Upload
lephuc
View
233
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
123
English Teaching, Vol. 69, No. 4, Winter 2014
DOI: 10.15858/engtea.69.4.201412.123
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension
Yusun Kang*
(Korea University)
Younjee Huh
(Korea University)
Boram Moon
(Korea University)
Yeoeun Park
(Korea University)
Kang, Yusun, Huh, Younjee, Moon, Boram, & Park, Yeoeun. (2014). Decoding
skills vs. reading fluency in Korean high school EFL learners’ reading
comprehension. English Teaching, 69(4), 123-143.
Despite the general understanding of the prominent role of basic reading sub-skills,
such as decoding abilities and reading fluency, in the reading comprehension of
younger and proficient first and second language readers, little is known about the role
of these skills in older and less skilled readers in foreign language contexts. The present
study was designed to investigate how decoding skills and reading fluency relate to the
reading comprehension of such readers, and to identify the relative strengths between
the two. Two hundred twenty two Korean high school students participated, and their
performance on decoding, reading fluency, and reading comprehension tasks was
analyzed. The results showed that both decoding skills and reading fluency were
strongly correlated to reading comprehension. Moreover, between the two fundamental
reading sub-skills, decoding skills outperformed reading fluency in explaining reading
comprehension, making a unique contribution beyond the effects of reading fluency.
These findings suggest that a basic skill like word decoding still deserves instructional
attention even at the secondary schools in EFL contexts.
Key words: decoding skills, reading fluency, reading comprehension, Korean EFL
learners
*
Yusun Kang: First author; Younjee Huh, Boram Moon, Yeoeun Park: Co-authors
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
124 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
1. INTRODUCTION
Since the seventh National Curriculum, which highlighted the use of English as basic
interpersonal communicative skills (BICS), was enacted in 2001, communicative
approaches mainly focusing on both speaking and listening skills have been widely
accepted for English education in Korean elementary schools (Ko, 2010). In this context,
reading instruction has been relatively limited to teaching how to differentiate and
articulate words correctly while reading. Though included in the national curriculum, an
effort to develop students’ decoding ability or to provide explicit phonics instruction has
been scarce or, if any, has targeted only younger learners for a very short period of time
(Ko, 2012). Without sufficient instruction or training on basic reading skills such as
decoding abilities in elementary schools, reading instruction in secondary schools in Korea
has largely focused on understanding the grammatical elements and word meanings
embedded in the texts or answering comprehension questions, which requires more higher
level cognitive skills such as inferencing, discerning cohesive ties, or identifying main
ideas (Kim & Shin, 2008). In other words, the fundamental reading sub-skills that are
prerequisite for successful reading comprehension, such as decoding abilities and reading
fluency, are seemingly expected to have somehow developed by the time students attend
secondary schools. However, contrary to this assumption, some high school learners may
still have difficulty in reading at the word-level (Chall, Jacobs, & Baldwin, 1991). Thus,
there is a great need for research focused on these fundamental but largely overlooked
reading sub-skills, and for investigating how they may relate to the reading abilities of
Korean secondary school students who may not have had sufficient exposure and practice
in developing automaticity in these fundamental skills at earlier stages.
In general, it has been demonstrated that decoding skills play a relatively greater role in
younger, or less-proficient readers’ reading comprehension, unlike reading fluency, which
gradually takes over the role of decoding skills and plays a bigger role in older and more
proficient readers’ reading comprehension (Adlof, Catts, & Little, 2006). Then the question
still remains as to whether this general assumption is also applicable to Korean English as a
foreign language (EFL) students who have received little formal instruction in these two
sets of skills at school and who have little language and literacy input outside school,
unlike those in second language contexts. Thus, it is worth reconsidering whether the basic
reading skills such as decoding abilities and reading fluency are still significant
contributors to Korean secondary school students’ reading comprehension, and what role
they each play with respect to each other. This study attempts to explore the role of
decoding skills and reading fluency in accounting for reading comprehension abilities of
Korean high school EFL learners, and also to confirm which of the two fundamental skills
plays a relatively stronger role for this particular population, who is relatively older but less
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 125
proficient in the target language compared to those in previous studies (García & Cain,
2014; Gough, Hoover, & Peterson, 1996; Keenan, Betjemann, & Olson, 2008; Kendeou,
van den Broek, White, & Lynch, 2009; Rupley & Wilson, 1997).
2. RELEVANT LITERATURE
2.1. Decoding Skills in Reading Comprehension
Decoding skill is the ability to transform printed words into phonetic codes and to read
them accurately (Perfetti, 1985; Stanovich, 1986). Given that accurate word reading is
crucial for accurate comprehension, the effects of readers’ decoding skills on their reading
comprehension have been the focus of research in both first language (L1) and second
language (L2) contexts.
In L1 contexts, there is a consensus that decoding skills make a larger contribution to
reading comprehension for younger or less-skilled readers, compared to older or skilled
readers (Bell & Perfetti, 1994; Curtis, 1980). Thus, researchers have indicated that
decoding ability is a significant predictor of reading comprehension for those in lower
grade levels, whose language and literacy abilities have supposedly developed relatively
less than those in upper grades. Gough et al. (1996) performed a meta-analysis of 17
previous studies and categorized them into four groups according to the participants’ age:
grades 1-2 (Group 1), grades 3-4 (Group 2), grades 5-6 (Group 3), and college (Group 4).
