27
The State of LOCAL CHAMBERS WCCE Regional Meetings Fall Series 2009 Madison, West Bend, Green Bay, Eau Claire Jim Morgan WMC Vice President / WCCE Secretary-Treasurer

Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

  • Upload
    jackie

  • View
    32

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The State of LOCAL CHAMBERS WCCE Regional Meetings Fall Series 2009 Madison, West Bend, Green Bay, Eau Claire Jim Morgan WMC Vice President / WCCE Secretary-Treasurer. 2007 2008 2009. Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72). 2007 2008 2009. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

The State ofLOCAL CHAMBERS

WCCE Regional MeetingsFall Series 2009

Madison, West Bend, Green Bay, Eau Claire

Jim MorganWMC Vice President / WCCE Secretary-Treasurer

Page 2: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Demographics

Who Participated(2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

72

22

33

15

36 34

45

2226

38

19

0

10

20

30

40

50

%

0-100 101-250 251-500 500+

Chamber Members

200720082009

Page 3: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Demographics

Who Participated

12

5

37

20

13

1923 22

1820 20

12

25

40

15

05

10152025303540

%

0-5,000 5,001-10,000

10,001-20,000

20,001-50,000

50,000+

Community Size

200720082009

Page 4: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Demographics

Who Participated

25

13

38

29 2830

29

37

19 1722

13

0

10

20

30

40

%

<$100,000 $100,000-$250,000

$250,001-$750,000

>$750,000

Annual Revenue

200720082009

Page 5: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Demographics

Who Participated

121116

35 36

26

18

27 28 26

13 13

8

1317

0

10

20

30

40

%

Southwest Southeast Central Northwest Northeast

Location

200720082009

Page 6: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Demographics

Percent Income from Dues

76-100

51-75

26-50

0-25

%

0 10 20 30 40 50 60200720082009

Page 7: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

Community Employment

In the next 12 months, do you anticipate your community employment will:

0

20

40

60

80

2007 2008 2009

IncreaseNo ChangeDecrease

Page 8: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

Business ClimateWhat is the business climate going to be like in your

community in 6 to 12 months?

010203040506070

2007 2008 2009

Good GrowthModerate GrowthRemain FlatDecline

Page 9: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

Wisconsin EconomyHow will the Wisconsin economy perform over the

next 12 months?

010203040506070

2007 2008 2009

Good GrowthModerate GrowthRemain FlatDecline

Page 10: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

Where are we headed?

Is Wisconsin on the right track or heading in the wrong direction?

0

20

40

60

80

100

2007 2008 2009

Right DirectionWrong Track

Page 11: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

State GovernmentThinking about the business climate in Wisconsin,

would you say that state government here is:

0

10

20

30

40

50

2007 2008 2009

Very pro-business

Somewhat pro-businessNeutral on business

Somewhat anti-businessVery anti-business

Page 12: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

You Said It . . .

• Attempts to help are offset by taxes and regulations

• A business ended up not rebuilding because every time they went to Madison with a plan it was rejected

• Every tax seems aimed at business – it's difficult to grow and provide jobs when we face such a high tax burden

Page 13: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

You Said It . . .

• Many people will claim to be pro-business but the tax items and legal issues in play don't feel very pro-business

• There is an impression given from the Legislature that the wallets of business have no bottom

• High regulation and high taxes have a negative effect on business

• Duh!!!!

Page 14: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

What could state government do?

• Understand how businesses make expansion and relocation decisions

• Coordinate Incentives– Target job creation– Coordinate all the programs

• Lower Taxes– Decrease personal income taxes– Eliminate combined reporting– Lower corporate income taxes– Decrease spending before increasing taxes

Page 15: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Economic Outlook

Top Business ConcernsWhat are the top business concerns facing your

community (% mentioning):

3

7

9

9

89

61

61

21

11

0 20 40 60 80 100

Security

Energy

Globalization

Competition

Labor Shortage

Regulation

Taxes

Health Care Costs

Economic Slowdown

200720082009

Page 16: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Membership Growth

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2007 2008 2009

Increase

No change

Decrease

Page 17: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Membership Growth• Personal contacts

• Better data/intelligence

• Allowing non-members to participate in some activities

• Playing up the promotional benefits – chamber offers cheap marketing

• Last out, first back in – going after the most recent drops

Page 18: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Revenue Growth

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2007 2008 2009

Increase

No change

Decrease

Page 19: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Revenue Growth

• Combining “chambers”

• More benefits through social media

• Cause-related sponsorships

• Can’t be worse than last year!!

Page 20: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Advocacy Growth

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2007 2008 2009

Increase

No change

Decrease

Page 21: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

• More board members attending more municipal meetings

• New strategic plan with increased advocacy as a tactic

• Will pick a small number of important issues and bang the drum

• Seeking more feedback from members on issues and then provide more advocacy for those issues

Chamber Outlook

Advocacy Growth

Page 22: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Volunteerism Growth

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2007 2008 2009

Increase

No change

Decrease

Page 23: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

• Plan to add ambassadors and create member volunteer opportunities to help with large chamber events

• Offering volunteer hours as part of a companies contribution to the Chamber

• Increasing the size of our ambassador committee and planning to recognize our volunteers more

Chamber Outlook

Volunteer Growth

Page 24: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Marketing “Re-evaluation”

• Including neighboring communities• Promotion in other parts of the state • Looking at more online, email, e-

newsletters, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, chamber TV show for cable online

• Advocacy• Planning a series of seminars – topics

include HR, IT, investing and succession planning

• “Good news" campaign

Page 25: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Membership “Re-evaluation”

• Using board members and staff to personally contact all members at least twice a year

• Board now involved in retention calls

• Explaining to our members how the Chamber can help

• Doubled our ambassador committee

• Asked members to "sponsor" another member (25% discount)

Page 26: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Chamber Outlook

Program “Re-evaluation”

• Member-to-member discount program

• More networking opportunities

• Less people, less hours, more focus

• Analyzing the financial merit of every activity

Page 27: Demographics Who Participated (2007 N=68 / 2008 N = 55 / 2009 N=72)

Jim Morgan

Vice President, WMC

[email protected]

(608) 258-3401 x3053

Questions