1
Preliminary doping dependence studies indicate that the ISHE signal does pass through a resonance as a function of doping. The curves below are plotted such that the displayed magnitude corresponds to the same injected spin polarization for all three samples as measured by companion non- local devices. 0 delocalized localized Nuclear enhancement of the spin Hall angle near the metal-insulator transition in n-GaAs C. C. Geppert 1 , K. D. Christie 1 , M. K. Chan 1 , Q. O. Hu 2 , S. J. Patel 2 , C. J. Palmstrøm 2, 3 , P. A. Crowell 1 1 School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, U.S.A. 2 Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3 Dept. of Materials, University of California Santa Barbara, U.S.A. Local Moments Introduction Resonant Scattering Nuclear Origin Summary Phenomenological Modeling density of states for spin . density of states for spin . exchange splitting in band A large Hanle signal is observed in the local Hall voltage when injecting vertical spin currents from a central ferromagnetic contact. This inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE) is caused by an asymmetry in the scattering for spin-up and spin-down electrons. ( ) = 0 + 1/ 2 + / Estimating of states are localized compares nicely to from Hertz distribution ( localization criterion). Expected lineshape: even Hanle curve (quasi- Lorentzian) 1 1+ ( ) 2 The signal collapses near zero-field unlike the electron spin polarization which is at a maximum. The observed signal is even (odd) with respect to the applied field in samples with the contact magnetization oriented perpendicular (parallel) to the Hall arms. The signal magnitude is much larger than expectations based on ionized impurity scattering. A large nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) response is observed in the Hall voltage. Garlid et. al., PRL 105, 156602 (2010) slope Plotting the ISHE signal vs. the magnitude of the spin polarization (non- local spin valve) exhibits a clear super- linear behavior. While it is well known that the electron precession dynamics see the nuclei as an effective field, this result suggests that the nuclei play a more direct role in the scattering mechanism. To manipulate the nuclear spin system independently of the electron spin polarization, we employ a pump-probe technique to take advantage of the large separation in relaxation time scales. In the absence of nuclear polarization, the ISHE signal is completely extinguished, whereas the electron spin polarization (3T) actually increases due to the smaller effective Overhauser field. pump bias probe bias Δ 1 One advantage of this technique is the ability to take field sweeps with the nuclear polarization in steady- state. The graph on the left shows the component of the ISHE signal which is odd with respect to the contact magnetization. + + 2 2 / Ω + = ˙ 0 + ¿ 0 ¿ Transport skewess: 0 Hall current: = ¿ flow indicies orientation 0 0 ( ) 0 0 ( ) 0 0 ( ) ( ) insulating metallic MIT: quasi-particle peak 0 , GaAs =2.5 × 10 16 / cm 3 By solving self-consistently the 3D spin drift-diffusion model including nuclear and fringe fields, the spin current tensor can be determined at each cell. Calculating the corresponding anomalous current yields excellent qualitative agreement with the ISHE line- shapes over a wide variety of angles, transverse fields, and nuclear parameters. The presence of neutral impurity scattering can be clearly seen in the bias dependence of the channel conductivity. Donor impact ionization becomes less effective at higher carrier concentrations. determined from fit is much less than hydrogenic donor binding energy (). The low temperature conductivity can be fit well by Quantum corrections due to electron-electron interactions () very sensitive to application of an electric field. Add description here about the metal- insulator transition. Fix the atrocious DOS diagrams below. Prune as necessary. = = Both contributions present: Explain here what gamma is and how to calculate it from the scattering amplitudes. Show the origin of the two contributions (1) exchange scattering and (2) Kondo-like flip-flop with the nuclear system. -1000 -500 0 500 1000 -250 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 50 100 150 200 -1000 -500 0 500 1000 M Experim ent 2.5° V ISH E ( V) Field (O e) T = 60 K j = 565 A/cm 2 V int = 0.253 V = 0° M Sim ulation Field (O e) 2.5° = 0° M M -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 ISHE; pum p 0 m A for4 s ISHE; pum p -3 m A for4 s ISHE; pum p -5 m A for4 s 3T; pum p 0 m A for4 s 3T; pum p -3 m A for4 s 3T; pum p -5 m A for4 s V ISHE ( V) Probe Interface Voltage (V) T = 60 K -40 0 -200 0 200 400 -2 5 0 25 50 75 100 125 0 A /cm 2 V ( V) F ie ld (O e) 60 K -1944 A /cm 2 0 100 200 300 0 20 40 60 71 Ga 75 As V ( V) f (kH z) 80 K 69 Ga -10 0 -50 0 50 100 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 C urrent(m A ) E lectric F ield (V /cm ) 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 C o n d u ctivity ( -1 m -1 ) -1 2.0 -11.5 -11 .0 -10 .5 -1 0.0 -1 3 -1 2 -1 1 -1 0 -9 L o g(| V ISH E |) Log(| V NLSV |) T = 20 K -1000 0 1000 -50 0 50 V ISH E ( V) Field (O e) T = 60 K j = 565 A/cm 2 M M = 0° Sam ple Q 059 -1000 0 1000 -400 -200 0 200 400 Sam ple Q 062 V ISH E ( V) Field (O e) T = 60 K j = 618 A/cm 2 M M = 0° 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 in ve rse S HE (1 0 -3 ) In x Ga 1- x A s (x,% ) directS H E -500 0 500 1000 0 400 800 1200 -500 0 500 1000 0 16 32 48 V int = -0.282 V 10° 3-Term inalSignal, V 3T ( V) Field (O e) 10° T = 60 K N on-Local Signal, V NL ( V) Field (O e) -1000 -500 0 500 1000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 V int = 0.354 V V int = 0.426 V T = 30 K x 3 V ISH E ( V) Field (O e) 5 x 10 16 /cm 3 3 x 10 16 /cm 3 11 x 10 16 /cm 3 j = 760 A/cm 2 V int = 0.364 V M M 0 1 2 3 4 5 18.78 18.80 18.82 18.84 18.86 18.88 0 .1 V /cm 0 .5 V /cm 1 .5 V /cm 2 V /cm C o nd uctivity (S /cm ) Tem p e ra tu re (K )