The findings of this meta-analysis revealed that significant between-group effects did exist.
Although the average correlations between decoding skills and reading comprehension
abilities were significantly positive for all four groups, the strength of the relationship
decreased with increasing age. In a similar vein, Rupley and Wilson (1997) examined the
relationships between word recognition skills and reading comprehension abilities of 8-12
year-old English monolingual children, and showed that the degree to which decoding
skills contribute to reading comprehension abilities decreased as children grew older. In
addition to the aforementioned studies revealing the importance of decoding skills among
younger readers, other studies have shown that decoding skills make a bigger contribution
to less-skilled readers’ performance in reading comprehension compared to skilled ones
(Bell & Perfetti, 1994; Curtis, 1980). For example, Curtis (1980) examined reading
comprehension abilities of both skilled and less-skilled English monolingual readers in
second, third, and fifth grades. The findings indicated that decoding skills accounted for
more variance in the less-skilled readers’ reading comprehension than for the skilled
readers. In short, the majority of the studies of relationships between decoding skills and
reading comprehension abilities in L1 contexts have suggested that decoding skills are a
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
126 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
strong contributor to reading comprehension, especially for younger and less-skilled
readers who have not yet developed automaticity in word reading skills.
In L2 contexts, on the other hand, little research has been conducted on the effects of
decoding skills on reading comprehension abilities, and thus there exists little agreement
on the primary role that decoding skills may play specifically in the reading comprehension
of lower level L2 learners. While some studies indicated decoding skills as a significant
predictor in the reading comprehension of younger students in L2 contexts, as in the case
of L1 speakers (Nakamoto, Lindsey, & Manis, 2007), others support the efficacy of
decoding skills in older L2 learners’ reading performance (Pasquarella, Gottardo, & Grant,
2012; Rydland, Aukrust, & Fulland, 2012). For example, Nakamoto et al. (2007) studied
the growth pattern of decoding skills and reading comprehension with 261 Spanish-
speaking English language learners from first to sixth grade longitudinally. They showed
that in first and second grade, both decoding skills and reading abilities made remarkable
progresses, while in third grade, their reading comprehension began to lag behind that of
native English speakers , despite the similarity between the decoding scores of the two
groups. Their study also provided evidence that higher-level reading skills rather than
decoding skills were required for L2 learners for successful reading comprehension, as for
L1 learners, and that L2 reading comprehension was dependent upon decoding skills only
at very young age. Pasquarella et al. (2012), on the other hand, showed that decoding skills
were a significant predictor for adolescent L2 learners’ reading comprehension, whereas
neither vocabulary knowledge nor decoding skills was a significant predictor for L1
adolescent students’ reading comprehension. Similarly, Jeon (2011) demonstrated that a
significant role of decoding skills was observed in explaining Korean high school EFL
learners’ reading comprehension, accounting for as much as 12% of the unique variance in
their reading abilities. This indicates decoding skills as an important contributor to reading
comprehension of L2 learners in foreign language contexts as well.
Given the complexity of language and literacy development in L2 contexts itself, age
may not be the only major factor in determining the efficacy of decoding skills in reading
comprehension of L2 learners. Thus, unlike research conducted in L1 contexts, decoding
skills may turn out to be an important predictor of L2 learners’ reading comprehension,
irrespective of their age. That is, there may be more than the “age” factor that relates to the
changing role of decoding skills in L2 learners’ reading comprehension abilities. One
possible explanation might be that L2 learners generally have relatively poor English
abilities than L1 learners of the same age. The ability to read written words accurately and
efficiently may thus play a significant role in even older L2 learners’ reading
comprehension, compensating for its relative weakness in oral language abilities including
vocabulary knowledge. However, further research is needed to gain a clearer and more
accurate picture of the role decoding skills play in L2 learners’ reading abilities, especially
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 127
in foreign language (FL) contexts, since the majority of the research with L2 learners has
been conducted in second language (SL) contexts.
2.2. Reading Fluency in Reading Comprehension
Reading fluency has been defined in various ways. While some simply regard reading
fluency as rapid reading of words or a passage with accuracy (Jenkins, Fuchs, van den
Broek, Espin, & Deno, 2003; Kim, Park, & Wagner, 2014), others expand the concept of
reading fluency to include the ability to read the text rapidly, accurately, and with prosody
or simultaneous comprehension (Grabe, 2010; Rasinski, Samuels, Hiebert, Petscher, &
Feller, 2011). According to the latter perspective, reading quickly and accurately without
understanding the read materials is meaningless. Most studies on reading fluency in both
L1 and L2 contexts, however, have adopted a limited view of reading fluency and have
used reading fluency measures that assess only speed and accuracy of oral reading, and
have not considered the comprehension element. As Kang (2011) argues that “reading
fluency is more than reading with speed and accuracy, as it also includes the
‘comprehension’ component at the word- and sentence-level, albeit not at the discourse
level” (p. 88), the expanded definition of reading fluency including reading accuracy, speed,
and comprehension is adopted in this study. In addition, the present study focuses on
reading fluency at the text level as opposed to the word level, in order to consider reading
fluency that is distinct and independent from decoding skills as much as possible.
