Upload
beverly-neal
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
December 04
1
On-Road Emissions in Asia Measured by Remote Sensing
Niranjan VescioPresentation at BAQ 2004
Agra, IndiaDecember 8, 2004
2
Presentation Outline
1. Introduction to Vehicle Remote Sensing
a. RSD Technology
b. RSD Measurements
2. Asia Remote Sensing Data India Data
3. Motorcycle Measurement Challenges
a. Improvement Plans
4. Concluding Remarks
3
Contributors Ms. K. Easter, Mr. K. Balakrishnam
US Asia Environmental Partnership
Dr. Balraj Bahnot, Director Automotive Research Association of India PB 832 Pune, India
Mr. Nitin Manawat, Managing Director Environmental Systems Products-India Powai, Mumbai, India [[email protected]]
Dr. Donald H. Stedman, Gary A. Bishop University of Denver, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Denver, CO, USA [[email protected]]
Dr. Peter McClintock Applied Analysis Tiburon, CA, USA [[email protected]]
India Study Sponsor
Data Collection
Data Analysis
December 04
4
Introduction to Remote Sensing
5
Measurement Principle
Spectroscopy (Light Absorption)
IR
Opacity
UV
6
Opacity (Smoke/PM) Measurement
Source:Presentation by David Kittleson, University of Minnesota, Department of Mechanical Engineering, et al “Chemical & Physical Characteristics of Diesel
Aerosol,” presented at the 12th Annual CRC Conference, April 15-17, 2002.
OldNew
0.550.23
Traditional OpacimeterNew Smoke Channel
1. Diesel EmissionsPM Mass Shift
Old to New1500nm to 250nm
2. Measurement λOpacimeter to RSD SF
550nm to 230nm
0.25 1.5
7
Remote Sensing Technology
www.rsdaccuscan.com
8
The On-Road Advantage
On-road emissions cause poor air quality.
Remote sensing measures on-road emissions.
9
1. RSDs Measure Ratios…
___CHX + ___N2 +___O2 ___CO2 + ___CO + ___CHX + NO2
2. RSDs Calculate Concentrations1. Simple Explanation - http://www.rsd-remotesensing.com/user_info.asp under “RSD for Non-Technicals”
2. Math Derivation - http://www.feat.biochem.du.edu/whatsafeat.html under “standard combustion equation.”
RSD MeasurementsRatios to Concentrations
Q
Q’
Q’’
10
Fuel Specific Mass EmissionsCO, HC, NO per kg of Fuel Burned
4.71)'2.23(1
28
Q
kgFUEL
gCO
4.71)'2.23(1
'2.244
Q
kgFUEL
gHC
4.71)'2.23(1
''30
Q
kgFUEL
gNO
2CO
COQ
2CO
HC'Q
2CO
NO'' Q
Where,
Smoke Factor of 1 = 10gmSmoke/kg of Fuel
11
On-Road Emissions
On-road emissions are not certification emissions.
Nevertheless new vehicles measured on-road usually read well below their certification values.
On-road emissions are not the same as readings from scheduled emission tests.
On average the two correlate very well
1. Second vs. Second ( a good analyzer)
2. Results vs. Result ( can screen vehicles)
3. Average vs. Average ( can characterize fleet emissions)
12
Correlation Test SetupJapan Petroleum Energy Center – February 2003
RSD
HORIBADirect analyzer
blower
Engine Cooling fan To bench analyzer
A/F sensor
to HORIBAMEXA9100EGR
Suction of blower
Mirror
AccuScan4000
Exhaust pipe Si tube
13
Correlation Test Method & ResultsMitsubishi Lancer
Several different drive modes were utilized: LA4 drive mode Steady state drive modes (60,40,20kph)
Horiba bench analyzers were compared to RSD: Comparisons between gas ratios and their
mean values. CO/CO2, HC/CO2, NO/CO2
14
On-Road Emissions
On-road emissions are not certification emissions.
Nevertheless new vehicles measured on-road usually read well below their certification values.
On-road emissions are not the same as readings from scheduled emission tests.
On average the two correlate very well Second vs. Second ( a good analyzer)
Result vs. Result ( can screen vehicles)
Average vs. Average ( can characterize fleet emissions)
15
RSD vs. I/M 240 - HC
IM240 HC g/mi vs. RSD HC ppm propane(Each point is one model year 1992-2002, N=83,737)
y = 0.0032x - 0.2559
R2 = 0.9794
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.4
80 100 120 140 160 180 200
RSD HC ppm propane
IM24
0 g
/mi
16
On-Road Emissions
On-road emissions are not certification emissions.
Nevertheless new vehicles measured on-road usually read well below their certification values.
On-road emissions are not the same as readings from scheduled emission tests.
