Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
10/2/2013
1
Evolving Your Vascular
Access Practice
Rita Larson, RN, BSN,
CRNI, MBA, VA-BC
Beyond the Status Quo
Defining the Risk of
Malpositioned Catheters
Inadvertent Arterial Puncture, Azygos, Upper
SVC
Disclosure
• Employee of Teleflex, Incorporated.
2
OBJECTIVE
• Define catheter tip malposition
• Describe five evidence-based publications describing the risks of catheter tip malposition
• Define clinical risks of malpositioned CVC catheters
• Discuss use of evidence to drive process improvement with the aim of reducing the risk of inadvertent arterial, azygos, and upper CVC catheter tips
3
10/2/2013
2
Present Standards, RecommendationsPosition Papers - Catheter Tip Placement
Group Guideline
AVA (1998) Lower 1/3 of SVC – RA Junction
ONS (2004) Lower 1/3 of SVC - CAJ
INS (2006) Lower 1/3 of SVC - CAJ
FDA CVC Working Group (1998,1994) Lower 1/3 of SVC – Catheter should not be allowed to migrate in RA
SIR (2000) SVC / RA Junction
NKF DOQI (2001) SVC / RA Junction or RA
4
Optimal Final Tip Location
• Cavoatrial Junction (CAJ) or the adjacent lower 1/3 of the superior vena cava
5
Hostetter, et al. Precision in CVC Tip Placement. 2010. JAVA 2010;15(3):112-125.
DataStudy Type Complication Detection Results
Schummer Observationalprospective
Malposition ECG Cardiac reflectionresults in malposition
Cadman Randomized, retrospective
Thrombosis Ultrasounds, Venograms
Thrombosis 16X higher when position high
Lozano Prospective Malposition Tomography Malposition reduced by 89% when cath in distal
SVC
Hostetter LiteratureReview
Malposition Landmarktechniques
Accuracy rate for first time placements
Gravenstein In-vitro Perforation In-vitro Perforation greater when not in distal SVC
6
10/2/2013
3
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
Ideal Tip Position Characteristics
• Best drug distribution and dilution
• Lowest occlusion rates
• Lowest tip related DVT
• Least catheter tip interference with venous and RA
walls
7
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?Q = k x П x r4 x ∆P Poiseuille’s Law
8 x L x η
Q = k x r2 x (П x r2) x ∆P
L x 8 x η
8
r
Pi
PfL
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?• Relative Effect of Vessel Size on Blood Flow
9
Cephalic 34
Basilic 44
Axillary 84
Subclavian 9.54
SVC 12.54
Radius of
Vessel (mm)4
Approx.
mL/Min.
2-4 mm
4-6 mm
16 mm
19 mm
20 mm
Actual
Diameter
38 cm
24 cm
13 cm
6 cm
7 cm
Length
(cm)
1
3.2
50
100
301.4
10/2/2013
4
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
• Irritating Medications• pH
• Concentration of hydrogen ions
• Osmolality
• Measurement of number of particles
dissolved in water (the concentration)
• Vesicant
• Toxic to the vein and can cause tissue
necrosis if extravasated
10
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
• Evidence defines lowest risk here
• Large vein diameter
• High blood flow velocity
• Significant turbulent blood flow elements
• Catheter tip distant from the wall
Timsit, JF et al. Central vein catheter-related thrombosis in intensive care patients. Incidence, risk factors,
and relationship with catheter-related sepsis. Chest 1998; 114(1):207-213
11
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
• 82 power injections
• 62% proximal tip positions resulted in displacement
• 10.14% distal tip positions resulted in displacement
• When tip is distal SVC, risk of displacement is reduced by 89%
Lozano,A, Marn, C, Goodman, L. (2012). Power Injectable Peripherally Inserted Central Venous
Catheter Lines Frequently Flip After Power Injection of Contrast. J Comput Assist Tomogr2012 Jul;36(4):427-30.
12
10/2/2013
5
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
• Legal Implications
• New case studies emerging of catheter tips in
the incorrect location
• Reduce liability by developing processes that promote the most consistent outcome
Orme,R, McSwiney, M, Chamberlein-Webber, R (2007) Fatal Cardiac Tamponade as a Result of a Peripherally
Inserted Catheter: A Case Report and Review of Literature. British Journal of Anesthesia 384-388.
13
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
14
Cadman, A, Lawrance, JL, Fitzsimmons, L, Spencer-Shaw A and Swindell R (2004). To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous catheters. Clinical Radiology, 59: 349-355
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
15
Arm movement, adduction and abduction
10/2/2013
6
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?
16
Parallax
17
Parallax is the apparent
shift in the position of an
object by a change in the
observation position
Pericardial Reflection
•Pericardial Reflection, rather than entry into the SVC may cause P Wave Spike
• X Ray is unable to detect pericardial reflection
• Doppler is unable to mistake pericardial reflection as a P Wave Spike
Schummer, et al. Central venous catheters—the inability of ‘intra-atrial ECG’ to prove adequate positioning. British Journal of Anesthesia 93 (2): 193-8 (2004).
Bayer , et al. Implication of the Anatomy of the Pericardial Reflection on Positioning of the Central Venous catheters”
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular :Anesthesia Vol 20:6 2(2006)
18
10/2/2013
7
Pericardial Reflection
19
Pericardial Reflection
•It is a location, not an
event or activity
•The extension of the
pericardial tissue is the
reflection
•Heart sits in the pericardial
sac
•Sac attaches around mid
SVC
Malpositioned Central
Lines
• Inadvertent Arterial Placements
• Azygos Placement
• Upper SVC
20
Inadvertent Arterial Puncture
• New Case Studies emerging with arterial
puncture
• IV Therapy.net
• Medical Legal Websites
Sumit Parikh, Vinodh Narayanan (2004) Misplaced Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: An Unusual Cause of Stroke.