In general, reading fluency has been identified as one of prerequisite skills for successful
reading comprehension of L1 readers of many different languages, including English
(Jenkins et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2014; Klauda & Guthrie, 2008; Paleologos & Brabham,
2011; Spear-Swerling, 2006). Klauda and Guthrie (2008), for example, demonstrated that
reading fluency had significant predictive power in reading comprehension of English-
speaking fifth graders. In an attempt to conduct a comprehensive examination of the role of
reading fluency, they assessed reading fluency at three different levels: word, syntactic, and
passage. The measure of reading fluency at the passage level also assessed the students’
ability to read with appropriate prosody. Their results illustrated that each fluency measure
was significantly correlated to reading comprehension, implying a close relationship
between overall reading fluency, measured from various perspectives, and reading
comprehension. Among studies conducted with speakers of languages other than English,
Kim et al. (2014) investigated to what extent L1 Korean kindergartners’ Korean text
reading fluency was interrelated with their reading comprehension, and identified a unique
contribution of text reading fluency to reading comprehension in Korean as well.
Interestingly, they accounted for language-specific properties of Korean and measured
reading fluency at both word- and syllable-level, and obtained identical results.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
128 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
Although relatively less research attention has been paid to the role of reading fluency in
reading comprehension in L2 contexts, the few available studies have commonly identified
reading fluency as a major contributor to L2 reading comprehension as well (Gorsuch &
Taguchi, 2010; Jeon, 2012; Jiang, Sawaki, & Sabatini, 2012; Kieffer, Biancarosa, &
Mancilla-Martinez, 2013; Saiegh-Haddad, 2003; Taguchi, Gorsuch, & Sasamoto, 2006;
van Gelderen, Schoonen, Stoel, de Glopper, & Hulstijn, 2007). For instance, Kieffer et al.
(2013) found a strong correlation between passage reading fluency and reading
comprehension in an experiment with kindergarten to eighth grade Spanish-speaking
English L2 (English as a second language: ESL) learners in the US. In a foreign language
context, in contrast to second language learning contexts, van Gelderen et al. (2007)
conducted a study with Dutch students from eighth to tenth grade, exploring both L1
(Dutch) and L2 (EFL) reading comprehension, and showed that L2 reading fluency as
measured by sentence verification task, significantly accounted for L2 reading
comprehension. Similarly, Jeon (2012) investigated the role of reading fluency with
Korean high school EFL learners, and demonstrated that their oral passage reading fluency
contributed significantly to reading comprehension in English. However, given the paucity
of research on the relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension with
L2 learners in general, and Korean EFL learners in particular (Jiang et al., 2012; Taguchi et
al., 2006), further studies are needed in order to gain more insights into the potential
facilitative role reading fluency plays in the reading development of L2 learners.
2.3. Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Reading Comprehension
Although both decoding skills and reading fluency are considered necessary for
successful reading comprehension, there exists little consensus on the relative importance
between the two. Some studies have shown that decoding skill is a relatively stronger
predictor of reading comprehension (Adlof et al., 2006; Goldberg, Eason, Ryan, & Cutting,
2010; Padeliadu & Antoniou, 2014). For instance, Adlof et al. (2006) showed that decoding
skill was the strongest contributor to reading comprehension of English-speaking students
in lower grade levels while its predictive power gradually became weaker as students
moved to higher grades. Reading fluency, on the other hand, remained a weaker predictor
compared to decoding skills regardless of the students’ grades. Similarly, Padeliadu and
Antoniou (2014) demonstrated that decoding skills had stronger predictive power than
reading fluency in lower grade levels in explaining reading comprehension of Greek
monolingual students, but showed discrepant findings, in that this pattern changed from the
fifth grade. That is, reading fluency gradually became a relatively stronger contributor to
reading comprehension in the upper grades. On the other hand, several other studies have
shown that reading fluency outperforms decoding skills in its predictive power for reading
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 129
comprehension (Jenkins et al., 2003; Shinn, Good, Knutson, Tilly, & Collins, 1992) or
explained additional variance in reading comprehension beyond the effects of decoding
skills (Tilstra, McMaster, van den Broek, Kendeou, & Rapp, 2009). For example, Tilstra et
al. (2009) revealed that reading fluency contributed additional unique variance in English
L1 fourth, seventh, and ninth graders’ reading comprehension after controlling for the
effects of decoding skills, listening comprehension, and verbal proficiency.
As such, previous studies have yielded inconclusive results regarding the relative
importance of decoding skills and reading fluency in relation to reading comprehension
abilities, leading to various hypotheses about these discrepancies in different studies. One
such hypothesis is that the discrepancies are related to learners’ age or language proficiency
(Crosson & Lesaux, 2010; Riedel, 2007; Wiley & Deno, 2005). That is, as learners grow
older and develop their language proficiency, reading fluency comes to play a more
significant role in reading comprehension, whereas the role of decoding skills gradually
decreases. However, some studies do not support this explanation (Adlof et al., 2006;
Tilstra et al., 2009), as only age or language proficiency does not seem to fully explain this
divergence. These differences in research findings, though, could be accounted for by a
number of methodological differences in the previous studies. In fact, researchers have
contended that readers’ performance varies depending on how reading comprehension is
measured (Cutting & Scarborough, 2006; Nation & Snowling, 1997; Spear-Swerling,
2004). For example, Cutting and Scarborough (2006) explained that decoding skill was
more strongly related to a cloze-type reading comprehension test than to a multiple-choice
type of test, while reading fluency showed a weaker unique contribution to a cloze-type
test than to a multiple-choice comprehension test. Most studies in L1 contexts have
administered multiple-choice tests in assessing learners’ comprehension, except for Adlof
et al. (2006), who adopted both types of tests.
