Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Deloitte Economics’ Coronavirus Impact MonitorIs C25 heading for a recovery by the end of 2020? 9th edition, 29 May 2020
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 2
• Between 1 February 2020 and 28 May 2020, the
number of global confirmed COVID-19 cases rose from
9,800 to about 5.6 million.
• As the number of new cases in Europe show signs of
falling, countries are beginning to take steps to reopen
their societies and economies. The Danish government
has activated Phase II of the reopening to take effect
from 18 May 2020.
• In Denmark, the increase in the number of confirmed
cases has remained relatively low. As of 28 May 2020,
there were 11,480 confirmed cases. 4 May24 Feb 9 Mar 6 Apr23 Mar 20 Apr 18 May 1 Jun
0.0
20,000
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
11,480
5.6
Sources: World Health Organisation (WHO), The Danish Health Authority (Sundhedsstyrelsen)
Coronavirus outbreak
New daily confirmed cases continue to slow in Denmark, while the number of daily deaths are falling across the globe
• The chart shows the daily number of deaths in the
world, the United States and Denmark. There are
currently around 4,000-5,000 daily deaths in the
world, lower than the 6,000-7,000 peak in mid-April.
• In Denmark, the 7-day average daily death rate has
fallen significantly to around 2 per day, from a peak of
around 16 at the beginning of April 2020.
• In Denmark, there were 20 patients in intensive care
as of 28 May 2020, of which 11 patients were in
respirators. This number has fallen steadily since the
peak at around 100-150 at the beginning of April
2020. The Danish Health Authority has ~925
respirators available for COVID-19 patients.
# c
onfirm
ed c
ases g
lobally
(millions)
Confirmed COVID-19 cases: World and Denmark
# c
onfirm
ed c
ases in
Denm
ark
7-day rolling average confirmed daily COVID-19 deaths: World, US and Denmark
# D
aily d
eath
s
World US
Denmark (RHS) World (LHS)
1 May 1 Jun1 Mar 1 Apr
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
1 Mar 1 Jun1 Apr 1 May
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
As of 28 May 2020
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1 Apr 1 Jun1 Mar 1 May
Denmark
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 3
Note:
Source:
1) Refinitiv European sectoral price indices measured by Refinitiv (Thomson Reuters)
Thomson Reuters Eikon
Impact on financial markets
COVID-19 impact on equity markets has been most severe on the transport and energy sectors, while medical and pharmaceutical stocks have largely recovered
• The outlook for increased public expenditure and gradual
opening of economies have supported markets.
• European equity indices suffered material losses
following the COVID-19 outbreak in Europe, but have, to
some extent, recovered from the bottom reached in mid-
March 2020.
• The Transport industry, including airlines, continues to
be severely affected by the virus and the related travel
restrictions. The Refinitiv Europe Transport Price Index is
down by some 28% since the end of January 2020,
driven by a material decline in volumes.
• The European energy sector, including oil and gas
companies, has lost more than 30% since the end of
January 2020. Declining energy prices have applied
downward pressure on energy equities.
• Financials, including banks, have also experienced value
destruction. Market concerns about increased credit
losses and funding squeezes are likely drivers.
• The lower right-hand chart shows the development in
quarterly net income results for OMX C25 Index
constituents.
• Q1 2020 results were unsurprisingly down compared to
Q1 2019 results a year earlier, but consensus estimates
(dashed lines) point to a relatively quick recovery,
reaching about 2019 levels by the end of the year.
10 Feb30 Dec 27 Jan 9 Mar
90
13 Jan 24 Feb 23 Mar 6 Apr 20 Apr 4 May 18 May 1 Jun
40
50
60
70
80
100
110
Equity markets: Sectoral indices in Europe1
Secto
ral in
dic
es
(2 J
an 2
020 =
100)
Major outbreak in Europe
Transport FinancialMedical & PharmaceuticalsEnergy Technology
30 Dec 2019
0
(200)
600
200
400
1,200
1,000
800
Q3 2020 EQ1 2019 A Q2 2019 A Q3 2019 A Q4 2019 A Q1 2020 A Q4 2020 EQ2 2020 E
OMX C25 Index, median quarterly net income, DKKm
25th percentile Median 75th percentile
Consensus estimates
Q1 2
020 n
et
incom
e
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 4
Note:
Source:
1) Deloitte surveys conducted on 12, 19, 26 March, 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 April and 7 May 2020, involving about 2,000 colleagues and clients.
Deloitte surveys, IMF World Economic outlook (October 2019) for pre-COVID-19 figures; IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2020) for revised forecasts
Economic Outlook: IMF and Deloitte survey
Q1 GDP contracted sharply across Europe and US
Economic growth projections• The “sudden stop” in the global economy, caused by the COVID-19
pandemic, has translated into significant downward revisions of
economic growth projections worldwide. According to IMF’s April
predictions:
− The global economy is expected to contract by 3.0% in 2020
instead of the initially estimated 3.4% growth. This 3.0%
contraction in global GDP is much worse than the 0.1%
contraction experienced during the 2009 financial crisis, ref.
page 23 in the appendix.
− Danish GDP is projected to contract by 6.5% in 2020
compared to the pre-COVID-19 growth estimate of 1.9%. GDP
in Denmark shrank by 4.9% in 2009. The median forecast of
Danish 2020 GDP growth is -5.1% according to our survey of
professional forecasters, ref. page 24 in the appendix.