Pediatric Neurology, 30:210,212
Nitin Garg, Amit Noheria, Ian R. McPhail, Joseph J. Ricotta II. (2010)Embolic Strokes After Peripherally Inserted Catheter
Placement. Annals of Vascular Surgery, 24: 1133.
21
10/2/2013
8
Inadvertent Arterial
PunctureRisks Associated:
• Pseudoanuerysm
• Inadvertent cannulation of Carotid
• Trachael Displacement
• Excessive Bleeding
• Tear in Carotid Artery
• TPN infused in vertebral artery
• Perforation of Aorta
22
Azygos Placement
• (Inadvertent) placement of PICC line in azygos vein is probably
the commonest complication associated with this procedure.
(Radiopeadia.org)
Complications Include
• Inaccurate Venous Pressure Measurements
• Thrombophlebitis
• Arrhythmias
• Potentially toxic solutions delivered into Azygos vein
Charles S. Langston. (1971) The Aberrant Central Venous Catheter and Its Complications. Radiology 100:1 55-59.
23
Azygos Placement
24
10/2/2013
9
P-wave Technology
Normal
P-wave
Range
Maximal
P-wave
Range
Biphasic
P-wave
Range
RA
CAJ
SVC
SVC
2-5 cm
RA
0-3 cm
RA
2-5 cm
Landing
zone lower
1/3 of
SVC-CAJ
Source: Jeon et al, CAN J ANESTH 2006 / 53: 10 / pp 978–983
Rx only
CONFIDENTIAL — NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION © 2013 Teleflex Incorporated. All rights reserved.
2013-2218
Doppler Technology
26
Sound Waves determine if sound waves
are moving with blood cells, or against
Driving Best Practices
Precise Catheter Tip Location
27
10/2/2013
10
Outline Evidence for Change
Ask the question;
Why is change in practice needed?
• Well documented: Malposition catheter tip = Complications
• Position statements, guidelines, recommendations &
position papers
• Multi-disciplinary collaboration reduces complications
28
Plan of Action• Begin with a proposal to consider the benefits of
precise catheter tip technology� Focus on timely start of therapy
� Reduce cost of care (no chest X-ray)
� Optimize vessel health and reduce liability
� Mitigate risks of post-insertion complications
� Improved patient safety and satisfaction with vascular access
device use
� Follow a business model� Identify champions in your healthcare facility
� Educate your team and key influencers
� Initiate performance improvement
� Measure the outcomes…drive change!
29
Net Impact of Precise Tip Location
• Reduce complications associated with
catheter malposition
• Reduce liability from terminal tip
complications
• Establish tip in optimum high flow area-CAJ
• Promote patient safety
• Cost-effective healthcare
30
10/2/2013
11
Our Call to Action
• First, Do No HARM
• The Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ every time
31
Why the Lower 1/3 SVC-CAJ?-
32
ReferencesSchummer, et al. Central venous catheters—the inability of ‘intra-atrial ECG’
to prove adequate positioning. British Journal of Anesthesia 93 (2): 193-8 (2004).
Cadman, A, Lawrance, JL, Fitzsimmons, L, Spencer-Shaw A and Swindell R
(2004). To clot or not to clot? That is the question in central venous
catheters. Clinical Radiology, 59: 349-355
Lozano,A,Mann,C,Goodman,L. (2012). Power Injectable Peripherally
Inserted Central Venous Catheter Lines Frequently Flip After Power
Injection of Contrast. J Comp Assist-Tomogr 2012 Jul;36(4);427-30
Gravenstein N, Blackshear RH. In vitro evaluation of relative perforating
potential of central venous catheters:comparison of materials, selected
models, number of lumens, and angles of incidence to simulated
membrane. J ClinMonit. 1991 Jan;7(1):1-6.
33
10/2/2013
12
References•
• Embolic Strokes After Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement
Annals of Vascular Surgery, Volume 24, Issue 8, November 2010, Pages 1133.e1-1133.e4
Nitin Garg, Amit Noheria, Ian R. McPhail, Joseph J. Ricotta II
Charles S. Langston
The Aberrant Central Venous Catheter and Its Complications Radiology July 1971 100:1 55-59; doi:10.1148/100.1.55
•
1 Blaivias M. Video analysis of accidental arterial cannulation with dynamic ultrasound guidance for central
venous access. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28:1239–1244.
• Kusminsky RE. Complications of Central Venous Catheterization. J Am Coll Surg 2007;204:4,681-696.
3 Petrus LV, Lois JF, Lo WWM. Iatrogenically induced cortical blindness associated with leptomeningeal
enhancement. Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1522–1524.
Garg N, Noheria A, McPhai IRl, Ricotta JJ. Embolic strokes after peripherally inserted central catheter placement. Ann
Vasc Surg 2010; 24: 1133.e1-1133.e4.Parikh S, Narayanan V. Misplaced peripherally inserted central catheter: an unusual cause of stroke. Pediatr Neurol
2004;30:210-212.
Hung HL, Chao KY, Tseng LM, Hung FM, Lee TY. Arterial misplacement of a femoral central venous catheter
complicated with acute arterial occlusion. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:3:138-141.
34
Thank you for your time and attention
35
Vascular Academy is a trademark of Teleflex Incorporated and its Affiliates. (c)2012 Teleflex Incorporated. All rights reserved. 2012-1360