Most previous studies on the relative predictive power between decoding skills and
reading fluency for reading comprehension have focused on L1 readers, and relatively less
research attention has been paid to L2 readers. Some studies in L2 contexts, albeit limited,
have demonstrated that reading fluency is a stronger predictor of reading comprehension
than decoding skills (Crosson & Lesaux, 2010; Geva & Farnia, 2012; Jiang et al., 2012;
Kim, 2012). For instance, Crosson and Lesaux (2010), in their study with Spanish-
speaking ESL fifth graders, showed that reading fluency remained as a significant
contributor to reading comprehension, even when the effects of word decoding skill were
controlled for. Similar patterns have been observed with EFL learners in China (Jiang et al.,
2012) and Korea (Kim, 2012). Kim (2012), for instance, demonstrated that decoding skill
was not a statistically significant contributor to English reading comprehension abilities of
Korean EFL learners, while oral reading fluency was. On the other hand, Proctor, Carlo,
August, and Snow (2005) showed that decoding skill affected reading comprehension of
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
130 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
Spanish-speaking fourth grade ESL students, while reading fluency did not. However,
reading fluency, in their study, was measured only at the discrete word level. Thus, there is
not sufficient research evidence for the relative importance of decoding skills and sentence-
or text- level fluency in L2 reading comprehension.
In general, further studies regarding the relationship among decoding skills, reading
fluency, and reading comprehension of L2 learners, especially those in foreign language
contexts and in upper grades, are in great need in order to develop a more conclusive
picture of reading development in L2. Thus, this study aims to investigate the relationship
among (1) decoding skills; (2) reading fluency, considering not only reading speed and
accuracy at text-level but also simultaneous comprehension of read material; and (3)
reading comprehension among Korean high school EFL students. In doing so, the relative
role decoding skills and reading fluency play in their English reading comprehension will
also be examined. More specifically, this study focuses on the following research
questions:
1. How do English decoding skills and reading fluency relate to reading
comprehension abilities of Korean high school EFL students?
2. Between English decoding skills and reading fluency, which is a stronger
predictor of Korean high school EFL students’ reading comprehension?
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1. Participants
Two hundred twenty two Korean EFL learners in their second year of high school (11th
grade) participated in the study. Data were gathered from two different school sites. Of the
222 participants, 129 students were enrolled in a boys’ high school located in Kyeonggi-do,
and the other 93 students were attending a girls’ high school in Gwangju, Jeollanam-do.
Although all participants were in the same grade and had been learning English for three
hours per week in their respective schools, there was a great difference in their English
proficiency according to the schools they attended. The Preliminary Korean Scholastic
Aptitude Test (PKSAT) scores of the participants from the boys’ high school ranged from
the top 4th percentile to the 96th percentile, while those from the girls’ high school ranged
from the top 4th percentile to the 17th percentile. There was also a large gap in the mean
PKSAT raw scores between the two schools: 44.91 and 88.29 for the boys’ and girls’ high
school, respectively. However, since this study does not aim to investigate group
differences between different schools, areas, or genders, but rather, to detect a general trend
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 131
in the reading comprehension of EFL learners in Korea, the diversity and variance in the
participants’ English language proficiency ensured sufficient variation in the reading
measures, which in turn enabled a comprehensive analysis of their reading abilities.
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Reading fluency test
English reading fluency was measured with the Reading Fluency subtest of the
standardized Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery (WJIII, Woodcock,
Mather, & Schrank, 2004). On this test, students were asked to read given sentences
quickly and accurately and to verify the veracity of the sentences by circling “yes” or “no.”
For example, for the sentence, “A mouse can fly,” the correct answer is “no.” The
sentences were ordered in terms of increasing complexity and length. There were 98 test
items in total with a three-minute time constraint. Total scores were calculated by counting
the number of correct answers. The test-retest reliability of .88 was reported by Woodcock,
Mather, and Schrank (2004).
3.2.2. Decoding test
The Word Decoding subtest of the standardized Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test (GMRT;
MacGinitie, MacGinitie, Maria, & Dreyer, 2000) was utilized to measure the decoding
ability of the students. There were 43 test items on the test and each correct answer
received one point, with a possible range of score from zero to 43. Students were told to
choose one correct word that matches the picture from four answer choices, e.g., for a
picture of a peach, the students were to select one correct answer among four choices of
“perch,” “peace,” “peak,” and “peach.” The reliability coefficient (Kuder-Richardson) was
reported as .94 (MacGinitie et al., 2000).
3.2.3. Reading comprehension test
In order to measure the students’ general reading comprehension abilities, the Reading
Comprehension subtest of the standardized Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised
(WRMT-R, Woodcock, 1998) was administered. Fifty-three questions were administered
in total, and one point was credited for each correct answer, and a possible score range
from zero to 53. The test employed a form of a cloze test, and the students were instructed
to read a sentence or a passage and write the proper words in the blank to complete the
unfinished sentences. The reported split-half reliability (Woodcock, 1998) was .92.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
132 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
3.2.4. PKSAT (Preliminary Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test)
In measuring the students’ general reading proficiency in English, the Preliminary
Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test (PKSAT) was used. The raw score of the participants’
PKSAT was taken into account as a control variable in this study, in controlling for their
general reading proficiency.
