12
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Demand Response inMidwest ISO Markets

February 17, 2008

Page 2: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Demand Response Example: August 2006

~ 3,000 MW Relief fromDemand Side Management

90,000

95,000

100,000

105,000

110,000

115,000

120,000

125,000

130,000

135,000

140,000

00

:00

:00

01

:00

:00

02

:00

:00

03

:00

:00

04

:00

:00

05

:00

:00

06

:00

:00

07

:00

:00

08

:00

:00

09

:00

:00

10

:00

:00

11

:00

:00

12

:00

:00

13

:00

:00

14

:00

:00

15

:00

:00

16

:00

:00

17

:00

:00

18

:00

:00

19

:00

:00

20

:00

:00

21

:00

:00

22

:00

:00

23

:00

:00

TIME (EST)

Lo

ad (

MW

)

24

:00

:00

Forecast Footprint LoadActual Footprint Load

Page 3: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Value of Demand Response

• System-wide demand response:– Enhances reliability– Reduces prices for all demand remaining on the

system– Provides significant savings to those offering demand

reductions• 3,000 MW• 10 Hours• ~$100/MWh on peak prices= $3,000,000 savings for end users

Page 4: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Targeted Demand ReductionsFebruary 6, 2007

12,000

12,500

13,000

13,500

14,000

14,500

15,000

15,500

16,000

16,500

17,000

0:0

0

1:0

0

2:0

0

3:0

0

4:0

0

5:0

0

6:0

0

7:0

0

8:0

0

9:0

0

10

:00

11

:00

12

:00

13

:00

14

:00

15

:00

16

:00

17

:00

18

:00

19

:00

20

:00

21

:00

22

:00

23

:00

0:0

0

MW

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

LM

P (

$)

West Market Load w/ Interruptibles Not Activated West Market Load Minn Hub Cin Hub

Page 5: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Targeted Demand Reductions

• Targeted demand response in constrained areas provides benefits, including significant cost savings with only modest reductions– In February 2007, prices savings of

$200-$300/MWh were realized with only 500 MW of demand response

Page 6: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

New Demand Participation Opportunities in ASM

Ancillary Services Markets:– Demand Response Resources (DRRs) may participate

directly, selling products tailored to the resource capabilities

• Type I DRR - Capable of supplying through physical load interruption, may sell either Energy or Contingency Reserves

• Type II DRR - Capable of supplying through behind-the-meter generation or controllable load, may sell Energy, Contingency Reserves or Regulation

Page 7: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

ASM DRR Registration

• Status of DRR Registration– DRR Type I

• 9 Market participants registered 24 DRR’s in 10 load zones

• Overall capacity: The default MW is not required to be specified during registration

– DRR Type II• 1 registration with controllable load• Overall capacity: 60MW

Page 8: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Additional New Demand Participation Opportunities

• Emergency Demand Response:– Designed to encourage entities with demand

response to offer during emergencies and be compensated appropriately

• Resource Adequacy:– Addresses capacity value of demand resources

in fulfilling planning reserve requirements

Page 9: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Additional New Demand Participation Opportunities

• RSG Forgiveness:– Provides forgiveness of RT RSG distribution for

curtailed demand in an energy emergency (EEA2) situation

• Planning Process:– In the 2009 MTEP planning study, the Midwest

ISO has begun the process of allowing demand resources to compete against generation or transmission in its evaluations

Page 10: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Demand Response ChallengesWholesale Market

• Market design issues limit flexibility or realization of the value of demand response, particularly in Real-Time

• Price signals do not provide incentives for participation when prices fail to reflect the value of demand response

• Technical limits restrict ability to dispatch demand consistent with physical characteristics

Page 11: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Demand Response ChallengesRetail Market

• Regulatory barriers or contract terms of existing demand response limit participation in the regional wholesale market

• Misaligned incentives limit demand response where those making consumption decisions do not recognize (or pay) value of energy consumed

Page 12: Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008

Next Steps• Midwest ISO Demand Response Working Group

(DRWG)– Developing additional market mechanisms based on unique

characteristics of demand response resources– Evaluating opportunities to lower barriers to participation due

to misalignment between wholesale and retail markets

• Midwest Demand Response Initiative (MWDRI) – OMS established task force focused on increasing

opportunities for demand response in Midwest ISO markets– Building a knowledge base among Midwestern regulators

utilizing the work already done via New England and Mid-Atlantic demand response initiatives