• Consistent with this, the eurozone economy contracted by 3.8% in
Q1 according to preliminary estimates from Eurostat. The French
and Spanish economies shrank by 5.8% and 5.2%, respectively, in
Q1, a sign of the extensive havoc caused by measures imposed to
curb the coronavirus’ spread. In the United States, GDP shrank at
an annualised rate of 4.8% in Q1.
• Deloitte’s latest survey among ~ 2,000 colleagues and clients from
all over the world on 7 May 2020 reveals that the majority of
participants continues to expect an economic rebound first in
2021. This appears to be aligned with IMF’s expectations of a 2021
rebound.
EurozoneWorld
1.4%
3.4%
Denmark
(3.0% )
5.8%
4.7%
(7.5% )
1.9%
(6.5% )
6.0%
2020 forecast pre COVID-19
Revised 2020 forecast post-COVID-19
Revised 2021 forecast post-COVID-19
Deloitte survey1: When do you think activity will rebound in your economy?
60%
23%28%
77%
19 Mar12 Mar
40%
83%
64%
36%
23 Apr
67%
26 Mar
62%
39%
2 Apr
17%
83%
9 Apr
33% 2020
41%
72%
16 Apr
59%
30 Apr
37%
63%
28 May7 May
24%
76%
17%
14 May
2021
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 5
Note: 1) Index is a composite measure based on nine response indicators, including school closures, workplace closures, and travel bans, rescaled to a value from 0 to 100 (100 = strictest response).
Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, Thomson Reuters Eikon
Government policy response impact
Q1 economic contraction broadly in line with the stringency of the lockdown in Denmark
(10%)
(9%)
(8%)
(7%)
(6%)
(5%)
(4%)
(3%)
(2%)
(1%)
0%
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
DenmarkGermany
Norway
France
United Kingdom
United States
Spain
Italy
Japan
South Korea
China
• Several countries have published first estimates of GDP
growth for Q1 2020. These initial GDP estimates
highlight how the coronavirus pandemic, and the
response to it, has affected the global economy. It is
expected that the duration of the outbreak, the public
health restrictions imposed to contain the virus spread,
and other voluntary social distancing measures, all
affect on the size of the economic slowdown.
• The Government Response Stringency Index captures
this information by collecting information on government
policy responses to measure the stringency of the
lockdown country by country.
• The Government Response Stringency Index is a
composite measure based on nine response
indicators, including school closures, workplace closures,
and travel bans, given the policies that have been put in
place in Denmark.
Q1 2020 GDP growth vs the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Stringency Index1
Q1 2
020 (
QoQ
) G
DP g
row
th
Sources:
Average of daily ‘stringency’ index for Q1 2020
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 6
Note: 1) Spending data is based on transactions, both domestically and abroad, with cards and MobilePay in stores for around 1m Danske Bank Danish personal customers. Excludes cash payments
and bank transfers. The charts show spending in 2020 compared with the same days in 2019 to correct for different spending patterns across the week. Source: Danske Bank
Private spending
Danish spending appears to be returning to more normal levels
• Danish spending data shows signs
that spending is slowly starting to
recover as the economy sluggishly
begins to open following the
lockdown since 11 March 2020. For
instance, compared with late March
2020, when total spending was down
by 20%, spending has been down by
only some 0%-12% in the past week.
• Spending at restaurants has been
picking up since mid-May in line with
the Phase 2 opening of the Danish
economy. We also see some positive
in other parts of retail. This includes
spending at gas stations where the
spending gap to last year’s levels has
narrowed to around 17% recently.
• Spending at airlines remains at very
depressed levels, consistent with the
tight travel restrictions in place.
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
27 Feb 21 Apr12 Apr3 Apr7 Mar 16 Mar 25 Mar 30 Apr 9 May 18 May 27 May
Total 7-day moving average Index=100=100
Private spending in Denmark (2020 versus 2019)1
Index
(100=
sam
e w
eekday in 2
019)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
12 Apr7 Mar 9 May30 Apr16 Mar 21 Apr25 Mar 3 Apr 18 May 27 May
Electronics storesAirlines
Clothing stores RestaurantsGrocery stores
Hotels & motels Index=100
Private spending on select sectors (2020 versus 2019)1
Index
(100=
sam
e w
eekday in 2
019)
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 7
1) Net index which expresses the difference in percentage of companies, weighted by employees, which have stated positive and negative expected sector development
Statistics Denmark
Danish business sector confidence indicators
Sentiment across key sectors stabilised in May 2020
-45
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
10
• Recent data suggests that sentiment across key sectors in the Danish economy stabilised in May 2020, after falling sharply in April 2020.
• Within the Services and the Industrial sectors, sentiment deteriorated slightly in May 2020.
• Sentiment has improved across the Construction and Retail trade sectors, possibly reflecting a more positive outlook on the economy as the government
implemented the first two phases to reopen society.
• Interestingly, sentiment within Industrials and Construction, while falling sharply in April 2020, did not reach the same levels as during the financial
crisis, suggesting that the COVID-19 related restrictions are perhaps not deemed to be as damning to the economy.
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
Industrials1 Services1
Construction1 Retail trade1
2012 20182014 2016 2020
2012 20182014 2016 2020
2004 20162008 2012 2020
2004 20162008 2012 2020
Source:
Note:
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 8
Consumer• Consumers are less confident affecting non-essential goods sectors.
Energy & Resources• Coronavirus affects short-term prices, but prices are expected to
rebound in 2021.
Financial Services• The anticipated recession will have a large impact on the sector.
Industrials• Eurozone economic downturn shows signs of easing as lockdowns
are lifted.