3.2.5. Oral comprehension test
A test of the participants’ general oral language abilities in English was included to serve
as a control variable. General oral comprehension abilities are considered one of the
primary components of reading, and its strong contribution to L1 and L2 reading has been
widely acknowledged (Adlof et al., 2006; Gough & Tunmer, 1986; Hoover & Gough,
1990; Proctor et al., 2005). Thus, in order to examine the unique predictive role decoding
skills and reading fluency play in explaining reading comprehension beyond the effects of
oral comprehension abilities, this variable was included in the present study as a control
variable along with the aforementioned PKSAT score. The Oral Comprehension subtest of
the standardized Woodcock-Johnson III Diagnostic Reading Battery (WJIII, Woodcock et
al., 2004) was used to assess students’ oral comprehension. On this test, the students
listened to tape-recorded passages in order of increasing difficulty. Each passage had one
missing word, and the students were asked to provide an appropriate response. For instance,
for the cloze, “Candy tastes ______,” the correct answer is “good” or “sweet.” The total
number of questions was 34, and each correct response scored one point. The reported test-
retest reliability is .88 (Woodcock et al., 2004).
3.3. Procedures
Each of the tests was administered during regular class times under the teachers’
supervision. Before each test, the teachers provided full explanations as to how it would
proceed, with a couple of practice items. Students were required to complete all tests
within given time limits. The testing time ranged from 10 to 20 minutes, depending on the
requirements outlined by each test publisher.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 133
4. RESULTS
The means and standard deviations for scores on each measure (reading comprehension,
decoding, reading fluency, Preliminary Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test, and oral
comprehension) are reported in Table 1. The average score on the reading proportion of the
PKSAT is 63.08. The students correctly answered 26 items out of 53 questions, on average,
on the reading comprehension test, correctly answered 35.59 out of 43 questions on
average on the decoding test, and scored 61 out of the possible 98, on average, on the
reading fluency test. There was a large variation (SD = 26.03) in the reading fluency test.
That is, unlike the measures of reading comprehension and decoding skills on which most
of the participants seemed to do uniformly well, a relatively large distribution in the of
reading fluency scores was detected.
TABLE 1
Descriptive Statistics for the Variables Examined
Min. Max. M SD
Reading Comprehension 0 47 26.00 7.64 Decoding 14 43 35.59 5.90 Reading Fluency 13 98 61.11 26.03 PKSAT 2 100 63.08 26.17 Oral Comprehension 0 17 6.94 3.89
Note. N = 222. PKSAT = Preliminary Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test.
In order to discern any potential relationships among the variables, correlation analyses
were conducted. As can be seen in Table 2, all variables (oral comprehension, decoding,
reading fluency, and the PKSAT scores) were significantly and positively correlated to
reading comprehension. Among them, the two variables, oral comprehension and PKSAT,
were more strongly correlated to reading comprehension than the others (r = .54 and .52,
respectively). The correlations of the two remaining variables, English decoding skill and
reading fluency, to reading comprehension were comparable, (r = .46 and .47, respectively).
In addition, it is worth noting that all the variables were significantly and positively
correlated with one another, suggesting that all English skills measured in the present study
were closely interrelated.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
134 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
TABLE 2
Correlations Among Tested Variables
1 2 3 4 5
1. Oral Comprehension 1 2. Reading Comprehension .543** 1 3. Decoding .468** .463** 1 4. Reading Fluency .278** .471** .541** 1 5. PKSAT .321** .519** .596** .854** 1
Note. PKSAT = Preliminary Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test. **p < .01
In examining the relative predictive power of decoding skills and reading fluency on
reading comprehension, when controlling for the participants’ general English proficiency
and oral comprehension abilities, two sets of hierarchical regression analyses were
conducted. As seen in Table 3, PKSAT and oral comprehension test scores were entered in
the first step, as control variables. When decoding skills and reading fluency were entered
in Step 2 and 3, respectively, decoding skills accounted for an additional 1.8% (p < 0.01) of
reading comprehension. On the other hand, reading fluency (p = .240) was not a significant
predictor of reading comprehension, when controlling for decoding skills as well as their
general English proficiency. In other words, reading fluency did not contribute any
additional unique variance to reading comprehension once the effects of decoding skills
were accounted for.
Then, in order to examine whether decoding abilities account for any additional variance
in reading comprehension on top of reading fluency, another hierarchical regression
analysis was conducted with the order of entry at Step 2 and 3 reversed (see the bottom
panel of Table 3). The result indicates that decoding skills still make a unique contribution,
explaining an additional 1.7% (p < 0.05) of the variance in reading comprehension, beyond
the effects of reading fluency. The contribution of reading fluency (p = .189) was not
statistically significant even when the effects of decoding skills were not controlled for. In
other words, reading fluency did not turn out to be a significant predictor of the Korean
high school EFL students’ reading comprehension, irrespective of their decoding skills.
