15
Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines: human rights perspec6ves on dichotomy, iden6ty and consent Marc Titus D. Cebreros LLM Human Rights Queen Mary University of London

Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Presentation at Essex University 8th Human Rights in Asia Conference

Citation preview

Page 1: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

DefendingindigenouslandrightsinthePhilippines:humanrights

perspec6vesondichotomy,iden6tyandconsent

MarcTitusD.CebrerosLLMHumanRights

QueenMaryUniversityofLondon

Page 2: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

Outline“Affirmingthat

indigenouspeoplesareequaltoallother

peoples,whilerecognizingtherightofallpeoplestobe

different,toconsiderthemselvesdifferent,

andtoberespectedassuch…”

-Preamble,UNDRIP

•  Context—legal,historical,social

•  Storiesofconflictandresistance•  Dichotomy•  Consent•  IdenFty

•  Prospectsforindigenouspeoplesrights

Page 3: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

Social,legalandhistoricalcontext

•  Indigeneityas“contextratherthan[legal]abstracFon”(Anaya)– complexofchronological,relaFonal,subjecFveandnormaFvefactors(ImaiandGunn)

–  idealizedas“specialconnecFontoland”

Page 4: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

Social,legalandhistoricalcontext

Factor Examples

Chronological •  Pre-HispaniccommuniFes•  SpanishreduccionandlandFtling(MauraLaw)policy•  AmericanreservaFonpolicy(s.2145,AdministraFveCode1917)

RelaFonal •  “uplanders”/“mountaintribes”/“pacified”tribes•  “non-ChrisFan”asdegreeofcivilizaFon(Rubiv.ProvincialBoard,

1919)•  Ethno-linguisFcgroups

SubjecFve

•  PANAMINandthediscoveryofstoneage“Tasaday”(1971)•  “Northern”and“southern”culturalcommuniFes•  Katutuboortheconceptofindigeneity

NormaFve •  NaFveFtle(Carinov.InsularGovernment,1909)cf.juraregalia(RegalianDoctrine)

•  ConsFtuFonalrecogniFon•  IndigenousPeoplesRightsAct1997•  MiningAct,EIASystemDecree&RegulaFons,LocalGovernment

Code

Page 5: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

DichotomiesState MNEs IndigenousPeoples

StatusunderinternaFonallaw

Sovereign,directsubject Non-sovereign,towardsbecomingdirectsubjects(privaFzaFonofsovereignfuncFons

Non-sovereign,indirectobject

LandrightsunderconsFtuFonallaw

Sovereignownership(publicdomain)

Contractualpossessor(publicdomain,privatelands)

Privateownership(ancestraldomainsandlands)

Sub-surfacerightsindomesFclaw

Sovereignownership(mineralsandothernaturalresources)

Servicecontracts(“withsafeguards”)forlarge-scaleexploraFon,developmentanduFlizaFonprojects

Priorityrights,Free,priorandinformedconsent(FPIC)procedure

RegulatoryrelaFonshipwithlocalgovernments

PresidenFalsupervision/subordinatelegislaFvepower/judicialreview

SubjecttolocalconsultaFon,endorsementandapproval

ParFcipaFonandrepresentaFonrights,VerFcalintegraFonofdevelopmentplans

Page 6: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

TampakanMiningProjectSitesofconflict Indigenouspeoplesresponses

•  NaFonalgovernment•  SupremeCourt•  DepartmentofEnvironmentandNaturalResources•  NaFonalCommissiononIndigenousPeoples•  Securitysector

•  LiFgatedconsFtuFonalityofFTAA•  CampaignedagainstEIA•  DenouncedNCIPbiases•  ProtestedmilitarizaFonandhamletpolicy•  ComplaintfiledwithNHRI•  ResortedtoUNmechanisms

•  Localgovernment•  ProvincialgovernmentofCotabato•  AffectedmunicipaliFes

•  Supportedenvironmentalcode

•  Projectproponent •  RangesfromcollaboraFontopassivetoacFve/armedresistance

•  Civilsociety•  Pro-mining•  AnF-mining•  Fence-sieers

•  PartneredwithR.C.C.,localandnaFonalNGOs,internaFonalsolidaritynetwork

•  Internal •  StrengtheningofindigenouspoliFcalandgovernancestructure

•  Humanrights-basedapproachcapacitybuilding•  ConflictresoluFonstrategies

Page 7: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

TampakanMiningProject

Page 8: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

ConsentState IndigenousPeoples

NatureofconsentobligaFonunderinternaFonallaw

LimitedrecogniFon,merelyprocedural(“akintobutlessthanconsent/veto”)

