Upload
alexander-townsend
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DEFENCE OF ORAL FELLOWSHIP EXAMINATIONS. L. Pitmang
Department of Family Medicine
Jos University Teaching Hospital
INTRODUCTION
Part I & II are the same Timing is the only difference 30 minutes for part I 60 minutes for Part II Content Methodology
OBJECTIVES OF THE ORALS
To assess the candidate’s knowledge and skills in Family Medicine.
To assess the efficient use of resources in the management of patients.
To assess the candidate’s understanding of his role in health promotion and education.
To assess the candidate’s understanding of the impact of ill health on the family, and vice versa.
To assess his commitment to follow up and continuing care of his patients.
To assess his desire for continuing medical education in patient care.
To assess his attitude towards his patients and their family and the community at large.
To assess his practical knowledge of the organization and management of health services including administration in a hospital or clinic-based practice.
AREA OF ASSESSMENT Clinical skills
Use of resources
The patient as part of family and community
Continuing Medical Education
Admin/Organization of health services
CLINICAL SKILLS
Management of given clinical situation
Follow up and continuity of care
USE OF RESOURCES
Appropriate use of investigations
Rational prescribing and rational drug use
Use of hospital supplies
THE PATIENT AS A PART OF A FAMILY AND COMMUNITY
Psychosocial aspect of patient care
Home based care
Role in health promotion, disease prevention, treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation
CONTINUING MEDICAL EDUCATION
Use of library, Internet, medical informatics
Interest and commitment to research in Family Medicine
Ability to train others
ADMIN/ORGANIZATION OF HEALTH SERVICES
Personnel (human resources) management
Interaction with other members of the health team
Finances and budget
Procurement and supplies
Health management information systems
Setting up and running a health facility
DEFENSE OF DISSERTATION/CASEBOOK
Every dissertation/Casebook presented for the FMCFM Part II examination is read and assessed independently by two examiners.
GENERAL
1. Layout of the book:• Does the length (no. of pages)
conform to that recommended by the Faculty?
2. Use of English:• Clarity and style.• Spelling and grammar.• Sentence and paragraph structure.
INTRODUCTION
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
PRELIMINARY PAGESThese should be numbered with small Roman numeralsi. Title page: This should include the
author, the name and address of the training institution, and the name and qualification of the Medical Doctor.
ii. Preface and Acknowledgementiii. Dedication (if any).iv. Certification. Signed by the
Supervisor(s) and Medical Director or Director of Training to certify that the book is the author’s person work
i. Table of contentsii. List of tablesiii. List of Figuresiv. AppendicesSummary: The text proper begins. The
pages are numbered with ordinary numerals starting with page 1. The summary should be about 200 to 500 words, and should include the study objectives and main conclusions
TITLE
Is the subject relevant to Family Medicine in Nigeria?
Does the title fit what is presented in the entire dissertation?
INTRODUCTION
Has the subject of study been adequately introduced?
Have relevant terms/issues been adequately defined?
LITERATURE REVIEW
Adequacy & relevance of literature search.
Use of Nigerian & African literature.
Critical review of literature cited.
AIM & OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
Clarity.Feasibility with study design.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Compliance with approved synopsis
Appropriateness to meet stated objectives
Study population clearly defined.Determination of sample size.Sampling method, including
selection (inclusion and exclusion) criteria.
RESULTS
Style of presentation.Method of data analysis and
choice of statistical instrument.Appropriate use of Tables, Figures,
and Illustrations.
DISCUSSION
Correctness of interpretation of results.
Use of existing literature (Nigeria & International) to discuss the findings.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Are conclusions justified by the study?
Appropriateness of recommendations for Family Medicine in Nigeria
REFERENCES
Scope & Relevance.Vancouver style of referencing.Date since publication.Spot checks can be made on
some of the references.
TIPS/HINTS
Read wide
Do you work conscientiously
Be confident
Dress well
Avoid mannerism
CONCLUSION
Work hard
Pray hard and ask God for wisdom
Heaven help those who help themselves
REFERENCES
Residents Handbook, Faculty of Family Medicine, National Postgraduate Medical College of Nigeria pg 22 - 32