Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    1/35

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTMIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

    FORT MYERS DIVISION

    JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE, Plaintiffs,

    versus Case # 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP

    CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON,

    Defendants.

    INDEPENDENT ACTION

    FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION

    ____________________________________________________________________________/

    EMERGENCY MOTION TO ENJOIN DEF. DISTRICT CLERK KIM ARNETT FROM

    OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, CONCEALING RECORD LACK OF WRIT OFEXECUTION

    AND COERCING PLAINTIFFS TO REFRAIN FROM PROSECUTION

    PUBLISHED RECORD CONCLUSIVE PUBLIC CORRUPTION & PERJURY PROOF

    NOTICE OF FAKE writ,lien and FAKE 07/29/2009 judgment, CH. 55, FLA. STAT.,

    AND FACIALLY FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5

    DEF. KIM ARNETT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE & CONCEALED FAUDULENT WRIT

    1. Defendant U.S. District Court Clerk Kim Arnett is the custodian of the records of said U.S.

    Court in Fort Myers, Florida.

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    2/35

    2

    2. Diligent search of designated records revealed no record or entry of a fraudulently pretended

    writ of execution and lien, Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    3. Examination of Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 evidenced that it was null and void.

    4. Here repeatedly, Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Dr. Jorg Busse had demanded certification and/or

    authentication of the lack of record(s) on the publicly recorded Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-

    00228.

    5. Fed.R.Civ.P. 44 states:

    (b) Lack of Record.

    A written statement that a diligent search of designated records revealed no record or

    entry of a specified tenor is admissible as evidence that the records contain no suchrecord or entry. For domestic records, the statement must be authenticated under Rule44(a)(1). For foreign records, the statement must comply with (a)(2)(C)(ii).

    6. Fed.R.Civ.P. 44(a)(1) states:

    Each of the following evidences an official record or an entry in it that isotherwise admissible and is kept within the United States, any state, district, orcommonwealth, or any territory subject to the administrative or judicial jurisdiction ofthe United States:(A) an official publication of the record; or(B) a copy attested by the officer with legal custody of the record or by the officer'sdeputy and accompanied by a certificate that the officer has custody. The certificatemust be made under seal:(i) by a judge of a court of record in the district or political subdivision where therecord is kept; or(ii) by any public officer with a seal of office and with official duties in the district orpolitical subdivision where the record is kept.

    7. Repeatedly, said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record

    absence of any writ of execution on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    8. Said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record absence of

    any 07/29/2010 judgment on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    3/35

    3

    9. Said Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett refused to certify and/orauthenticate the record absence of

    any judgment received by this Court on or around July 29, 2009, from any other Court

    pursuant to the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    10. Said Defendants refusals were witnessed in said Clerks Office by Defendant U.S. Marshall

    Richard Jessup, District Court staff member and/or employee Donald Johnson and Jack Primm

    on Wednesday, July 14, 2010.

    11. Furthermore, Defendant Kim Arnett unlawfully refused to file Plaintiffs Notice of Appeal in

    Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

    12. Said Defendant Arnett obstructed and conspired with Defendant Judge C. E. Honeywell to

    obstruct Plaintiffs court access without anyjustification and authority.

    13. As witnessed, said Defendant conceded and stated that she had agreed not to authenticate and

    certify the evident lack of records at the direction of Defendant Judge Charlene E. Honeywell.

    14. Said Def. Clerk Clerk Kim Arnett refused to make available the minutes and/or transcript of

    the Hearing before Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell in Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

    DEFENDANT COURT REPORTED JOY STANCEL

    15. Def. Court Reporter Joy Stancel refused to make available the minutes and/or transcript of the

    Hearing before Defendant corrupt Judge Honeywell in Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791.

    EMERGENCY OF CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL RECORD PERJURY

    16. Defendant Crooked Judge Charlene E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and agreed to

    conceal that Defendant JACK N. PETERSON had perjured himself, Doc. # 432-2, Case No.

    2:2007-cv-00228:

    KENNETH M. WILKINSON, as Property Appraiser of Lee County, Florida, is theholder of a judgment issued by the United States of Appeals in and for the EleventhCircuit on July 29, 2009 in Docket 08-13170-BB against Appellant JORG BUSSE inthe amount of $5,048.60.

