Defense Research & EngineeringDefense Research & EngineeringDefense Research & EngineeringDefense Research & Engineering

Dr. Ron Sega Director of Defense Research and Engineering

Director, Defense Research & Engineering (DDR&E) is

the principal staff assistant and advisor to the Under

Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and

Logistics (USD(AT&L)) and the Secretary and Deputy

Secretary of Defense for research and engineering

matters. Research and engineering includes Science

and Technology programs (consisting of Basic and

Applied Research, and Advanced Technology

Development), and Advanced Component

Development and Prototypes programs.

Charter

The Chief Technology Officer forthe Department of Defense

Director, Defense Research & Engineering

Dr. Ronald M. Sega

DDR&E Organization

DUSD, Science & Technology

Dr. Charles J. Holland

Director, Plans & Programs

Mr. Alan R. Shaffer

DUSD, Laboratories and Basic Sciences

Dr. Bill Berry (Acting)

Dir, Defense AdvancedResearch Projects Agency

Dr. Anthony Tether

DUSD, AdvancedSystems & Concepts

Ms. Sue Payton

Defense Technical Information Center

Mr. Kurt Molholm

Deputy Director, Defense Research and Engineering

Ms. Sue Payton (Acting)

Priorities

• Integrate DoD Science and Technology and Focus on Transformation

• Enhance Technology Transition • Expand Outreach to Combatant Commands and Intelligence

Community

• Accelerate Support to the War on Terrorism

• Address National Security Science and Engineering Workforce

Year

EstimatedTotal

Bill

ion

s o

f 87

$

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 20001970196519601955

U.S. Gov. – DoD

U.S. Commercial

DoD

E.U. and Japan

Projected

Source: Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on the Technology Capabilities of Non-DoD Providers; June 2000; Data provided by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development & National Science Foundation

U.S. and WorldwideResearch Base Since WWII

BA5 System Development & Demonstration ($19.3B)

BA4 Advanced Component Development & Prototypes ($15.3B)

BA3 Advanced Technology Development ($5.3B)BA2 Applied Research ($3.8B)

BA1 Basic Research ($1.3B)

Technology Base(BA1 + 2) = $5.1B)

Science and Technology(6.1 + 6.2 + BA3 = $10.5B)

FY05 RDT&E = $68.9B requested

(Budget Activity 1-7)

15% of RDT&E

BA6 RDT&E Management Support ($3.3B)

BA7 Operational Systems Development ($20.5.B)

Development(BA4 + BA5 = $34.5B)

(BA6 + BA7 = $23.7B)

($B)

FY05 RDT&E Budget Request

Knowledge

SpeedAgility

Lethality

Transformation Attributes

Transformation Technology Initiatives:• National Aerospace Initiative• Surveillance and Knowledge Systems• Energy and Power Technologies

Transformation Technology Initiatives

Long RangeStrike

Cruise

Space Access

Time C

ritical T

arget

SEAD

Boost/Ascent

Anti-accessTheater of Operation

Value of Speed

Cruise

Missile Defense

NPR

Reconnaissance

National Aerospace Initiative-- Technology Framework --

NAI

Space Access

Expendable(Missiles)

Reusable[Mach 0 - 12]

Reusable Launch Vehicle

Long-RangeStrike

[Mach 0-7]

Air-Breathing 1st Stage (TSTO)

[Mach 0 - 12]

4<Mach<15

Mach<4

2nd Stage Rocket Engine

FlexibleComm

ISR

• Strategic Focus• Technical Coordination• Aerospace Workforce

TCT/NPRDoD/NASA

Space Commission

Synergy Goal: 1 + 1 + 1 > 3

Space Technology

High Speed Hypersonics

ResponsivePayloads

Space Maneuvering

Vehicle

Space Control

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 20200

5

25

Mac

h N

um

ber

10

15

F-4

SR-71

F-15 F-16 F-22

Hydrocarbon Scramjet Mach 4-7

Production

NAIRamjet

Mach 3-4

High Speed TurbineMach 2-4

X-15

Concorde

XB-70

B-2F-117

Hydrogen ScramjetMach 8-15

Missiles

Strike Aircraft

Space AccessX-Vehicles

National Aerospace Initiative

Hypersonic Component Technology Development and Ground Demonstrations

NAIHypersonic System Technology Development and Flight Demonstrations

Test/Demonstrator RoadmapHigh Speed/Hypersonics and Space Access

M7 M10

M4 M6+

M3M4

M6.5 M6.5

M10 M12

M5-7NASA/USAF

SLV CAV HCV

M0-4 M0-7

M12 M15

M3+P/L P/L

Expendable Systems

Reusable Systems

X-43D Flight Demo

Reusable Combined Cycle Flight Demo

2015

RATTLRS

2009 2010 2011 20122007 2008

NAVY / USAF

HyFly

2013

NASA

DARPA / NAVY

20142003 2004 2005 2006

Hyper-X X-43A

Single Engine Demo

X-43C

FALCON

RASCAL MPVRASCAL ERV DARPA

Ground Demo

Flight Demo

DARPA / USAF

NASA/DARPA/USAF

NASA/USAF

DARPA/USAF

ARMYHypersonic Intercept Weapon

2002

• Sensing: Management and tasking of pervasive, persistent sensors for enhancing battlespace knowledge