delocalized

  • Upload
    lark

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Nuclear enhancement of the spin Hall angle near the metal-insulator transition in n - GaAs. Hall current:. flow indicies. C. C. Geppert 1 , K. D. Christie 1 , M. K. Chan 1 , Q. O. Hu 2 , S. J. Patel 2 , C . J. Palmstrøm 2, 3 , P. A. Crowell 1. orientation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

PowerPoint Presentation

Preliminary doping dependence studies indicate that the ISHE signal does pass through a resonance as a function of doping.

The curves below are plotted such that the displayed magnitude corresponds to the same injected spin polarization for all three samples as measured by companion non-local devices.

delocalizedlocalizedNuclear enhancement of the spin Hall angle nearthe metal-insulator transition in n-GaAsC. C. Geppert1, K. D. Christie1 , M. K. Chan1, Q. O. Hu2, S. J. Patel2, C.J. Palmstrm2, 3, P. A. Crowell11School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, U.S.A.2Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 3Dept. of Materials, University of California Santa Barbara, U.S.A.

Local MomentsIntroductionResonant ScatteringNuclear OriginSummaryPhenomenological Modeling

(15 nm)(15 nm)Tunnelbarriernn+:GaAsn+ ~ 5 x 1018 cm-3(5 nm)FeSemi-insulating GaAs substrate [001]n:GaAsn ~ 5 x 1016 cm-3(~ 2500 nm)n:GaAsn ~ 5 x 1018 cm-3Cap

Vxy

density of states for spin .density of states for spin .

A large Hanle signal is observed in the local Hall voltage when injecting vertical spin currents from a central ferromagnetic contact. This inverse spin Hall effect (ISHE) is caused by an asymmetry in the scattering for spin-up and spin-down electrons.

electron spin splittingspin-orbit couplingOverhauser field

Expected lineshape:

even Hanle curve (quasi-Lorentzian)

The signal collapses near zero-field unlike the electron spin polarization which is at a maximum.The observed signal is even (odd) with respect to the applied field in samples with the contact magnetization oriented perpendicular (parallel) to the Hall arms.The signal magnitude is much larger than expectations based on ionized impurity scattering.A large nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) response is observed in the Hall voltage.Garlid et. al., PRL 105, 156602 (2010)Plotting the ISHE signal vs. the magnitude of the spin polarization (non-local spin valve) exhibits a clear super-linear behavior.While it is well known that the electron precession dynamics see the nuclei as an effective field, this result suggests that the nuclei play a more direct role in the scattering mechanism.To manipulate the nuclear spin system independently of the electron spin polarization, we employ a pump-probe technique to take advantage of the large separation in relaxation time scales.In the absence of nuclear polarization, the ISHE signal is completely extinguished, whereas the electron spin polarization (3T) actually increases due to the smaller effective Overhauser field.pump bias probe bias One advantage of this technique is the ability to take field sweeps with the nuclear polarization in steady-state. The graph on the left shows the component of the ISHE signal which is odd with respect to the contact magnetization.

Transport skewess:Hall current:flow indiciesorientation

insulatingmetallicMIT:quasi-particlepeak

The presence of neutral impurity scattering can be clearly seen in the bias dependence of the channel conductivity.

Donor impact ionization becomes less effective at higher carrier concentrations.The low temperature conductivity can be fit well byAdd description here about the metal-insulator transition. Fix the atrocious DOS diagrams below. Prune as necessary.Both contributions present:Explain here what gamma is and how to calculate it from the scattering amplitudes. Show the origin of the two contributions (1) exchange scattering and (2) Kondo-like flip-flop with the nuclear system.