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    4/35

    4

    Here, said Defendant Crooked Government Officials Honeywell, Wilkinson, and Peterson

    conspired with other Defendants, Judges, and Officials to fraudulently conceal the non-

    existent July 29, 2009 judgment and the non-existent lien. See Ch. 55, Florida

    Statutes.

    CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CLOSURE OF CASE # 08-13170-BB ON 06/11/2009

    17. Here, said Defendants conspired with other Defendants to fraudulently conceal that CASE

    NO. 2008-13170-BB had been CLOSED on June 11, 2009. See Appellate Docket on file.

    11th Circuit Record and Exhibits had been RETURNED to this Court on 06/11/2009.

    RECORD JUN 11 2009 BILL OF COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $24.30

    18. The facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009 and received by the U.S.

    District Court 2009 JUN 15 AM 11:20, Doc. # 365, was in the amount of$24.30, Doc. #

    386, 386-3, 365; BILL OF COSTS issued on JUN 11 2009; 11th CIRCUIT FORM MISC-

    12 (12/07).

    19. Here, Defendant Wilkinson had never claimedmore than $24.30, and therefore under the

    Rules, was neverentitledto morethan $24.30. See attached Fed. R. App. P. Here as a matter

    of record, Defendant Wilkinson and/or his Attorney had sworn and/or affirmed that the

    costs claimed were $24.30. See Doc. # 386-3; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    $24.30 WAS FINAL AMOUNT [FRAUDULENTLY ALLOWED]

    20. The Eleventh Circuit has held that the action becomes final on the date the district court

    receives the appellate court's mandate. See U.S. v. Lasteed, 832 F.2d 1240-43 (11th Cir. 1987).

    HONEYWELL CONCEALED DEFENDANTS CONCOCTION OF FAKE $5,048.60

    21. Here, Defendant Crooked Honeywell concealed and agreed to conceal that Defendants

    Peterson and Wilkinson had concocted an amount of $5,048.60. Plaintiff Government

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    5/35

    5

    corruption and crime victims sued Defendants KENNETH M. WILKINSON, JACK N.

    PETERSON, and CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL in theirprivate individual capacities.

    RECORD EXTORTION, PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD

    22. Under color of non-existent authority, Lee County, Florida, Defendants and Officials

    fabricated and conspired to fabricate fake land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and 07-

    44-21-01-00001.0000. See Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25 (1912).

    CONSPIRACY TO COVER UP & CONCEAL RECORD GOVERNMENT CRIMES

    23. In these State and Federal Cases since 2006, Defendant U.S. Judges idiotically conspired with

    other Officials to conceal the prima facie record forgeries of said non-existent land parcels.

    See, e.g., record Transcript of corrupted proceedings before Defendant judicial whore Sheri

    Polster Chappell in November 2007 on file; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    DEF. CROOK HONEYWELL CONSPIRED TO CONCEAL 2006 STATE ACTION

    24. Even though the State Court Judge himself was a Co-Defendant in this U.S. Court, Defendant

    Corrupt Judges John E. Steele and Sheri Polster Chappell fraudulently concealed Plaintiffs

    State Court action after said judicial Defendants themselves had removed Plaintiffs legal

    action from State to Federal Court. See Case No. 2:2008-cv-00899 (BUSSE v. STATE OF

    FLORIDA, Lee County Circuit Court; Def. Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.).

    FACIALLY FRAUDULENT 03/05/09 judgment and 06/11/09 mandate

    25. In its facially fraudulent judgment issued as mandate June 11 2009, said 11th

    Circuit

    fraudulently pretended and fabricated on the record, Doc. ## 365; 386:

    III. Since Busses takings claim was not ripe because he had notpursued available stateremedies and he failed to adequately plead his other federal claims Id.

    Here as a matter of fact and record, Busse and Prescott had pursued available state remedies

    in Lee County Circuit Court [removed to this Court: 2:2008-cv-00899], adequately pleadedall

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    6/35

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    7/35

    7

    30. Here, Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywell had admitted to having been served and

    disqualified herself. See Doc. # 3; 06/22/2010; Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390.

    31. Idiotically, the Court then reassigned the Case to Co-Defendant Crooked Judge John Edwin

    Steele. See Doc. # 4, 06/22/2010.

    32. Here, no notice of appearance was filed on behalf of said Defendant Corrupt Judge

    Honeywell. See Docket, Case No. 2:2010-cv-00390; 07/14/2009, 19:43:47.

    GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AGREED TO CONCEAL FORGED LAND PARCELS

    33. Judges, Defendants, and Officials knew and fraudulently concealed that said facially forged

    parcels had neverexistednor been legally described, conveyed, andplatted. See 1912 Plat

    of Survey of private undedicated Cayo Costa Subdivision, Lee County PB 3 PG 25.

    FRAUDULENT PRETENSES OF 07/292009 judgment

    34. Defendant crooked Officials Kenneth M. Wilkinson and Jack N. Peterson fraudulently

    pretended:

    11. A certified copy of the [07/29/09] judgment has been recorded in the PublicRecords of Lee County, Florida at Instrument No. 2009000309384 and serves as a lienagainst the property. See Doc. # 386, p. 3, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

    Here, the non-existentjudgmentdid notserveasany lien. See Ch. 55, Fla. Stat.

    35. Here, the Clerk of this U.S. District Court and custodian of said Courts records could not

    authenticate the fraudulently pretended 07/29/2009 judgment, because said Clerk never

    received any 07/29/2009 judgment. Here, the Docket, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, was

    devoid of any 07/29/09 judgment. See authenticated Docket on file.

    36. Here, Def. U.S. Judges, Government Officials, and the other Defendants knew and agreed to

    conceal that this Court had no power whatsoever to enforce a non-existentjudgment.

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    8/35

    8

    DEF. WILKINSON FORGED judgment, DOC. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2

    37. Defendant Crooked Official Kenneth M. Wilkinson had forged, e.g., land parcels, and maps.

    Here, Defendant Wilkinson perpetrated fraud on the Court and facially forged a judgment.

    See Doc. # 386-5, Page 2 of 2. The smaller font size of the page number 2 did not match

    font size 14 of the text. The facially forged judgment was not, and could not possibly have

    been, a true copy. See Exhibit below. The facially forged and pasted judgment copy did not

    comply with 55.10, Fla. Stat. E.g., said fake did not contain any address.

    38. In Doc. # 432, p. 3 of 7, Defendant Wilkinson had asserted:

    On February 2, 2010, the Clerk of this Court issued a Writ of Execution (D.E. 425).

    39. Here, said Clerk knew that no such judgment had ever been receivedfrom the Circuit Clerk

    and that no 07/29/2010 judgment appeared on the Docket, Case # 2:2007-cv-00228.

    HONEYWELL CONCEALED THAT FAKE WRIT WAS VOID & NEVER WITNESSED

    40. Here, Doc. # 425 Filed 02/02/10 materially misrepresented in the record absence of any

    identifiable judge:

    you cause to be made and levied as well a certain debt of:$Five thousand Forty-Eight AND Sixty Centsin the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, before the Judgeof the said Court by the consideration of the same Judge lately recovered against thesaid, Jorg Busse Witness the Honorable [United States Judge] ____ [blank]

    Here on its face, the fraudulent writ of execution did not identify any judge and was

    null and void. In particular, Witness the Honorable ___ was blank. See Doc. # 425.

    DEF. WILKINSON EXTORTED MONEY AND PROPERTY

    41. Defendant Wilkinson extorted fees and property by fraudulently pretending:

    4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule 27-4, requesting an order awarding attorneys fees in the amount of $5,000,double costs and such other relief as the Court deemed appropriate for defendantAppellants frivolous appeal. See Doc. # 432, p. 2.

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    9/35

    9

    Here, Def. Wilkinson again deceived the Court, because Jorg Busse had been the Plaintiff [and

    not the defendant] and Wilkinson had admittedly neverfiledany Rule 38 motion.

    42. Fed.R.App.P. 27-4 states:

    Repy to Response. Any reply to a response must be filed within 7 days after serviceof the response. A reply must not present matters that do not relate to the response.

    Here, Def. Wilkinsons pleading(s) and brief had been without legal meritand could not be

    supported by a reasonable argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law,

    or the establishment of new law. In addition, Def. Wilkinsons pleadings contained assertions

    of material facts that were patently clearly false and unsupported by the record, O.R.

    569/875 In particular, prima facie sham claim O.R. 569/875 was not any regulation,

    legislative act, resolution, or law and as a matter of law, could not have possibly divested

    the Plaintiffs of their property against Plaintiffs expressly stated will. Here, the Plaintiffs had

    defended their unimpeachable record title against any condemnation and refused to exchange

    their perfected title just because corrupt Government Officials, e.g., threatened, harassed,

    defrauded, and deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their fundamental rights to own

    property, exclude Government(s), redress their grievances of no due process and no equal

    protection, and have ajury trial.

