Department of Land Use & Transportation · Office of the Director 155 N First Avenue, Ste. 350 MS 16 · Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072

phone: (503) 846-4530 · fax: (503) 846-4412 · TTY: (503) 846-4598 · www.co.washington.or.us

WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATING COMMITTEE POLICY GROUP SUMMARY

February 9, 2015 Voting Members:

Brian Biehl, Banks Ken Gibson, King City

Randy Ealy, Beaverton John Cook, Tigard

Jef Dalin, Cornelius Monique Beikman, Tualatin

Gery Schirado, Durham Roy Rogers, Washington County

Peter Truax, Forest Grove Tim Knapp, Wilsonville

Jerry Willey, Hillsboro

Non Voting Members

Susie Lahsene, Port of Portland

Attendees:

Andrew Singelakis, Washington County Rob Dixon, City of Hillsboro

Chris Deffebach, Washington County Marc San Soucie, Beaverton City Council

Steve Szigethy, Washington County Todd Juhasz, City of Beaverton

Susan Aguilar, Washington County Lisa Frank, BTA

Joy Chang, Washington County Jeff Petrillo, Washington County PC

Dyami Valentine, Washington County Julia, Hajduk, City of Sherwood

Jonathan Schlueter, Washington County Zoe Monahan, City of Tualatin

Dr. Bill Barber, King City

Kelly Brooke, ODOT

Mark Bernard, City of Tigard

Lynne Mutrie, Oregon SRTS

Chris Rall, T 4 America

Rob Foster, City of Forest Grove

Anne Debbaut, DLCD

Shelli Romero, ODOT-Region 1

Don Odermott, City of Hillsboro

Rich Blackman, City of Forest Grove

Chairman Roy Rogers called the Washington County Coordinating Committee (WCCC) meeting to order at 12:05 p.m. Visitor Comments None Consideration of Minutes Mayor Jerry Willey moved to approve the minutes from January 5, 2015 WCCC meeting. Mayor Peter Truax seconded. Vote: Unanimous

WCCC Meeting Summary February 9, 2015, 2015

Page 2 of 3

ODOT Region 1 Area Commission of Transportation (ACT) Kelly Brooks from ODOT provided an updated on ACT. Eight comments were received. The ACT draft was updated per a joint request from Washington and Clackamas counties, to assign a small portion of Washington County to an ACT region. Ms. Brooks shared the task force indicated that one of the stakeholders needs to represent the environment justice / health field. Any of the ACTS can nominate this representative (no need for one per county). The Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) is on board and will be issuing a Charter soon - good for a year. ACTs should start making nominations soon after. Various counties have already started compiling nomination lists. Currently, Ms. Brooks is developing a nomination form. State Legislative Agenda Updates Jonathon Schlueter with Washington County provided a brief overview of Washington County’s federal and state legislative agendas. The following agenda items will be Washington County focus this legislative session:

Mr. Schlueter noted that the Columbia River Crossing is not on the federal agenda this year.

Federal Highway Trust Fund - current funding will come to an end May 31, 2015 and there is no federal funding support after. This will be one of the priorities for the JPACT delegation this year.

Washington County’s federal priority again will be the Water Supply Project and stabilization security of-Scoggins Dam. The Bureau of Reclamation has $20 million dollars in the President’s budget to identify hazards to existing structures, and the Dam is on the list. The county has identified that Scoggins dam sits on a seismic fault, and would not withstand a major earthquake.

Housing issues in Washington County – not adequate to the rising rental costs and the growing population. Landlords are not excepting rental assistance vouchers.

The Gain Share is the top priority for Washington County at the state level. The 2007 Legislature passed Senate Bill (SB) 954 which grants local governments a share of the personal income tax revenue generated by the retention and creation of Strategic Investment Program (SIP) related jobs. The Board of County Commissioners and local partners have concerns regarding the continuity of the program as it is set to sunset July, 2019.

Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Joy Chang of Washington County provided information on the SRTS program. In 2014, Washington County was awarded $150,000 from Oregon’s SRTS program. Currently, the program has one part –time SRTS Coordinator for the entire program (13 cities, 7 school districts, 80 elementary public schools, 20 middle/junior high and 24 high schools). The SRTS program is designed to increase the number of students walking, and biking to school while at the same time promoting health and exercise. Ms. Chang shared the benefits of this program, history and recent updates. The goals are to build partnerships, increase participation, coordinate and develop a priority list with partners. Surveys will be conducted to evaluate service levels. Shelley Oylear of Washington County shared that the county has contracted a consultant to do an inventory of the sidewalks and infrastructure within a mile of 56 schools. Priority lists of improvement projects will be generated with each school to enhance and make a difference in kids walking and bike to school. Mark Bernard of Tigard gave an update on Tigard/Tualatin School District’s SRTS program. The school district received funding for a SRTS coordinator for two years. Coordination with schools and community partners regarding SRTS planning are currently happening.

WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON

Department of Land Use & Transportation · Office of the Director 155 N First Avenue, Ste. 350 MS 16 · Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072

phone: (503) 846-4530 · fax: (503) 846-4412 · TTY: (503) 846-4598 · www.co.washington.or.us

MEMORANDUM

DATE: March 2, 2015

TO: Washington County Coordinating Committee

FROM: Chris Deffebach, Policy Analyst

SUBJECT: Region 1 Area Commission on Transportation nominations

On February 19th

, the Oregon Transportation Commission granted a provisional charter for the Region 1

Area Commission on Transportation (R1 ACT). The WCCC has until April 17, 2015 to submit

nominations for five of the six members of the ACT from Washington County. One of the members

must represent business/labor and one must be an elected representative from a city. The sixth position

is a county commissioner, appointed by the Washington County Board of County Commissioners.

At the last WCCC meeting, Kelly Brooks, ODOT, outlined the process for submitting nominations for

the R1 ACT. ODOT staff has asked the chair of the WCCC to submit the WCCC’s nominations, as

described in the attached letter to Commissioner Rogers and the nomination form.

To meet this schedule, staff proposes that the WCCC discuss and recommend the categories for

nominations for the R1 ACT at the March 9th

meeting and approve the individual nominations at the

April 6th meeting.

The March 9th

meeting would include discussion and recommendation of:

The number of nominations for city representatives. The approach for nominating the business/labor representative. Other categories of nominations for the remaining position(s), such as shipping/goods

movement, finance, active transportation, health, tourism, rural or unincorporated community representative for example.

Between the two meetings, staff can support the WCCC process as needed and collect information to

complete the forms.

In addition to the nominations from the other county coordinating committees, ODOT is seeking

nominations for the regional positions representing freight and active transportation.

R1 ACT Nomination Form

ORS 184.610 to 184.666 gives the Oregon Transportation Commission (OTC) authority to establish the policies for the operation of the Oregon Department of Transportation and for the administration of programs related to transportation. R1ACT is an advisory body chartered under authority of the OTC. While the OTC retains oversight and final decision-making authority, R1ACT provides valuable input and recommendations.

R1ACT membership shall consist of 31 voting members. Sixteen of the 31 members will be nominated by county commissions and/or county coordinating committees per the R1 ACT Formation Proposal. Each nominating entity must return a form for each nominee to Kelly.brooks@odot.state.or.us by April 17th, 2015. The forms must be accompanied by a single cover letter signed by the chair of the nominating entity. You may attach resumes or other supporting documentation as needed.

Nominating Entity Information

Organization Name: Submittal Date:

Signing Authority: Number of Nominees:

E-Mail Address: Phone No:

Nominee Information

Candidate Name:

Occupation:

Phone No:

Is this nominee an elected official?

Describe the candidate’s experience in transportation policy, project development, project delivery and/or finance.

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

1

YES NO If Yes, what elected position does he or she hold?

