Upload
myra
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
1/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-1
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision Analysis(Theory)
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
2/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-2
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Introduction
Decision theory is an analytical
and systematic way to tackle
problems
A good decision is based on
logic.
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
3/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-3
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
The Six Steps inDecision Theory
1) Clearly define the problem at
hand
2) List the possible alternatives3) Identify the possible outcomes
4) List the payoff or profit of
each combination ofalternatives and outcomes
5) Select one of the mathematical
decision theory models6) Apply the model and make
your decision
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
4/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-4
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision Tablefor Thompson Lumber
State of Nature
Alternative FavorableMarket
UnfavorableMarket
Construct alarge plant
$200,000 -$180,000
Construct asmall plant
$100,000 -$20,000
Do nothing $0 0
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
5/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-5
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Types of Decision-Making Environments
Type 1: Decision-making under certainty
decision-makerknows with certainty the
consequences of every alternative or decision choice
Type 2: Decision-making under risk
The decision-makerdoes know the probabilities of
the various outcomes
Type 3: Decision-making under uncertainty
The decision-makerdoes not know the probabilities
of the various outcomes
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
6/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-6
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision-MakingCertainty
Knows with certainty the result
of every alternative
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
7/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-7
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision-MakingUnder Risk
Expected Monetary Value
nature.ofstagesofnumbernwhere
)(*SPayoffative)EMV(Altern1
j
j
n
j
SP
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
8/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-8
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision Table(Matrix)
for Thompson Lumber
Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
MarketAlternative State of Nature
Construct a
large plant
$200,000 -$180,000 $10,000
Construct asmall plant
$100,000 -$20,000 $40,000
Do nothing $0 0
0.50 0.50
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
9/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-9
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected Value ofPerfect Information
(EVPI)
EVPIplaces an upper bound on
what one would pay for
additional information
EVPIis the expected value with
perfect information minus themaximum EMV
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
10/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-10
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected Value WithPerfect Information
(EV | PI)
nature.ofstatesofnumbern
)P(S*nature)ofstateforoutcome(BestPI|EVn
1j
j
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
11/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-11
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected Value ofPerfect Information
EVPI=EV|PI- maximumEMV
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
12/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-12
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected Value ofPerfect Information
State of Nature
Alternative Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
Market
EMV
Construct alarge plant
$200,000
Construct a
small plant
$40,000
Do Nothing $0
0.50 0.50
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
13/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-13
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected Value ofPerfect Information
EVPI= expected value with perfect
information - max(EMV)
= $200,000*0.50 + $0*0.50 - $40,000
= $60,000
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
14/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-14
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Expected OpportunityLoss
EOL is the cost of not picking
the best solution
EOL = Expected Regret
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
15/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-15
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Computing EOL - TheOpportunity Loss Table
State of Nature
ternative Favorable Market
($)
Unfavorabl
Market ($)
Large Plant 200,000 - 200,000 0 - (-180,000
Small Plant 200,000 - 100,000 0 -(-20,000
Do Nothing 200,000 - 0 0-0
Probability 0.50 0.50
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
16/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-16
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
The Opportunity LossTable continued
State of Nature
lternative FavorableMarket
UnfavorablMarket
Large Plant 0 $180,000
Small Plant $100,000 $20,000
Do Nothing $200,000 0
Probability 0.50 0.50
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
17/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-17
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
The Opportunity LossTable - continued
lternative EOL
Large Plant (0.50)*$0 +(0.50)*($180,000)
$90,000
Small Plant (0.50)*($100,000)+ (0.50)(*$20,000)
$60,000
Do Nothing (0.50)*($200,000)
+ (0.50)*($0)
$100,000
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
18/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-18
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Sensitivity Analysis
EMV(Large Plant) = $200,000P- (1-
P)$180,000
EMV(Small Plant) = $100,000P-
$20,000(1-P)
EMV(Do Nothing) = $0P+ 0(1-P)
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
19/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-19
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Sensitivity Analysis -continued
-200000
-150000
-100000
-500000
50000
100000
150000
200000
250000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Values of P
EMV
Values
Point 1 Point 2Small Plant
Large Plant EMV
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
20/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-20
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Maximax
Maximin
Equally likely (Laplace)
Criterion of Realism
Minimax
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
21/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-21
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Maximax - Choose the alternativewith the maximum output
State of Nature
Alternative FavorableMarket
UnfavorableMarket
Construct alarge plant
200,000 -180,000
Construct asmall plant
100,000 -20,000
Do nothing 0 0
Probability 0.50 0.50
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
22/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-22
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Maximin - Choose the alternative withthe maximum minimum output
State of Nature
Alternative FavorableMarket
UnfavorableMarket
Construct a
large plant
200,000 -180,000
Construct a
small plant
100,000 -20,000
Do nothing 0 0
Probabilities
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
23/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-23
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Equally likely (Laplace) - Assume all
states of nature to be equally
likely, choose maximum Average
States of Nature
Alternative Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
Market
Avg.
Construct
Large Plant
$200,000 -$180,000 10,000
Construct
mall plant
100,000 -20,000 40,000
Do nothing 0 0 0
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
24/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-24
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Criterion of Realism (Hurwicz):
CR = *(row max) + (1-)*(row min)
State of Nature
Alternative Favorable
Market
Unfavorable
Market
CR
Constructarge plant $200,000 -180,000 124,000
Construct
small plant
$100,000 -20,000 76,000
Do nothing 0 0 0
0.80 0.20
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
25/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-25
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Decision MakingUnder Uncertainty
Minimax - choose the alternative withthe minimum maximum OpportunityLoss
States of Nature
Alternative FavorableMarket
Unfavorable
MarketMax
Construct a
arge plant
0$ $180,000 $180,000
Construct a
mall plant
$100,000 20,000 100,000
Do nothing 200,000 0 200,000
Regret Matrix
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
26/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-26
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Marginal Analysis -Discrete Distributions
Steps using Normal Distributions:
Determine the value forP.
Locate P on the normal distribution. For agiven area under the curve, we findZfrom
thestandard Normal table.
Using we can now
solve forX*
sm
*
XZ
MPML
ML
P +
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
27/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-27
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes NewsstandExample A
ML = 4
MP= 6
m= Average demand = 50
papers per day
s= Standard deviation of
demand = 10
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
28/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-28
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes Newsstand
Example A - continued
Step 1:
Step 2: Look in the Normal tableforP= 0.6 (i.e., 1 0.4)
.
40.064
4
+
+
MPML
MLp
newspapers53or52.5500.25*10X
or
10
50X0.25Z
*
*
+
-
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
29/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-29
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes Newsstand
Example A continued
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
30/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-30
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes NewsstandExample B
ML = 8
MP= 2
m= Average demand = 100
papers per day
s= Standard deviation ofdemand = 10
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
31/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-31
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes Newsstand
Example B - continued
Step 1:
Step 2:Z= -0.84 for an areaof 0.80
and
or:
80.028
8
+
+
MPML
MLp
10
1000X0.84
*-
-
newspapers92or91.6
1000.84(10)X*
+- 0
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
32/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-32
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
Joes Newsstand
Example B continued
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
33/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-33
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
34/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-34
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
35/36
To accompany Quantitative Analysis
for Management, 8e
by Render/Stair/Hanna3-35
2003 by Prentice Hall, Inc.
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
7/28/2019 Decision Analysis (1)
36/36