Upload
barclay-simpson
View
20
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Defining the Research Problem. The Marketing Research Process. Figure 1.4 The Marketing Research Process. Step 1: Defining the Problem (research objectives). Step 2: Planning the Research Design. Step 3: Planning a Sample. Step 4: Doing Field Work. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Defining the Research Defining the Research ProblemProblem
The Marketing Research ProcessThe Marketing Research Process
Step 1: Defining the Problem (research objectives)
Step 2: Planning the Research Design
Step 3: Planning a Sample
Step 4: Doing Field Work
Step 5: Preparing and Analyzing Data
Step 6: Preparing and Presenting the Report
Problemdiscovery
Problem definition(statement of
research objectives)
Secondary(historical)
data
Experiencesurvey
Pilotstudy
Casestudy
Selection ofexploratory research
technique
Selection ofbasic research
method
Experiment SurveyObservation Secondary
Data StudyLaboratory Field Interview Questionnaire
Selection ofexploratory research
techniqueSampling
Probability Nonprobability
Collection ofdata
(fieldwork)
Editing andcodingdata
Dataprocessing
Interpretationof
findings
Report
DataGathering
Data Processingand Analysis
Conclusionsand Report
Research Design
Problem Discoveryand Definition
What Does “Problem” Mean?
•The terms “problem” or “deliverables” can mean– something has gone wrong– clarification of the situation– defining an opportunity– monitoring & evaluating operations
•Ultimately, they mean the objectives of the research
The Problem Definition Stage
Tasks Involved
Qualitative Research
Discussions with Decision Makers
Interviews withExperts
Secondary DataAnalysis
Environmental Context of the Problem
Step 1: Problem Definition
Management Decision Problem
Marketing Research Problem
ResearchQuestions and Hypotheses
Analytical Framework and Models
Specification of
Information Needed
Beware the Iceberg!
•The Iceberg Principle– The dangerous part of many marketing problems is
neither visible to nor understood by many marketing managers.
– “Submerged” parts of the problem must be understood and including in the research design for the research to be useful.
Symptoms vs. Problems
•Microbrewery•Symptom
– Consumers prefer the taste of competitor’s brand
•PD based on the Symptom– What type of reformulated taste is needed?
•True Problem– Old-fashioned package influenced taste perception
Symptoms vs. Problems
• Manufacturer of palm-size computers with Internet access
• Symptom– Distributors complain prices are too high
• PD based on the Symptom– Investigate business users to learn how much prices need
to be reduced
• True Problem– Distributors do not have adequate product knowledge to
communicate product’s value
Management Decision Problems vs.
Marketing Research Problems
• Management Decision Problems– Ask what the decision
maker needs to do
– Action oriented
– Focus on symptoms
• Marketing Research Problems– Ask what information is
needed and how it should be obtained
– Information oriented– Focus on the underlying
causes
Translating Management Problems into Research Problems
(Questions)
• Management Problem– Determine the best ways the firm can communicate with
potential purchasers of laptop computers
• Research Questions– How familiar are consumers with the various brands of
computers?– What attitudes do consumers have toward these brands?– How important are the various factors for evaluating the
purchase of a laptop computer?– How effective are the communications efforts of the various
competitive marketers in terms of message recognition?
“Bad” vs. “Good” Research Questions
•Research questions should be stated as clearly as possible
•“Bad” research question– Is advertising copy X better than advertising copy Y?
•“Good” research question– Which advertising copy has a higher day-after recall
score?
Components of the Marketing
Research Problem
ResearchQuestions
Hypotheses
Analytical Framework
andModels
Development of Research Questions & Hypothesis
Theories
• Formal, logical explanations of events
• Include descriptions of how things relate to one another (this is the “framework”)
• Built through a process of• Reviewing previous findings of similar situations• Simple logical deduction• Knowledge of applicable theoretical areas
Theories
• Web designer wants to determine what color is best to use for page backgrounds– Consult prior studies that examined the effects of
color on package design and retail store design– Perhaps also look at theories that explain retail
atmospherics– This would allow logical deductions of how color
interacts with atmospherics to improve retail sales
Hypotheses• A formal, unproven proposition (prediction)
about the empirical (real) world.• Hypotheses state the relationships defined
by the theory• Through empirical testing, we can
– Reject the hypothesis: the data proved to be inconsistent with the hypothesis
– Fail to Reject the hypothesis: the data proved to be consistent with the hypothesis
• Never accept an hypothesis … you simply may not yet have discovered enough evidence to reject it.
How They Fit Together
• Management Question– What retail price should we charge for our new iPad?
• Research Objective– Forecast sales of the new iPad at 3 different price levels.
• Hypotheses1)Sales will be higher at $599 than at $499.
2)Sales will be higher at $699 than at $499.
3)Sales will be higher at $599 than at $699.