• Comms & Networking: Guaranteed, 365x24x7, mobile, information access and delivery (always-on “internet dial tone”)

• Knowledge Management:Dramatically improved speed of command through integrated Common Picture, Collaboration, and Planning

• Information Security (Cyber Ops):Network protection, information assurance; offensive disruption

Surveillance and Knowledge Systems (SKS) Initiative

Information and Decision Dominance achieved through integrated C4ISR technologies that enable seamless, interoperable, knowledge-based, and assured

Joint & Coalition Network-Centric Operations & Warfare.

Surveillance and Knowledge Systems- Enabling Integrated C4ISR -

Decision

s

Data

Information

Knowledge

Understanding

Wisdom

CP1

…

…

…

Sensing

“Common” Pictures

Networks

Warfighters

Collab. & Planning

Collab. & Planning

Collab. & Planning

CP2 CP3 CPn

Collab. & Planning

CivilNGO

Coalition

Sensing

Networks

Warfighters/Decisionmakers

Collaboration & PlanningT

aski

ng

JCS ServicesCoComs

IC

Operational history, Cultural

factors, Surveillance

history

Predictive Battlespace Awareness

Virtual “Common” PicturesIntegration, Abstraction, Display

• Adaptive Networks• Ubiquitous Sensors• Decision Aids

FY02 FY12

Power Nee

ds

Energy and Power Technologies-- Enabling an Electric Force --

POWERGENERATION

• Fuel Cells & Fuel Reforming

• Novel Power

ENERGY STORAGE

• Batteries• Capacitors

POWER MANAGEMENT& CONTROL

• Switching & Conditioning

• Power Transmission & Distribution

• Thermal Management

FUEL CELL

New Operational New Operational CapabilitiesCapabilities

Electric Warship

Warrior

High Power Microwave

Space Based Radar

Hybrid/Electric Combat Vehicle

Electric/Hybrid Weapons

More Electric Aircraft

Electric Warship

Sec Min Hrs Days Month Years

1 G

10 M

100K

1K

10

0.1

0.001

Mission Length

Po

wer

, W

atts

DoD Focus

Commercial Focus

X Directed Energy Weapons

X Ship DDX (Destroyer)

X Future Combat System, Mobility

X Cameras

X Satellites

X Warrior

X Cars

X Watches

X Laptops

X Home

X Tools

X Cell Phones

Energy and Power Technologies

Pre-Systems Acquisition

Systems Acquisition (Engineering Development, Demonstration, LRIP & Production)

Initial Product/Initial Product/Process CapabilityProcess Capability

Product/ProcessProduct/ProcessDevelopmentDevelopment

Product/Process Product/Process InsertionInsertion

Product/Process Product/Process Improvement & SustainmentImprovement & Sustainment

Sustainment & Maintenance

IOCConcept & Tech Development

System Development & Demonstration

Production & Deployment

SupportA B C

DDR&E Transition Programs Across Acquisition Life Cycle

Title III of the Defense Production Act

Manufacturing Technology - ManTech

Dual Use Science & Technology - DUS&T

Independent Research & Development

Foreign Comparative Testing

ACTDs

Defense Acquisition Challenge FY03

Tech Transition Initiative

Tech Link

Joint Warfighting Program (JWP)

Quick Reaction Special Projects - QRSP

Combating Terrorism Technology Task Force (CTTTF)

• Director, Defense Research & Engineering initiated;– Membership included technology senior executives

• Services and Defense Agencies• Other national security agencies

• Duration: Phase 1: September 2001 to February 2002 – Operation ENDURING FREEDOM Phase 2: May 2002 to May 2003 – Operation IRAQI FREEDOM Phase 3: June 2003 to present – Force Protection & Counter-Insurgency

• Objective: – Rapidly identify, prioritize, integrate and deliver DoD technology to help fight the global war on terrorism– Purpose: Develop an integrated DoD plan for using technology to contribute to the Global War on

Terrorism

Producing Scientists and EngineersEngineering PhD’s

Produced in US Universities

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

5,500

6,000

6,500

7,000

1992 15-Jun 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001

# of

Eng

inee

r PhD

s

US Citizens Only

All Students

Trends

• International Science and Technology

• Asymmetric Threats

• Intellectual Capital Advantage of the US

• Defense Industry Options

• Defense Industry S&T