    43. Here, no accountingwhatsoever, and none was ever provided as required, could have possibly

    explained and/orjustified the fraudulent amount of $5,048.60 under the Rules. Here,

    presenting or opposing Plaintiff(s) conclusive record evidence of Def. Wilkinsons fraud,

    extortion, corruption on the record did not, and could not,possibly have incurred 5,048.60

    according to the Rule.

    WILKINSON FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED REGULATORY TAKING

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    10/35

    10

    IN THE PRIMA FACIE RECORD ABSENCE OF ANYREGULATION:

    HOW FRIVOLOUS WAS THAT?

    44. Therefore here, Defendant Wilkinsons assertion of a regulatory taking was on its face

    frivolous, deceptive, and fraudulent. Furthermore, Defendant Wilkinson presented his

    pleadings and brief for the improper and illegal purposes of, e.g., extorting fees and property

    from the Plaintiff public corruption victims, coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from further

    prosecution, fraudulentlyconcealingforged land parcels 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0 and

    07-44-21-01-00001.0000, extending and conspiringto extend extortion and fraud scheme

    O.R. 569/875, obstructing justice and just speedy adjudication of Plaintiffs claims for

    relief, harassing the Plaintiffs, and causing unnecessary delayand needless increase in the

    cost of litigation since 2006 in State and Federal Courts over one single piece of trash paper:

    facially null and void O.R. 569/875.

    45. Therefore here admittedly, Defendant Wilkinson had neverfiledany Rule 38 motion, never

    allegeda frivolous appeal, and neverdemanded any Rule 38 relief.

    UPDATED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

    46. Plaintiff public corruption victims filed another updated Criminal Complaint in this matter

    with State and Federal law enforcement.

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

    1. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the

    record lack of any writ of execution and lien on the Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-

    00228;

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    11/35

    11

    2. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the

    record lackof any judgment received by this Court on or around July 29, 2010, on the

    Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;

    3. An EMERGENCY Order directing the Clerk of Court to certify and authenticate the

    record lackof any judgment [which could have become a lien] by this Court on or around

    July 29, 2010, on the Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;

    4. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with

    Defendant Richard Jessup to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of fake writ, Doc.

    # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;

    5. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with

    Defendant C. E. Honeywell to conceal the prima facie nullity and illegality of fake writ,

    Doc. # 425, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228;

    6. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett from conspiring with

    Defendant Court Reporter Joy Stancel to conceal the minutes of the hearing before Def. C. E.

    Honeywell, Case No. 2:2009-cv-00791;

    7. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Defendant Crooked Judge Honeywells record

    EXTORTION and CORRUPTION under color of authority and prima facie scam O.R.

    569/875, said fake lien, fake 07/29/09 judgment, and fake writ of execution, 55.10,

    Ch. 55, 56, Fla. Stat.;

    8. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining said record judicial EXTORTION and

    CORRUPTION under color of non-existent O.R. 569/875, resolution 569/875, and

    fraudulent regulatory taking pretenses, because as a matter of law, no law or resolution,

    whatsoever, could havepossiblyalienatedPlaintiffs record property against their will;

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    12/35

    12

    9. An EMERGENCY Orderenjoining said record EXTORTION and CORRUPTION and

    embarrassingly idiotic Governmental and judicial hoax of a lien and public land claim

    [see, e.g., Doc. ## 213; 214; 212, Case No. 2:09-cv-00791; and Case No. 2:07-cv-00228, Doc.

    ## 288, 282, 425, 386, 365].

    10. An EMERGENCY Order enjoining Def. objectively partial/crooked Judge Honeywell,

    and Defendants Jack N. Peterson, and Kenneth M. Wilkinson from perverting the record &

    concealing Plaintiffs record ownership of Lot 15A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912);

    11. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent judgment, orders, and

    proceedings of record such as, e.g., Doc. ## 48, 49; and Doc. ## 210, 212, 213, 214, Case No.