Does this nominee fulfill your requirement of a business or labor stakeholder? If so, what are his or her qualifications specific to this role? _________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ Will this nominee represent the interests of environmental justice or health stakeholders? If so please describe his or her qualifications specific to this role. __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________

ODOT Staff Contact Information

Kelly Brooks ODOT Region 1

123 NW Flanders St. Portland, OR 97209-4012

503-731-3087 Kelly.Brooks@odot.state.or.us

2

Department of Land Use & Transportation · Planning & Development Services · Long Range Planning

155 N First Avenue Ste. 350 MS 14 · Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072

phone: (503) 846-3519 · fax: (503) 846-4412 · www.co.washington.or.us

Memorandum Date: March 2, 2015 To: Washington County Coordinating Committee From: Steve Szigethy, Principal Planner RE: Transportation Development Tax – Annual Adjustment

Requested Action Forward a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners to adjust Transportation Development Tax (TDT) rates according to the TDT index, effective July 1, 2015. This year the TDT index will increase TDT rates by approximately 1%. The TDT annual rate adjustment is a non-discretionary adjustment. However, the Board of County Commissioners is required by the county code to take action to implement the adjustment each year. The WCCC Transportation Advisory Committee discussed this issue at its February 26 meeting and recommended that the adjustment be implemented. Background The TDT code defines the methodology for an annual adjustment of the rate schedule according to the fluctuation in construction costs. The methodology cannot be changed without voter approval. The TDT index has three components:

Percentage change in the National Highway Construction Cost Index reflecting the cost of materials (weighted 50%);

Percentage change in the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for Private Industry Workers, by Occupational Group and Industry, Construction Group, reflecting the cost of labor (weighted 30%); and

The average annual change in total real market value of Washington County real property as estimated from data published by the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation reflecting the cost of right-of-way (weighted 20%).

A five-year moving average of the index is utilized to avoid significant annual fluctuation. In the event that the above index factors use a different base year (i.e. calendar or fiscal year), the

Page 2 of 2

most recent year with complete data is used. The rates cannot increase more than 10% per year. As of this writing the National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI) information is only available through June 2014. If additional information becomes available prior to the deadline for Board materials it will be included in the index. Given the current information available the TDT will increase by 0.926% percent as calculated by the Index. Implementing the increase will mean the TDT for a single-family detached home would increase from the current $8,036 to $8,110. A full rate increase history is included with this memo. This will be the first increase caused by the index. TDT rates from July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2014 were discounted by the TDT ordinance and subsequent amendments. Rates between October 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015 were the first to be adjusted by the TDT index, but in that case the index was negative and had the effect of reducing rates compared to the fully phased-in rates. The index is now positive, resulting in a slight increase. Process-wise, staff must calculate the index no later than April 1 of each year. The Board of County Commissioners then implements the adjustment by resolution and order adopted by May 1. Revised rates take effect July 1. Washington County must promptly notify the cities of each increase or decrease. Attachments

Land Use Category

ITE Code Unit*

Rates 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016

determined by index (no more

than 10% increase )

Residential

Single Family Detached 210 /dwelling unit $8,036 $8,110Apartment 220 /dwelling unit $5,257 $5,306Residential Condomunium/Townhouse 230 /dwelling unit $4,806 $4,851Manufactured Housing (in Park) 240 /dwelling unit $4,021 $4,058Assisted Living 254 /bed $2,483 $2,506Continuing Care Retirement 255 /unit $2,512 $2,535Recreational

Park 411 /acre $1,347 $1,360Golf Course 430 /hole $14,284 $14,416Golf Driving Range 432 /tee $11,302 $11,406Multipurpose Recreational/Arcade 435 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $2,516 $2,540Bowling Alley 437 /lane $818 $825Multiplex Movie Theater 445 /screen $112,858 $113,903Health/Fitness Club 492 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $7,914 $7,987Recreation/Community Center 495 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $9,333 $9,419Institutional/Medical