On average the two correlate very well Second vs. Second ( a good analyzer)
Results vs. Result ( can screen vehicles)
Average vs. Average ( can characterize fleet emissions)
17
Exhaust Emissions Variability“Key: Knowing when dealing with it”
All emissions tests show low variability on new vehicles.
All emissions tests show high variability when testing older, and especially older broken, vehicles. (Bishop et al, 1996; www.feat.biochem.du.edu)
Even Federal Test Procedure (FTP) testing performed 21 times shows this high variability.
18
Gra
ms/
mil
e
AQIRP data
19
Station-Based Test Variability”Unlikely to Identify Variability”
Scheduled emission tests tend to be performed only once for vehicles which pass.
Scheduled emission tests are only repeated for vehicles which fail the first time.
Therefore, vehicle emissions variability less likely to be identified through conventional station-based testing.
20
Remote Sensing Test Variability“More Likely to Identify Variability”
Remote sensing readings can include as many as 5000 vehicles per day.
Variability of readings taken day after day on the same vehicle is readily apparent.
Sources of Variability (descending order of magnitude):
1. Vehicle (site selection, cutpoints)
2. Ambient Conditions (track & account for changes)
3. Instrument Set-up (audits, self-diagnostics)
4. Instrument Itself (building a better analyzer)
21
Gross Emitter ID Study“On-Road Screening”
22
BAR Pullover Study Method
Upstream Dual RSD Screen:
Downstream Roadside ASM:
Dual RSDs
Vehicles exceeding RSD Cutpoints
23
RSD Gross Emitter ID Performance
On-road gross emitters pulled over by a policeman have more than an 82-88% chance of failing a California emissions test based on one RSD exceedance.
>92% chance based on 2 RSD readings above cutpoints.
[“REMOTE SENSING DEVICE HIGH EMITTER IDENTIFICATION WITH CONFIRMATORY ROADSIDE INSPECTION”; California BAR Final Report 2001 – 06 August 30, 2001, copy available on www.feat.biochem.du.edu.]
December 04
24
Asia Remote Sensing Data
25
Locations & Year Measurements Mean gCO/kg
Mean gHC/kg
Mean gNO/kg
Bangkok THA, 1993 5,260 264 220 *
Hong Kong, 1993 5,891 115 20 *
Katmandu NPL, 1993 11,227 362 189 *
Kuala Lumpur MAL, 1995 9,478 209 22 31
Seoul KOR, 1993 3,104 100 14.7 *
Taipei TWN, 1993 12,062 180 23.4 *
Singapore 1995
2004
1,681 148
327
52410
Tokyo JPN, 1995 3,881 67 7.6 *
Melbourne AUS, 1992 5,260 149 6.8 24
New Delhi, India, 2004 10,800 106 61 20
Auckland NZ, 2004 34,400 89 13 10
Average USA 1989-92 34,000 113 26 *
Average USA 2003 63,000 39 3.5 4.9
Everywhere a few vehicle produce the majority of the motor vehicle emissions.
Asian on-road
emissions show large variabilitySingapore
appears comparable to the US
Asia RSD Data
26
Auto emissions by decile. New Delhi, 2004
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Decile
pp
m (
CO
/10)
COHCNO
Average is dominated by a small fraction of high emitters
Majority of vehicles have negligible emissions
27
India Data Collection Summary
4 Days each in Pune and Delhi
2 Pune Sites, 3 Delhi Sites
~10,000 valid records each in Pune and Delhi
Speed/Acceleration measurements were not used to to filter measurements (i.e. Vehicle specific power).
