Upload
lionel-hutchinson
View
220
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)Program Goals:Program Goals: - Provide critically needed high resolution scattered-light - Provide critically needed high resolution scattered-light imagery of protoplanetary and debris disks to assist in imagery of protoplanetary and debris disks to assist in discriminating between proposed evolutionary scenarios discriminating between proposed evolutionary scenarios in the epochs of planet-building.in the epochs of planet-building.
- Provide a legacy of cataloged morphologies for - Provide a legacy of cataloged morphologies for interpreting mid- and far-IR SEDs (e.g., Spitzer) and interpreting mid- and far-IR SEDs (e.g., Spitzer) and reliable, spatially resolved, photometry and flux density reliable, spatially resolved, photometry and flux density limits (for non-detections).limits (for non-detections).
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)
Scattered-light imagery of CS disks directly provides:
- Spatial distribution of the constituent grains, which cannot be uniquely inferred from (longer-) SEDs alone.
- Constraints to break degeneracies in disk geometries and compositions in SED models of CS disks.
Spatially resolved images and SEDs of CS disks, together, inform on their global structures and on the distribution and physical properties of the CS grains. (e.g., Schneider et al 2003, AJ, 125, 1467).
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)Disk Structures & Disk/Planet Interactions
Asymmetries (e.g., warps, gaps, arc, spirals, rings, axial anisotropies, etc.) in the spatial distributions of dusty debris in evolved disks provide evidence for unseen co-orbital planetary-mass companions through their dynamical interactions with the disk grains.
NICMOS 1.1NICMOS 1.1mm
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
Why NICMOS?Why NICMOS? - Probe material as close as r = 0.3”.- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”. (ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).(ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).
- Sensitive to circumstellar material - Sensitive to circumstellar material with disks of scattering fractionswith disks of scattering fractions of a few x 10of a few x 10-5-5 of total starlight at 1”. of total starlight at 1”. (Similar to ACS at larger radii).(Similar to ACS at larger radii).
- ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 - ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 m. m. (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 m)m)
1216s1216s
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
Why NICMOS?Why NICMOS? ACS 0.6ACS 0.6mm
- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”.- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”. (ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).(ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).
- Sensitive to circumstellar material - Sensitive to circumstellar material with disks of scattering fractionswith disks of scattering fractions of a few x 10of a few x 10-5-5 of total starlight at 1”. of total starlight at 1”. (Similar to ACS at larger radii).(Similar to ACS at larger radii).
- ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 - ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 m. m. (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 m)m)
4910s4910s
STISSTIS STIS, no longer functional STIS, no longer functional :-(:-(
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
Why NICMOS?Why NICMOS? ACS 0.6ACS 0.6mm
- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”.- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”. (ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).(ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).
- Sensitive to circumstellar material - Sensitive to circumstellar material with disks of scattering fractionswith disks of scattering fractions of a few x 10of a few x 10-5-5 of total starlight at 1”. of total starlight at 1”. (Similar to ACS at larger radii).(Similar to ACS at larger radii).
- ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 - ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 m. m. (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 m)m)
4910s4910s
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
Why NICMOS?Why NICMOS? ACS 0.6ACS 0.6mm
4910s4910s
1"
- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”.- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”. (ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).(ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).
- Sensitive to circumstellar material - Sensitive to circumstellar material with disks of scattering fractionswith disks of scattering fractions of a few x 10of a few x 10-5-5 of total starlight at 1”. of total starlight at 1”. (Similar to ACS at larger radii).(Similar to ACS at larger radii).
- ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 - ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 m. m. (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 m)m)
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
Why NICMOS?Why NICMOS? ACS 0.6ACS 0.6mm
4910s4910s
- - Capable of imaging young EGP’s of ~ 2 MCapable of imaging young EGP’s of ~ 2 Mjupjup in optically thin (e.g., debris) disks at in optically thin (e.g., debris) disks at >> 1”. 1”.
1"
- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”.- Probe material as close as r = 0.3”. (ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).(ACS inner working angle > 0.9”).
- Sensitive to circumstellar material - Sensitive to circumstellar material with disks of scattering fractionswith disks of scattering fractions of a few x 10of a few x 10-5-5 of total starlight at 1”. of total starlight at 1”. (Similar to ACS at larger radii).(Similar to ACS at larger radii).
- ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 - ~ 0.1” spatial resolution 1.1 m. m. (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 (ACS ~2x better @ 0.6 m)m)
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
A few Examples…A few Examples…
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
3.5"
STIS
DM Tauri (K5, H = 9.8)K5, H = 9.8)
ring @ 240AU, “dark” to ~ 180AU, ring @ 240AU, “dark” to ~ 180AU, shadowing(?) @ PA = 95dshadowing(?) @ PA = 95d
Peak 1.6Peak 1.6m S.B = 17 m S.B = 17 Jy/sq. arcsecJy/sq. arcsec
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
GO Tauri (K5, H = 9.8)K5, H = 9.8)
r ~ 540 AU, dark zone to ~ 290 AUr ~ 540 AU, dark zone to ~ 290 AUring-like, strong minor axis asymmetryring-like, strong minor axis asymmetrystriated structures “above” midplanestriated structures “above” midplane
3.5"
log(10) to3.2 mJy/ sq. arcsec
linear to134 J y/ sq. arcsec
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
Do Ar 25 (K7, H = 8.4; ROXR1 23)K7, H = 8.4; ROXR1 23)
r ~ 380 AU (2.7”)r ~ 380 AU (2.7”)Morphologically similar to GM AurMorphologically similar to GM Aur
dark mid-plane ~ 0.7” from stardark mid-plane ~ 0.7” from star
3.5"
H =12.43
linear to 5.3 mJy/ sq. arcsec
linear to 0.53 mJy/ sq. arcsec
In
In
Oph
sta
r fo
rmin
g re
gion
Oph
sta
r fo
rmin
g re
gion
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
SZ-82 (IM Lup; M0, H = 8.1)
Weak Lined T Tauri StarWeak Lined T Tauri Starr = 4.3” (~ 600 AU)r = 4.3” (~ 600 AU)
Morphology Similar to GM AurMorphology Similar to GM Aur
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 “YSO” Disk Candidates26 “YSO” Disk Candidates< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)< 10 Myr (Optically Thick)Many with Gas (+Dust) Many with Gas (+Dust) 18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc)18 T Tau Stars (d < 150 pc) Spectra Types: G-MSpectra Types: G-M mm Continuum Excessesmm Continuum Excesses and/orand/or High Optical PolarizationHigh Optical Polarization
4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)4 Herbig AeBes (d < 200 pc)8 A-F Stars 8 A-F Stars FIR or mm excess >> photosphere FIR or mm excess >> photosphere
~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections~ 1/3 HST Optical Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections2 Ground-Based NIR Detections
DL Tau (GVe:, H = 8.68)1.6m Radial Surface Brightness Profile
1 ADU/s/pix = 0.267 mJy arcsec-21" = 13.2 pixels
SQRT (0 to 4 ADU/s/pix) display
93 x 93 pixels
r ~ 420AU (3.5”), Face-On Diskr ~ 420AU (3.5”), Face-On DiskCO disk with r ~ 3.7” (48 NIC3 pix)CO disk with r ~ 3.7” (48 NIC3 pix)
Jet seen in optical (STIS)Jet seen in optical (STIS)Surface Brightness ~ r Surface Brightness ~ r -2.6-2.6
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 Debris Disk Candidates26 Debris Disk Candidates>> 10 Myr (Optically Thin) 10 Myr (Optically Thin)Likely Dust Dominated Likely Dust Dominated Spectral Types: A0 - K2Spectral Types: A0 - K2Main Sequence StarsMain Sequence StarsIRAS FIR Excesses:IRAS FIR Excesses: LL25+60 mm25+60 mm / L / L** > 3 x 10 > 3 x 10-4-4
unconfused by backgroundunconfused by background nebulosity @ nebulosity @ bb > 10 > 10°
None Previously ImagedNone Previously Imaged