Life Science & Health Care (LSHC)• Swift recovery of the LSHC sector with listed companies trading
above pre-corona levels.
Real Estate• Expectation-driven real estate market leads to price reductions in
the short term.
Technology, Media & Telco (TMT)• TMT sectors have shown relative resilient to COVID-19 as the world
has gone digital.
Transport• The transportation market in recovery following the opening of
several markets.
Public• The pandemic will cause a major deficit on public finances in both
2020 and 2021.
We refer to pages 12-20 for in-depth coverage of developments in the sectors above.
Coronavirus heatmap
Deloitte Economics’ view on the short-term outlook across selected sectors in Denmark
Sources: Deloitte analysis, Dansk Erhverv
Sector
Denmark
Short-term Outlook
Financial Services High impact Moderate recovery
Consumer Slow recoveryHigh impact
Transport High impact Slow recovery
Technology,
Media & TelcoModerate impact Moderate recovery
Real Estate High impact Moderate recovery
Energy & Resources High impact Moderate recovery
Life Science &
Health Care Neutral/Low impact Growth opportunities
Industrials High impact Moderate recovery
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 9
Key messages
Q1 has been tough on C25, but as restrictions are being lifted and economic activity slowly begins to rebound a limited optimism is observed
• In Denmark, the number of confirmed cases continues to slow. As of 28 May 2020, there were 11,480 confirmed cases. The reopening of the society
has not been accompanied by a significant increase in confirmed cases.
• The COVID-19 crisis has caused dramatic supply and demand shocks in the world economy, and these shocks are inevitably causing major disruptions
to trade.
• Governments all over the world have introduced major aid packages, which amount to two-digit percentages of GDP, including credit measures.
• Q1 GDP contracted sharply across Europe and the United States, and unemployment rates have sky-rocketed. More than 40 million Americans have
claimed unemployment insurance since mid-March 2020 pushing unemployment to levels not observed since the Great Depression. Projections of GDP
growth rates reveal a significant contraction of the world economy in 2020.
• The OMX C25 index for Q1 2020 was unsurprisingly down on Q1 2019, but consensus estimates point to a relatively quick recovery, reaching about
2019 levels by the end of the year.
• The COVID-19 crisis is now in the recovery phase, where lockdown restrictions are being lifted in most Western countries. This is reflected in increased
spending, and economic activity is slowly beginning to rebound. Sentiment across key sectors also seems to stabilise.
• Deloitte Economics will continue monitoring the impact of the coronavirus in Denmark and globally. Find our updates here
Disclaimer: The information in this document is intended for knowledge sharing only.
For questions on the contents of this report, please contact:
Majbritt Skov
Director, Head of Deloitte Economics
Mobile: +45 30 93 54 71
Peter Lildholdt
Assistant Director
Mobile: +45 40 35 25 36
Tinus Bang Christensen
Partner
Mobile: +45 30 93 44 63
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 10
Industry outlook
Consumer
Energy & Resources
Financial Services
Life Science & Health Care
Public
Technology, Media & Telco (TMT)
Transport
Industrials
Real Estate
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 19
Page 18
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 11
Consumers will spend less on restaurants, apparel and electronics
Consumers’ intention to spend more over the next four weeks
Consumer intended purchase channel
Note:
Sources:
1) MSCI World Retailing Index; 2) MSCI World Consumer Services Index; 3) MSCI Consumer Staples Index; 4) Based on OECD – Europe region
Capital IQ; MSCI; European Parliament; Deloitte State of the Consumer Tracker
Industry outlook: Consumer
Consumers are less confident affecting non-essential goods sectors
Retail index has moved from index 93.4 to 101.3 (since last update).
Hospitality index has moved from index 80.0 to 84.9 (since last update).
Consumer index has moved from index 91.7 to 92.5 (since last update).
Highlights from the industry (as of 27 May 2020)
Trading multiples and economic outlook (as of 27 May 2020)
10y avg. 5y avg. 3y avg.
13.2x11.7x14.1x
Index: MSCI World Retailing Index (top 10 companies)
CurrentJan 1, 2020
17.0x 14.8x
-2.2x
Historical averages
(EV/FY0 EBITDA)
Coronavirus impact
(EV/FY0 EBITDA)
As of April 2020, the consumer confidence index4 was 98.02 indicating a
somewhat doubtful attitude towards the economic development, possibly
resulting in higher saving and less consumption among consumers.
Based on top 10
companies
1 2 3
Indexed s
hare
price
101.3
84.9
92.5
90.7
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
80.0
85.0
90.0
95.0
100.0
105.0
110.0
26 Dec 19 26 Jan 20 26 Feb 20 26 Mar 20 26 Apr 20 26 May 20
Retail Hospitality Consumer MSCI World
98.0
95
98
101
Apr-06 Apr-08 Apr-10 Apr-12 Apr-14 Apr-16 Apr-18 Apr-20
Consumer confidence index (OECD-Europe)
AlcoholRestaurant/
takeoutMedicines
Household
goodsGroceriesElectronicsBooks
Apparel/
footwear
17%
25%
16%
49%16%
34%
27%68%
38%
26%
33%41%
29%
31%
16%
19%
16%
65%
20%
62%
17%
68%
27%
40%
Online/delivered Mixed In-store
-14% -18%10%23%30%-17%-6%-17%
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 12
Hydropower generation
− Prior to Corona, electricity prices were already pressured in the
Nordics due to a warm winter, which increased the generation capacity
of Norwegian hydropower plants.
− Further, the mild winter decreased demand for electricity.