Elementary School (Public) 520 /student $387 $391Middle/Junior High School (Public) 522 /student $440 $444High School (Public) 530 /student $604 $610Private School (K-12) 536 /student $448 $452Junior College 540 /student $632 $638University/College 550 /student $1,048 $1,058Church 560 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $3,328 $3,358Day Care Center/Preschool 565 /student $1,239 $1,251Library 590 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $15,614 $15,758Hospital 610 /bed $3,165 $3,194Nursing Home 620 /bed $1,088 $1,098Clinic 630 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $22,582 $22,791Commercial/Services

Hotel/Motel 310 /room $2,280 $2,302Building Materials/Lumber 812 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $8,021 $8,095Free-Standing Discount Superstore with Groceries 813 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $15,333 $15,475Specialty Retail Center 814 /T.S.F.G.L.A. $10,663 $10,762Free-Standing Discount Store without Groceries 815 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $16,453 $16,606Hardware/Paint Store 816 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $13,387 $13,511Nursery/Garden Center 817 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $9,481 $9,569Shopping Center 820 /T.S.F.G.L.A. $11,034 $11,136Factory Outlet Center 823 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $8,656 $8,736New Car Sales 841 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $12,427 $12,542Automobile Parts Sales 843 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $11,968 $12,079Tire Superstore 849 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $9,402 $9,489Supermarket 850 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $22,245 $22,451Convenience Market (24-hour) 851 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $26,212 $26,455Convenience Market with Fuel Pump 853 /V.F.P. $25,170 $25,403Wholesale Market 860 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $6,398 $6,457Discount Club 861 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $17,273 $17,433Home Improvement Superstore 862 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $6,434 $6,494Electronics Superstore 863 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $8,902 $8,984Office Supply Superstore 867 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $11,968 $12,079

TABLE 12

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX RATE SCHEDULE

Rates 10/1/2014 - 6/30/2015

Land Use Category

ITE Code Unit*

Rates 7/1/2015 - 6/30/2016

determined by index (no more

than 10% increase )

TABLE 12

TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT TAX RATE SCHEDULE

Rates 10/1/2014 - 6/30/2015

Pharmacy/Drugstore without Drive-Thru Window 880 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $11,968 $12,079Pharmacy/Drugstore with Drive-Thru Window 881 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $11,968 $12,079Furniture Store 890 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $1,510 $1,524Bank/Savings: Walk-in 911 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $24,778 $25,008Bank/Savings: Drive-in 912 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $26,212 $26,455Quality Restaurant (not a chain) 931 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $23,792 $24,012High Turnover, Sit-Down Restaurant (chain or stand alone) 932 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $19,959 $20,143Fast Food Restaurant (No Drive-Thru) 933 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $26,212 $26,455Fast Food Restaurant (With Drive-Thru) 934 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $26,212 $26,455Drive-Thru Restaurant (No Seating) 935 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $26,212 $26,455Drinking Place/Bar 936 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $21,444 $21,642Quick Lubrication Vehicle Shop 941 /Service Stall $18,334 $18,503Automobile Care Center 942 /T.S.F.G.L.A. $12,456 $12,571Gasoline/Service Station (no Market or Car Wash) 944 /V.F.P. $15,727 $15,873Gasoline/Service Station (with Market and Car Wash) 946 /V.F.P. $15,727 $15,873Office

General Office Building 710 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $8,433 $8,512Medical-Dental Office Building 720 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $28,575 $28,840Government Office Building 730 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $55,955 $56,474U.S. Post Office 732 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $71,734 $72,398Office Park 750 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $11,152 $11,256Port/Industrial

Truck Terminal 030 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $4,287 $4,327General Light Industrial 110 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $5,701 $5,754General Heavy Industrial 120 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $1,227 $1,238Manufacturing 140 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $3,136 $3,165Warehouse 150 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $4,026 $4,063Mini-Warehouse 151 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $2,088 $2,107Utilities 170 /T.S.F.G.F.A. $5,418 $5,469

* Abbrevations used in the "Unit" colum:

