Upload
christine-gallagher
View
216
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Denise Rouleau New England School of Acupuncture
Bob Cohen Attain LLC
Joe O’Brien Attain LLC
Cost TransfersClearly Allowable, Clearly Not Allowable,
Clearly Confusing?
FRA XIVMarch 12, 2013
Learning Objectives
What Are Cost Transfers?
Recent Findings
Challenge For Research Administrators
Typical Audit Questions/ Findings
What Federal Regulations Require
Cost Transfer Red Flags
What Have We Learned?
How To Manage Risk
Case Studies
What are Cost Transfers?
Lets begin with a definition…
A Cost Transfer is the transfer of an expenditure that initially posted
to one project and is then transferred to another project
What are Cost Transfers?
Salary expenditures
Labor, including salaries, wages, and benefits
Non-salary expenditures
Non-Labor, all costs other than salary (e.g., chemicals, lab supplies, equipment, travel, internal service provider charges)
Recent Findings
Mayo Clinic- May 2005Related to cost transfers
$6.5 million False Claims Act settlement
Whistleblower-initiated
Yale University- December 2008Related to cost transfers
$7.6 million False Claims Act settlement
Effort reporting was also an issue
Recent Findings
Univ. of California Santa Barbara – Sept 2012$500,000 of Cost Transfers Questioned by NSF
OIG$6.3M total Compliance Findings
Georgia Institute of Technology – June 2009Effort Reporting Controls and Transfers$16M in NSF Salaries, $49M in other Federal
Salaries
Recent Findings
Thomas Jefferson University – April 200711-year NIH review after designation as “High
Risk”6-year Integrity Agreement with HHS
California Institute of Technology – March 2007Salary transferred from Overspent NSF Award
Challenge for Research Administrators
The Government expects that:
Costs are charged appropriately at the time they are incurred
Significant adjustments should not be required
Adequate financial management practices and policies exist
Challenge for Research Administrators
Auditors often disallow costs transferred into federal
accounts because of misallocation or because of non-compliance with timing,
documentation, or procedural requirements.
Challenge for Research Administrators
Policies and Procedures: no formal rules governing cost transfers
Documentation: lack of audit trail, insufficient explanations for the cost transfer
Awareness: PIs and others may be unaware of the sensitivities and requirements
Screening: determining the appropriate level of review before a transaction can be processed
Monitoring: developing an effective oversight program
Challenge for Research Administrators
Reporting: Poor financial reports, which impede PIs from tracking where charges hit, and whether deficits are projected
Technology: Inflexible accounting systems – e.g., no“suspense accounts” for pre-award costs
Culture: A culture that views federal funding as interchangeable
Causes: determining the “root causes” and implementing improvements to reduce the need for transfers
Challenge for Research Administrators- The Four Requirements
ALLOWABLEItems not restricted by
OMB Circular A-21 or the specific grant
REASONABLEGoods or services acquired and the amount involved
reflect an action a prudent person would have taken
(Prudent Person Rule)
ALLOCABLEChargeable based on the relative benefits
received by the project
TREATED CONSISTENTLY
Like costs in similar instances need to be treated
consistently throughout the institution
Typical Audit Questions/ Findings
Are there cost transfers between projects which are in an overrun condition to those with unexpended balances?
Are cost transfers which represent corrections of clerical errors made promptly after discovery?
Are cost transfers dated?
Are late cost transfers reviewed and approved by post award leadership?
Typical Audit Questions/ Findings
What is the volume of cost transfers?
Is there a standard form (electronic or paper) for initiating cost transfers?
Are cost transfers supported by documentation which adequately explains and justifies why the transfers were made and how the error occurred?
Are cost transfers caused by work which is supported by more than one funding source?
Typical Audit Questions/ Findings
Is there a defined process in place for approvals?
Is there a process for initiating cost transfers after changes on an effort certification?
Is there a process for reviewing late cost transfers?
Is there training that addresses cost transfers?
Typical Audit Questions/ Findings
DOCUMENTATION
TIMING
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
CONTROLS
Insufficient / incomplete documentation
Significant number of late transfers (over 90 days after original charge)
Transfers after the grant had closed
Transfers from overspent account to account with large balance
Frequent transfers from departmental to sponsored accounts
Unsupported direct charges to grant
Accounting system unable to monitor and manage charges on grants
What Federal Regulations Require
NIH Grants Policy Statement:
Cost Transfers, Overruns, and Accelerated/ Delayed Expenditures:
“An explanation merely stating that the transfer was made "to correct error" or "to transfer to correct project" is not sufficient
Cost transfers should be accomplished “within 90 days”
What Federal Regulations Require
NIH Grants Policy Statement:
Cost Transfers, Overruns, and Accelerated/ Delayed Expenditures:
“Transfers of costs from one project to another or from one competitive segment to the next solely to cover cost overruns are not allowable”
“Must be supported by documentation that:
a) Fully explains how the error occurred
b) Certification of the correctness of the new charge by a responsible organizational official of the grantee, consortium participant, or contractor
What Federal Regulations Require
NIH Grants Policy Statement:
Cost Transfers, Overruns, and Accelerated / Delayed Expenditures:
“Grantees must maintain documentation of cost transfers, pursuant to 45 CFR 74.53 or 92.42 for audit or other review”
“The grantee should have systems in place to detect such errors within a reasonable time frame; untimely discovery of errors could be an indication of poor internal controls”
“Frequent errors in recording costs may indicate the need for accounting system improvements, enhanced internal controls, or both”
Cost Transfers – Red Flags
Observed Activity Potential Root Activity
Frequent cost transfers at the start of projects, especially late cost transfers
Late award setups, “Parking” charges
Late or high volume of cost transfers coinciding with effort report due to dates
Labor distribution not monitored; Effort reports used to manage labor
High volume cost transfers through the life of the award
Poor management of funds or accounting practices
High volume of cost transfers near the end of an award or after
Surplus or shortfall transferred on or off of federal awards
Despite being a compliance issue themselves, cost transfers are often the symptoms for other compliance
and management issues:
What have we learned?Federal auditors and investigators have learned to
recognize the signs of abusive cost transfers:
Transfers that exactly clear deficits
Round dollar amount transfers
Transfers made near end of budget period
Large batch transfers
Late transfers – especially over 90 days
High volume of transfers
Post-effort certification transfers
Poorly documented transfers
What have we learned?