Lockdown affects demand
− The coronavirus lockdown has negatively affected the demand of both
public institutions, private individuals and corporations.
Carbon market prices
− Lower emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gasses have decreased
carbon prices.
− Coal becomes cheaper, lowering overall prices, as coal is marginally
price setting. This creates a self-enforcing effect, which drives down
prices even further.
Source: Thomson Reuters Eikon
Industry outlook: Energy & Resources
Coronavirus affects short-term prices, but prices are expected to rebound in 2021
The mild winter puts pressure on Nordic electricity prices prior to the Corona crisis.
Electricity demand has decreased marginally due to the Coronavirus lockdown.
Significant drop in carbon emissions resulting in lower prices.
Highlights from the industry (as of 28 May 2020)
As the effects described above are temporary and a result of the current
lockdowns and restrictions on travel, we expect an increase in prices once
the restrictions are lifted.
Although the short-term impact on electricity producers is significant, we
expect prices to rebound in 2021. This is supported by significantly larger
price drops in electricity futures prices in the short-term compared to the
long-term.
Economic outlook
1 mar 201 jan 20 1 apr 201 feb 20 1 maj 20 1 jun 20
20
30
60
40
50
70
80
90
100
110
Natural gas TTF, spot Coal API2, spot Nordic electricity future, Q3-20
Selected futures
2635 33
25
922 23 21
Nordic power, Q3-20 EUA, Jun-20Nordic power, Q4-20 Nordic power, FY-21
-63.9%
-38.2% -29.0% -13.4%
Jan 1, 2020 May 27, 2020
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 13
Banks and consumer finance
− Credit businesses that retain a large physical branch network or have IT inefficiencies will find a drag on their cost bases. This is at a time where they must work through increased loan loss provisions amplified by the adoption of IFRS9 accounting standard in 2018. A higher cost base juxtaposed against a continued low base rate environment and an inability to generate high levels of net interest margin. Inefficient or subscale players may need to look for new capital or become part of a wider market consolidation.
Insurance
− Lloyds of London estimates a USD 203bn underwriting loss for the insurance industry as a result of the global pandemic. Obviously, some asset classes will fair better than others (e.g., motor insurance will benefit from lockdown versus business interruption insurance). Dependent on products and attitudes to reinsurance, there may be stress in the insurance industry.
Asset managers
− A Deloitte study demonstrates that consumers expect to spend more on wealth management services as a response to the COVID-19 crisis (click here to read the study). Asset managers who have been successfully able to pivot from physical meetings to conduct sales and provide advice virtually may be able to capture market share. However, the shock to equity markets will negatively affect income across the sector.
1) Indices are from Stoxx Europe 600 Financial Services and MSCI World; 2) DCA: Debt Collection Agencies; 3) P/BV is measured as average of Nordic Insurers, banks, and DCA
A. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2020/may/14/lloyds-of-london-coronavirus-payouts
Industry outlook: Financial Services
The anticipated recession will have a large impact on the sector
Equity values of financial services firms have made a modest recovery from the mid-March 2020 low point. Uncertainty, particularly in consumer finance, and debt collector businesses continues to be priced into valuations.
Highlights from the industry (as of 27 May 2020)
The impact of the COVID-19-led recession on financial services firms will be felt, as government support schemes unwind in the next few months. Firms that have been affected by lockdown measures may trade through the summer months before losing the battle with cash flow issues and debt servicing issues during the autumn.
Financial Services businesses that are easily able to interact with their clients online, and offer a good user experience, are better placed to thrive during the recession. Many of the tech elements, most notably the proliferation of smart phones, were not available during the financial crisis. This provides customers with a greater number of alternative providers.
Trading multiples and economic outlook
100
70
40
30
90
50
60
80
110
120
5/25/201/9/20 1/24/20 2/25/20 3/26/20 4/28/20
Index: S&P Capital IQ
Jan. 1, 2020
1.7x
Mar. 16, 2020
Current
1.0x1.3x
-0.4x
Coronavirus impact (P/BV)
81
80
64
44
87
Nordic Consumer Finance
Nordic Insurers
Nordic Banks
Nordic DCAs
European AM
27-05-2020
Market capitalization (1 Jan = index 100)
2
3
[64.1]
[44.1]
[80.6][87.0]
[80.4]
1
[89.0]
[A]
European AMBanking
DCA MSCI WorldConsumer Finance
Insurance
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Note:
Source:
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 14
Note:
Sources:
1) Data as of 28 May 2020
Capital IQ; MSCI World Indices; IHS Markit; Trading Economics
Industry outlook: Industrials
Eurozone economic downturn shows signs of easing as lockdowns are lifted
Since the last update on 7 May 2020, the EV/EBITDA
multiple has been up from 11.8x to 12.8x.
Share price development year-to-date
Trading multiples
1 Feb 20
110
60
1 Jan 20 1 Mar 20 1 Apr 20 1 May 20
50
70
80
90
100
Industrials Materials Automotive MSCI World
11.7x
10y avg. 5y avg.
14.2x
3y avg.
13.1x
Jan 1, 20
13.8x
Current
12.8x
-1.0x
MSCI World Industrials Index
Historical averages
(EV/EBITDA)
Coronavirus impact
(EV/EBITDA)
3y avg.5y avg.
10.3x
10y avg.
11.5x 11.7x 11.8x
Jan 1, 20
12.7x
Current
+0.9x
MSCI World Materials Index
Historical averages
(EV/EBITDA)
Coronavirus impact
(EV/EBITDA)
MSCI World Automotive Index
Historical averages
(EV/EBITDA)
Coronavirus impact
(EV/EBITDA)
10.1x
5y avg.10y avg.