GO/10177GO/10177NICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging SurveyNICMOS Coronagraphic Imaging Survey
52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)52 Targets (+ 5 Calibration Orbits)26 Debris Disk Candidates26 Debris Disk Candidates>> 10 Myr (Optically Thin) 10 Myr (Optically Thin)Likely Dust Dominated Likely Dust Dominated Spectral Types: A0 - K2Spectral Types: A0 - K2Main Sequence StarsMain Sequence StarsIRAS FIR Excesses:IRAS FIR Excesses: LL25+60 mm25+60 mm / L / L** > 3 x 10 > 3 x 10-4-4
unconfused by backgroundunconfused by background nebulosity @ nebulosity @ bb > 10 > 10°
None Previously ImagedNone Previously Imaged
1. Significant 60 1. Significant 60 m excessm excess2. Estimate T2. Estimate Tdustdust and R and Rdisk disk from from
25/60 & 60/10025/60 & 60/100m color excessm color excess3. Assume small grains with 1.13. Assume small grains with 1.1mm albedos ~ 0.2-0.5 so (falbedos ~ 0.2-0.5 so (fscatscat/f/f**) )
comparable to absorbed starlightcomparable to absorbed starlight4. f4. fscatscat/f/f** instrumentally detectable instrumentally detectable
5. Disk radii likely > 0.3”5. Disk radii likely > 0.3”6. Distance < 150 pc6. Distance < 150 pc7. Surface brightness sufficiently7. Surface brightness sufficiently high to detect in 1 HST orbit high to detect in 1 HST orbit
0
-1
-2
-3
-4
-5
-6
Log
Fra
ctio
nal
IR
Exc
ess
/ arc
sec2
0.1 1 10Log Radius (Arcseconds)
DEBRIS DISK CANDIDATE SELECTION
HD 32297HD 32297Anon. F5Anon. F5
HD 107146HD 107146
HD 92945HD 92945OB
SC
UR
ED
BY
CO
RO
NA
GR
AP
HO
BS
CU
RE
D B
Y C
OR
ON
AG
RA
PH
NICMOS 1.1NICMOS 1.1m: 1300sm: 1300s ACS 0.8ACS 0.8m: 7800sm: 7800s
-Spectral Type: A0Spectral Type: A0
-Distance: 112 Distance: 112 ± 12 pc 12 pc
-J=7.69, H=7.62, K=7.59 (2MASS)J=7.69, H=7.62, K=7.59 (2MASS)
-LL25+6025+60mm//LL** ~ 0.27% (IRAS FSC) ~ 0.27% (IRAS FSC) 12(Jy)12(Jy) 25(Jy) 25(Jy) 60(Jy) 60(Jy) 100(Jy)100(Jy) 870*(mJy)870*(mJy) <0.14 0.211 <0.14 0.211±0.034 1.1220.034 1.122±0.067 <1.60 5.60.067 <1.60 5.6±6.8 6.8
-Age: Uncertain, but…Age: Uncertain, but…
HD 32297HD 32297
* Silverstone, et al. 2004* Silverstone, et al. 2004
HD 32297HD 32297
Low Luminosity for itsLow Luminosity for itsB-V Color Similar to Young B-V Color Similar to Young A-stars at the Bottom LocusA-stars at the Bottom Locusof the V vs. B-V C-M Diagramof the V vs. B-V C-M Diagram
F110W Coronagraphic ImagingF110W Coronagraphic Imaging
Difference ImageDifference Image
HD 32297HD 32297
672s Integrations672s Integrations29.9 deg 29.9 deg Orientation OrientationO
RIE
NT
AT
ION
2O
RIE
NT
AT
ION
2O
RIE
NA
TIO
N 1
OR
IEN
AT
ION
1
F110W Coronagraphic ImagingF110W Coronagraphic Imaging
Difference ImageDifference Image
HD 32297HD 32297
672s Integrations672s Integrations
RE
FE
RE
NC
E P
SF
RE
FE
RE
NC
E P
SF
OR
IEN
AT
ION
1O
RIE
NA
TIO
N 1
F110W Coronagraphic ImagingF110W Coronagraphic Imaging
RE
FE
RE
NC
E P
SF
RE
FE
RE
NC
E P
SF
OR
IEN
AT
ION
2O
RIE
NA
TIO
N 2
Difference ImageDifference Image
HD 32297HD 32297
672s Integrations672s Integrations
HD 32297HD 32297Near Edge-On (“Near Edge-On (“ Pic-like”) Disk Pic-like”) Disk
NN
EE