In short, about 34% of the variance in reading comprehension was explained by PKSAT
scores, oral comprehension abilities, decoding skills, and reading fluency in English. Both
English decoding skills and reading fluency were significantly correlated to reading
comprehension, and reading fluency seemed to have stronger correlations to reading
comprehension, compared to decoding skills. However, only decoding skills turned out to
be a significant predictor of Korean high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension,
when their general English proficiency was controlled for, whereas reading fluency did not.
This indicates that English decoding skill is a better predictor of successful reading
comprehension than reading fluency for Korean high school EFL learners. Thus, in general,
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 135
those who were good decoders of English words, for example, were more likely to perform
better on reading comprehension in English.
TABLE 3
Hierarchical Regression Analyses Predicting Reading Comprehension
Steps Variables R2 ΔR
2 ΔF Sig.
1 PKSAT & Oral Comprehension .410 .410 76.172*** .000 2 Decoding .428 .018 6.754** .009 3 Reading Fluency .432 .004 1.388 .240
2 Reading Fluency .415 .005 1.735 .189 3 Decoding .432 .017 6.376* .012
Note. PKSAT = Preliminary Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test. *p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.
5. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION
This study was designed to investigate the relationship among the key sub-components
of reading abilities, namely decoding skills, reading fluency, and reading comprehension of
Korean high school EFL students, and to discern the relative importance of decoding skills
and reading fluency, in predicting their reading comprehension abilities when their general
English proficiency is taken into consideration. The findings from this study indicated that
decoding skills and reading fluency both significantly correlated with the students’
performance on reading comprehension. Yet, with respect to the second research question,
decoding skill was identified as having more significant predictive power than reading
fluency in explaining their reading comprehension outcomes.
The significant relationship found for both decoding skills and reading fluency with
reading comprehension is in a similar vein with previous research findings with both L1
and L2 readers (Jeon, 2012; Kieffer et al., 2013; Padeliadu & Antoniou, 2014; Quirk &
Beem, 2012; Silverman, Speece, Harring, & Ritchey, 2013). However, the relatively
greater significant role of decoding skills compared to reading fluency in predicting
reading comprehension abilities of the Korean EFL learners is not in accordance with most
of the previous studies conducted with either L1 or L2 readers (Crosson & Lesaux, 2010;
Geva & Farnia, 2012; Jenkins et al., 2003; Jiang et al., 2012; Kim, 2012; Shinn et al, 1992).
While other previous studies have mostly identified the prominent contribution of reading
fluency to reading comprehension for students in higher grades or for relatively advanced
readers’, the present study with Korean high school EFL students, who are relatively older
and less proficient in English compared to the participants in the previous studies, showed
that it was decoding skills that played a more prominent role in their reading
comprehension performance in English.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
136 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
This particular finding, then, could be in accordance with another body of previous
research which has attributed L2 readers’ overreliance on decoding skills to their relatively
less developed English proficiency (Nakamoto et al., 2007; Pasquarella et al., 2012).
According to this perspective, L2 readers with under-developed language proficiency,
compared to L1 readers who have supposedly developed their language skills from infancy,
tend to rely more on word reading skills, since they do not have sufficient oral language
resources to support spontaneous comprehension of the read materials, or because they
have not yet developed automaticity in decoding skill to the extent that it does not interfere
with their reading process. For instance, Pasquarella et al. (2012) compared L1
adolescents’ reading comprehension to that of L2 adolescent learners’, and showed that it
was decoding skills that explained individual differences in L2 readers’ reading
comprehension, while this was not to the case for L1 readers. The researchers explained
this group difference in terms of the degree to which each group of readers had developed
decoding skills. For the L2 learners in their study, their decoding skills were neither as
accurate nor as fluent as for the L1 readers. Thus, unlike L1 readers, a greater role for
decoding skills was required in L2 readers’ reading comprehension to compensate both for
their relatively limited English language proficiency and for their relatively less accurate
and efficient word reading abilities. This hypothesis may apply to the similar results found
in the present study with Korean high school EFL learners whose English proficiency may
not have sufficiently developed to the extent that it ensures efficient reading
comprehension.
On the other hand, the present study also indicated that even upper-level L2 readers,
who have supposedly already acquired basic L2 reading skills, were largely dependent on
decoding skills in their reading comprehension, when reading comprehension was
measured with a cloze-type test. Since previous studies have shown that the relationship
between readers’ performance on various reading sub-skills and reading comprehension is
dependent upon the types of reading comprehension tests (Cutting & Scarborough, 2006;
Nation & Snowling, 1997; Spear-Swerling, 2004), further studies are warranted in order to
arrive at a firm conclusion regarding L2 readers’ reliance on particular reading skills, such
as decoding skills as in the case of present study.
In addition, another methodological difference in this study, compared to others, is the
reading fluency measurement. Most previous studies measured reading fluency only in
terms of reading speed and accuracy, and did not consider simultaneous comprehension of
efficiently read materials, or prosody, while this study did. This difference in the fluency
measurement might have led to these differences in the research findings. Generally
speaking, reading fluency refers to the ability to read texts quickly and accurately. However,
if a reader can read rapidly and accurately, but fails to comprehend the meaning of the texts
s/he reads at the same time, s/he cannot be regarded as a fluent reader, but is simply a
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 137
“word caller” (Hamilton & Shinn, 2003). Thus, this study further highlights the importance
of capturing the full meaning of reading fluency in assessing its role in the readers’ overall
reading comprehension processes.