9.8x
3y avg.
10.0x
Jan 1, 20 Current
10.5x11.1x
-0.6x
The “Manufacturing PMI Output Index1” is slowly picking up in May 2020
The index is based on the
survey question:
“Is the level of
production/output in your
company higher, the same or
lower than one month ago?”
Index =50: No change
Index <50: Contradiction
Index >50: Expansion
34.9
Eurozone
UK
Germany
18.1
35.4
35.3
France
38.5
41.0
16.3
43.9
31.5
19.7
15.1
35.8
May April March
Since the last update on 7 May 2020, the EV/EBITDA
multiple has been down from 13.1x to 12.7x.
Since the last update on 7 May 2020, the EV/EBITDA
multiple has been up from 9.8x to 10.5x.
90.693.1
98.5
78.0
85.184.3
92.4
69.3
The industrial indices and the stock market in general have further rebounded in
recent weeks with activity level in the economy picking up.
Indexed share price as of:
28 May 7 May
Consumer Financial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 15
Collaboration is the new normal
− COVID-19 has further accelerated an ongoing trend of collaboration
among LSHC companies, scientists, and public institutions.
− Examples of recent private collaborations are:
− Bavarian Nordic and AdaptVac for COVID-19 vaccine
− Consortium of 15 large life science companies, including Novartis,
Johnson & Johnson, and Pfizer, to share knowledge
Race for COVID-19 vaccine or other treatment
− The antiviral, Remdesivir, has shown promising results in preliminary
trials with improved recovery time and potential survival benefits.
− Race for developing a vaccine is still ongoing with a horizon of 12-18
months.
− According to Milken Institute, 123 candidate vaccines and 203 different
treatment variations are being developed as of 7 May 2020.
Note:
Sources:
1) MSCI World Health Care Index (top 10 constituents); 2) MSCI World Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology and Life Sciences Index (top 10 constituents)
Milken Institute, Deloitte Health Forward Blog, Capital IQ, NIH
Industry outlook: Life Science and Health Care (LSHC)
Swift recovery of LSHC sector with listed companies trading above pre-corona levels
Significant recovery in both Health Care and Life Science in recent weeks continues.
Life Science trades above pre-corona levels.
Significantly faster recovery and better performance among Life Science and Health
Care companies compared to the general market.
Highlights from the industry (as of 6 May 2020)
LSHC companies trade above pre-corona levels.
Countries are reopening, and many health care systems are again
focusing on other illnesses and treatments than COVID-19.
Rapid recovery expected for LSHC companies unrelated to COVID-19
treatments as demand for non-essential medications and equipment rises.
Continued high demand for COVID-19 related therapies and equipment.
Trading multiples and economic outlook
85.1
99.2
10y avg.
14.1x
5y avg. 3y avg.
11.7x13.7x
Index: MSCI World Health Care Index
Jan 1, 2020
14.2x
Current
14.2x
0.0x
Historical averages (EV/EBITDA FY0) Coronavirus impact (EV/EBITDA FY0)
103.6
1 2
Indexed share price development
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
105
110
22 Dec 19 22 Jan 20 22 Feb 20 22 Mar 20 22 Apr 20
Healthcare Life science MSCI World
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 16
Towards normality
− Government’s focus is to move society towards normality and avoid an
increase in the reproduction rate.
− As part of a controlled reopening, all citizens can book an appointment
to a COVID-19 test.
The recovery phase has intensified
− Pressure on government to increase the pace, by which the economy is
reopened.
− Phase 2 of the reopening has been extended to include for instance zoos
and museums.
Deficit on public finances
After a surplus in 2019, a deficit of 7.2% of GDP is expected in 2020. The
deficit is expected to be 1.8% of GDP in 2021.
− The public EMU debt is expected to increase from 33% pf GDP in 2019 to
41% in 2020.
− European recovery fund of about DKK 5,000bn is being negotiated in EU.
Sources: Deloitte Insights, Government’s response to COVID-19. From pandemic crisis to a better future, April 2020, Ministry of Finance, May 2020
Industry outlook: Public
The pandemic will cause a major deficit on public finances in both 2020 and 2021
Consumer
Highlights from the industry (as of 28 May 2020)
Aid packages and focus on supporting the private sector through earlier start-up of planned investment and prepayment of suppliers are expected to ease the negative
impact on the economy.
Aid packages and the economic setback will have an immediate negative impact on public finances and may challenge government spending in the long term.
The severe and long-lasting financial and economic impacts of the pandemic depend on the effects of the aid packages and the strategy for the reopening of society.
Digitalisation in the public sector may be boosted as the crisis has reinforced virtual ways of working.
Economic outlook
A timeline for COVID-19 government response
Financial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 17
Retail
− Despite the reopening of the retail sector, footfall is not at pre-COVID-
19 levels.
− As the number of transactions in retail is back to pre-COVID-19 levels,
we believe that a shift to online trade has already taken place. As
such, new occupiers and business models need to be developed by
landlords.
− The reopening of many cafés and restaurants has not attracted
customers as expected, and it will take time before "normality".
• Residential
− Historically, there has been a close relationship between consumer
confidence and growth in housing prices.
− This suggests decreasing prices in 2020. However, transaction volumes
have recovered since Easter – also driven by the summer housing
market.
