Click here to load reader
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Deepwater Horizon Response
April 30, 2010 – August 27, 2010
After Action Report/Improvement Plan
3/2/2011
Florida Division of Emergency Management
After Action Report/Improvement Plan: Deepwater Horizon Response
March 2, 2011
2
Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 4
Best Practices ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Issues and Challenges ........................................................................................................................... 7
Recommendations ................................................................................................................................ 7
Section 1: Detailed Response Timeline ................................................................................................. 8
Section 2: Best Practices .................................................................................................................... 12
Reconnaissance (RECON) .................................................................................................................... 12
Geospatial Assessment Tool for Operations and Response (GATOR) ................................................ 13
Boom Coordination Cell ...................................................................................................................... 14
Google Docs ........................................................................................................................................ 16
Branch Structure ................................................................................................................................. 16
Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) ..................................................................... 16
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) .................................................................... 17
BP and United States Coast Guard co‐location in the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) .. 18
Command Briefings ............................................................................................................................. 18
Business, Industry, and Economic Development ................................................................................ 18
Unified Sampling and Early Testing .................................................................................................... 18
State Management Teams (SMTs) ...................................................................................................... 19
Food Service Area ............................................................................................................................... 19
Volunteer Coordination ...................................................................................................................... 19
Meteorology ....................................................................................................................................... 20
Close Coordination of State Agencies ................................................................................................. 21
Outreach, the Florida Emergency Information Line (FEIL), and the Florida Oil Spill Information Line (FOSIL) ....................................................................................................................................... 25
Adjusting to Operational Needs.......................................................................................................... 26
Section 3: Issues and Challenges ........................................................................................................ 28
Unified Command Mobile (UC Mobile) .............................................................................................. 28
Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) ...................................................................................................... 29
National Contingency Plan (NCP) and Area Contingency Plan (ACP) ................................................. 29
Reimbursement for Government Claims ............................................................................................ 30
After Action Report/Improvement Plan: Deepwater Horizon Response
March 2, 2011
3
Local Integration into Operations ....................................................................................................... 30
Rumors and Outreach ......................................................................................................................... 30
Skimmers and Vessels of Opportunity (VOOs) ................................................................................... 31
Section 4: Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 32
1. Recommend broader incorporation of all federal response plans into the National Response Framework (NRF) and update the National Contingency Plan (NCP). ...................................... 32
2. Update the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) to reflect the updated NCP. ........................................................................................................................................... 32
3. Review and update the Area Contingency Plan (ACP). ............................................................. 32
4. Enhance the State Emergency Response Team (SERT) Air Branch. .......................................... 32
5. Integrate the State Watch Office (SWO) into Geospatial Assessment Tool for Operations and Response (GATOR). ................................................................................................................... 32
6. Develop reconnaissance (RECON) website on FloridaDisaster.Org. ......................................... 33
7. Expand training opportunities for all stakeholders and non‐traditional lead agencies. .......... 33
8. Review and develop best practices for sampling analysis and distribution. ............................ 33
Appendix A: List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................. 34
After Action Report/Improvement Plan: Deepwater Horizon Response
March 2, 2011
4
Executive Summary The purpose of this report is to provide information on response efforts during Deepwater Horizon Response. The Florida State Emergency Operation Center (SEOC) was activated for 120 days from April 30, 2010 to August 27, 2010. This report was initiated by the State Emergency Response Team (SERT) for its own review and analysis on the efficacy and efficiency of their performance during that time. It contains recommendations for improving upon operations and procedures for future activations.
The Deepwater Horizon offshore oil drilling platform experienced a major explosion in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20, 2010. Initial reports of oil release from the disaster site were limited to by‐products of the collapsed oil rig itself, but further examination revealed that the well blow‐out preventer was not functioning. Shortly after this discovery, BP confirmed that oil from the MC‐252 well site was entering the Gulf. Under the Oil Pollution Act (OPA) of 1990, BP was designated the responsible party, meaning that they would have the statutory obligation to fund all response efforts. President Barack Obama designated the United States Coast Guard (USCG) as the lead federal response agency.
Rescue crews try to extinguish the flames onboard the Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig Fire extinguishing, search and rescue, and skimming operations began the following day with off‐shore fire suppression vessels. Three attempts were made to shut‐down the well, all unsuccessful. The USCG was on scene assisting with response efforts, and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) began monitoring the response, the fire, and the oil release.
The Unified Command (UC) Mobile was established quickly in response to the spill to allow representatives from federal and state (Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida) emergency management and environmental partners to make consensus decisions regarding objectives, strategies, and plans for dealing with potential impacts of coastal shorelines from the oil spill. Florida sent a For