The discrepancies found between the present study and the previous research, which can
be largely explained by the language proficiency of the readers and the differences in the
measurement of relevant reading sub-skills, point to the need of further studies in order to
reach a more precise understanding of the patterns of L2 learners’ reading comprehension
development. Moreover, in order to examine not only the direct effects of reading sub-
skills on reading comprehension, but also their indirect effects, further studies using other
analytic approaches such as a structural equation modeling seem to be in need (Silverman
et al., 2013). Nonetheless, this study has provided important information regarding the role
of decoding skills and reading fluency in the reading comprehension of even older L2
learners in foreign language contexts, and further highlights the need to develop both their
decoding skills to facilitate efficient reading comprehension, and at the same time language
proficiency in general to promote reading fluency. In addition, given that the efficiency of
decoding instruction was proven in L2 contexts for relatively older learners as well (Dai &
Liu, 2012; Fukkink, Hulstjn, & Simis, 2005), the findings of the present study also suggest
the need of extensive training on decoding skills for better reading instruction even within
secondary EFL curricula in Korea. In other words, it seems that a certain amount of time
needs to be set aside to teach decoding skills or to promote reading accuracy for secondary
school Korean EFL learners, irrespective of their English proficiency level, especially since
the primary focus of high school English classes is on developing students’ reading
comprehension abilities. For this purpose, widely implemented practices such as oral
language fluency (ORF) training and Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) at both
word- and text-level could be adopted, as is already the case in the US. In doing so,
however, considerations for students’ reading proficiency should be taken into account, as
decoding accuracy and fluency at different levels (word- vs. text-level) have differential
effects on reading comprehension abilities depending on students’ reading abilities
(Crosson & Lesaux, 2010; Fuchs, Fuchs, Hosp, & Jenkins, 2001; Jenkins et al., 2003). On
the whole, development in decoding skills should not be taken for granted either in
elementary or secondary schools in the Korean EFL context in promoting successful
reading comprehension abilities, and deserves much instructional and research attention.
REFERENCES
Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W., & Little, T. D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading
include a fluency component? Reading and Writing, 19(9), 933-958.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
138 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1994). Reading skill: Some adult comparisons. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 86(2), 244-255.
Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1991). The reading crisis: Why poor students
fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of
fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English.
Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475-494.
Curtis, M. E. (1980). Development of components of reading skill. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 72(5), 656-669.
Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension:
Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other
cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies
of Reading, 10(3), 277-299.
Dai, C., & Liu, L. (2012). The effectiveness of explicit instruction of certain decoding
skills in improving Chinese EFL listeners’ general comprehension performance.
Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 243-255.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an
indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
Fukkink, R. G., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. (2005). Does training in second-language word
recognition skills affect reading comprehension? An experimental study. The
Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 54-75.
García, J. R., & Cain, K. (2014). A meta-analysis to identify which reader and assessment
characteristics influence the strength of the relationship in English. Review of
Educational Research, 84(1), 74-111.
Geva, E., & Farnia, F. (2012). Developmental changes in the nature of language
proficiency and reading fluency paint a more complex view of reading
comprehension in ELL and EL1. Reading and Writing, 25(8), 1819-1845.
Goldberg, L. F., Eason, S. H., Ryan, M., & Cutting, L. E. (2010, June). Combining the
simple view of reading with fluency, world knowledge, and reading strategies to
predict comprehensions. Poster session presented at the 8th American Academy of
Clinical Neuropsychology Conference, Chicago, IL.
Gorsuch, G., & Taguchi, E. (2010). Developing reading fluency and comprehension using
repeated reading: Evidence from longitudinal student reports. Language Teaching
Research, 14(1), 27-59.
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., & Peterson, C. L. (1996). Some observations on a simple
view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension
difficulties (pp. 1-13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 139
Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remeidal
and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
Grabe, W. (2010). Fluency in reading-thirty-five years later. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 22(1), 71-83.
Hamilton, C., & Shinn, M. R. (2003). Characteristics of word callers: An investigation of
the accuracy of teachers’ judgments of reading comprehension and oral reading
skills. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 228-240.
Hoover, W. A. & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2,
127-160.
Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of
individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.
Jeon, E. H. (2011). Contribution of morphological awareness to second-language reading
comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(2), 217-235.
Jeon, E. H. (2012). Oral reading fluency in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign
Language, 24(2), 186-208.
Jiang, X., Sawaki, Y., & Sabatini, J. (2012). Word reading efficiency, text reading fluency,
and reading comprehension among Chinese learners of English. Reading
Psychology, 33(4), 323-349.
Kang, Y. (2011). Reading fluency vs. oral language comprehension in predicting reading
comprehension of Korean EFL learners. Korean Journal of Applied Linguistics,
27(4), 81-102.
Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests
vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral
comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12(3), 281-300.
Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M. J., & Lynch, J. S. (2009). Predicting reading
comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral
language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 765-778.
Kieffer, M. J., Biancarosa, G., & Mancilla-Martinez, J. (2013). Roles of morphological
awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking language minority
learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied
Psycholinguistics, 34(4), 697-725.
Kim, H. (2012). The simple view of reading: Decoding or fluency? Korean Journal of
Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 209-230.
Kim, J. R., & Shin, J. Y. (2008). A study of inference skills instruction effects on L2
reading achievement of Korean Scholastic Aptitude Test (KSAT). Modern English
Education, 9(1), 188-213.
