Demon Gone Crazy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Demon Gone Crazy

    1/4

    Most of the Muslims World has been subjugated to the Western way of ruling, since her

    birth, in the name ofIslamic Democracy. Regrettably, some Muslims feel proud to relate

    democracy with the ruling style of Hazrat Umar (R.A) and other Caliphs of Islam. The origination

    ofDemocracy has to be cognized so as to comprehend it profoundly.Democracy emanated from the creed of the vague compromise solution, in the midst of

    18th

    century, brought about by the struggle between the kings and emperors of Europe and

    Russia and the philosophers and thinkers. Since the kings and emperors were using religion as a

    means to exploit the peoples, oppress them and spill their blood under the claim that they are

    Gods representatives on earth by using the priests as a cover. Eventually, a terrible conflict

    broke out between them and their peoples. During which the philosophers and thinkers rose.

    Some of them rejected religion altogether and some of them recognised it, whilst others called

    for its separation from life and consequently from the state (ruling). This conflict resulted in the

    idea of the compromise solution, the idea of separating religion from life i.e. the separation of

    religion from state. It then became imperative for the people to select their system of life

    themselves, and to establish the rulers who rule them with these systems and laws. This is the

    way that the democratic system originated.As a result of the success of the revolutions against the emperors and kings and the

    demise of the idea of the divine right, the two ideas ofsovereignty is for the people and the

    people are the source of authorities were laid down for implementation and execution.

    Democracy is the rule of the majority. Thus the members of the legislative body are

    chosen by the majority votes of the people who have voted & the election of the rulers via their

    elected representatives. That is why the majority is the prominent feature of the democratic

    system. The view of the majority is thus the true measure that expresses the view of the people

    (according to the democratic viewpoint).

    The general freedoms are the foundations and Democracy obliges that they areprovided for every individual of the community in order to realize his sovereignty, exercise his

    will. Their general freedoms are represented in four, which are Freedom of belief, speech,

    ownership & Personal freedom.

    Democracy, in its true meaning, is an imaginary and inapplicable idea. In the ancient

    democratic countries, like America and Britain, the heads of state and MPs represent the will of

    the capitalists from the businessmen and big landowners, not that of the people or their

    majority. The big capitalists are the ones who bring to power or into the representative

    assemblies. They are the ones who pay for the costs of the election campaign for the post of

    head of state and the membership of parliament. As a result, they (capitalists) have control

    over the head of state and the members of parliament. Wall Street's top investment bank Gold

    Sachs was a generous contributor which donated $994,795 during 2007-2008 to Obama's

    presidential campaign and it is self-explanatory that a company doesnt invest in vain.Moreover, it is obvious that if a person spending millions in his election campaign of his own;

    his ultimate purpose will be acquiring at least double of it when he comes into the power,

    rather than to legislate in the favor of people, since he has a complete authority to make laws

    as per his will. This is the reason why we see number of sugar mills & huge property difference

    before and after his reign and loads of unnecessary taxes as much as he desires. Therefore, the

    view that parliament in the democratic countries represents the opinion of the majority and

  • 7/30/2019 Demon Gone Crazy

    2/4

    that they rule by what the majority of the people want, is a view that is contrary to the truth,

    and it is but a deception.

    The source from which democracy came is man. The sovereign in democracy which

    determines the things as pretty or ugly is the mind and the origin of this is the philosophers

    and thinkers of Europe. It has to be admitted that Human Mind is limited and is always under

    the influence of circumstances, time & era and thus remains in a conflict. Therefore Human

    Mind is not capable to legislate for the whole mankind, if he does, then it mustnt be flawless.

    Consequently we see many foolish man-made laws in the world which has only favored therulers or brought detriment to the peoples. For example, Article 248-b of 1973 Constitution

    provides immunity to the ruler to be answerable to any court during his term of office, which

    puts an end to the obligation of accountability of a ruler and a rule of Kam Bachey Khushhaal

    Gharana has led to less labor and manpower in Russia and Japan, which is being implemented

    in Pakistan too, etc. and the list goes on.

    Allah (S.W.T) is the Creator & He is best aware about the Beneficial or Catastrophic or

    Halaal or Haraam. As for Islam, sovereignty is for the Sharia and not for the Ummah. Thus

    Allah is the only Legislator; even the most intellectual and pious person or the whole Ummah,

    does not possess the right to legislate even a single rule. If all the Muslims met and agreed to

    permit usury so as to revive the economic situation or if they agreed to allow special places forfornication so that it does not spread among the people. This agreement of the Ummah would

    have no value, in the sight of Islam, even to the wing of mosquito. Thus it is not allowed for

    them to legislate even a single rule. Therefore, Allah is the only Legislator. There are definite

    Verses and Ahadeeth which clarify that sovereignty is for the Sharia, and that Allah is the

    legislator, that it is not allowed for man to legislate.

    Have you seen those (hypocrites) who claim that they believe in that which has been

    sent down to you, and that which has been sent down before you, and they wish to go for

    judgment (in their disputes) to the Taghut (false judges) while they have been ordered to reject

    them?