T.S.F.G.F.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area

T.S.F.G.L.A. = Thousand Square Feet Gross Leaseable Area

V.F.P. = Vehicle Fueling Position

Note: all index adjustments per 3.17.050F

YEAR 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014Index ComponentsMaterials Component National Highway CCI 1.0031 1.0664 1.1788 1.3492 1.2899 1.2948 1.0970 1.0617 1.0728 1.1624 1.1029 1.099 % Annual Change 6.31% 10.54% 14.45% -4.39% 0.38% -15.28% -3.22% 1.04% 5.00% -2.09% -0.32% Avg. 5-Year Change 4.96% 0.50% -1.89% -4.54% -2.81% -3.40% 0.04%Labor Component BLS Employment Cost Index 90.1 93.5 96.7 100 103.6 107.6 110.9 111.7 113.6 116.4 117.6 118.6 120.7 % Annual Change 3.77% 3.42% 3.41% 3.60% 3.86% 3.07% 0.72% 1.70% 2.46% 1.03% 0.85% 1.77% Avg. 5-Year Change 3.61% 3.47% 2.93% 2.59% 2.36% 1.80% 1.35% 1.56%Right-of-Way Component Avg. Total Real Market Value $270,176 $279,865 $308,772 $315,784 $342,179 $399,958 $435,632 412,268$ 391,972$ 374,922$ 365,516$ 407,690$ 453,046$ % Annual Change 3.59% 10.33% 2.27% 8.36% 16.89% 8.92% -5.36% -4.92% -4.35% -2.51% 11.54% 11.13% Avg. 5-Year Change 8.29% 9.35% 6.21% 4.78% 2.23% -1.65% -1.12% 2.18%Weighted Average Index 2.74% 5.39% 2.37% 0.79% -1.113% -1.195% -1.516% 0.926%

<------------Five-year running average------------>

Cost Change Index using National Highway Construction Cost IndexTable 2: Transportation Development Tax

2/20/2015

Washington County TDT Code*

Effective October 1, 2014

Page 6 of 21

*This is an unofficial codification of Ordinance 691-A, Exhibit ‘A’ as modified by Ordinances 729, 741, 746-A, 751

and 793-A. This document is supplied for informational purposes only. Washington County Code Chapter 3.17 is

the official source for the TDT code. The TDT was approved by voters on November 4, 2008.

6. Relocation due to government acquisition of the entire previous use as part of a project listed in Appendix C, to the extent the use at the new site does not exceed the size or impact of the previous use. Any additional size or impact shall be subject to the tax.

3.17.050 Amount.

A. Except as otherwise provided in this Chapter, the amount of the TDT due shall be calculated by: 1) determining the category of the proposed use from the list in Appendix B; 2) determining the TDT rate per unit for that use in Appendix B; and 3) determining the number of units for the proposed use. The TDT rate per unit, multiplied by the number of units for the use, shall be the TDT charge.

B. For new development for which a previous use existed on the property, the amount of the TDT due shall be determined by calculating the TDT of the previous use(s) on the property and subtracting that sum from the TDT for all of the proposed use(s) as provided in Paragraph A above. Except as provided for in subsection C of this section, the proposed use and the previous use shall be determined based on the rates listed in Appendix B.

C. In the event the Director determines that a particular use does not have a basis for TDT calculation stated in Appendix B the Director shall either:

1. Determine the TDT based on the use listed in Appendix B most similar in trip generation; or

2. At the election (and expense) of the applicant, consider an alternate TDT based on a traffic study to estimate the weekday average person trip generation of a same or similar use verified by a registered traffic engineer. In the event an alternate TDT is utilized, the Director may make such adjustments as deemed applicable in consideration of location, size and other appropriate factors.

a. The applicant’s traffic study methodology must be consistent with Appendix A and follow standard professional traffic engineering practice.

b. The applicant’s study must provide complete and detailed documentation, including verifiable data. Supporting documentation must rely upon generally accepted sampling methods, sources of information, demographics, growth projections, and techniques of analysis.

c. The TDT shall be determined according to the methodology set forth in Appendix A, applied to the trip generation determined by the traffic study.