28
Pune RSD Sites
29
Delhi RSD Sites
30
One Pune Site
31
One Delhi Site
32
CO Emissions (g/kg fuel)
CO Emissions g/kg of fuel
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rcy
cle
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rs
coo
ter
Th
ree
wh
ee
ler
Co
mm
erc
ial
veh
icle
s
Fo
ur
wh
eel
veh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rcy
cle
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rs
coo
ter
Th
ree
wh
ee
ler
Co
mm
erc
ial
veh
icle
s
Fo
ur
wh
eel
veh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
33
HC Emissions (g/kg fuel)
HC Emissions g/kg of fuel
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rcy
cle
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rs
co
ote
r
Th
ree
wh
ee
ler
Co
mm
erc
ial
ve
hic
les
Fo
ur
wh
ee
lv
eh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
34
NO Emissions (g/kg fuel)
NO Emissions g/kg of fuel
-
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
Two
wh
eel
mo
torc
ycle
Two
wh
eel
mo
tor
sco
ote
r
Th
ree
wh
eele
r
Co
mm
erci
alve
hic
les
Fo
ur
wh
eel
veh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
Two
wh
eel
mo
torc
ycle
Two
wh
eel
mo
tor
sco
ote
r
Th
ree
wh
eele
r
Co
mm
erci
alve
hic
les
Fo
ur
wh
eel
veh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
35
Smoke Emissions (g/kg fuel)
Smoke Emissions g/kg of fuel
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rcy
cle
Two
wh
ee
lm
oto
rs
co
ote
r
Th
ree
wh
ee
ler
Co
mm
erc
ial
ve
hic
les
Fo
ur
wh
ee
lv
eh
icle
s
Bu
s
Pune
Delhi
36
Pollutant Contribution (% of Total)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Two wheelmotorcycle
Two wheelmotor
scooter
Threewheeler
Heavy dieselvehicles
Four wheelvehicles
Per
cen
t o
f To
tal
CO
HC
NO
Smoke
Fleet
HC
Smoke
NOx
NOx
37
NO Mean Emissions by Decile
Bus
Comm
ercia
l veh
icle
Four w
heel v
ehicl
e
Three w
heeler
Two whee
l mot
orcy
cle
Two whee
l mot
or sc
ooter
12
34
56
78
910
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
NO ppm
Decile
RSD NO Mean Emissons of Each Decile
38
Smoke Mean Emissions by Decile
Two whee
l mot
or sc
ooter
Two whee
l mot
orcy
cle
Comm
ercia
l veh
icle
Three w
heeler
Four w
heel v
ehicl
e
Bus 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
Smoke Factor
Decile
RSD Smoke Mean Emissions of Each Decile
39
RSD Smoke - Singapore
Diesel vehicle smoke increases steadily with
age
Petrol vehicles have less smoke but smoke
also increases with age
40
RSD Diesel Smoke - Singapore
Average Smoke
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
1980
& o
lder
1981
-198
5
1986
-199
0
1991
-199
5
1996
-200
0
2001
& n
ewer
Sm
oke
HGV - D
BUSES - D
LGV - D
TAXIS - D
41
RSD Patrol Smoke - Singapore
Average Smoke
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
1980
& o
lder
1981
-198
5
1986
-199
0
1991
-199
5
1996
-200
0
2001
& n
ewer
Sm
oke
MOTORCYCLE - P
BUSES - P
LGV - P
CARS - P
42
India Data Collection Efficiency
Pune Delhi
TypeVehicles
ObservedEmissions Measured
% Emissions Measured
Vehicles Observed
Emissions Measured
% Emissions Measured
Approx. Delhi Registrations
2WM 7,126 2,095 29% 2,705 293 11% 1,600,000 2WS 4,704 1,326 28% 1,987 249 13% 1,000,000 3WV 3,695 2,065 56% 1,602 529 33% 73,772 4WD 975 759 78% 1,349 973 72% 122,625 4WV 1,689 1,558 92% 8,750 6,846 78% 1,233,064 Bus - CNG 1,565 1,318 84% 24,678 Other 1608 773 3502
19,797 8,576 21,460 10,208 4,054,139
December 04
43
RSD Motorcycle Measurement
44
2-Wheeler Measurement Challenges
1. Exhaust Volume Small samples
2. Exhaust Location Variable height and directions
3. Driving Mode Many Coasts and Decelerations
4. Dual Vehicle Passes Contaminated or Blocked
Measurement
45
RSD4000 System
Remote sensingbeam
Exhaust
IR Reference
CO2 Channel
Trigger
Acquired CO2 Channel
TRUCK MODE DATA ACQUISITION
High Pipe Low Pipe
RSD3000
46
3-mirror option 5-mirror option
Motorcycle RSD Concept
Loaded Mode Measurement Dedicated Lane Multiple Beam Heights
2.5m
47
Concluding Remarks…
REMOTE SENSING – RSD4000 introduces UV smoke channel. RSDs offer the advantage of measuring on-road emissions. Emissions variability recognized in multiple RSD measurements. RSDs proven & widely used for screening and characterization.
INDIA REMOTE SENSING DATA - CO uniform across types and proportional to fleet #s. HC higher in rich burning 2/3-wheelers.
Lower in Delhi 3-Ws (credit CNG program) Low in Delhi’s CNG buses.
NO highest among lean burning Comm. Diesels and Petrol 4-Ws Highest rates from CNG buses, but should assess contribution.
Smoke highest in rich burners (2/3-Ws), lowest in lean burning high NOx emitters. Lower in Delhi’s 3-Ws and CNG Buses Rises with age and higher in Diesels.
MOTORCYCLE MEASUREMENT - 2-W capture efficiency must be improved.
Loaded mode measurement in a dedicated lane with more versatile beam deployment.
48
Web Sites
University of Denver: www.feat.biochem.du.edu DU reports,
publications and downloadable data. www.sign.du.edu SMART SIGN 24/7 RSD
operation and live web camera.
Environmental Systems Products www.esp-global.com – general ESP Product Info www.rsdaccuscan.com – history, legislation,
reports, documents, technology, products