Inclination = 10.5Inclination = 10.5° ± 2.52.5°, P.A. = 227.5, P.A. = 227.5° ± 11° Extent*: Extent*: >> 3.3” (400 AU) to NE; 3.3” (400 AU) to NE; >> 2.5” to SW 2.5” to SW *3*3 per resolution element lower limits per resolution element lower limits
HD 32297HD 32297Near Edge-On (“Near Edge-On (“ Pic-like”) Disk Pic-like”) Disk
NN
EE
1.11.1m Disk Flux Density: 4.81 m Disk Flux Density: 4.81 ± 0.57 mJy (r > 0.3”) 0.57 mJy (r > 0.3”)Scattering Fraction: 0.33% Scattering Fraction: 0.33% ± 0.04% (r 0.04% (r >> 0.3”) 0.3”)
““Above”: 56% Above”: 56% ± 12%, “Below”: 44 12%, “Below”: 44 ± 12% 12% But…But…
HD 32297 AU MIC HD 32297 AU MIC
GO/10177 GO/10228 P.I.: Kalas
“The {AU Mic} disk is ... has a thin midplane… Within 50 AU {5”} the midplane is straight and aligned with the star, and beyond that it deviates by 3 deg, resulting in a bowed appearance…” --Krist et al 2004
AU MIC/ACSAU MIC/ACS
EE F606W (PSF Subtracted)F606W (PSF Subtracted)
9"
HD 32297HD 32297
Radial Surface Brightness Profile Radial Surface Brightness Profile DISK ASYMMETRIESDISK ASYMMETRIESSW(r>0.3”) = 3.14 SW(r>0.3”) = 3.14 ± 0.57mJy 0.57mJyNE(r>0.3”) = 1.67 NE(r>0.3”) = 1.67 ± 0.57mJy 0.57mJy
Symmetric: 0.5” < r < 1.7”Symmetric: 0.5” < r < 1.7”
SW Brighter @ r < 0.6”SW Brighter @ r < 0.6”NE Brighter @ r > 2.4”NE Brighter @ r > 2.4”
SB(SW;r>0.5”) =0.455 rSB(SW;r>0.5”) =0.455 r-3.57-3.57
NW(SB;0.5”<r<1.7”) =0.51rNW(SB;0.5”<r<1.7”) =0.51r-3.7-3.7
NW(SB;1.7”<r<3.4”) =0.27rNW(SB;1.7”<r<3.4”) =0.27r-2.7-2.7
S.B. in mJy/sq. arcsecondS.B. in mJy/sq. arcsecond
SW SW NENE
SB ~ r -3.72
SB ~ r -2.74
SB ~ r -3.57
-Spectral Type: G2V (solar analog)Spectral Type: G2V (solar analog)
-Distance: 28.5 Distance: 28.5 ± 0.7pc 0.7pc
-J=5.87, H=5.61, K=5.54 (2MASS)J=5.87, H=5.61, K=5.54 (2MASS)
-LL60+10060+100mm//LL** ~ 0.10% (IRAS FSC) ~ 0.10% (IRAS FSC)12(Jy)12(Jy) 25(Jy)25(Jy) 60(Jy) 60(Jy) 100(Jy) 100(Jy) 870*(mJy)870*(mJy)0.2590.259±0.031 <0.135 0.7050.031 <0.135 0.705±0.056 0.9100.056 0.910±0.155 34.20.155 34.2±10.010.0
-Age: 30 - 250 Myr (Williams et al, 2004)-Age: 30 - 250 Myr (Williams et al, 2004)
-Also Observed With ACS (Ardila et al, 2004)-Also Observed With ACS (Ardila et al, 2004)
HD 107146HD 107146
* Silverstone, et al. 2004* Silverstone, et al. 2004
HD 107146HD 107146NICMOS 1.1 , 1350 ,m s linear display unbinned
2-roll combined2-roll combinedPSF subtractedPSF subtractedcoronagraphycoronagraphy
*Ardila, et al (2004) ApJ 517, L174
ACS* 0.8 , 2150 , ,m s log display 3 3 x pixel binning
*“Within 2” from the star, the {ACS} image is dominated by PSF subtraction residuals”. - Ardila 2004
Broad outer ringBroad outer ringR = 170 AU (6.0”)R = 170 AU (6.0”)peakpeak @ ~ 115 AU (4.0”) @ ~ 115 AU (4.0”)
ACS*:ACS*: ff0.60.6mm = 6.8 +/- 0.8 x 10 = 6.8 +/- 0.8 x 10-5-5
ff0.80.8mm = 1.0 +/- 0.1 x 10 = 1.0 +/- 0.1 x 10-4-4
NICMOS:NICMOS: ff1.11.1mm = 1.4 +/- 0.2 x 10 = 1.4 +/- 0.2 x 10-4-4
Disk Flux DensityDisk Flux Density(1.1 (1.1 m)m)
= 68 = 68 ± 10 10 Jy (r>0.3”)Jy (r>0.3”)
HD 107146HD 107146
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.1
1
10
100
1000
Radial Distance (arcsec)
S.
B.
(mic
roJy
/ s
q. a
rcse
cond
) 6”6”U
nd
etec
ted
by
NIC
MO
SU
nd
etec
ted
by
NIC
MO
S
Un
det
ecte
d b
y A
CS
Un
det
ecte
d b
y A
CS
HD 107146HD 107146
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 70.1
1
10
100
1000
Radial Distance (arcsec)
S.
B.