    2:09-cv-00791 at the dirty hands of Def. judicial whore Honeywell for said well-proven

    reasons;

    12. An EMERGENCY orderrelieving the Plaintiffs from the fraudulent concealment of their

    State action, 2006-CA-003185, Lee County Circuit Court, BUSSE v. STATE OF FLORIDA;

    13. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

    not fabricate a lien and did not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs record ownership of said Lot

    15A, Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A as evidenced in Plaintiffs Complaint and pleadings;

    14. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

    not fraudulently conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel #

    12-44-20-01-00015.015A as affirmed by the public record;

    15. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

    not maliciously pervert the dispositive affirmation of Plaintiffs record ownership by the U.S.

    Court of Appeals for the 11th

    Circuit, Prescott, et al., v. State of Florida, et al., 343 Fed.

    Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Cir. Apr. 21, 2009);

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    13/35

    13

    16. An Ordercompelling Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why she did

    not capriciously conceal Plaintiffs unimpeachable record ownership of said Lot 15A, Parcel #

    12-44-20-01-00015.015A, which the Defendants Lee County had asserted before the 11th

    Circuit U.S. Appellate Court, Appeal # 08-13170, BUSSE v. LEE COUNTY;

    17. An Ordercompelling Defendant Honeywell to SHOW CAUSE why her rulings were not

    NULL AND VOID and procured through the criminal scheme of false frivolity and

    vexatiousness pretenses and the concealment of said fake legal descriptions, fake land

    parcels, and fake Government ownership claims and contentions;

    18. An EMERGENCY Order recusing Defendant crooked Judge Honeywell, because she

    disrespected the law, disrupted the proceedings in favor of the Defendants, perverted the facts

    of record, and could not possibly be trusted to be impartial and fair, 28 U.S.C. 455; 28

    U.S.C. 144.

    /S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT

    Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff,pro seP.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295____________________________________/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.

    Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff,pro seState Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor;[email protected]

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    14/35

    14

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    15/35

    15

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    16/35

    16

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    17/35

    The World of Jimmy Star Publications Inc.1940 E Sunrise Blvd

    Fort Lauderdale FL 33304

    +1 954.828.9979 Call [email protected]

    www.wojspubs.com

    CONTACT: Jimmy Star, +1 954.828.9979, [email protected]

    For Immediate ReleaseRe: Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) v. Gil Eriksen

    Properties LLC; Case No. 06-004169 (21)

    THERES A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN - GRAND JURY

    INVESTIGATION OF SOUTH FLORIDA CORRUPTION

    UNDERWAY

    Pompano Beach, FL, May 18, 2010 A long history of untold corruption in

    South Florida is starting to be exposed. The illegal taking of private property by

    the Pompano Beach Community Redevelopment Agency under the guise of

    'eminent domain' while not actually having the right of eminent domain to seize

    property, and the complicity of Broward County as a whole in the land grab scam

    that has irreparably damaged countless citizens and businesses for the nefarious

    profit of the rich and powerful is but one of the abuses of public office being

    revealed.

    There is a 'new sheriff in town' by way of an anti-corruption grand jury that

    has been convened to investigate South Florida's public officials. Governor Crist

    requested the Florida Supreme Court empanel the 12-month 19th Grand Jury on

    Public Corruption as in recent months FBI investigations have exposed an entire

    wave of criminality in the highest seats of South Florida government. Judge Victor

    Tobin is presiding over the grand jury and jurors have been chosen from multiple

    South Florida districts. Victims of corrupt officials are pleased at the prospect of a

    real investigation into the good ole boy (and girl) networks tied to big business and

    racketeering that have taken over government at the expense of the people.

    Recently a hand-appointed member of the Advisory Board to the Pompano

    Beach Community Redevelopment Agency, Vincente Thrower, was arrested forbribery and unlawful compensation for misusing his position and making deals

    with developers and money lenders. Thrower's appointment to that advisory board

    was made by current Commissioner and CRA member, Woodrow Poitier, who

    himself has also faced FBI investigation in his past position as chairman of the

    city's public housing agency who 'misused' one million dollars in federal funding

    meant for low-income housing programs. The Pompano Beach City Attorney

    1 of 2

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    18/35

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    19/35

    17

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    20/35

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    21/35

    19

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    22/35

    20

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    23/35

    21

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    24/35

    22

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    25/35

    23

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    26/35

    24

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    27/35

    25

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    28/35

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    29/35

    27

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    30/35

    28

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    31/35

    29

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    32/35

    30

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    33/35

    31

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    34/35

    32

  • 8/9/2019 Defendant Clerk Kim Arnett 1

    35/35