Between Domestic and International Students ABSTRACT: The new field of Dirac quantum matter has produced a lot of interesting theories and materials, especially in the dynamics of magnetic materials. One such material is RuCl 3 , which is a S = 1/2 zigzag honeycomb lattice. Through inelastic neutron scattering, this material has demonstrated spin waves with an energy scale of 1.5-8.0 meV. According to literature, RuCl 3 may be the realization of a new theoretical phase of matter called a spin liquid. This materials seems to fit the profile and has been investigated using a Kitaev model. In this study, we re-examine the data for RuCl 3 using a standard Heisenberg spin- spin exchange model with easy axis anisotropy. By imposing a Holstein-Primakoff expansion and utilizing competing exchange interactions within the zigzag magnetic configurations of RuCl 3 , we provide insight into the evolution of the spin dynamics. By analyzing the system by adding frustration, we are able to demonstrate that a standard Heisenberg model can produce an accurate model of the observed spin waves is produced. Therefore, with simpler model describing the spin dynamics of RuCl 3 , we ultimately shed some doubt on the current considerations of RuCl 3 as a quantum spin liquid. MODEL: Using a Heisenberg spin-spin exchange Hamiltonian, we examine the spin-wave dynamics and excitations for the zig-zag magnetic configuration of the honeycomb lattice. Using a model that incorporates variable nearest neighbor and next-nearest neighbor interactions, we investigate their effects on the overall energy and spin-wave dynamics. Through a comparison of the various model parameters, we find that the observed inelastic neutron scattering excitations in RuCl 3 may be a realization of spin frustration with spin-orbit coupling and not necessarily due to the presence of a quantum spin liquid. Future calculation of the spin wave intensities will hopefully clarify this model. E. Wilson and J. T. Haraldsen Department of Physics, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA Take a picture to go to the UNF Materials Theory website Understanding the magnetic interactions of the zig-zag honeycomb lattice: Application to RuCl 3 K. Ran et al. Physical Review Letters 118 107203 (2017) No Frustration Model ↓ Frustration Model ↑

Department of Physics, University of North Florida

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Non-Cognitive Predictors of Student Success:A Predictive Validity Comparison Between Domestic and International Students

Non-Cognitive Predictors of Student Success:A Predictive Validity Comparison Between Domestic and International Students

The magnetic interactions of

RuCl3 can be described through

the frustration of Heisenberg spin

exchanges

Non-Cognitive Predictors of Student Success:A Predictive Validity Comparison Between Domestic and International Students

ABSTRACT: The new field of Dirac quantum matter hasproduced a lot of interesting theories andmaterials, especially in the dynamics of magneticmaterials. One such material is RuCl3, which is aS = 1/2 zigzag honeycomb lattice. Throughinelastic neutron scattering, this material hasdemonstrated spin waves with an energy scale of1.5-8.0 meV. According to literature, RuCl3 maybe the realization of a new theoretical phase ofmatter called a spin liquid. This materials seemsto fit the profile and has been investigated usinga Kitaev model. In this study, we re-examine thedata for RuCl3 using a standard Heisenberg spin-spin exchange model with easy axis anisotropy.By imposing a Holstein-Primakoff expansion andutilizing competing exchange interactions withinthe zigzag magnetic configurations of RuCl3, weprovide insight into the evolution of the spindynamics. By analyzing the system by addingfrustration, we are able to demonstrate that astandard Heisenberg model can produce anaccurate model of the observed spin waves isproduced. Therefore, with simpler modeldescribing the spin dynamics of RuCl3, weultimately shed some doubt on the currentconsiderations of RuCl3 as a quantum spin liquid.

MODEL:Using a Heisenberg spin-spin exchangeHamiltonian, we examine the spin-wavedynamics and excitations for the zig-zagmagnetic configuration of the honeycomb lattice.Using a model that incorporates variable nearestneighbor and next-nearest neighbor interactions,we investigate their effects on the overall energyand spin-wave dynamics. Through a comparisonof the various model parameters, we find that theobserved inelastic neutron scattering excitationsin RuCl3 may be a realization of spin frustrationwith spin-orbit coupling and not necessarily dueto the presence of a quantum spin liquid. Futurecalculation of the spin wave intensities willhopefully clarify this model.

E. Wilson and J. T. HaraldsenDepartment of Physics, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA

Take a picture to go to the UNF Materials Theory website

Understanding the magnetic interactions of the zig-zag honeycomb lattice: Application to RuCl3

K. Ran et al. Physical Review Letters 118 107203 (2017)

No Frustration Model ↓

Frustration Model ↑

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Notes: In Powerpoint, click View > Guides Keep text within gutter guides. Author list: Don’t split names onto two lines (e.g., “Jimmy [break] Smith”). If that happens, use a new line, unless you need the space. Bold the first names of anybody who’s presenting in person. Intro/methods/result: Do not drop below font size 28, but if you have extra space, jack up the font size until the space is full. Do not use color in the sidebars except in graphs/figures. It’ll pull attention from the center and slow interpretation for passersby.