1) Based on Collier International, Patrizia AG, Agate Ejendomme, Jeudan A/S, and Park Street Nordicom
Finans Danmark, Thomson Reuters Eikon, Capital IQ
Industry outlook: Real Estate
Expectation-driven real estate market leads to price reductions in the short term ...
The leading real estate index is recovering from the COVID-19 chock in March 2020. Despite the
current challenges in some sectors, the industry is in general better prepared financially.
Interest rates are now fixed at a higher level. However, in troubled times, we normally see a
spread to bigger economies such as Germany, which may last throughout the COVID-19 crisis.
Consumer
Highlights from the industry (as of 28 May 2020)
As seen opposite, price multiples are not affected significantly by COVID-19, and in
general the major listed RE companies are well-positioned to handle the crisis.
Decreasing prices in 2020 for single-family houses and apartments in the major
Danish cities are expected due to reduced volumes. Many households have
significant savings, and financing costs are still very low. However, as volumes and
prices are expectation-driven, we believe that the uncertainty about the financial
impact of COVID-19 will put things on a hold – for now!
Trading multiples and economic outlook
10y avg. 5y avg.
28.1x
3y avg.
27.6x 25.4x
Historical averages (EV/EBITDA) Coronavirus impact (EV/EBITDA)
Index: Custom weighted average index1
Note:
Sources:
Financial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Current1 Jan 2020
31.2x30.6x
+0.6x
0.5%
0.8%
1.0%
1.3%
1.5%
1.8%
2.0%
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
01 Jan 22 Jan 12 Feb 04 Mar 25 Mar 15 Apr 06 May 27 May
Inte
rest ra
te
Sto
ck p
rice index
(2 J
an 2
02
0 =
10
0)
STOXX 600 Real Estate Index Danish long-term mortgage rates
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 18
TMT perceived as a defensive sector, which has less to lose from COVID-19
Telecom: Spend among consumers is often within a contract; demand is
up; need is not discretionary (new cars) or constrained (leisure).
Media and Entertainment: Financial impact varies across sub-sectors.
Media consumption up (e.g., Netflix, Disney+), but willingness/ability to
pay may be constrained as economic outlook exacerbates. Events
(consumer, business) mostly heavily restricted; cinemas, theatres,
museums mostly closed. TV and movie production mostly halted. Theme
parks mostly closed.
Technology: Some segments (e.g., robotics, communication software)
experiencing record demand; digital transformation being accelerated;
companies catering to SMEs may suffer from customer liquidity.
Note:
Sources:
1) MSCI World industry indices used, 01-01-2020 = index 100; 2) In EMEA and selected Asian countries, physical game sales are up by 63% according to GamesIndustry.biz.
S&P Capital IQ (May 2020), Forrester Research (March 2020)
Industry outlook: TMT
TMT sectors have been relatively resilient to COVID-19 as the world has gone digital
TMT companies are trading above the overall equity market.
Media and Entertainment quickly recovered after the shockwave on the stock
market. As people stay at home, the entertainment market is making records2.
Highlights from the industry (as of 28 May 2020)
Forrester has revised its IT spending forecast downward by a best-case
scenario where the global tech market growth is slowing to ~2% in 2020.
If a full-fledged recession hits, there is a 50% probability that the global
tech market will decline by 2% or more in 2020.
Software spending is the subsector expected to show highest growth,
while computer equipment and IT consulting and systems integration
services spending are expected to show weaker growth.
Trading multiples and economic outlook
1 Mar 201 Jan 20 1 Feb 20 1 May 201 Apr 20
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
102
91
21.3x
3y avg.10y avg. 5y avg.
16.1x
24.1x
Index: MSCI World Information Technology
Jan 1, 2020 Current
28.3x28.0x
+0.3x
Historical averages (EV/EBITDA) Coronavirus impact (EV/EBITDA)
112108
MSCI WorldInformation Technology1 Communication Services Media and Entertainment
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 19
500
700
900
1100
1 11 21 31 41 51 61
Note:
Source:
1) A.P. Møller-Mærsk, D/S Norden, DFDS, DSV Panalpina, NTG, TORM, 2) Lowest YTD is 4.6x on March 20th
Capital IQ, Shanghai Shipping Exchange, Forbes, IHS Markit
Industry outlook: Transportation
The transportation market in recovery following the opening of several markets
Highlights from the industry (as of May-29)
Trading multiples and economic outlook (as of May-29)
Transportation indices have largely followed the total market as a recovering market
implies and increased need for goods transportation
The transportation stocks indicate belief in the market’s recovery
− The rapid spread of COVID-19 has had a major impact on global goods
transport, with ripple effects from the shortfall in demand for goods
from China
− The recent surge in stock prices since the low point in mid-March
indicates an expectation to a recovering demand global trade as
several countries are now opening up, driving the recovery of physical
retail
Accelerated conversion to e-commerce to aid in recovery
− As of mid-April, US retailers’ online YoY revenue growth was 68%,
substantiated by a 146% YoY growth in number of online retail orders
− A big rush on freight capacity and subsequent increase in freight rates
is expected as demand recovers and companies try to get their
products on the water
10y avg. 5y avg. 3y avg.