3. If all of the above criteria are not met, the Director shall provide the Applicant a written decision explaining the basis for rejecting the proposed study, and shall determine the TDT according to subsection C.1 above.

D. It is recognized that single structures may include more than one use. In such event the Director for purposes of establishing the TDT shall proportion the uses accordingly.

E. The tax rates per unit for each land use set forth in Appendix B to this Ordinance shall on July 1 of each succeeding year be adjusted automatically based on a five-year moving

Washington County TDT Code*

Effective October 1, 2014

Page 7 of 21

*This is an unofficial codification of Ordinance 691-A, Exhibit ‘A’ as modified by Ordinances 729, 741, 746-A, 751

and 793-A. This document is supplied for informational purposes only. Washington County Code Chapter 3.17 is

the official source for the TDT code. The TDT was approved by voters on November 4, 2008.

average of the TDT index described in Appendix D. A final product ending in $0.49 or less shall be rounded down to the nearest dollar, $0.50 or more up to the next dollar. The TDT index shall be calculated based on a combination of the following indices:

1. The National Highway Construction Cost Index reflecting the cost of materials (weighted 50%),

2. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Employment Cost Index for Private Industry Workers, by Occupational Group and Industry, Construction Group reflecting the cost of labor (weighted 30%), and;

3. The average annual change in total real market value of Washington County real property as estimated from data published by the Washington County Department of Assessment and Taxation reflecting the cost of right-of-way (weighted 20%).

In the event the above index factors use a different base year (i.e., calendar year or fiscal year), the most recent year with complete data shall be used. In the event any of the index factors set forth in this section and Appendix D are no longer available, the Board may by Resolution and Order adopt a replacement index factor that meets the requirements of ORS 223.304(8) for the same type of cost information.

F. Beginning April 1, 2013, and not later than April 1 of each succeeding year, the Director shall calculate the index adjustment as provided in the section for the preceding five-year period. In the event the TDT rates in Ordinance 691-A Engrossed, as adjusted by this index calculation, are greater than the TDT rates set forth in Appendix A to his Ordinance, then the lower set of TDT rates shall apply as provided in subsection H below. In the event the TDT rates in Ordinance 691-A Engrossed, as adjusted by this index calculation, are less than the TDT rates set forth in Append A to his Ordinance, then the lower set of TDT rates shall apply as provided in subsection H below. This subsection G shall apply only for the duration of the revised rate phase-in.

G. The Board of Commissioners of the County shall implement the adjustment annually by resolution and order adopted by May 1 of each year, to take effect on July 1 of that year, including a revised rate table showing adjusted rates for all land uses. In no event shall there be an increase of over ten percent (10%) per year.

H. Washington County shall promptly notify each city in writing of the increase or decrease. The adjustment to the dollar amount as described above shall apply to all building permit applications accepted for review on or after July 1, by the county or city having jurisdiction over the development.

3.17.060 Payment.

A. Unless deferred, the tax imposed is due and payable at the time of issuance of a building permit by the county or city. Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, no building permit shall be issued for a development subject to this tax unless the tax is first paid in full.

B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, in those cases where the amount due exceeds the amount of TDT on a single family detached residence (ITE Code 210), the applicant may request a payment deferral. The request must be made in writing to the Director no later

March 2, 2015 MSTIP Opportunity Fund Accounting

Page | 1

Disbursed Funds These funds have been awarded and are being used currently or have been used in the past.

Sponsor Project/ Activity Total Cost

MSTIP Request

WCCC Approval

Match Match Source Timing*

Project/Activity Description

Washington County

TDM Project Implementation

$290,000 $50,000 12/17/12 $250,000 RTO FY 13-14 Implement countywide TDM strategies. Westside Transportation Alliance partnering organization.

Disbursed Sub Total $290,000 $50,000 $250,000

Obligated Funds These funds have been obligated and are awaiting disbursement.