NatureofconsentunderdomesFclaw

Vague:•  Const.–notaveto•  Regulatory–a

bureaucraFcrequirement(potenFalveto)

•  LimitedunderstandingofnatureofFPIC

•  Consentalwaysgiven

•  QuesFonablequalityofprocesses

Scopeofconsentrequirement

Land(entry,possession,exploraFon,developmentetc.)butnotsub-surfacemineralsandother

naturalresources

Validityofconsentgiven

Irrevocableoncegiven,butrequiredateverystageintheprojectlifecycle

Page 9: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

APECOProject

•  AuroraSpecialEconomicZoneAct(2007)andamendatorylaw(2010)passedwithoutFPICofaffectedDumagatcommuniFes

“States shall consult and cooperate in good faith with the indigenous peoplesconcerned through their own representaFve insFtuFons in order to obtain theirfree,priorand informedconsentbeforeadopFngand implemenFnglegislaFveoradministraFve measures that may affect them.” - ArFcle 19, UNDRIP

Page 10: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

APECOProject

Page 11: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

IdenFtyInterna6onalLaw Na6onalLaw

“IndigenouspeoplesandindividualshavetherighttobelongtoanindigenouscommunityornaFon,inaccordancewiththetradiFonsandcustomsofthecommunityornaFonconcerned.”–ArFcle9,IPRA

“…agroupofpeopleorhomogenoussocieFesidenFfiedbyself-ascripFonandascripFonbyothers,whohaveconFnuouslylivedasorganizedcommunityoncommunallyboundedanddefinedterritory,andwhohave,underclaimsofownershipsinceFmeimmemorial,occupied,possessedanduFlizedsuchterritories,sharingcommonbondsoflanguage,customs,tradiFonsandotherdisFncFveculturaltraits,orwhohave,throughresistancetopoliFcal,socialandculturalinroadsofcolonizaFon,non-indigenousreligionsandcultures,becamehistoricallydifferenFatedfromthemajorityofFilipinos.ICCs/IPsshalllikewiseincludepeopleswhoareregardedasindigenousonaccountoftheirdescentfromthepopulaFonswhichinhabitedthecountry,attheFmeofconquestorcolonizaFon,orattheFmeofinroadsofnon-indigenousreligionsandcultures,ortheestablishmentofpresentstateboundaries,whoretainsomeoralloftheirownsocial,economic,culturalandpoliFcalinsFtuFons,butwhomayhavebeendisplacedfromtheirtradiFonaldomainsorwhomayhavereseeledoutsidetheirancestraldomains;”

-SecFon3(h),IPRA

Page 12: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

OceanaGoldProject

•  In2008,Australian-ledminingcompany,OceanaGoldPhilippinesInc.,forciblyandviolentlyevicted,withpoliceassistance,thousandsofIfugaowhohaveseeledwithintheFTAAareainthe1950saoerfleeingtheirformerhomelandwhichhadbeensubmergedbytheAmbuklaoDamproject.

Page 13: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

OceanaGoldProject

“FTAAgrantsuntoitsholdertheState’sblessingstoundertakeminingandotherextracFveventures…itisnotacarteblancheforthewholesaledenigraFonoftherightsofpeoplewhostandtobeaffectedbysaidundertakings.”

-InRe:DisplacementofResidentsofKasibuNuevaViscaya,CHRH-2008-0055

Page 14: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

Quovadis?

•  Uneven–andooendeadly–playingfieldbetweenMNEsandindigenouscommuniFes.

•  Free,priorandinformedconsentinherentlyvagueandmalleable.

•  IndigenousidenFty:bloodorexperience?

Page 15: Defending indigenous land rights in the Philippines

[email protected]/07401601874

”If,inatacitway,itwasassumedthatthewildtribesofthePhilippinesweretobedealtwithasthepowerandinclinaFonoftheconquerormightdictate,CongresshasnotyetsancFonedthesamecourseastheproperone‘forthebenefitoftheinhabitantsthereof.’”

-JusFceOliverWendellHolmes,Jr.,Carinovs.InsularGovernment