7.1x 7.5x 7.5x
Historical averages
(EV/FY1 EBITDA)
Trough CurrentLast close 2019
7.4x
4.6x
7.5x
+0.1x
Coronavirus impact2
(EV/FY1 EBITDA)
Danish-listed transportation companies1
2020
The Shanghai Containerized Freight Index (SCFI) is down 19.0% to 829
from its high 1023 in week 1, however up 9.5% YoY
2019
104.0
95.999.0
6065707580859095
100105110115120125130
May 19 Jul 19 Sep 19 Oct 19 Dec 19 Feb 20 Mar 20 May 20
MSCI World MSCI Transportation Danish Transportation Index
ConsumerFinancial Services
Energy & Resources
Life Science & Health Care
Public TMT TransportIndustrials Real Estate
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 20
Industry outlook: Deloitte contacts
How Deloitte can help you
• Please use the contact details opposite to get in touch
with our Financial Advisory industry group leaders and
find out how we can assist you.
• We are well-positioned to assist in a range of tasks,
such as those below.
Mads Damborg
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 54 81
Consumer
Troels Ellemose Lorentzen
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 56 90
Energy & Resources
Mads Damborg
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 54 81
Life Science & Health Care
Kasper Svold Maagaard
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 54 54
TMT
Tinus Bang Christensen
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 44 63
Real Estate
Financial Services
Rikke Beckmann Danielsen
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 56 92
Government & Public Services
Niels Stoustrup
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 59 15
Industrials
State aid packages
Liquidity scenario analysis
Debt covenant advice and financing
Business restructuring and M&A
Bankable business plan development
Stakeholder management and process control
Impact assessment
Economic modelling and forecasting
Focus areas
Mike Robinson
Partner
Email: [email protected]
Mobile: +45 30 93 00 03
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 21
European corporate earnings expectations
Danish, European and World GDP development
Danish 2020 GDP expectations
European market volatility and credit default probability
Government support packages
Deloitte Government Response Portal
Appendices
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 22
Note:
Source:
1) Based on analyst estimates for S&P Europe 350 Index constituent companies
S&P Capital IQ
Corporate earnings expectations
Corporate earnings expectations have been severely curtailed since the outbreak
• The selloff in European equity markets, triggered by the
COVID-19 pandemic and the associated economic
slowdown, differs across sectors, ref. page 3.
• To shed light on the underlying drivers of this selloff
across sectors, the chart opposite displays changes in
expectations of stock analysts. In particular, the chart
shows how stock analysts have downgraded consensus
expectations of net income across sectors and time:
− Energy, incl. oil and gas companies, saw its net
income estimates being downgraded by 40%-80%
in 2020-2021 likely due to sharp declines in oil and
gas prices.
− Consumer Discretionary, Financials, and
Transportation are expected to be severely affected.
Their net income estimates for 2020 are, on
average, more than 40% below pre-crisis
estimates.
− Health Care and Real Estate are expected to
weather the storm relatively well, both in the short
(2020) and the long (2023) term.
− Food & Staples Retailing is the only sector whose
expectations for 2020 have improved, albeit the
improvement is marginal.
Change in net income consensus estimates between 31 January 2020 and 27 May 20201
(90%) (80%) (70%) (60%) (50%) (40%) (30%) (20%) (10%) - 10%
Food & staples retailing
Real estate
Health care
Utilities
Communication services
Other consumer staples
Information Technology
Materials
Industrials
Transportation
Financials
Consumer discretionary
Energy
2020 2021 2022 2023
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 23
Source: IMF, World Economic Outlook (April 2020)
Danish, European and World GDP development
World Economic Outlook: GDP growth projections for Denmark, Eurozone and World
• IMF is projecting the global economy to contract by
3% in 2020, far worse than the -0.1% growth
experienced during the 2009 financial crisis. The
economic growth forecasts from the IMF assume that
the COVID-19 pandemic fades in the second half of
2020 and that containment efforts can be unwound.
The disruptions are assumed to be concentrated
mostly in the second quarter of 2020 for almost all
countries, with a gradual recovery thereafter, as it
takes some time for production to ramp up after the
shock.
• The global economy is projected to rebound in 2021,
growing at 5.8% as economic activity normalises,
helped by policy support. In comparison, global growth
rebounded to 5.4% in 2010 from -0.1% in 2009.
• Please note that the 2021 rebound depends critically
on the pandemic fading in the second half of 2020,
allowing containment efforts to be gradually scaled
back and restoring consumer and investor confidence.
(4 .9%) (6.5%)
6.0%
(10%)
(5%)
-
5%
10%
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020
Denmark: GDP growth
Historical Forecast
(0.1%)
(3.0%)
5.8%
(10%)
(5%)
-
5%
10%
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020
World: GDP growth
Historical Forecast
(4 .5%)(7 .5%)
4.7%
(10%)
(5%)
-
5%
10%
1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014 2017 2020
Eurozone: GDP growth
Historical Forecast
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 24
Sources: IMF, Danish Central Bank, Danish Ministry of Finance, DØRS, Confederation of Danish Industry, Danske Bank, Nordea
Danish 2020 GDP expectations
Latest survey of forecasters suggests a Danish GDP contraction of 5.1% for 2020
• The Danish Central Bank forecasts three scenarios for the Danish economy in 2020. The three scenarios differ by the speed with which containment
efforts are unwound. In the mild scenario, where GDP is contracting by 3% in 2020, restrictions are gradually eased from Easter to a full lifting of
restrictions by October 2020.
• The Confederation of Danish Industry has based its projection of a 7% decline in 2020 GDP on a survey of its member firms.
• The Economic Councils project two scenarios for the Danish economy. In the optimistic scenario, the economy rebounds relatively quickly, and GDP
declines by 3.5% in 2020. In the pessimistic scenario, a second wave of COVID-19 emerges during the fall, and new containment efforts and
restrictions are activated; new aid packages are introduced. In this scenario, GDP contracts by 5.5% in 2020.