    [TMQ: An-Nisa: 60]

    O you who believe, obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among

    you. Then, if you quarrel about something, revert it back to Allah and the Messenger, if you

    believe in Allah and the Last Day. That is good, and the best at the end

    [TMQAn-Nisa:65,59]

    And the people of the Injil must judge according to what Allah has sent down therein.

    Those who do not judge according to what Allah has sent down, they are the sinners.

    We have sent down to you the Book with truth, confirming the Book before it, and a

    protector for it. So, judge between them according to what Allah has sent down, and do notfollow their desires against the truth that has come to you. For each of you We have made a

    law and a method. Had Allah willed, He would have made a single community of people, but

    (He did not), so that He may test you in what He has given to you. Strive, then, to excel each

    other in good deeds. To Allah is the return for all of you. Then Allah shall tell you about that in

    which you disputed.

    We order you to judge between them according to what Allah has sent down. Do not

    follow their desires, and beware of them, lest they should turn you away from some of what

    Allah has sent down to you. If they turn away, be assured that Allah intends to make them

    suffer for some of their sins. Surely, many of the people are sinners.

  • 7/30/2019 Demon Gone Crazy

    3/4

    Is it, then, the judgement of (the days of) Ignorance that they seek? Who is better in

    judgement than Allah, for a people who believe?

    [TMQ: Al-Maida:47-50],

    None can command exceptAllah: On Him do I put my trust: and let all that trust put

    their trust on Him."

    [TMQ: Yousuf:6]

    It is not open for a believing man or a believing woman, once Allah and His messenger

    have decided a thing, that they should have a choice about their matter; and whoever disobeys

    Allah and His messenger, he indeed gets off the track, falling into an open error

    [TMQ: Al-Ahzab:36]

    The general freedoms (as discussed above) in their four categories are not present in

    Islam. A Muslim is bound in all his actions by the Sharia rules and he is not free in any action.

    One of the severest afflictions brought to humanity is the idea of general freedoms initiated by

    the democratic system. This idea caused nothing but disaster for mankind and societaldecadence in democratic countries to a level lower than that of the animals.

    Allah (S.W.T) says in the Glorious Quran:

    Have you (O Muhammad) seen him who has taken as his ilah (god) his own desire?

    Would you then be a disposer of his affairs over him? Or do you think that most of them hear or

    understand? They are only like cattle; nay, they are even farther astray from the Path.

    [TMQ: Al-Furqan: 43]

    Freedom of belief in the democratic system means that man has the right to believe in

    the creed he wishes and he has the right to leave his creed and religion and move to another

    new creed and religion, or to no religion at all. Islam forbids the Muslim from leaving thecreed of Islam, the one who apostatizes from Islam is asked to repent; if he returns he will

    remain in Islam and if he does not repent his wealth is confiscated and he is separated from his

    wife, then he is killed.

    Freedom of expression in the democratic system means that the individual has the right

    to carry any opinion or thought, whatever this opinion or thought may be, whereas the Muslim

    is bound in all his sayings by the Sharia. He is not allowed to make any statement unless the

    Sharia has allowed that. Islam obliges that the truth is spoken at all times.

    Freedom of ownership in the democratic system - which is the freedom that resulted inthe capitalist economic system and consequently created the idea of colonizing people,

    plundering their wealth and looting their resources, means that man is firstly permitted to

    possess wealth and then to increase it using any means (encroachment of those countries who

    claim to be flag-bearers of democracy into the under-developed countries is the best example).

    Islam contradicts this freedom as it fights the idea of colonizing people and plundering their

    resources and seizing their wealth, just as it fights the idea of usury. Islam has defined the

    means of ownership of wealth, the means of its growth and the manner in which it can be

    spent, and it prohibited all other means.

  • 7/30/2019 Demon Gone Crazy

    4/4

    Personal freedom in the democratic system is the freedom, which has led Western

    societies to become animalistic societies, which decided that it is the right of man to conduct

    his personal life in the form he pleases, with absolute freedom without any limit, restriction &

    compulsion. Due to which we see disastrous outcomes in the western society, it has lost the

    sense of affection between blood relations, single parent idea due to numerous divorces, old

    homes for parents, limitless rape cases, and the list goes on. The rules of Islam completely

    contradict with this personal freedom. The Muslim is restricted by the orders and prohibitions

    of Allah in all his actions. If he were to commit any such prohibited actions he would be sinful.

    Therefore Islam is not that flexible that we start relating it with this sinister way of ruling

    (democracy) which was originated in 18th

    Century. Hence using the word Islamic Democracy

    is as absurd as saying Islamic Wine. Since we all accept that Islam is the complete code of life,

    it has its own way of ruling called Caliphate which is indeed a perfect system for Humankind

    having complete guidance of social, economic, judicial, educational and political system. This is

    the reason why Caliphate persisted for about 1300 years as a single super power on the surface

    of earth.

    Therefore, Democracy, can now be defined as a rule in which sovereignty belongs tothe MAJORITY OF THE JERKS sitting in the HOUSE OF PARLIAMENT whose ultimate objective, in

    reality, is to rule as per their desire, and conceptually, take care of the INHUMAN FREEDOMS of

    the peoples which strictly contradicts with the rules of Islam, in the source from which it came,

    in the creedfrom which it emanated, in the basis on which it is established and in the thoughts

    and systems it has brought.