Upload
julianna-ferguson
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Demand Response in Integration of Renewable Generation:
Pacific Northwest Experience
Ken CorumNASUCA Mid-year Meeting
June 10, 2013, Seattle WA
What Kind of DR?
• DR 1.0– Vast majority of DR experience– Peak load reductions– Limit of ~ 100 hours/year
• DR 2.0– Reductions and increases in load– Throughout day and year – perhaps 8760
hours/year
Illustration of DR 2.0 Electric Water Heaters
Illustration of DR 2.0 Electric Water Heaters
More Examples of DR 2.0
• Refrigerated warehouses
• Pulp and paper plants
• Municipal water pumping and treatment
• Data centers
• Electrochemical processes (e.g. aluminum)
• Electric vehicles (cars, forklifts, etc.)
• More….. “the more we look, the more we find”
Features of DR 2.0 Loads?
• Storage–Heat–“Coolth”–Elevated water, compressed air–Intermediate product (e.g. wood pulp)
• Flexible delivery of service• Timing of oxygenation of treated water• Timing or location of data center service
Time Scale of DR 2.0
• Hours – load shifting
• Minutes – “load following”, 5-minute energy market(?)
• Seconds – regulation
Cost Effectiveness?
• Early days – many potential alternatives– Hardware, market structure, forecasting
• Mass market options (e.g. WH) need “market transformation” strategies to reduce cost and simplify participation
• C&I options need detailed understanding of processes (joint benefit with energy efficiency)
• Portfolio management
Caveats
• Not all loads can do DR 2.0
• Like batteries, resource available now depends on recent deployments
• Will require innovative commercial relationships