De Beauvoir Secondsex

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 De Beauvoir Secondsex

    1/13

    m

    . t .--.

    M

  • 8/11/2019 De Beauvoir Secondsex

    2/13

    f l ~

    ~ J l :

    1

    i

    :1)

    iii

    ,

    Ii

    .

    Sf

    I

    rH

    ,

    I

    i

    i

    ,I

    11

    I

    H

    I,

    ji

    Contenl$

    Introduction

    xv

    /. ....

    BOOK ONEy CTS

    ND MYTHS

    r

    PartI ~ ~

    I The Data of Biology V

    )-:e....iU\A.

    3

    The Psychoanalytic Point of View

    42

    m

    The Point of

    View

    of

    Historical

    Materialism

    58

    art

    IS

    TO R

    Y

    IV The Nomads 69

    V Early Tillers of the Soil . 74

    / LVI Patriarchal Times and Classica J 6 (

    Antiquity 92

    VII

    1prough the Middle

    Ages

    to .

    Eighteenth-century France 109

    VIII Since the French Revolution:

    the

    Job and the Vote 122

    art i l l

    M Y T S

    l X Dreams, Fears, o l s ~ 157

    X The Myth

    of

    Woman in Five Authors 224

    1.

    MONTHERLANT

    or the Bread

    of Disgust

    224

    ./ [3.

    D.

    H. LAWRENCE

    or Phallic Pride

    242

    xiii

  • 8/11/2019 De Beauvoir Secondsex

    3/13

    xiv

    J

    ",

    I'

    I

    XII

    XIII

    XIV

    ;i

    :

    I'li

    .

    "I:

    Ii

    i\

    II

    II

    -0:"_:.,

    ,

    -

    -

    ....::

    INTRODUCTION

    xxxiii

    .

    ,

    :

    /:

    one of the points

    of

    view most frequently adopted

    is

    that

    of

    the public good, the general interest; and one always means

    by this the benefit of society as one wishes it to be main

    tained or established. For our part, we hold that the only

    public good is that which assures the private good

    of

    the

    citizens; we shall pass judgment

    on

    institutions according

    to

    their effectiveness in giving concrete opportunities to indi

    viduals. But we do not confuse the idea of private interest

    with that

    of

    happiness, although that

    is

    another common

    point of view. Are not women of the harem more happy

    than women voters? Is not the housekeeper happier than

    the workingwoman? I t is not too clear just what the word

    happy

    really means and stilI less what true values it may

    mask. There is no possibility of measuring the happiness of

    others, and it is always easy to describe as happy the

    s ~

    tion in which one wishes to place them.

    In

    particular those who are condemned to s t n t i o ~ ,

    often pronounced happy on the pretext that happiness . , ,

    sists in being at rest.

    This

    notion we reject, for

    our

    perspec

    tive is that of existentialist ethics. Every subject plays

    tiD

    Eart

    as

    such s

    eCI

    ca oug exploits

    or

    projects

    that

    serve as a mode

    of

    transcen ence; e ac ves I - . .

    _

    mroulZh a continual reachinlZ oul .

    'Iiie re is no Justification for resent existence other than

    its

    ex ansion into an In e tely open future. Every time tran

    scendence falls bac Into immanence, stagnatIon, there is a

    deJZradation of existence mto the

    en-soi -the

    6rutish life

    Qf sub'ection to given

    conditions-and

    of libe into con

    straint and contIngence. s downfall represents a mor

    fault

    if

    the subject conseats to it;

    i f

    it is mfhcted upon

    hiiri

    it s ells frustration and oppression.

    In

    botli cases

    i t

    is aD

    absolute ev. very In

    VI

    uaconcerned to justify his ex

    istence feels tha t hiS eXistence involves an undefined need

    to

    transcend hImself,

    to en

    age in freely cnosen projects.

    ow, w

    at

    peculiarly signalizest .esituation of womap. is

    that

    she-a

    free and autonomous being like all human crea

    tures-nevertheless finds herself living in a world where

    men compel her to assume the status of the Other

    .. .Tt!ev

    propose to stabilize her as object and to doo er to

    im-

    ~ e n ~ t r n s e n ence is to be overshadowed

    i \ )

    (\\

    P

  • 8/11/2019 De Beauvoir Secondsex

    13/13

    xxiv

    j

    forever transcended b ano cience

    WID

    IS n an sovereign. The drama of woman lies

    in this conflict between the fundamental aspirations of ev

    ery subject ego)-who always regards the self as the es-

    sential-and the compulsions of a situation in which she is

    the inessential. How can a human being in woman's

    situation attain fulfillment? What roads are open to her?

    Which are blocked? w can independe overed in

    a state of dependency? a CIrcumstances limit woman-s

    i

    liberty and how can they be overcome? These are the fun

    damental questions on which I would fain throw some light.

    ThiS means that I am interested in the fortunes of

    t ~ l l ~ -

    v i d ~ as 4.iiDed not m terms

    of

    happiriess but in terms of

    . liberty.

    , Quite evidently this problem would be without signifi

    cance

    if

    we

    were to believe that woman's destiny is inevita

    bly determined by physiological, psychological oreconom

    ic forces. Hence I shall discuss first of all the light in which

    woman is viewed by biology, psychoanalysis, and historical

    materialism. Next I shall try to show exactly how the con

    cept of the truly feminine has been fashioned-why

    woman has been defined as the Other-and what have been

    the consequences from man's point of view. Then from

    woman's point of view I shall describe the world in which

    women must live; and thus we shall be able to envisage the

    difficulties in their way as, endeavoring to make their es

    cape from the sphere hitherto assigned them, they aspire to

    full membership in the human race.

    ------).

    _ ~ .

    ntroduction

    to ook

    U

    The women

    of

    today are

    in

    a fair way to dethrone the

    myth of femininity; they are beginning to affirm their inde

    pendence in concrete ways; but they do not easily succeed in

    living completely the life of a human being. Reared by

    women within a feminine world, their normal destiny is

    marriage, which still means practically subordination to

    man; for masculine prestige is far from extinction, resting

    still upon solid economic and social foundations. We must

    therefore study the traditional destiny of woman with some

    care. In Book II I shall seek to describe how woman under

    goes her apprenticeship, how she experiences her situation,

    in what kind of universe she

    is

    confined, what modes

    of

    es-

    cape are vouchsafed her. Then

    only-with so

    much under

    stood-shall we be able to comprehend the problems of

    women, the heirs

    of

    a burdensome past, who are striving to

    build a new future. When I use the words

    woman or femi-

    nine I evidently refer to no archetype, no changeless es

    sence whatever; the reader must understand the phrase in

    the present state of education and custom after most of

    my statements. I t is not our concern here to proclaim eter

    nal verities, but rather to describe the common basis that

    underlies every individual feminine existence.