11
Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International [email protected] www.winrock.org ing and Monitoring Forest Degradation Acros

Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International [email protected] Measuring

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Degradation Accounting Methods

Katie GosleeProgram Officer, Ecosystem Services UnitWinrock [email protected] www.winrock.org

Measuring and Monitoring Forest Degradation Across Asia

Page 2: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Presentation Overview

Overview of activity- and land-based accounting Examples of each accounting method Rationale for deciding which to use

2

Page 3: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Activity- and Land-based Accounting

Methods described by IPCC Activity-based considers specific human

activities leading to forest degradation, and estimates emissions separately for each activity.

Land-based estimates the change in carbon stocks in a specified area of land, regardless of activities occurring.

3

Page 4: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Activity-based

• Full accounting of all land-based emissions.

• Can capture net effect of emissions and sinks across large areas.

• Difficult to distinguish between effects of multiple activities.

• Requires large amounts of data that are expensive to collect.

• Measurement resolution will likely miss many localized small-scale impacts.

• May simplify tracking net emissions and removals from place to place or year to year.

• Emissions combined across activities.

• Where multiple activities occur, it may be difficult to verify emissions.

• Inherently distinguishes between activities.

• Cost effective approach; complexity of methods based on each activity

• Small scale impacts can be included by activity if deemed significant.

• Requires development of emission or removal factors for each activity in each region.

5

Land-based

Page 5: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Activity-based accounting - Guyana

Limited existing biomass data No reliable data on land use change Most degradation from logging and small scale

mining Field work focused on areas most impacted by

degradation Some activities have yet to be included

6

Page 6: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Land-based accounting - Vietnam

National Forest Inventory with extensive biomass data

Existing data on forest cover change over 20 years• Including degradation of timber stocks

Not clear which activities result in emissions from degradation

High uncertainty in areas/forest types with few plots

7

Page 7: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Rationale for accounting system

Are there existing data on forest biomass? Is extent of land use change quantified? Is degradation occurring across the landscape,

rather than in specific areas? Activity-based is common and cost-effective

approach to degradation accounting

8

Page 8: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Monitoring Forest Degradation Emissions

Need to know magnitude and cause to design a system for degradation• Difficult to detect areas of degradation with Remote Sensing• Emissions estimated with emission factors and activity data• Not all agents of degradation can be monitored with same

approach• Can use government and other statistics or social surveys

Procedures for estimating impact on C stocks already exist under IPCC for some forms, such as logging

Other forms require development of procedure

9

Page 9: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Developing a monitoring system

Simple Based on existing systems Affordable Replicable & Upscaleable Focus on areas likely subject to degradation Include spot checking and allow some error Verifiable

10

Page 10: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Challenges

Data consistency Consistency of implementation Financial resources Technical capacity Replicability

11

Page 11: Degradation Accounting Methods Katie Goslee Program Officer, Ecosystem Services Unit Winrock International kgoslee@winrock.org  Measuring

Thank You

Katie GosleeEcosystem Services UnitWinrock [email protected] www.winrock.org

25