18
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov E. Reese

DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov E. Reese

  • Upload
    gypsy

  • View
    29

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov E. Reese. Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning. The undulator can not be tuned when assembled. Each magnet array was tuned individually then mounted on a quadrant actuator plate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

DELTA Quadrant Tuning

Y. LevashovE. Reese

Page 2: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning

Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50 m in X and <+50 m in Y.

Parameter Assembled Undulator Quadrant

K >3.4853 (Slot 33) >1.2323 (± 110-3 )

Phase error R.M.S. <10° < 3°

First field Integrals < 40 Tm (40 G-cm) < 10 Tm (10 G-cm)

Second field Integrals < 50 Tm2 (5000 G-cm2) < 10 Tm2 (1000 G-cm2)

The undulator can not be tuned when assembled. Each magnet array was tuned individually then mounted on a quadrant actuator plate.

Page 3: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Tuning procedure outlineInitial magnet alignment using CMM to ±50 m from the beam axis. Tuning with iterations based on virtual shimming(re-positioning the magnets w.r.t. magnetic axis).Round 1: - Tune trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data.- Measure K- Check magnet positions on CMM.Round 2: - Correct magnet positions to be within ±50 m from the beam line. - Continue tuning trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data. - Set K-value as close as possible to the average from Round 1.- Check magnet positions at CMM.Round 3:- Correct magnet positions to be within ±50 m from the beam line. - Do final adjustments to trajectories, phase errors, and K.- Check magnet positions at CMM.Round 4(if necessary)….

Page 4: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

CMM measurements

1. Measure dowel pin holes on the bottom. Transfer x – axis on the side of the plate.2. Scan along the curve surface on each magnet, fit circle of 3.2mm radius, for each

magnet find x & y coordinates of the circle center.3. Find deviations of magnet centers from the beam line in x and y.

Dowel pin holes

Set screw forX- adjustments

Shim forY- adjustments

Beam axis

YX

Page 5: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Set-up on measurement bench

Alignment table Thermistors Hall probeGranite block

6 threaded inserts

2 dowel pinholes

Micrometer

Page 6: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Alignment to the bench (X & yaw)

0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.028 0.030

0.050.1

0.150.2

0.250.3

0.350.4

0.450.5

By vs probe X position

X (m)

B (T

)

1. Do Hall probe scan in X at each pole location2. Truncate data ± 3mm from center3. Fit parabola, find center4. Fit a straight line through all pole centers, find x and yaw, correct yaw if necessary.

Page 7: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Alignment to the bench (Y)

Bottom of the magnet array bottom to beam line = 44.653mm (1.758”)

Fiducialization fixture

Sight level

Granite block

• Find center of fiducialization fixture with the Hall probe• Measure difference in height between the fixture and the granite by optical tools• Set Hall probe Y using bench vertical stage

ΔY = 30μm ΔB/B 1%

Page 8: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2x 10

-6 X Trajectory

X (m

)

Z position (m)

5 18 30 43 55 Pole

Trajectories (#3)

I1Y = -351µTmI2Y = -281µTm2

-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2x 10

-6 Y Trajectory

Y (m

)

Z position (m)

5 18 30 43 55 Pole

I1X = +738 µTmI2X = +479µTm2

I1Y = +5µTmI2Y = +5µTm2

I1X = +1 µTmI2X = -8 µTm2

Page 9: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-8

-6

-4

-2

0

2

4

6Phase Error At Field Peaks, No Ends

Pha

se E

rror (

deg)

Z position (m)

5 11 18 24 30 36 43 49 55 Pole

Phase Error: Ave = 0.000000 deg, RMS = 2.278216 deg

Phase Errors (#3)

R.M.S = 40 deg.

R.M.S = 2 deg.

After tuning the trajectories the R.M.S. phase error goes down to 1015 deg. The rest is tuned out by virtual shimming

Page 10: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Tuning resultsDataSet 001

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.2

I1X +7 -8 -2 -11 I2X +2 -2 +6 -14 I1Y -12 +8 -4 +3 I2Y -4 +2 0 +12 K 1.3085 1.2986 1.3322 1.3447

Ph.Err.RMS 3.4 5.0 3.4 3.6 Run # 49 58 70 77

DataSet 002

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.1 20.3 20.2 20.2

I1X -3 -4 +5 -2 I2X +8 0 +3 -3 I1Y +1 0 +2 -4 I2Y 0 -7 +1 +3 K 1.3348 1.3346 1.3347 1.3350

Ph.Err.RMS 2.6 3.1 2.5 3.2 Run # 7 23 26 16

DataSet 003

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.2 20.4 20.3 20.1

I1X -2 -4 +1 +6 I2X +6 -2 -8 +2 I1Y -2 -2 +5 -4 I2Y -6 -8 +5 -1 K 1.3281 1.3297 1.3327 1.3285

Ph.Err.RMS 2.8 3.1 2.3 3.0 Run # 3 6 11 8

(ΔK/K +7%)

Page 11: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Final CMM Measurement results

Maximum deviation from center line is:-69 m in X and +37m in Y

Page 12: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Issues for 3.2m device

• A special fixture is required to allow a quick accurate quadrant set-up on the

measurement bench, magnets facing up.

• The Hall probe has to be set at the same height for all quadrants with accuracy

better than 10m. Optical tools to be replaced by micrometers or Keyence sensor.

• Larger screws for magnet X adjustment.

• A provision to mount a micrometer to control magnet motion.

• Since vacuum chamber has no fins, magnet alignment tolerance in X direction

could be ± 100μm. It will reduce number of iterations.

Page 13: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Current Status

5mm ID, 6.3mm OD copper tube

Hall probes

1.2 m long G-10 rod

• Measurement system for the 1m long prototype is in place and ready.• First measurements done to check the system. • Relative roll angles and displacements are measured for X and Y probes.• Prototype mechanical and controls’ issues to be solved before measurements

continue.

stage

Retro-reflector

Page 14: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Conclusion

•Tuning procedure has been developed for DELTA quadrants.

•Four quadrants have been successfully tuned to tolerances in 12 days (3 days/quadrant).

•Simulations show that the assembled device should meet the tolerances.

•Measurements system for assembled prototype is in place and it’s functionality tested.

•Magnetic measurements are in progress.

Page 15: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Back-up slides

Page 16: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Field superposition, Linear Horizontal

Page 17: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Field superposition, Linear Vertical

Page 18: DELTA Quadrant Tuning  Y. Levashov E. Reese

Field superposition, Circular left