Upload
gypsy
View
29
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov E. Reese. Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning. The undulator can not be tuned when assembled. Each magnet array was tuned individually then mounted on a quadrant actuator plate. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
DELTA Quadrant Tuning
Y. LevashovE. Reese
Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning
Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50 m in X and <+50 m in Y.
Parameter Assembled Undulator Quadrant
K >3.4853 (Slot 33) >1.2323 (± 110-3 )
Phase error R.M.S. <10° < 3°
First field Integrals < 40 Tm (40 G-cm) < 10 Tm (10 G-cm)
Second field Integrals < 50 Tm2 (5000 G-cm2) < 10 Tm2 (1000 G-cm2)
The undulator can not be tuned when assembled. Each magnet array was tuned individually then mounted on a quadrant actuator plate.
Tuning procedure outlineInitial magnet alignment using CMM to ±50 m from the beam axis. Tuning with iterations based on virtual shimming(re-positioning the magnets w.r.t. magnetic axis).Round 1: - Tune trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data.- Measure K- Check magnet positions on CMM.Round 2: - Correct magnet positions to be within ±50 m from the beam line. - Continue tuning trajectories and phase errors with the use of CMM data. - Set K-value as close as possible to the average from Round 1.- Check magnet positions at CMM.Round 3:- Correct magnet positions to be within ±50 m from the beam line. - Do final adjustments to trajectories, phase errors, and K.- Check magnet positions at CMM.Round 4(if necessary)….
CMM measurements
1. Measure dowel pin holes on the bottom. Transfer x – axis on the side of the plate.2. Scan along the curve surface on each magnet, fit circle of 3.2mm radius, for each
magnet find x & y coordinates of the circle center.3. Find deviations of magnet centers from the beam line in x and y.
Dowel pin holes
Set screw forX- adjustments
Shim forY- adjustments
Beam axis
YX
Set-up on measurement bench
Alignment table Thermistors Hall probeGranite block
6 threaded inserts
2 dowel pinholes
Micrometer
Alignment to the bench (X & yaw)
0.012 0.014 0.016 0.018 0.02 0.022 0.024 0.026 0.028 0.030
0.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
0.450.5
By vs probe X position
X (m)
B (T
)
1. Do Hall probe scan in X at each pole location2. Truncate data ± 3mm from center3. Fit parabola, find center4. Fit a straight line through all pole centers, find x and yaw, correct yaw if necessary.
Alignment to the bench (Y)
Bottom of the magnet array bottom to beam line = 44.653mm (1.758”)
Fiducialization fixture
Sight level
Granite block
• Find center of fiducialization fixture with the Hall probe• Measure difference in height between the fixture and the granite by optical tools• Set Hall probe Y using bench vertical stage
ΔY = 30μm ΔB/B 1%
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2x 10
-6 X Trajectory
X (m
)
Z position (m)
5 18 30 43 55 Pole
Trajectories (#3)
I1Y = -351µTmI2Y = -281µTm2
-1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-2
-1.5
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2x 10
-6 Y Trajectory
Y (m
)
Z position (m)
5 18 30 43 55 Pole
I1X = +738 µTmI2X = +479µTm2
I1Y = +5µTmI2Y = +5µTm2
I1X = +1 µTmI2X = -8 µTm2
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6Phase Error At Field Peaks, No Ends
Pha
se E
rror (
deg)
Z position (m)
5 11 18 24 30 36 43 49 55 Pole
Phase Error: Ave = 0.000000 deg, RMS = 2.278216 deg
Phase Errors (#3)
R.M.S = 40 deg.
R.M.S = 2 deg.
After tuning the trajectories the R.M.S. phase error goes down to 1015 deg. The rest is tuned out by virtual shimming
Tuning resultsDataSet 001
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.2 20.3 20.4 20.2
I1X +7 -8 -2 -11 I2X +2 -2 +6 -14 I1Y -12 +8 -4 +3 I2Y -4 +2 0 +12 K 1.3085 1.2986 1.3322 1.3447
Ph.Err.RMS 3.4 5.0 3.4 3.6 Run # 49 58 70 77
DataSet 002
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.1 20.3 20.2 20.2
I1X -3 -4 +5 -2 I2X +8 0 +3 -3 I1Y +1 0 +2 -4 I2Y 0 -7 +1 +3 K 1.3348 1.3346 1.3347 1.3350
Ph.Err.RMS 2.6 3.1 2.5 3.2 Run # 7 23 26 16
DataSet 003
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 T 20.2 20.4 20.3 20.1
I1X -2 -4 +1 +6 I2X +6 -2 -8 +2 I1Y -2 -2 +5 -4 I2Y -6 -8 +5 -1 K 1.3281 1.3297 1.3327 1.3285
Ph.Err.RMS 2.8 3.1 2.3 3.0 Run # 3 6 11 8
(ΔK/K +7%)
Final CMM Measurement results
Maximum deviation from center line is:-69 m in X and +37m in Y
Issues for 3.2m device
• A special fixture is required to allow a quick accurate quadrant set-up on the
measurement bench, magnets facing up.
• The Hall probe has to be set at the same height for all quadrants with accuracy
better than 10m. Optical tools to be replaced by micrometers or Keyence sensor.
• Larger screws for magnet X adjustment.
• A provision to mount a micrometer to control magnet motion.
• Since vacuum chamber has no fins, magnet alignment tolerance in X direction
could be ± 100μm. It will reduce number of iterations.
Current Status
5mm ID, 6.3mm OD copper tube
Hall probes
1.2 m long G-10 rod
• Measurement system for the 1m long prototype is in place and ready.• First measurements done to check the system. • Relative roll angles and displacements are measured for X and Y probes.• Prototype mechanical and controls’ issues to be solved before measurements
continue.
stage
Retro-reflector
Conclusion
•Tuning procedure has been developed for DELTA quadrants.
•Four quadrants have been successfully tuned to tolerances in 12 days (3 days/quadrant).
•Simulations show that the assembled device should meet the tolerances.
•Measurements system for assembled prototype is in place and it’s functionality tested.
•Magnetic measurements are in progress.
Back-up slides
Field superposition, Linear Horizontal
Field superposition, Linear Vertical
Field superposition, Circular left