(mic
roJy
/ s
q. a
rcse
cond
) 6”6”U
nd
etec
ted
by
NIC
MO
SU
nd
etec
ted
by
NIC
MO
S
STAR:STAR:
Spectral Type: F5Spectral Type: F5
Pic Moving GroupPic Moving Group
Age: ~ 12 MyrAge: ~ 12 Myr
Distance: 50 pcDistance: 50 pc
LL25+6025+60mm//LL** ~ 0.2% ~ 0.2%
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISK
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKOBSERVATION:OBSERVATION:
-F110W (1.1F110W (1.1m)m)
-NIC2 CoronagraphNIC2 Coronagraph
-Two-OrientationTwo-Orientation
-PSF-Subtraction-PSF-Subtraction
-Recombination-Recombination
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKMODEL (best fit):MODEL (best fit):
-Inclined RingInclined Ring
-Intrinsic SymmetryIntrinsic Symmetry
-I(r)/II(r)/I** ~ r ~ r-2-2
-SB(SB() ~ H-G() ~ H-G(,g),g)
-SB(r) ~ SB(r-SB(r) ~ SB(rpeakpeak) e) e-1-1
-PSF Convolution-PSF Convolution
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISK““Smoothed” ObservationSmoothed” Observation
Elliptical low-pass filterElliptical low-pass filter (preserve radial )(preserve radial )
±99° “Rotation” kernal “Rotation” kernal
(i = 31.7(i = 31.7°)
Gaussian WeightingGaussian Weighting
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKOBSERVATION:OBSERVATION:
-F110W (1.1F110W (1.1m)m)
-NIC2 CoronagraphNIC2 Coronagraph
-Two-OrientationTwo-Orientation
-PSF-Subtraction-PSF-Subtraction
-Recombination-Recombination
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKRESIDUALS:RESIDUALS:
Observation - ModelObservation - Model
Diffuse HaloDiffuse Halo
(Currently not in model)(Currently not in model)
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKRESIDUALS:RESIDUALS:
Observation - ModelObservation - Model
Diffuse HaloDiffuse Halo
(Currently not in model)(Currently not in model)
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKRESIDUALS:RESIDUALS:
Observation - ModelObservation - Model
Diffuse HaloDiffuse Halo
(Currently not in model)(Currently not in model)
ACSACS Courtesy of J. Krist &Courtesy of J. Krist &ACS/GTO Disk TeamACS/GTO Disk Team
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKRESIDUALS:RESIDUALS:
Observation - ModelObservation - Model
Diffuse HaloDiffuse Halo
(Currently not in model)(Currently not in model)
NICMOS NICMOS + ACS+ ACS
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISK
N
E
1 "
Steeply Truncated Inner Radius(r = 86 AU, rinner = 61AU)
“Similar” to HR 4796A(r =70 AU, rinner = 62.5AU)
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISK
.
Angular Distance (arcseconds)
Axial & Median S. B. Profiles
Bilaterally Symmetric Ring + Diffuse Outer Halo
Ring Radius = 1.706”+/-0.023” = 86.3 ± 3.7 AU
70% of scattered starlight in 36 AU wide annulus
Fdisk/F* = 0.17 ± 0.015%
Flux Density: 9.6 ± 0.8 mJy (1.2”< r <5.0”)
Surface Brightness (mJy/sq.”): Peak(r=86AU) 1.75 ± 0.14
ANOTHER NEW DISKANOTHER NEW DISKBilaterally Symmetric Ring + Diffuse Outer Halo
Ring Radius = 1.706”+/-0.023” = 86.3 ± 3.7 AU
70% of scattered starlight in 36 AU wide annulus
Fdisk/F* = 0.17 ± 0.015%
Flux Density: 9.6 ± 0.8 mJy (1.2”< r <5.0”)
Surface Brightness (mJy/sq.”): Peak(r=86AU) 1.75 ± 0.14
Directionally Pref. Scattering: g(H-G) ~ 0.3
I = 31.7° ± 1.6°
No Photocentric Offset
Deprojection, Major Axis Horizontal
Debris Rings - Angular ScalesDebris Rings - Angular Scales
Angular scale: r(Fomalhaut) = 19”Angular scale: r(Fomalhaut) = 19”
10"4" 10"
0.6"
20" 20"5"
AU
Mic Pic
HD 32297
HR
4796F-Star
HD
141569
HD
107146
PscA
M0 A5 A0 A0 F5HAeBe
B9.5G2 A3
12-20 12-20 < 10 ? 8 12 5 30-250 200
210 ~1600 > 400 70 86 400 170 140
0.003 0.0033 0.0024 0.0017 0.0025 1.4x10-4 10-6
0.0004 0.0015 0.0027 0.005 0.002 0.0084 0.001 5x10-6
WingTilt
manyS.B.
W. TiltAzim.
No,
g ~ 0.3Yes… No.
Offset,
g ~ 0.3Ass
ym L
ir/L
* Fn
ir>
0.3” r
AU
Myr
S
pec
I
mag
e
Sta
r