Cost transfers should not be used:
As a cost management strategy
To avoid or eliminate cost overruns
Solely for the purpose of utilizing unexpended funds of a sponsored award
To circumvent pre- and/or post-awards restrictions
For any other reasons of convenience
How to Manage Risk
PeopleReview Skills, Knowledge, SupportConduct TrainingReview Organizational Skills
ProcessClear policies and procedures Document requirements
TechnologyConfiguration/Control SettingsSystems IntegrationEvaluate Technology Alternatives
How to Manage Risk
Expedite setting up accounts
Better financial reports
Regular monitoring of grant activity
Streamlined processes
Standard form for documentation
How to Manage Risk
Plan expenditures to avoid cost transfers.
Charge costs to the correct award initially.
When costs are shared by more than one award, allocate appropriately.
Set up non-sponsored program accounts to hold costs to be allocated.
Set up advance accounts for costs incurred prior to receipt of notice of grant award.
How to Manage Risk Update funding sources for items such as
salaries and open purchase orders in a timely manner when award numbers change.
If a transfer corrects effort, recertify that month’s effort and attach documentation.
Obtain “no cost” extensions prior to the end date of the original project in order to complete work after the original award ends.
Plan and monitor costs monthly.
Process cost transfers in a timely manner.
How to Manage Risk
Document, document, document! Provide documentation to support the transfer and make the situation clear to an outside person, including:
A description of the error and how it occurred
A description of how the cost benefits the project it is being moved to
Certification of the transfer by a responsible organizational official
Use clear and concise language explaining the transfer.
Review documentation for late cost transfers justifying the request.
How to Manage RiskTop 10 List:
1. Do it right the first time—“fixing” it after-the-fact creates more work.
2. Talk with the people initiating the transactions—and by “talk” we don’t mean “email”.
3. Keep good supporting documentation—if you can’t prove it, it never happened.
4. Develop a routine—meet periodically rather than once or twice and letting things slip.
5. Be concise—the shorter the better.
How to Manage RiskTop 10 List:
6. Identify bottlenecks to offer solutions—not just to complain… anyone can do that.
7. Don’t wait for direction to come from the top—implement change at your level.
8. Suggest solutions—outline the issue, the obstacle, intended improvement, and explain how they can help.
9. Do things first that don’t cost money, show progress, then ask for more resources.
10. Be positive—no one responds to negativity.
Timing: Case Studies
Scenario: The grant administrator requests salary transfers for multiple individuals to/from sponsored projects, some dating back over 6 months.
Justification: “The main reason for this is that two of our accounts are out of money and the salaries need to be moved to avoid a cost over run”.
Would you approve? Why or why not?
Timing: Case Studies
Scenario: The grant administrator requests a salary transfer for John Smith for July from Grant 12345 to Grant 12346. The transfer request is submitted in August.
Justification: “The budget period for Grant 12345 ended on 6/30/11 and the next year of the fund, Grant 12346, had not been set up. In the future, we will request an advance account in a more timely fashion.”
Would you approve? Why or why not?
Wording: Case Studies
Scenario: The grant administrator requests that a cost of $1,000 be moved from Grant 12345 to Grant 12354. The expense occurred in May and the transfer is requested in June.
Justification: “ I incorrectly charged Grant 12345 instead of Grant 12354. This was a data-keying error that was discovered when reconciling our monthly financial reports.”
Would you approve? Why or why not?
Wording : Case Studies
Scenario: The grant administrator requests in July that expenses incurred during the period of January – June be moved to another sponsored project.
Justification: “Please process this cost transfer. Other priorities prevented me from reconciling my monthly financial reports and I am just noticing the error now.”
Would you approve? Why or why not?
Allocations : Case StudiesScenario: A freezer was purchased on Grant
12345. At the time of the purchase Grant 67891 was not set up and therefore not included on the original PO#. The grant administrator is requesting to move 50% of the freezer cost from Grant 12345 to Grant 67891.
Justification: “This freezer is used by two PI’s for sample storage. Each PI estimates 50% usage of this freezer. PI Davis stores blood samples for Grant 12345, PI Abrams stores cell tissue for Grant 67891.”
Would you approve this? Why or why not?
Other: Case Studies
Scenario: Lab supplies were charged to a private award and the grant administrator is now requesting to move to an NIH federal award.
Justification: “We’re requesting the P-card charges be move to Dr. Spock’s federal award because the items were in the approved budget (attached). The error was made because the P-card default had been setup on another PI’s private grant. We’ve updated our P-card default to a University account number.”
Would you approve this? Why or why not?
Other: Case Studies
Scenario: Travel expenses were charged to a department account and the grant administrator is now requesting to move to a private award. The individual for whom the travel was for had no effort on the grant.
Justification: “The travel expenses were charged to the department account in error. Please move these expenses to the private award because this is where they belong.”
Would you approve this? Why or why not?
For Questions, Contact:
Bob Cohen [email protected]
Denise Rouleau [email protected]
Joe O’Brien [email protected]