Sponsor Project/ Activity Total Cost

MSTIP Request

WCCC Approval

Match

Match Source Timing* Project/Activity Description

City of Forest Grove

Hwy 8/47 Intersection Improvements

$4,341,000

$318,000 11/05/12 $4,023,000 STIP, MTIP, City of F.G.

FY 16-18 Construct a southbound right-turn lane from Hwy 47 to Hwy 8, a right-turn lane from Hwy 8 northbound onto Hwy 47 and a new crosswalk on the east leg of the intersection.

City of Tualatin Tualatin River Greenway Gap Completion

$3,102,300 $750,000 11/04/13 $2,352,000 ($1,585,000 in

Connect OR funds)

Connect Oregon V, local public and private funding

FY 14-16 The Tualatin River Greenway Gap Completion project is a multimodal trail that fills a missing link in Tualatin’s bike and pedestrian network. The project will complete the Tualatin River Greenway in Tualatin’s eastern and central areas between Nyberg Lane and Martinazzi Avenue.

Washington County

TriMet Westside Bike & Ride Access Project

$1,915,572 $250,000 11/04/13 $1,665,572 Connect Oregon V, TriMet, private funds

FY 14-16 Bike and Ride facility at Beaverton Creek MAX Station and a new trail crossing at Beaverton Creek to connect to the proposed Nike woods trail.

Washington County / ODOT

Regional Active Transportation Management

$13,600,000 $1,500,000 04/07/14 $12,100,000 Tiger VI, ODOT FY 15-17 Improve freeway and arterial flow, traveler information, and traffic management for the West-side Economic Corridor.

March 2, 2015 MSTIP Opportunity Fund Accounting

Page | 2

Washington County

TDM Project Implementation

$253,500 $50,000 11/10/14 $203,500 Region Travel Options

FY 15-16 Continue the strong support to implement countywide TDM strategies. Fund a portion of Westside Transportation Alliance 2015-2017 scope of work budget ($25K/year).

City of Tigard Safe Routes to School Program Coordinator

$516,000 $41,000 11/10/14 $475,000 Region Travel Options, City of

Tigard

FY 15-16 Fund a Safe Routes to School Coordinator position in the City of Tigard for fiscal years 2016 and 2017

Washington County

Augusta Lane Pedestrian and Bicycle Bridge

$1,493,400 $500,000 01/05/15 $993,400 Nature in Neighborhoods

FY 15-16 Construct a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over Beaverton Creek within existing Augusta Lane right-of-way to improve access to nature, schools, and transit.

Obligated Sub Total $25,221,772 $2,909,000 $22,312,772

Total Disbursed and Obligated $25,511 ,772 $3,459,000 $22,052 ,772

Total Remaining Allocation $1,541,000

*Based on project schedule and contract agreement. Fiscal year (FY) is July 1-June 30.

WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATING COMMITTEE (WCCC) POLICY GROUP MEETING

March 2, 2015

JURISDICTION NAME POSITION

Wash County Roy Rogers Policy Chair

Andy Duyck Alternate

Banks Brian Biehl Councilor

Jolynn Becker Alternate

Beaverton Dennis Doyle Mayor

Randy Ealy Alternate

Cornelius Jef Dalin Mayor

TBD Alternate

Durham Gery Schirado Mayor

Chuck Van Meter Alternate (Councilor)

Forest Grove Peter Truax Mayor

TBD Alternate

Gaston Rich Williams Public Works Director

Hillsboro Jerry Willey Mayor

Rob Dixon Alternate 1

Don Odermott Alternate 2

King City Ken Gibson Councilor

David Newham Alternate

North Plains David Hatcher Mayor

Martha DeBry Alternate (City Mgr)

Sherwood Krisanna Clark Mayor

Sally Robinson Alternate

Tigard John Cook Mayor

John Goodhouse Alternate

Tualatin Lou Ogden Mayor

Monique Beikman Alternate

Wilsonville Tim Knapp Mayor

Julie Fitzgerald Alternate