Kim, Y., Park, C. H., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a ‘bridge’ to
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
140 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 27(1), 79-99.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading
fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2),
310-321.
Ko, J. (2010). The realities of elementary English education in teaching methods, TEE,
native English teachers, and differentiated classes. Journal of the Korea English
Education Society, 9(3), 101-118.
Ko, Y. R. (2012). An analysis of phonics contents in elementary English fourth grade
textbooks as revised by the 2008 Revised National English Curriculum. Journal of
the Korea English Education Society, 11(2), 81-103.
MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L. G. (2000). Gates-
MacGinitie reading tests (4th ed.). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Nakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2007). A longitudinal analysis of English
language learners’ word decoding and reading comprehension. Reading and
Writing, 20(7), 691-719.
Nation, K., & Snowling, M. (1997). Assessing reading difficulties: The validity and utility
of current measures of reading skill. British Journal of Educational Psychology,
67(3), 359-370.
Padeliadu, S., & Antoniou, F. (2014). The relationship between reading comprehension,
decoding, and fluency in Greek: A cross-sectional study. Reading & Writing
Quarterly, 30(1), 1-31.
Paleologos, T. M., & Brabham, E. G. (2011). The effectiveness of DIBELS oral reading
fluency for predicting reading comprehension of high- and low-income students.
Reading Psychology, 32(1), 54-74.
Pasquarella, A., Gottardo, A., & Grant, A. (2012). Comparing factors related to reading
comprehension in adolescents who speak English as a first (L1) or second (L2)
language. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(6), 475-503.
Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). Native Spanish-speaking children
reading in English: Toward a model of comprehension. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 97(2), 246-256.
Quirk, M., & Beem, S. (2012). Examining the relations between reading fluency and
reading comprehension for English language learners. Psychology in the Schools,
49(6), 539-553.
Rasinski, T., Samuels, S. J., Hiebert, E., Petscher, Y., & Feller, K. (2011). The relationship
between a silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students' reading
comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting. Reading Psychology,
32(1), 75-97.
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 141
Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and
vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 546-
567.
Rupley, W. H., & Willson, V. L. (1997). Relationship between comprehension and
components of word recognition: Support for developmental shifts. Journal of
Research and Development in Education, 30(4), 255-260.
Rydland, V., Aukrust, V. G., & Fulland, H. (2012). How word decoding, vocabulary and
prior topic knowledge predict reading comprehension. A study of language-
minority students in Norwegian fifth grade classrooms. Reading and Writing, 25(2),
465-482.
Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Bilingual oral reading fluency and reading comprehension: The
case of Arabic/Hebrew (L1)-English (L2) readers. Reading and Writing, 16(8), 717-
736.
Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N., Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-
based measurement reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to
reading. School Psychology Review, 21(3), 459-479.
Silverman, R. D., Speece, D. L., Harring, J. R., & Ritchey, K. D. (2013). Fluency has a role
in the simple view of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(2), 108-133.
Spear-Swerling, L. (2004). Fourth graders' performance on a state-mandated assessment
involving two different measures of reading comprehension. Reading Psychology,
25(2), 121-148.
Spear-Swerling, L. (2006). Children's reading comprehension and oral reading fluency.
Reading and Writing, 19(2), 199-220.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360-
407.
Taguchi, E., Gorsuch, G. J., & Sasamoto, E. (2006). Developing second and foreign
language reading fluency and its effect on comprehension: A missing link. The
Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 6(2), 1-18. Retrieved from
http://search.proquest.com.oca.korea.ac.kr/docview/85656368?accountid= 14558
Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P., & Rapp, D. (2009). Simple but
complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of
Research in Reading, 32(4), 383-401.
van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., Stoel, R. D., de Glopper, K., & Hulstijn, J. (2007).
Development of adolescent reading comprehension in language 1 and language 2:
A longitudinal analysis of constituent components. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 99(3), 477-491.
Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
142 Yusun Kang · Younjee Huh · Boram Moon · Yeoeun Park
success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special
Education, 26(4), 207-214.
Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests–revised. Minneapolis, MN:
NCS Pearson.
Woodcock, R. W., Mather, N., & Schrank, F. A. (2004). Woodcock-Johnson III diagnostic
reading battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
Applicable levels: Secondary
Yusun Kang
Department of English Education
Korea University
Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu
Seoul 136-701, Korea
Phone: 02-3290-2354
Fax: 02-3290-2350
Email: [email protected]
Younjee Huh
Department of English Education
Korea University
Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu
Seoul 136-701, Korea
Phone: 02-3290-2350
Fax: 02-3290-2350
Email: [email protected]
Boram Moon
Department of English Education
Korea University
Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu
Seoul 136-701, Korea
Phone: 02-3290-2350
Fax: 02-3290-2350
Email: [email protected]
Yeoeun Park
Department of English Education
Korea University
Anam-ro 145, Seongbuk-gu
Seoul 136-701, Korea
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO
Decoding Skills vs. Reading Fluency in Korean High School EFL Learners’ Reading ... 143
Phone: 02-3290-2350
Fax: 02-3290-2350
Email: [email protected]
Received in September 2014
Reviewed in October 2014
Revised version received in November 2014
Book Centre교보문고 KYOBO