• Nordea updated its economic outlook for Denmark and the Nordic countries on 27 May 2020. Nordea expects the Danish GDP to contract 5% in 2020
before rebounding 4% in 2021. Previously, Nordea expected a 3% fall in output in 2020.
• The Danish Ministry of Finance has also updated its forecast, expecting a 5.25% contraction in national output in 2020 (compared to an earlier
prediction of -4.4%).
2.3%
3.9%
0.9%
(0 .5%)
(4.9%)
1.9% 1.3%
0.2% 0.9%
1.6% 2.3%
3.2% 2.0% 2.4% 2.4%
Median; (5 .1%)
(12%)
(10%)
(8%)
(6%)
(4%)
(2%)
-
2%
4%
6%
8%
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Denmark: GDP growth and 2020 market expectations
Historical (IMF) Danish Central Bank Ministry of Finance
The Economic Councils IMF Confederation of Danish Industry
Danske Bank Nordea Median
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 25
Note:
Source:
1) VSTOXX as volatility index of EURO STOXX; 2) Default probability calculated based on 5Y iTraxx European Crossover CDS and a recovery rate of 40%
Thomson Reuters Eikon
Market volatility and European credit default probability
Equity market volatility remains elevated and comparable to the levels observed during the global financial crisis
• The VSTOXX Index measures 30-day implied volatility
of the EURO STOXX 50 equity index and reflects
investors' uncertainty about future equity market
moves.
• As shown, the coronavirus induced an increase in
volatility to a level comparable to that experienced
during the global financial crisis in 2008. Since then,
volatility has declined, but still remains elevated and
comparable to the levels observed during the global
financial crisis.
81
74
29
2008 2016 2018 20212019
10
2012
0
2011 2014 20202013
50
20
40
80
30
2007 2009
60
2010 2017
70
90
100
2015
VSTOXX Index1
Vola
tility
index
• The chart opposite shows the development in the
implied default probabilities based on the 5Y iTraxx
European Crossover spread of Credit Default Swaps and
an assumed recovery rate of 40%. It measures default
probabilities on a portfolio of sub-investment grade
corporate debt in Europe.
• With a current default probability of about 30%, we are
at the highest level since the European debt crisis, but
still below peak financial crisis levels.
• As the index reflects cost of debt, any refinancing will
be costly for leveraged companies, even though interest
rates are close to being record low.
40
0
60
50
10
20
30
70
20142008 202120162010 20172012 2018 20202007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2019
%
50.2%
30.2%
43.3%
61.7%D
efa
ult p
robability in %
iTraxx Europe Crossover index: Default probability2
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 26
Sources:
In some countries, including Denmark, aid packages also include credit measures like state-guaranteed loans.
Danske Bank, Deloitte Covid-19 portal as of 5 May 2020
Government support packages
Massive state aid packages are launched to counter economic fallout from COVID-19
• The various lock-down measures in response to COVID-
19 have halted economic activity in certain sectors and
harshly disrupted others. The resulting job losses and
bankruptcies may crate major economic strains for
millions in Europe and worldwide.
• Gigantic state aid packages have been launched across
the world to counter the impact of the economic crisis.
• EU finance ministers agreed on a EUR 540bn (3.5% of
EU GDP) emergency support package for countries hit by
the coronavirus. The measures aim to provide safety
nets for workers, businesses and sovereigns.
• As these state aid packages are launched, governments
sharply increase debts to finance the increased spending
levels. On this background, the questions about the
following issues have started start to emerge:
− The sustainability of government debt funding
− The impact on inflation from sharp increases in
government spending
France
Greece
EU
Canada
New Zealand
Austria
Finland
2%
5%
22%
China
Denmark
Germany
Italy
Japan 20%
Norway
Portugal
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
17%
The Netherlands
2%
8%
UK
USA
10%
9%
6%
6%
1%
4%
17%
10%
21%
4%
4%
12%
21%
13%
13%
3%
4%
7%
10%
State aid packages relative to GDP
FiscalCredit
Coronavirus Impact Monitor – 29 May 2020 Deloitte Economics © 2020Page 27
• To aid our clients in navigating the complex landscape of COVID-19 assistance programmes, we have developed a free digital portal that captures the
latest financial, tax, business and social measures enacted by country.
Deloitte Government Response Portal
Database of financial, tax, business and social measures announced by governments globally
Access the portal!
This communication contains general information only, and none of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms or their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”) is, by means of this communication, rendering professional advice or services. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser.
No representations, warranties or undertakings (express or implied) are given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information in this communication, and none of DTTL, its member firms, related entities, employees or agents shall be liable or responsible for any loss or damage whatsoever arising directly or indirectly in connection with any person relying on this communication. DTTL and each of its member firms, and their related entities, are legally separate and independent entities.
About Deloitte Deloitte is a leading global provider of audit and assurance, consulting, financial advisory, risk advisory, tax and related services. Our global network of member firms and related entities in more than 150 countries and territories (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”) serves four out of five Fortune Global 500® companies. Learn how Deloitte’s approximately 312,000 people make an impact that matters at www.deloitte.com.
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu LimitedDeloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (“DTTL”), its global network of member firms, and their related entities (collectively, the “Deloitte organization”). DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) and each of its member firms and related entities are legally separate and independent entities, which cannot obligate or bind each other in respect of third parties. DTTL and each DTTL member firm and related entity is liable only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of each other. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please seewww.deloitte.com/about to learn more.
© 2020 Deloitte Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab. Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited.